Founder of Dividend Mantra. Founder of Mr. Free At 33. Co-Founder of Dividends & Income. I started blogging about my journey to financial independence back in 2011. By living well below my means and intelligently investing my hard-earned capital, I went from below broke at age 27 to financially free at 33 years old. I regularly create content on dividend growth investing, living off of dividends, undervalued high-quality dividend growth stocks, high-yield situations, and other long-term investment opportuni ...

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Lockheed Martin Corporation due to alleged violations of federal securities laws, with a deadline for investors to seek lead plaintiff status in a class action lawsuit by September 26, 2025 [2][3]. Group 1: Allegations Against Lockheed Martin - The complaint alleges that Lockheed Martin and its executives made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant issues regarding internal controls and risk management related to their contracts [3]. - Specific allegations include the company's inability to perform accurate reviews of program requirements and overstating its ability to meet contract commitments, leading to significant losses [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact and Stock Performance - On October 22, 2024, Lockheed Martin announced $80 million in losses due to higher-than-anticipated costs, resulting in a 6.12% drop in share price to $576.98 [4]. - On January 28, 2025, the company reported pre-tax losses of $1.7 billion, leading to a 9.2% decline in share price to $457.45 [5][6]. - On July 22, 2025, an additional $1.6 billion in pre-tax losses was disclosed, causing a further 10.8% drop in share price to $410.74 [7][8]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Investor Actions - The lead plaintiff in the class action will be the investor with the largest financial interest who is typical of class members, and any member can move to serve as lead plaintiff [9]. - Faruqi & Faruqi encourages individuals with information regarding Lockheed Martin's conduct to come forward, including whistleblowers and former employees [9].

Core Viewpoint - Lockheed Martin has faced operational challenges leading to a decline in stock performance, but its long-term value proposition remains strong due to a robust order backlog and strategic importance in the defense sector [2][3][14] Financial Performance - The company reported a pre-tax loss of $1.6 billion in Q2 2025, prompting a reduction in full-year EPS guidance to a range of $21.70 - $22.00 [2][8] - Lockheed Martin's aeronautics division generated $7.4 billion in sales during Q2 2025, with the F-35 Lightning II being a key product [4] - The Missiles and Fire Control segment experienced an 11% year-over-year sales growth, driven by demand for essential tactical weapons [5] Order Backlog and Revenue Visibility - As of Q2 2025, Lockheed Martin reported a total backlog of $166.5 billion, providing exceptional visibility into future revenue [6][7] - This backlog insulates the company from short-term economic volatility, reinforcing its status as a defensive stock [7] Shareholder Returns - The company maintains a dividend yield of 2.86% and has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years, with an annual dividend of $13.20 [10] - Lockheed Martin's dividend payout ratio stands at 74.32% of earnings but is more sustainable at 38% of cash flow, indicating strong capacity for continued payments [11] - In Q2 2025, the company returned $1.3 billion to shareholders through share repurchases, reducing the number of diluted shares outstanding [12] Analyst Outlook - The consensus 12-month price target for Lockheed Martin is $494.00, suggesting an 8.32% upside from the current price [6][13] - Despite recent challenges, the company is viewed as a core holding for long-term, defense-oriented portfolios due to its strategic product line and commitment to shareholder returns [14]

Group 1: Investment Opportunities - The article emphasizes the importance of purchasing quality stocks at discounted prices, particularly dividend stocks, to maximize yield [1] - It highlights three S&P 500 dividend stocks that are currently down significantly from their highs, presenting potential buying opportunities [2] Group 2: Verizon Communications - Verizon Communications is noted for its stable dividend yield of 6.2%, which has been raised annually for the past 18 years, despite a nearly 30% decline from its late-2019 peak [5][6] - The company has a substantial debt load of $124 billion, resulting in annual interest payments of approximately $6.6 billion, but it is still capable of funding its dividend [7][8] Group 3: Accenture - Accenture, valued at $158 billion, generated $65 billion in revenue last fiscal year, with a net income of $7.7 billion, showcasing its diverse business model that includes both consulting and managed services [9][10] - The stock has decreased by 36% from its peak due to market fears regarding tariffs and rising interest rates, but the company reported an 8% year-over-year revenue increase last quarter [12][13] Group 4: Lockheed Martin - Lockheed Martin's stock has fallen 26% from its October high, primarily due to reduced orders for F-35 fighter jets, although this segment accounts for less than one-third of its total revenue [14][15] - The company is still expected to achieve revenue growth, projecting around $74 billion for 2025, and has maintained a solid dividend yield of 2.9%, having increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years [18][19]

