憨巴龙王
Search documents
X @憨巴龙王
憨巴龙王· 2025-10-21 12:28
这我跟你battle两句吧,首先,我没说嘴撸不行,相反,我还推荐大家都去当kol嘴撸。其次,必须要指明一下,信息和判断是两个相差极大的价值。你自己也说了,你发了很多信息,涨幅都不错,但是自己没有下场赚钱。为什么,因为判断。普通kol写一篇1000字的字的plsma文章,我连看都懒得看一眼。而老陆只用说“plsma打钱”我就可以梭哈500万刀,甚至1000万刀,这是一个基于对老陆长期判断的信任。同样的,只要我打钱了,就有一堆大户跟风我打,这也是基于我以前打钱盘的判断。我一直说交易的四步,看准,买入,重仓买入,拿住。这是4个不同等级的难度,如果只说看准,那可以问问@thankUcrypto 鹰子,我玩小币夸张到什么地步。为什么大家一直要求实盘成绩,因为只有实盘成绩才能体现你买入和拿住的水平。看准这个事,真的太简单了....最后再说一次,我现在真不觉得嘴撸,收费群,返佣有啥不好的,也是一种现金流的来源,反正这个市场就是黑暗森林,就比谁能掏就行了。ZC (@ZhanweiC):看完了龙王的文章,我只能说,写的和我想的一模一样,只是他写的文采比较好,然后比较吸引人,除了赌场币+btc+eth其他的币都是PVP玩法,活到 ...
X @憨巴龙王
憨巴龙王· 2025-10-21 11:03
2025年.10.21 全文都是讨论山寨,因为大多数人来币圈是为了暴富。首先,这个圈子是一个绝对的负和市场,绝大多数山寨不产生任何价值,所以财富都是靠圈外资金进来产生的。BTC不断的在新高,而山寨的上限越来越低,以散户盘为例,people,ordi,币安人生,都是非常典型的散户盘,没有绝对主力。people在21年牛市,只是一个现象级meme,都不是什么新的龙头叙事,都能炒刀12亿刀市值,而ordi作为BTC的MEME新叙事,最高也就20亿刀。币安人生作为新的中文叙事,现在4亿刀都开始疯狂浇给。为什么?因为这个圈子相信山寨的傻子已经被割完了,留下的都是聪明人,都认识到,山寨的价值是0.以前的山寨财富是怎么产生的,是BTC,ETH等主流币带来的圈外资金。早期散户囤BTC,随着华尔街机构的进入,散户被山寨的涨幅所吸引,卖出BTC去抄山寨。即便一开始山寨赚了钱,后续也会因为熊市的来临亏回去,随着一轮一轮的牛熊,散户因为BTC所获得的红利,一步步转移到更高阶的玩家。一个更形象的例子,散户A是18年以前买BTC的傻瓜,B是21年进场的普通人。C是23年进场的聪明人。A后面卖了BTC,去炒山寨,因为A比较菜,所以21-2 ...
X @憨巴龙王
憨巴龙王· 2025-10-21 08:55
Business Model & Pricing - The document explores the potential pricing for a small group (10-20 people) [1] Profitability & Revenue - The document mentions receiving红包 (red envelopes, a form of digital gifting/payment in China), suggesting a revenue stream [1] - The document implies generating profits for others ("带鹰子赚钱"), potentially through investment advice or similar services [1]
X @憨巴龙王
憨巴龙王· 2025-10-19 00:36
我愿赌服输,我觉得这个项目方做的非常到位,利用了周末不能及时处理,利用了最近10个alpha合约没有低于20m市值的热度,利用了之前项目方为了点脸面道德锁仓,就无限硬掏。你们操盘累不累啊?直接掏不就完事了。我已经是这个圈子最难被割的一批人了,连我都开始被掏了,可以想象这个圈子的散户已经死成什么样了。23年新币,2-3亿刀市值叫低估,现在10m市值还被掏。早点退了吧,山寨的价值是0,你做空就爆空,你做多就无限增发掏池子。憨巴龙王 (@dotyyds1234):实在忍不住出来提醒两句。怕很多人不知道。这个rvv项目方一直在掏池子,榜一第一个本来是锁仓,多签的,所以写着8m市值,实际不是的,项目方就硬掏,装都不装了。 ...
X @憨巴龙王
憨巴龙王· 2025-10-19 00:25
Project Operation & Risk - The project team of Rvv has been continuously withdrawing funds from the liquidity pool [1] - The project team is suspected of continuously transferring out locked tokens, initially claimed to be locked with a market value of 8 million [1] - The project team's actions are described as blatant and undisguised fund withdrawals [1] - The author lost $100 thousand in this project [1] - The author expresses strong disapproval of the project team's behavior, characterizing it as exceptionally shameless [1] - The author believes the value of the project is zero [1][3] Exchange Response - The exchange (Binance) is criticized for not taking action against the project team's fund withdrawals [2] - The exchange is perceived as prioritizing its reputation over addressing the issue [2]
X @憨巴龙王
憨巴龙王· 2025-10-15 06:53
Industry Personality & Social Media Presence - The individual expresses a strong desire for sharing and has a large number of unpublished drafts [1] - The individual acknowledges being sensitive to negative feedback despite receiving substantial support [1] - The individual reflects on personal growth through introspection, particularly in adapting to market changes and maintaining profitability in the cryptocurrency space [1] - The individual is considering alternative platforms like Telegram (TG) for sharing thoughts [2] - The individual is taking a one-month break from Twitter due to perceived lack of value and negative experiences [3]