11月8日，《每日经济新闻》记者从昆仑天和关联方了解到，昆仑天和已就相关事件委托律师发布声 明，主要内容包括：昆仑天和是深圳优联的供应商之一，向深圳优联供应新疆地方特色产品，公司与消 费者不产生直接法律关系，公司也从未参与优联云购的运营管理、用户服务、销售模式制定、营销策略 决策及相关促销活动等工作。昆仑天和向深圳优联供应的货物没有任何政府补贴。关于混合所有制改革 事宜，公司前期仅有初步意向，目前已全面停止拟与深圳优联的混改工作。 另据消费者提供的资料，深圳市场监管部门11月回应消费者表示，企业（深圳优联）涉嫌诈骗和非法集 资。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 10月29日，《每日经济新闻》报道深圳优联网讯网络科技有限公司（以下简称"深圳优联"）旗下的优联 云购商城长期低价线上销售黄金，且多次出现延迟发货问题。 2024年以来，优联云购自称销售新疆"地方补贴产品"，消费者购买后可返U豆（类似购物积分），并可 用U豆低价购买黄金。 今年8月前后，优联云购对黄金"延迟发货"，公司称将与国企新疆昆仑天和农业科技发展有限公司（以 下简称"昆仑天和"）开展混合所有制改革，需核实"补贴"等。 ...

每日经济新闻 随着一根根金条邮寄到手，刘云清愈发信任该商城，但2025年8月前后，优联云购的黄金却突然延迟发货了。随后两个月里，尽管该商 城公布了理由，众多消费者的心情却未能平静。直到10月下旬，等不到发货的刘云清和朋友们越发感觉不对劲，他们回想公司前后一 系列操作，怀疑遭遇了投资诈骗。刘云清告诉《每日经济新闻》记者："光是委托我到深圳报案的消费者就有几十人，这里面最多的在 优联云购投入超百万元。" 随后，记者以消费者身份与深圳优联工作人员对话，公司一方却称消费者低价购买黄金可能涉嫌骗取"补贴"获利。 买卖双方各执一词，这场黄金投资"罗生门"真相为何？ 每经记者|孔泽思 每经编辑|陈 旭 10月27日，当刘云清（化名）站在深圳优联网讯网络科技有限公司（以下简称深圳优联）办公室楼下时，他心中思绪万千。 近两年，黄金价格大涨之际，投资金产品持续热销。2024年，刘云清偶然得知深圳优联旗下的优联云购商城以低于市场价线上销售黄 金，他便陆续在该网络商城购买了价值数十万元的金条。 过去两年多次延迟发货 据消费者介绍，优联云购长期以低于市场的价格线上销售黄金，与常规购金渠道形成价差，这为商城吸引了大量消费者。 其实，20 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issues surrounding Shenzhen Youlian Network Technology Co., Ltd. and its online gold purchasing platform, Youlian Cloud Purchase, which has faced delays in gold deliveries, leading to consumer suspicions of investment fraud [1][3][4]. Group 1: Company Operations - Youlian Cloud Purchase has been selling gold at prices lower than the market rate, attracting many consumers [3][4]. - The company has experienced multiple instances of delayed gold deliveries, with consumers reporting issues since 2023 [4][10]. - In 2023, Youlian Cloud Purchase achieved a daily sales record of 40 million yuan, with a revenue target of 15 billion yuan for 2024 [11]. Group 2: Consumer Experiences - Consumers like Liu Yunqing have invested significant amounts in gold through the platform, only to face delays in receiving their purchases [1][4]. - Many consumers have expressed concerns about the company's practices, with some alleging that they have been victims of fraud [1][3][4]. - The introduction of a new sales model involving "local subsidy products" has led to confusion and dissatisfaction among consumers, as these products are priced higher than market rates [5][10]. Group 3: Regulatory and Legal Issues - The company is undergoing a mixed-ownership reform with a state-owned enterprise, which has led to a review of its operations and potential delays in fulfilling orders [11][12]. - Allegations have arisen regarding consumers potentially violating subsidy regulations by reselling products purchased through the platform [12][16]. - The company has announced plans to investigate users suspected of fraudulent activities related to subsidy claims, further complicating the situation [12][16].