Core Insights - The article discusses the foundational development and advancements of stealth technology in the U.S. and China's rapid progress in this field, highlighting the competitive dynamics between the two nations [1][3][6]. U.S. Stealth Technology Development - Stealth technology research in the U.S. began in the 1970s, with key contributions from Ben Rich at Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works, leading to significant projects like the F-117 and B-2 bombers [1][3]. - The F-117, developed from 1975 to 1981, achieved unprecedented low detectability through innovative design and radar-absorbing coatings, demonstrating its effectiveness during the Gulf War in 1991 [1][3]. - The U.S. Department of Defense continues to invest heavily in maintaining its stealth technology advantage, allocating $5 billion in 2023 for new stealth material research [3]. China's Stealth Technology Advancements - China began to catch up in stealth technology in the 2010s, with the J-20 stealth fighter entering service in 2017, featuring advanced engines and improved stealth capabilities [3][4]. - In 2024, a breakthrough was achieved with the development of a revolutionary iron-based stealth coating that absorbs electromagnetic waves and reduces infrared radiation by 80%, with a production cost of only $1 per kilogram [4][10]. - The introduction of new materials has significantly enhanced the operational durability of Chinese aircraft, such as the J-20 and J-35, which require less frequent maintenance compared to U.S. counterparts like the F-22 [10][14]. Competitive Dynamics - The competition in stealth technology has intensified, with the U.S. increasing its F-35 upgrade budget in response to China's advancements, although attempts to replicate Chinese materials have been unsuccessful [16][18]. - By 2025, China's stealth aircraft fleet is projected to surpass that of the U.S., with significant investments in military modernization, including a defense budget of $237 billion, 12% of which is allocated for stealth missile projects [14][16]. - The article emphasizes that while the U.S. has historically led in stealth technology, China has emerged as a formidable innovator, potentially reshaping global military balance [18].

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of Lockheed Martin Corporation regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and lack of effective internal controls during a specified class period [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations - The complaint alleges that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls related to risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rates [3]. - It is claimed that the company did not have adequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [3]. - Lockheed Martin is accused of overstating its ability to meet contract commitments regarding cost, quality, and schedule, leading to potential significant losses [3]. Group 2: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is defined as January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [3]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by the deadline of September 26, 2025, to potentially become lead plaintiffs [4]. - Participants will be enrolled in a portfolio monitoring system to receive updates on the case's progress [4]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm focused on protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [5]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors affected by misleading statements [5].

Core Insights - The US military is experiencing significant delays in the delivery of F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters, with 2024 deliveries averaging a delay of 238 days [1][2] - The delays are primarily attributed to the Technology Refresh 3 (TR-3) upgrades, which are part of a modernization effort that has seen costs increase by approximately $6 billion and timelines extend by at least five years [2] - Despite the delays and rising costs, the Pentagon plans to procure around 2,500 F-35 aircraft, and international allies continue to place orders for the fighter jet [5][6] Delivery Delays - In 2023, most F-35s delivered were late, averaging a delay of 61 days, while in 2024, every delivered aircraft was late [1] - The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that the structure of on-time delivery incentives allowed contractors to deliver aircraft up to 60 days late and still receive some incentive fees [3] Cost and Budget Implications - The estimated lifetime cost of the F-35 program has risen to over $2 trillion, covering procurement, operations, and sustainment [6] - The modernization effort, originally budgeted at $2 billion, is now expected to cost significantly more due to the delays and additional requirements [2] Operational Readiness - The F-35 fleet's mission-capable rate is just over 50%, indicating ongoing challenges with readiness and reliability [6] - Lockheed Martin aims to deliver between 170 to 190 F-35s in the current year while continuing to implement Block 4 capabilities [4]

