Workflow
Kappa运动衫
icon
Search documents
从碾压安踏李宁,到如今月亏过亿:被抛弃的运动品牌顶流,到底错在哪?
首席商业评论· 2025-11-09 04:01
Core Viewpoint - Kappa, once a leading sports brand in China, has experienced a significant decline, struggling to maintain its market presence and resorting to selling trademarks to survive [6][9][34]. Group 1: Historical Success - Kappa was founded in 1916 in Italy and became a prominent sports brand, especially known for its association with football teams like Juventus and AC Milan [10][12]. - At its peak, Kappa achieved annual sales of 4.2 billion and operated nearly 4,000 stores, surpassing competitors like Li Ning and Anta [7][20]. - The brand's success was driven by innovative marketing strategies and a focus on trendy sportswear, appealing to younger consumers [14][16]. Group 2: Decline and Challenges - After the 2008 Beijing Olympics, Kappa faced a downturn as the sportswear market declined, leading to significant inventory issues [22]. - Kappa's reliance on a light-asset model and external manufacturers hindered its ability to respond quickly to market changes, resulting in a loss of control over product quality and brand reputation [22][32]. - The brand's market share diminished as competitors adapted to new consumer trends, while Kappa struggled to innovate and maintain relevance [23][25]. Group 3: Attempts at Revival - Kappa made several attempts to revitalize its brand, including collaborations with celebrities and a shift towards a fashion-oriented strategy [27][29]. - Despite these efforts, Kappa's financial performance continued to decline, with net profits dropping significantly from 8-9 billion to around 300 million from 2018 to 2020 [30]. - The company ultimately resorted to selling trademarks and intellectual property rights to sustain operations, indicating a dire financial situation [32][32].
从碾压安踏李宁,到如今月亏过亿:被抛弃的运动品牌顶流,到底错在哪?
创业邦· 2025-11-09 03:11
Core Viewpoint - Kappa, once a leading sports brand in China, has faced significant decline, struggling to maintain market presence and resorting to selling trademarks for survival [5][6][28]. Group 1: Historical Performance - Kappa achieved peak sales of 4.2 billion in its prime, with nearly 4,000 stores, surpassing competitors like Li Ning and Anta [6][20]. - The brand's revenue fell to 1.68 billion in the latest fiscal year, a 3.7% decline year-on-year [6][30]. - Kappa's market presence diminished significantly, with store numbers dropping from 4,000 to 1,000 [23]. Group 2: Strategic Decisions - Kappa's entry into the Chinese market in 2002 was initially unsuccessful due to a lack of consumer acceptance [11]. - Under new leadership, Kappa pivoted to a trendy sports market, adopting bold designs and innovative marketing strategies [13][15]. - The company adopted a light asset model, relying heavily on third-party manufacturers and distributors, which ultimately led to a loss of control over product quality and brand reputation [23][33]. Group 3: Market Challenges - The sports apparel industry faced a downturn post-2008 Beijing Olympics, leading to inventory crises for Kappa and its competitors [22]. - Competitors like Li Ning and Anta adapted quickly to market changes, while Kappa struggled to respond effectively [23]. - The emergence of new brands and changing consumer preferences further eroded Kappa's market share [25][30]. Group 4: Recent Developments - Kappa attempted to revitalize its brand through collaborations and marketing campaigns targeting younger consumers, but these efforts did not translate into increased sales [29][30]. - The company reported significant losses, including 1.783 billion in the 2022 fiscal year, prompting the sale of trademarks to sustain operations [28][34]. - Kappa's inability to innovate and adapt to market demands has left it in a precarious position, questioning its future viability [33][35].