synthetix infinex team dumped snx positions then promoted susd deposits knowing the depeg was coming. infinex patrons nft collection now worth more than snx itself. kain took back governance control same week. susd cant redeem for snx at par, 171m tokens staked facing slashing if depeg worsens. insiders exit, stakers get trapped with the debt pool liability ...

Trading Competition Update - Synthetix Mainnet trading competition experienced a volatile 24 hours [1] - An anonymous sUSD pre-depositor is currently in 1st place [1] - @Web3Feng is holding strong in 2nd place [1] - Several other traders are showing notable performance fluctuations, including @KeyboardMonkey3, @CryptoKaleo, @eyearea, and @EasyEatsBodega [1]

Project Overview - SRUSD on Morpho achieved $500 million TVL through recursive leverage loops [1] - A project with a $10 million market cap exhibits a 50x TVL/MCAP ratio based on circular collateral [1] Investment Strategy - Deposit SRUSD at an 18% yield and borrow USDC at 12% to buy more SRUSD, repeating this process 5 times [1] Risk Assessment - The entire stack unwinds when borrow rates reach 20% [1]

Market Cap & Treasury - Synthetix's market capitalization stands at $686 million [1] - Synthetix's treasury is smaller than $16 million [1] Stablecoin & Market Maker - Wintermute controls the entire sUSD pool [1] - One market maker's control over the stablecoin raises concerns [1] Financial Stability & Risk - The treasury cannot fund six months of development [1] - The 155% pump is considered a potential liquidation event [1]

Stablecoin Landscape - The document lists a variety of stablecoins, including USDT, USDC, BUSD, FDUSD, PYUSD, GUSD, TUSD, USDP, DAI, sUSD, LUSD, FRAX, USDD, USDe, and USD1 [1] - Mentions the question of how many stablecoins are sufficient [1] - Includes potentially misspelled or variant stablecoin names like mUSD, NET, and PYUSD0 [1]

Core Viewpoint - The rapid expansion of stablecoins is transforming them from mere crypto assets into key financial variables with macroeconomic implications, impacting traditional financial systems, particularly in areas like money supply, credit creation, and the U.S. Treasury market [2]. Group 1: Stablecoins as Financial Ecosystem Variables - Stablecoins have evolved from being used solely in the crypto market to broader applications, showcasing advantages in cross-border payments and crypto settlements due to their 24/7 availability and low costs [4]. - Global regulatory frameworks are being established to address the rapid development of stablecoins, with the U.S. implementing the GENIUS Act to set clear licensing and reserve requirements [4]. Group 2: Financial Institutions' Participation in the Stablecoin Ecosystem - Commercial banks are actively issuing on-chain deposits to counteract the risk of deposit erosion from stablecoins while also providing reserve custody services to stablecoin issuers [5]. - Asset management companies are managing the substantial reserves of stablecoins, particularly U.S. Treasury securities, recognizing the market opportunity as stablecoin reserves reach hundreds of billions [5]. - Payment companies are leveraging their networks to create closed ecosystems by issuing their own stablecoins or integrating third-party stablecoins to reduce payment costs and enhance transaction efficiency [5]. - Exchanges are capitalizing on the infrastructure benefits by providing low-cost fiat-stablecoin exchange channels and developing stablecoin derivatives to attract institutional investors [5]. Group 3: Impact of Stablecoins on Money Supply - The key to stablecoins not expanding the total M2 money supply lies in their adherence to a 1:1 reserve ratio, which results in structural changes in existing M2 rather than net expansion [7]. - If stablecoins begin to pay interest and expand into everyday payment scenarios, they could significantly compete with traditional banks, potentially eroding bank deposits and limiting credit creation [7]. - The introduction of a fractional reserve system for stablecoins could lead to actual M2 expansion, as stablecoin issuers would gain the ability to create new money through leverage [8]. Group 4: Stablecoins as a New Cornerstone for U.S. Treasury - Stablecoins are creating substantial incremental demand for U.S. Treasury securities, particularly short-term bills, as their reserves grow to hundreds of billions [9]. - However, the inherent risks associated with stablecoins could make them a "fragile fulcrum" for the Treasury market, particularly during liquidity crises when large-scale redemptions could lead to forced sales of Treasury holdings [9]. Group 5: Lessons from the Breakdown of the Bretton Woods System - The potential decoupling risks faced by stablecoins echo the trust crisis that led to the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system, particularly if regulators allow a shift to a fractional reserve model [10]. - The transition from a fully reserved system to a fractional reserve model for stablecoins could fundamentally alter their nature, transforming them from passive digital assets to active credit creators [10]. Group 6: Regulatory Landscape - The U.S. GENIUS Act establishes a federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, requiring issuers to hold reserves in high-quality liquid assets and undergo regular audits [31]. - Hong Kong has implemented the Stablecoin Ordinance, mandating that stablecoin issuers maintain 100% backing with high-quality assets and obtain licenses from the HKMA [32]. - Singapore's MAS has introduced a regulatory framework for single-currency stablecoins, ensuring that reserves equal at least 100% of the circulating stablecoin value [33]. - The EU's MiCA regulation categorizes different types of crypto assets and imposes reserve and disclosure requirements to protect consumers and maintain financial stability [34].