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Lockheed Martin Corporation, alleging that the company misled investors about its financial health by failing to disclose inadequate internal controls to assess program risks [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Misrepresentations - The lawsuit claims that Lockheed Martin overstated its ability to deliver on contracts in its Aeronautics and Rotary and Mission Systems (RMS) segments, presenting a false view of its operations [2]. - It is alleged that the company lacked effective internal controls and procedures to accurately review program requirements and risks, leading to undisclosed significant losses [2]. Group 2: Financial Disclosures and Impact - On July 22, 2025, Lockheed Martin disclosed an additional $950 million in pre-tax losses for its Aeronautics segment and $570 million for its RMS segment, primarily due to issues with the Canadian Maritime Helicopter Program [3]. - Following these disclosures, Lockheed Martin's stock price experienced a significant drop, with shares falling almost 11% on the final disclosure [4]. Group 3: Investigation and Systemic Issues - Hagens Berman is investigating whether the substantial losses were a foreseeable consequence of poor internal controls and a failure to communicate risks accurately to investors [5]. - The investigation suggests that the scale and recurrence of losses indicate a systemic issue rather than isolated problems, raising questions about management's awareness of internal control deficiencies [6]. Group 4: Additional Financial Losses - On January 28, 2025, Lockheed Martin reported $1.8 billion in pre-tax losses in its Aeronautics segment [7]. - On April 17, 2025, the company announced the departure of its CFO, which may indicate internal challenges [7].

Core Viewpoint - Lockheed Martin Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its internal controls and contract commitments, which may lead to significant losses for the company [1]. Group 1: Allegations - The complaint alleges that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls related to its risk-adjusted contracts, including the reporting of its risk-adjusted profit booking rate [1]. - It is claimed that the company did not have adequate procedures for conducting comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [1]. - Lockheed Martin is accused of overstating its ability to fulfill contract commitments in terms of cost, quality, and schedule [1]. - As a result of these issues, the company is likely to report significant losses, and the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were materially misleading [1]. Group 2: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is defined as January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1]. - Shareholders who purchased shares during this period are encouraged to register for the class action, with a deadline set for September 26, 2025 [2]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [2]. Group 3: Law Firm Information - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of investors affected by deceit and fraud [3]. - The firm aims to ensure that companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements or omissions [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Lockheed Martin Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 due to misleading statements and lack of effective internal controls, resulting in significant financial losses during the specified class period [1][3]. Summary by Sections Class Action Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is titled Khan v. Lockheed Martin Corporation and covers purchasers or acquirers of Lockheed Martin securities from January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until September 26, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. Allegations Against Lockheed Martin - The lawsuit claims that Lockheed Martin made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose critical information regarding its internal controls and risk management practices [3]. - Specific allegations include: - Lack of effective internal controls over risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rates [3]. - Inadequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements and risks [3]. - Overstating the company's ability to meet contract commitments in terms of cost, quality, and schedule [3]. - Likelihood of reporting significant losses as a result of these issues [3]. Financial Impact and Stock Performance - On October 22, 2024, Lockheed Martin announced an $80 million loss on a classified program, leading to a stock price drop of over 6% [4]. - On January 28, 2025, the company reported pre-tax losses of $1.7 billion related to classified programs, causing a stock price decline of more than 9% [5]. - On July 22, 2025, an additional $1.6 billion in pre-tax losses was disclosed, including $950 million related to the Aeronautics Classified program, resulting in a nearly 11% drop in stock price [6]. Lead Plaintiff Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Lockheed Martin securities during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status [7]. - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm for litigation [7]. About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [8]. - The firm has a strong track record in obtaining significant recoveries in securities class action cases [8].