Group 1: Earnings Overview - The Q4 earnings season is expected to begin with major banks like JPMorgan Chase, BNY Mellon, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup reporting results, with corporate earnings expectations strengthening over recent quarters [1] - Total S&P 500 earnings for Q4 2025 are projected to rise by 7.9% year over year, supported by an 8.2% increase in revenues, marking the 10th consecutive quarter of positive earnings growth for the index [2] Group 2: Sector Performance - Aerospace, tech, and finance sectors are anticipated to perform well in Q4, while seven of the 16 Zacks sectors are expected to underperform, notably Autos with a projected earnings decline of 24%, Transportation with an 8.5% decline, and Consumer Staples with a 4.1% decline [3] - The Auto sector is expected to see a 24% decline in earnings due to a 7.3% decrease in revenues, following a 20.7% earnings loss in Q3 2025 despite 4% revenue growth [4] - The Transportation sector is projected to lose 8.5% in earnings with only 1.2% revenue growth, following a minimal earnings gain of 0.3% in Q3 [7] - The Consumer Staples sector is expected to post a 4% earnings decline despite 2.4% revenue growth, following a 0.9% earnings drop in Q3 [8] Group 3: Sector Challenges - The Auto sector faces challenges from increased costs due to tariffs and softening demand, with lower-income buyers likely to pull back on purchases [6] - The Transportation sector is experiencing earnings pressure from subdued freight demand, attributed to earlier inventory buildup from trade policy uncertainty [7] - Consumer Staples companies are under pressure from inflation, a soft labor market, and falling affordability, impacting their pricing power [8]

Core Insights - The State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is a passively managed ETF launched on December 16, 1998, providing broad exposure to the Consumer Staples sector [1] - The ETF is the largest in its category with over $14.9 billion in assets, aiming to match the performance of the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index [3] - It has a low expense ratio of 0.08% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.67%, making it an attractive option for investors [4] Fund Details - XLP seeks to replicate the performance of the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, which represents the consumer staples sector of the S&P 500 Index [3] - The ETF has a 100% allocation in the Consumer Staples sector, providing diversified exposure [5] - The top three holdings include Walmart Inc (11.83%), Costco Wholesale Corp, and Procter & Gamble Co, with the top 10 holdings comprising 61.12% of total assets [6] Performance Metrics - As of January 13, 2026, the ETF has increased by approximately 3.22% year-to-date and 7.83% over the past year, trading between $75.6 and $83.6 in the last 52 weeks [7] - The ETF has a beta of 0.51 and a standard deviation of 11.61% over the trailing three-year period, indicating medium risk [7] Alternatives - XLP carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to the Consumer Staples sector [8] - Other alternatives include Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) with $1.35 billion in assets and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) with $7.47 billion, both with competitive expense ratios [10]

Core Insights - The article compares two ETFs targeting the U.S. consumer staples sector: Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP), highlighting their differences in portfolio structure, yield, and liquidity [4][5][10]. Group 1: Portfolio Structure - FSTA holds 104 stocks with a sector tilt of 98% towards consumer defensive, providing broader diversification compared to XLP, which has only 36 holdings [1][8]. - XLP's top holdings include Walmart, Costco Wholesale, and The Procter & Gamble Co., which constitute a significant portion of its assets, indicating a concentrated investment approach [2][5]. - FSTA's top five holdings represent a larger percentage of its total portfolio compared to XLP, making it somewhat top-heavy [9]. Group 2: Yield and Expense Ratio - Both ETFs charge a low expense ratio of 0.08%, but XLP offers a higher yield of 2.7% compared to FSTA's 2.3%, appealing to income-focused investors [3][5]. Group 3: Liquidity and Size - XLP has $14.9 billion in assets under management (AUM), making it larger and more liquid than FSTA, which may benefit investors looking for ease in executing large trades [2][8]. - The greater liquidity of XLP is a significant advantage over FSTA, despite both ETFs covering the same defensive sector [5][10].

Core Viewpoint - Investors are advised to consider dividend ETFs as a defensive strategy during potential market downturns, with historical performance indicating resilience during recessions [1][2]. Group 1: Dividend ETFs Overview - The State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) focuses on companies selling essential goods, providing stability during economic downturns due to inelastic demand for consumer staples [3][4]. - The State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) includes large healthcare companies, benefiting from consistent demand for medical services regardless of economic conditions [6][7]. - The iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) offers exposure to U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, serving as a hedge against inflation and providing liquidity [9][10]. Group 2: Performance and Characteristics - XLP has 40 holdings, with Walmart (11.64%), Costco (9.08%), and Procter & Gamble (7.67%) as its largest components, featuring a 2.66% dividend yield and a low expense ratio of 0.08% [5]. - XLV has outperformed the S&P 500 during past downturns, showing a 12% increase over the past year, with a 1.58% dividend yield and an expense ratio of 0.08% [8]. - TIP has a dividend yield of 3.29%, which fluctuates with inflation, and an expense ratio of 0.18% [10][11].

Core Insights - The article compares two consumer staples ETFs, the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS), highlighting their distinct approaches to sector exposure and investment strategies [1][2]. Expense Ratios and Portfolio Structure - XLP has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to RSPS's 0.40%, making it more cost-effective for investors [3][10]. - XLP manages $15.5 billion in assets under management (AUM), while RSPS has $236.2 million, indicating XLP's larger scale and potential liquidity advantages [3][11]. - XLP's portfolio is market-cap-weighted, leading to heavy exposure to large companies like Walmart and Procter & Gamble, with its top three holdings comprising nearly 30% of the fund [5][7]. - RSPS employs an equal-weighting strategy, providing more balanced exposure across its 37 holdings, with top positions representing less than 4% of assets each [6][7]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over the past year, RSPS has returned -5.05%, while XLP has returned -3.19%, indicating better performance for XLP in this timeframe [3]. - The maximum drawdown over five years for RSPS is -18.61%, compared to -16.32% for XLP, suggesting that XLP has been slightly less volatile [4]. - The growth of $1,000 invested over five years would yield $992 for RSPS and $1,180 for XLP, further illustrating XLP's superior performance [4]. Investment Implications - XLP's concentrated approach can lead to higher returns when top holdings perform well, but it also poses risks if those stocks underperform [8][9]. - RSPS's diversified strategy may protect against volatility but could dilute the potential gains from high-performing stocks [9]. - Investors should consider the trade-offs between cost, performance, and risk when choosing between these two ETFs [10].

