证券之星消息，11月13日专业工程板块较上一交易日上涨0.99%，三维化学领涨。当日上证指数报收于 4029.5，上涨0.73%。深证成指报收于13476.52，上涨1.78%。专业工程板块个股涨跌见下表： | 代码 | 名称 | 收盘价 | 涨跌幅 | 成交量(手) | 成交额(元) | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 002469 | 三维化学 | 9.26 | 6.81% | 63.50万 | | 5.87亿 | | 605289 | 爱曼股份 | 69.93 | 6.16% | 4.62万 | | 3.18亿 | | 300712 | 永福股份 | 31.58 | 4.29% | 15.29万 | | 4.77亿 | | 002140 | 东华科技 | 12.97 | 3.93% | 30.50万 | | 3.95亿 | | 6568209 | 百利科技 | 7.50 | 3.02% | 27.49万 | | 2.05亿 | | 601068 | 中铝国际 | 5.80 | 3.02% | 45.41万 | | 2.60亿 | | 002 ...

此外，团队还创新应用了双轨迹氧化铝浓度控制方法，首次实现不同过热条件下物料溶解效率的智能匹 配。配套研发的耐高温压力传感器与伺服电动缸驱动机构，提升了设备在高温强磁环境下的可靠性。 技术应用数据显示，该系统可使铝电解生产电流效率提升0.3%，吨铝直流电耗降低30—50千瓦时，设 备维护成本下降近三成。在内蒙古华云新材料有限公司的500千安电解系列中，单台电解槽年节电量超 过5万千瓦时。据初步统计，该技术年均可节约能耗约4亿千瓦时，相当于减少二氧化碳排放23.64万 吨，为应用企业创造直接经济效益超过3.7亿元。 （文章来源：科技日报） 11月10日，记者从中铝国际贵阳铝镁设计研究院有限公司获悉，由该院牵头研发的铝电解槽智能打壳下 料控制技术，成功破解了长期困扰全球铝电解行业的"卡堵"世界级难题，推动生产控制由传统经验型向 精准智能化转型。 据项目负责人杨涛介绍，铝电解生产中，打壳下料系统如同"心脏瓣膜"，其畅通与否直接关系能耗与效 率。传统控制方式下，"卡堵"问题易导致下料不畅、能耗攀升，是行业共性瓶颈。历经6年攻关，团队 首创了"机理研究+智能识别+自动处理+动态预警"一体化技术路线，研发出非接触式卡堵识别 ...

证券之星消息，11月10日专业工程板块较上一交易日上涨0.56%，华电科工领涨。当日上证指数报收于 4018.6，上涨0.53%。深证成指报收于13427.61，上涨0.18%。专业工程板块个股涨跌见下表： 从资金流向上来看，当日专业工程板块主力资金净流出1.12亿元，游资资金净流入6368.19万元，散户资 金净流入4830.4万元。专业工程板块个股资金流向见下表： | 代码 | 名称 | 主力净流入(元) | 主力净占比 游资净流入 (元) | | 游资净占比 散户净流入(元) | | 散户净占比 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 601226 华电科工 | | -5693.91万 | 17.09% | -3177.77万 | -9.54% | -2516.14万 | -7.55% | | 000032 深桑达 A | | 5366.73万 | 5.89% | 272.96万 | 0.30% | -5639.69万 | -6.19% | | 300712 永福股份 | | 4813.52万 | 9.25% | -400.67万 | ...

chinalco chinalco chinarana co ...

Core Points - As of November 7, 2025, China Aluminum International (601068) closed at 5.46 CNY, a 3.21% increase from the previous week's 5.29 CNY [1] - The company's market capitalization is currently 16.314 billion CNY, ranking 5th out of 39 in the professional engineering sector and 1173rd out of 5166 in the A-share market [1] Company Announcements - China Aluminum International will hold a third-quarter earnings presentation on November 10, 2025, from 16:00 to 17:00 via the Shanghai Stock Exchange's online roadshow center [1] - Investors can submit questions for the presentation from November 3 to November 7, 2025, through the roadshow center or the company's email [1] - Key executives, including Chairman Li Yihua and General Manager Liu Jing, will attend the presentation [1]

Core Insights - The professional engineering sector experienced a 0.77% increase on November 6, with Shikong Technology leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4007.76, up 0.97%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13452.42, up 1.73% [1] Stock Performance - Shikong Technology (605178) closed at 76.00, up 5.56% with a trading volume of 227,300 shares and a transaction value of 1.687 billion [1] - Yaxiang Integration (603929) closed at 53.00, up 5.26% with a trading volume of 81,500 shares [1] - Jiapo Aoshi (605598) closed at 33.02, up 4.10% with a trading volume of 121,500 shares [1] - Other notable performers include Shenghui Integration (603163) and Zhonglv International (601068), with increases of 3.62% and 3.55% respectively [1] Capital Flow - The professional engineering sector saw a net inflow of 2.8371 million in main funds, while retail funds experienced a net inflow of 34.1623 million [2] - The sector's main funds saw significant inflows into stocks like Yihai Port and Australia (605598) and Beifang International (000065) [3] - Conversely, stocks like Baoli Technology (6039509) and Yongfu Co. (300712) experienced net outflows [2][3]

