Shares of Coca-Cola ( NYSE:KO )Â lost 5.10% over the past month after gaining 1.09% the month prior. ...

ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Coca-Cola Company today announced it will release third quarter 2025 financial results Oct. 21 before the New York Stock Exchange opens. The release will be followed by an investor conference call at 8:30 a.m. ET to discuss the results. The company invites investors to join a webcast at www.cocacolacompany.com/investors. Downloadable files, as well as a transcript, will be available within 24 hours after the call on the company's website. About The Coca-Cola Compan. ...

Core Viewpoint - Investors seeking attractive yields and recession-resilient businesses should consider Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble as strong options due to their historical performance and current valuations [1][2]. Group 1: Dividend Yields and Comparisons - The average dividend yield for S&P 500 stocks is 1.2%, while consumer staples companies average 2.5%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of over 3%, and Procter & Gamble's yield is approximately 2.8% [2][8]. - Both companies are classified as Dividend Kings, having consistently increased their dividends for over 50 years, even during recessions [7]. Group 2: Business Resilience - The consumer staples sector is considered recession-resistant as it includes businesses selling essential items, which consumers continue to purchase regardless of economic conditions [3][5]. - Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble are among the largest publicly traded consumer staples companies, ranking No. 3 and No. 4 globally [5]. Group 3: Investment Valuation - Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble are currently trading at attractive valuations, with price-to-sales, price-to-earnings, and price-to-book ratios below their five-year averages [9]. - Although neither stock is extremely cheap, their reasonable pricing is considered a good opportunity for investors, as these companies rarely go on sale [9]. Group 4: Long-term Investment Strategy - Warren Buffett's investment philosophy emphasizes buying good businesses at reasonable prices and holding them for long-term growth, which applies to both Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble [10][11]. - Adopting a long-term investment approach with these companies may yield favorable outcomes, as current valuations could be seen as bargains in hindsight [11].

Core Insights - The article presents an analysis of The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO) and highlights the market's underestimation of Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF) quality [1]. Group 1: Company Overview - The Coca-Cola Company is being analyzed for its investment potential, with a focus on its long-term value [1]. Group 2: Analyst Background - The analysis is conducted by an individual investor with over five years of personal investing experience and a PhD in Economics [1].

Group 1 - The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO) is a well-diversified global consumer staples company known primarily for its soft drinks but also produces a variety of beverages including water, coffee, and juices [1] - The company has significant global reach and operates in multiple beverage categories, which helps mitigate risks associated with reliance on a single product line [1] Group 2 - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding macro trends and their influence on asset prices and investor behavior, which is crucial for constructing actionable investment strategies [1] - It highlights the role of central bank policies and sector rotation in shaping market dynamics, which can impact investment decisions in the consumer staples sector [1]

Core Insights - The Coca-Cola Company is a well-diversified global consumer staples company known primarily for its soft drinks but also offers a variety of beverage products including water, coffee, and juices [1] Company Overview - Coca-Cola operates under the ticker symbol NYSE: KO and is recognized for its iconic brand [1] - The company has a broad product portfolio that extends beyond soft drinks, indicating a strategic diversification in its offerings [1] Market Position - Coca-Cola's diversification allows it to mitigate risks associated with reliance on a single product category, positioning it favorably in the competitive beverage market [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights three established companies—Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, and Sherwin-Williams—as reliable dividend stocks that can enhance passive income for investors, especially in the current market environment [2][20]. Coca-Cola - Coca-Cola has a strong history of dividend payments, having raised its dividend for 63 consecutive years, earning it the title of Dividend King [8]. - The company is currently experiencing solid organic growth and is diversifying its product lineup towards healthier options, such as Coca-Cola Zero Sugar and Diet Coke [7]. - Coca-Cola's stock is trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 23.6, below its 10-year median P/E of 27.7, and offers a dividend yield of 3.1% [8]. Procter & Gamble - Procter & Gamble is facing challenges due to inflation and cost-of-living pressures affecting consumers, which has led to its stock hovering around a 52-week low [9][10]. - The company has announced a restructuring plan that includes cutting 7,000 jobs and exiting certain brands and markets [10]. - P&G has a P/E ratio of 23.4 and a forward P/E of 21.8, with a dividend yield of 2.8%, making it appealing for risk-averse investors [14]. Sherwin-Williams - Sherwin-Williams has underperformed major indexes this year due to high interest rates impacting its end markets, but it has a strong history of dividend increases, with 46 consecutive years of raises [15][17]. - The company has a solid business model, selling products through various channels, and has seen its stock price increase by 352% over the last decade [17][18]. - Sherwin-Williams is considered a good buy for long-term investors, despite its current dividend yield of only 0.9% [17][18]. Investment Appeal - All three companies are characterized by their ability to pay growing and reliable dividends, making them suitable for investors looking for non-tech-focused investment opportunities [20]. - Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble are currently trading at discounted valuations compared to their historical averages, while Sherwin-Williams is in line with its 10-year median valuation [20].