Core Insights - The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) provide exposure to the U.S. consumer staples sector, with XLP being slightly cheaper and offering a higher yield, while VDC has a broader portfolio and better five-year returns [1][2][8] Cost & Size - VDC has an expense ratio of 0.09% and assets under management (AUM) of $8.6 billion, while XLP has a lower expense ratio of 0.08% and a larger AUM of $15.3 billion [3][4] - The one-year return for VDC is -2.4% compared to XLP's -3.4%, and the dividend yield for VDC is 2.2% versus XLP's 2.7% [3][4] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over five years, VDC has a maximum drawdown of -17.6% and has grown $1,000 to $1,246, while XLP has a maximum drawdown of -17.8% and has grown $1,000 to $1,180 [5] Portfolio Composition - XLP holds 36 stocks with a 100% allocation to consumer defensive companies, led by Walmart (11.9%), Costco Wholesale (9.2%), and Procter & Gamble (7.8%) [6] - VDC has a broader approach with 105 holdings, 98% in consumer defensive, and top positions including Walmart (14.2%), Costco Wholesale (13.0%), and Procter & Gamble (11.2%) [7] Investor Considerations - XLP's lower expense ratio and higher yield may attract cost- and income-focused investors, while VDC's broader portfolio and stronger five-year total return may appeal to those seeking diversification [8][10] - The concentration of XLP with only 36 stocks could be a risk if the largest holdings underperform, whereas VDC's wider scope may provide better resilience [9][10]

Core Insights - The article compares two consumer staples ETFs: Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP), highlighting their similarities and differences in terms of holdings, performance, and cost [6][9]. Fund Overview - Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) includes 103 stocks, providing broader coverage in the consumer defensive sector, with significant holdings in Walmart, Costco Wholesale, and Procter & Gamble [2]. - State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) focuses on 37 companies, primarily large-cap stocks, and aims to mirror the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index [3]. Performance Metrics - XLP offers a higher dividend yield of 2.7% compared to VDC's 2.2%, making it more appealing for income-focused investors [7]. - Both funds have low expense ratios and solid long-term performance histories, making them suitable for buy-and-hold investors [9]. Holdings Composition - XLP has a higher weighting in consumer non-durables, while VDC has a greater focus on retail stocks [8]. Investment Considerations - Income-oriented investors may prefer XLP due to its higher dividend yield, while those bullish on retail may favor VDC [9].

Core Insights - The article compares two consumer staples ETFs: State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and iShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK), highlighting their differences in cost, portfolio composition, and sector exposure [1][2]. Cost and Size - XLP has a lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to IYK's 0.38%, making it more cost-effective for investors [3][4]. - XLP has a larger Assets Under Management (AUM) of $15.5 billion, while IYK has an AUM of $1.3 billion [3]. - The one-year return for XLP is -5.4%, while IYK's is -3.9%, indicating IYK has outperformed XLP in the short term [3]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over five years, XLP has a maximum drawdown of -17.8%, while IYK's is -16.3%, suggesting IYK has slightly better risk management [5]. - The growth of $1,000 invested over five years is $1,167 for XLP and $1,239 for IYK, indicating IYK has provided better returns [5]. Portfolio Composition - IYK includes 12% in healthcare and 2% in basic materials, with a total of 55 holdings, while XLP is strictly focused on consumer staples with 100% allocation and 37 holdings [6][7]. - Top holdings for IYK include Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, and Philip Morris International, while XLP's largest positions are Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble [6][7]. Investment Considerations - The decision between XLP and IYK may hinge on the trade-off between fees and performance, with XLP being more affordable but IYK potentially offering broader exposure [8][9]. - Investors may prefer IYK if they seek exposure to healthcare and basic materials, despite its higher fees [10][11].

Core Insights - The article compares two consumer staples ETFs, the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS), highlighting their differing approaches to sector exposure and investment strategies [1][2]. Cost and Size - XLP has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to RSPS's 0.40% [3][4]. - As of November 28, 2025, XLP has a one-year return of -4.5%, while RSPS has a return of -6.6% [3]. - XLP has a much larger Assets Under Management (AUM) of $15.5 billion compared to RSPS's $237.2 million [3]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, RSPS experienced a maximum drawdown of -18.61%, while XLP had a drawdown of -16.32% [5]. - An investment of $1,000 in XLP would have grown to $1,186 over five years, while the same investment in RSPS would have decreased to $990 [5]. Portfolio Composition - XLP holds 38 stocks and is heavily weighted towards large companies like Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble, which can dominate its performance [6]. - RSPS also consists of 38 stocks but employs an equal-weighting strategy, giving each holding similar allocation, featuring companies like Monster Beverage, Bunge Global, and Dollar Tree [7]. Market Context - Consumer staples are generally considered defensive stocks, but many have struggled due to inflation and tariff concerns [8][9]. - Both ETFs provide diversification options for investors concerned about concentration in tech stocks within the S&P 500 [9]. - XLP's focus on larger companies has contributed to its better performance compared to RSPS, which may appeal to those interested in small- and medium-cap stocks [10][11].