Investment Rating - The report indicates a positive investment outlook for the construction state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the ESG context, highlighting strong performance in green development and social responsibility [5][11]. Core Insights - The overall ESG scores for the 19 construction SOEs are good, with 8 companies scoring above 80 and 10 between 60-79, while only 1 company scored below 60. Climate governance and governance improvements are identified as key weaknesses [11][21]. - The importance assessment is well-disclosed among the companies, with 19 companies reporting their assessments, and 17 completing dual importance assessments. However, third-party verification is lacking, with only 3 companies engaging external validation [13][18]. - Environmental disclosures are mature, but climate disclosures need improvement. The total score for "environment + climate change response" ranges from 0 to 32 out of a maximum of 34, indicating a need for better climate-related disclosures [21][22]. - Social responsibility is a strong focus, with all 19 companies disclosing relevant information, particularly in rural revitalization and social welfare, showcasing their commitment to social responsibility [50][53]. - Governance structures are generally robust, with most companies having established boards and supervisory committees, although transparency in performance evaluation and ESG integration remains an area for improvement [60][65]. Summary by Sections Overall Performance - The ESG performance of the 19 construction SOEs is generally good, with strengths in green development and social responsibility, while climate governance remains a critical shortcoming [11][21]. Importance Assessment - All 19 companies have disclosed their importance assessments, with a high level of completeness. However, third-party verification is limited, indicating a need for greater transparency [13][18]. Environmental & Climate - Environmental disclosures are well-developed, but climate-related disclosures are lagging. The overall score for environmental and climate issues indicates a need for enhanced climate strategy integration [21][22]. Social Responsibility - Social issues are prominently featured in disclosures, with a focus on rural revitalization and community welfare, reflecting a strong commitment to social responsibility among the companies [50][53]. Governance - Governance frameworks are well-established, with most companies having comprehensive governance structures. However, the integration of ESG metrics into performance evaluations is not uniformly transparent [60][65].

Investment Rating - The report rates the industry as "Positive" for A-share central enterprises in the construction sector, indicating an expectation of outperforming the overall market [3]. Core Insights - The ESG performance of 19 central enterprises in the construction industry is generally good, with strengths in green development and social responsibility, while climate governance and governance enhancement remain key weaknesses [5][13]. - The overall ESG scores show that 8 companies scored above 80, 10 companies scored between 60-79, and 1 company scored below 60, with a maximum score of 100 [13]. - Importance assessments are disclosed by all 19 companies, with 17 completing dual importance assessments, although third-party verification is lacking, with only 3 companies engaging third-party validation [16][18]. Summary by Sections 1. Overall Scores and Areas for Improvement - The ESG scores of the 19 central enterprises are generally good, with green development and social responsibility as strong areas, while climate governance and governance improvements are identified as critical weaknesses [5][13]. 2. Importance Assessment - All 19 companies disclosed importance assessments, with 17 completing dual assessments. However, third-party verification is limited, with only 3 companies providing such validation [16][18]. 3. Environmental & Climate - The total score for "Environment + Climate Change" among the 19 companies ranges from 0 to 32 points (out of 34). Two companies scored between 30-34, indicating strong performance in both environmental and climate disclosures. Twelve companies scored between 20-29, primarily focusing on environmental disclosures, while five companies scored between 10-19, showing limited engagement with climate issues [24][25]. 4. Social Responsibility - All 19 companies disclosed social responsibility initiatives, with a focus on rural revitalization and social welfare, reflecting a strong commitment to social responsibility. However, some disclosures lack quantitative performance indicators [57][60]. 5. Governance - The governance scores are primarily in the mid to high range, with most companies having established governance structures. However, the integration of ESG performance indicators into governance mechanisms remains unclear for many companies [68][73].

Core Viewpoint - The "Ultra-deep Green Safe Paste Filling New Technology" developed by China Aluminum International Changsha Nonferrous Metallurgy Design Institute has been recognized as reaching "international leading level" by the China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association, providing significant technical support for the green and safe development of deep mineral resources in China [1] Group 1: Technology Breakthroughs - The project team achieved key technological breakthroughs in four areas: optimizing complex filling pipeline systems, developing precise air-water pipe cleaning processes, enhancing control over deep rock layer displacement, and creating new early-strength gelling materials [1] - The optimized pipeline system allows for long-distance safe self-flow transportation of paste, significantly reducing pipeline wear and explosion risks [1] - The new cleaning process greatly reduces the amount of water used for pipe cleaning [1] - The multi-cooperative paste filling technology improves the ability to control rock layer displacement [1] - The new gelling materials reduce the amount of gelling agent required and increase the early strength of the filling body [1] Group 2: Industrial Application - The technology has been applied in the Yunnan Huize Mining Company, resulting in a 31% reduction in the total length of the filling pipeline network and over 90% reduction in the number of pipeline inspection personnel [1] - The lifespan of the pipelines has been extended by 3 years due to the application of this technology [1]

FF301 股份發行人及根據《上市規則》第十九B章上市的香港預託證券發行人的證券變動月報表 截至月份: 2025年10月31日 狀態: 新提交 致：香港交易及結算所有限公司 公司名稱: 中鋁國際工程股份有限公司 呈交日期: 2025年11月5日 I. 法定/註冊股本變動 第 1 頁 共 10 頁 v 1.1.1 FF301 II. 已發行股份及/或庫存股份變動 | 1. 股份分類 | 普通股 | 股份類別 | H | | 於香港聯交所上市 (註1) | 是 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 02068 | 說明 | | | | | | | | | 已發行股份（不包括庫存股份）數目 | | 庫存股份數目 | | 已發行股份總數 | | | 上月底結存 | | | 399,476,000 | | 0 | | 399,476,000 | | 增加 / 減少 (-) | | | 0 | | 0 | | | | 本月底結存 | | | 399,476,000 | | 0 | | 399,476,000 | | 2. ...