Adjusted segment margin improved 150 basis points to 19%, driven by new business wins, as well as good control of SG&A, which was down mid-single digits. We also continued our strong cost control efforts within the administrative segment, where SG&A was down a low single-digit percentage in the quarter, including one-time restructuring costs of approximately $2 million. Excluding these restructuring costs and the non-annualized new building operating costs, administrative SG&A was down by a low teens percen ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Consolidated sales in Q4 2025 increased by a mid-single-digit percentage, with a low single-digit contribution from the Suvinil acquisition [3] - Adjusted diluted net income per share in the quarter increased by 6.7% [3] - Adjusted EBITDA in the quarter grew 13.4% and expanded 100 basis points to 17.7% as a percentage of sales [3] - Free cash flow conversion in the quarter was 90.1% [3] - Full-year net operating cash grew 9.4% to $3.5 billion, or 14.6% of sales [9] - Free cash flow for the year was $2.7 billion, with a conversion rate of 59% [10] - The company ended 2025 with a net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio of 2.3x [11] Business Segment Data and Key Metrics Changes - Paint Stores Group sales increased by a low single-digit percentage, with high single-digit growth in Protective and Marine [11] - Consumer Brands Group sales grew by a low single-digit percentage, driven by the Suvinil acquisition, while underlying sales decreased by low single digits [12] - Performance Coatings Group sales were flat overall, with strength in packaging and auto refinish, and adjusted segment margin improved by 150 basis points to 19% [5][12] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The residential repaint segment remains a significant growth opportunity, despite a challenging demand environment [17] - The new residential market is expected to decline at least in the mid-single-digit range due to negative single-family starts [18] - The Architectural Billings Index has continued its long run of negative readings, indicating a challenging commercial segment [19] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company focuses on creating opportunities and controlling costs amid a challenging operating environment [9] - Strategic investments continue, including the acquisition of Suvinil and the opening of a new global headquarters [10] - The company aims to outperform the market despite a difficult demand backdrop, emphasizing share gains and customer relationships [21][28] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - The management anticipates a softer demand environment to persist into 2026, with cautious consumer sentiment providing little support for recovery [16] - The company remains committed to its customer-first strategy and is focused on winning new business and maintaining pricing discipline [28] - Management expressed confidence in the company's ability to navigate challenges and generate growth despite market conditions [27] Other Important Information - The company plans to open 80-100 net new stores in the U.S. and Canada in 2026 [26] - An annual dividend increase of 1.3% to $3.20 per share is recommended, marking the 48th consecutive year of dividend increases [26] Q&A Session Summary Question: Performance Coatings segment margin outperformance - Management attributed the margin outperformance to discipline and focus on SG&A control, with strong new business wins contributing to improved margins [32][34] Question: SG&A outlook for 2026 - SG&A is expected to grow by a low single-digit percentage, factoring in the reinstatement of the 401(k) match and cost control measures [37][40] Question: Impact of severe winter weather on demand trends - Management noted that weather impacts are typical and do not raise concerns for current demand trends [61] Question: Residential Repaint sales performance - Management indicated that while sales were up low single digits, they remain confident in the segment's potential for share gains [74][75] Question: Consumer Brands performance expectations - Management highlighted challenges in the North American DIY market but remains optimistic about the Suvinil acquisition and its integration [78][82]

Core Viewpoint - Mayville Engineering Company, Inc. (MEC) is navigating financial challenges while pursuing strategic growth through acquisitions, with mixed analyst sentiments regarding its valuation and future performance [2][4][5]. Group 1: Company Overview - MEC is a contract manufacturer based in Mayville, Wisconsin, founded in 1945, serving industries such as commercial vehicles, construction, agriculture, and military [1]. - The company offers services including prototyping, tooling, production fabrication, coating, assembly, and aftermarket components [1]. Group 2: Financial Performance - The consensus price target for MEC has remained stable at $24, while Citigroup has set a lower target of $18, indicating differing analyst perspectives on the company's outlook [2][6]. - MEC's upcoming third-quarter 2025 earnings report is expected to show earnings of $0.05 per share and revenue of approximately $141 million, following a second-quarter report with an adjusted net income of $2.1 million and an adjusted diluted EPS of $0.10 [3][6]. - Despite these figures, the company reported a GAAP net loss of $1.1 million, reflecting ongoing financial pressures [3]. Group 3: Strategic Initiatives - The acquisition of Accu-Fab is a strategic move aimed at enhancing MEC's long-term growth prospects and is expected to contribute high-margin EBITDA to offset weaknesses in the legacy business [4]. - MEC faces short-term challenges, including soft demand in end markets, elevated interest rates, and geopolitical factors [4]. Group 4: Market Position and Analyst Sentiment - MEC is considered undervalued compared to its industry peers, supporting a "Strong Buy" rating from analysts [5]. - Analysts emphasize the importance of monitoring earnings estimates and revisions as the company navigates its current hurdles [5].

Insider Buying Trends - Insider buying has been below normal in 13 of the past 15 months, with August showing only 26% of purchases compared to sales [3] - Historically, the highest ratio of buys to sells was 2.01 in October 2008 during the Great Recession, indicating that insider buying can signal future recovery [4] Eastman Chemical - Eastman Chemical Co. (EMN) executives, including CEO Mark Costa and CFO McLain William Thomas Jr., made significant purchases of shares on August 27, totaling approximately $502,000 and $252,000 respectively [5] - The stock has fallen 24% this year, impacted by high tariffs on imported materials, yet it has shown profitability for over 30 years [6] - Current valuation is attractive, trading at about nine times earnings and less than one times revenue, suggesting potential for recovery [6] Eli Lilly - Eight executives at Eli Lilly (LLY) bought shares in August, including CEO David Ricks and CFO Lucas Montarce, who spent over $1 million and nearly $495,000 respectively [7] - The stock price has decreased from a high of $942 to around $755, but it trades at a high valuation of 49 times recent earnings and over 12 times revenue, indicating it may be overvalued [8] United Parcel Service - United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS) shares have dropped more than 31% this year, with CEO Carol Tome purchasing over $1 million in August [9] - Despite competitive pressures, UPS maintains a strong return on equity of over 34% and trades for less than 13 times earnings, suggesting potential for future gains [10] First Citizens BancShares - At First Citizens BancShares Inc. (FCNCA), CEO Frank Holding Jr. invested over $1 million in August, alongside four other insiders [11] - The bank has shown improving profits and has consistently achieved a return on assets of 1.0% or better, with the stock trading at a reasonable valuation of 12 times recent earnings [12] Performance of Insider Buying Stocks - Stocks recommended based on insider buying have returned an average of 8.9% over 12 months, underperforming the S&P 500 Total Return Index by 1.8 percentage points [13] - Stocks to avoid despite insider buying have lagged the index by 24 percentage points, while those with ambiguous comments on insider buying have outperformed the index by 14.2 percentage points [14]