We recently compiled a list of the 12 Most Undervalued Dow Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. The Coca-Cola Company is one of them. The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO), a global beverage leader known for its iconic soda, juices, coffees, teas, and alcoholic drinks, continues to demonstrate resilience and strategic growth. Operating through a franchise model with local bottlers, the company maintains a strong global footprint while adapting to evolving consumer habits. In September 2025, KO emphasized its c ...

Core Viewpoint - Coca-Cola stock is not recommended for purchase despite its historical performance and dividend track record, suggesting it is a hold at best [1][2][16]. Group 1: Dividend Analysis - Coca-Cola has increased its dividend for 63 consecutive years, achieving Dividend King status, which is a significant accomplishment [4]. - The current annual payout is $2.04 per share, providing a dividend yield of just above 3%, which is attractive compared to the average S&P 500 yield of less than 1.2% [5]. - However, PepsiCo offers a higher dividend yield of 3.9%, making it a more appealing choice for income-oriented investors [6]. Group 2: Stock Performance - Coca-Cola has underperformed the S&P 500 in total returns over most time periods since 1990, despite having a higher return for parts of the current year [8]. - The company's growth is limited due to its extensive global presence, leading to revenue growth that rarely exceeds single-digit rates [10][11]. - The current P/E ratio of 24 is slightly below its five-year average of 27, but given the slower revenue growth, it may not be an attractive investment [12]. Group 3: Berkshire Hathaway's Position - Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has held Coca-Cola shares since 1988, which may lead some investors to consider the stock [13]. - However, Berkshire has not bought or sold Coca-Cola shares since 1994, indicating a lack of recent interest in the stock [14]. - Berkshire's substantial dividend income from its Coca-Cola shares, amounting to $816 million this year, contrasts with the lower yield available to new shareholders [15]. Group 4: Conclusion - Given the challenges outlined, including competition from PepsiCo and limited growth prospects, Coca-Cola stock is not recommended for new purchases [16][17].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for traditional brands to find new positioning strategies to navigate consumer cycles and for new brands to achieve rapid growth across categories [1] - Cultural strategy has become a key element in brand strategy, especially in the high-end market, where product characteristics alone are insufficient to build brand momentum [2][4] - The Chinese market shows a disparity in brand momentum between local and international brands, with examples like China Red Bull and Austrian Red Bull illustrating different market scales and brand strategies [4] Group 2 - The white liquor industry in China is experiencing a shift from quantity to quality, with market size increasing from 536.4 billion yuan in 2018 to 756.3 billion yuan in 2023, despite production halving [8] - Major liquor brands are adopting cultural strategies to connect with younger consumers, moving from traditional relationship-based consumption to self-expression and cultural values [9] - Successful brands like Moutai and Wuliangye are developing comprehensive cultural systems to enhance their brand value and consumer connection [9] Group 3 - The article discusses the pitfalls of brands that focus solely on product attributes, such as Wanglaoji and Six Walnut, which have struggled to maintain market relevance [4][5] - The case of Nongfu Spring illustrates the importance of evolving brand narratives beyond product quality to include cultural and environmental themes, leading to a resurgence in market leadership [7] - The need for liquor brands to embrace cultural strategies is highlighted, as many still rely on outdated marketing approaches that fail to resonate with modern consumers [12] Group 4 - The article notes that many liquor brands lack a strategic understanding of consumer culture, which hinders their ability to establish effective brand positioning [12] - It emphasizes the importance of emotional and ideological engagement in building brand culture, as seen in successful examples from both domestic and international markets [15] - The competitive landscape necessitates that brands connect consumer culture with added value to differentiate themselves effectively [17]