Core Viewpoint - The Lockheed Martin Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 due to misleading statements and lack of effective internal controls, resulting in significant financial losses during the specified class period [1][3]. Summary by Sections Class Action Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is titled Khan v. Lockheed Martin Corporation and covers purchasers or acquirers of Lockheed Martin securities from January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until September 26, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. Allegations Against Lockheed Martin - The lawsuit claims that Lockheed Martin made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose critical information regarding its internal controls and risk management practices [3]. - Specific allegations include: - Lack of effective internal controls over risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rates [3]. - Inadequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements and risks [3]. - Overstating the company's ability to meet contract commitments in terms of cost, quality, and schedule [3]. - Likelihood of reporting significant losses as a result of these issues [3]. Financial Impact and Stock Performance - On October 22, 2024, Lockheed Martin announced an $80 million loss on a classified program, leading to a stock price drop of over 6% [4]. - On January 28, 2025, the company reported pre-tax losses of $1.7 billion related to classified programs, causing a stock price decline of more than 9% [5]. - On July 22, 2025, an additional $1.6 billion in pre-tax losses was disclosed, including $950 million related to the Aeronautics Classified program, resulting in a nearly 11% drop in stock price [6]. Lead Plaintiff Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Lockheed Martin securities during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status [7]. - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm for litigation [7]. About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [8]. - The firm has a strong track record in obtaining significant recoveries in securities class action cases [8].

Core Viewpoint - Lockheed Martin has shown strong stock performance recently, with a return of +7.5% over the past month, outperforming the S&P 500 composite's +3.8% and the Zacks Aerospace - Defense industry's +2.3% [1] Earnings Estimate Revisions - The current quarter's earnings estimate for Lockheed is $6.36 per share, reflecting a -7% change year-over-year, with a slight adjustment of -0.2% in the last 30 days [4] - The consensus earnings estimate for the current fiscal year is $22.4, indicating a -21.3% year-over-year change, with a recent change of +0.2% [4] - For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate is $29.5, showing a +31.7% change from the previous year, with a minor adjustment of -0.1% [5] - Lockheed holds a Zacks Rank 3 (Hold), influenced by recent changes in earnings estimates and other related factors [6] Projected Revenue Growth - The consensus sales estimate for the current quarter is $18.54 billion, indicating an +8.4% year-over-year change [8] - Revenue estimates for the current and next fiscal years are $74.3 billion and $77.23 billion, reflecting changes of +4.6% and +3.9%, respectively [8] Last Reported Results and Surprise History - In the last reported quarter, Lockheed generated revenues of $18.16 billion, a +0.2% year-over-year change, with an EPS of $7.29 compared to $7.11 a year ago [9] - The reported revenues were -2.21% below the Zacks Consensus Estimate, while the EPS exceeded estimates by +12.33% [9] - Lockheed has consistently beaten consensus EPS estimates over the last four quarters, but has only surpassed revenue estimates once during this period [10] Valuation - Lockheed is graded B in the Zacks Value Style Score, indicating it is trading at a discount compared to its peers [14]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Lockheed Martin Corporation, alleging securities fraud that affected investors between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls regarding its risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rate [2]. - It is alleged that the company did not have adequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [2]. - The complaint states that Lockheed Martin overstated its ability to fulfill contract commitments in terms of cost, quality, and schedule, leading to a likelihood of significant losses [2]. - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants about the company's business and prospects were materially misleading [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until September 26, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff [3]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [4].

Core Insights - Nations are enhancing defense capabilities with hypersonic weapons seen as a potential game-changer due to their speed and maneuverability, posing a threat to existing defense systems [1] - Lockheed Martin Corp. has been a leader in hypersonic technology development for 60 years, with programs like ARRW, CPS, and LRHW [2][9] Company Developments - Lockheed's Mako missile is designed for the U.S. Air Force's SiAW program and is being refined for speed and cost-effectiveness to attract customers [3] - The successful deployment of Lockheed's LRHW system by the U.S. Army during Talisman Sabre 25 highlights the demand for hypersonic weapons among U.S. allies and potential future contracts [4][9] Industry Context - The U.S. is heavily investing in hypersonic technology to compete with China and Russia, benefiting defense contractors like RTX Corp. and Northrop Grumman [5] - RTX is involved in the Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept program and is transitioning the LTAMDS radar to production [6] - Northrop Grumman develops both hypersonic weapons and counter-hypersonic systems, utilizing scramjet technology and Glide Phase Interceptor capabilities [7] Market Performance - Lockheed's shares have increased by 7.4% in the past month, outperforming the industry growth of 1.4% [8] - Lockheed is trading at a forward 12-month earnings multiple of 16.77, which is lower than the industry average of 28.04 [10]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025, about the September 26, 2025, lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by September 26, 2025 [3] - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4] - Rosen Law Firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013 [4] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Lockheed Martin made false and misleading statements regarding its internal controls and ability to meet contract commitments, which misled investors [5] - Specific claims include a lack of effective internal controls, inaccurate reviews of program requirements, and an overstatement of the company's delivery capabilities [5] - The lawsuit asserts that these misrepresentations likely led to significant losses for investors when the true details became public [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights China's comprehensive control over 17 types of rare earth elements, which significantly impacts the U.S. military's sixth-generation aircraft project, demonstrating that financial investments alone cannot overcome technological barriers [1][13]. Group 1: Rare Earth Control - China accounts for over 60% of global rare earth production and 90% of refined supply, making it a critical supplier for U.S. military equipment [3]. - The introduction of China's Rare Earth Management Regulations has led to export controls on seven medium and heavy rare earth elements, requiring U.S. companies to apply for permits [3][5]. - 87% of the supply chain for 153 types of U.S. military equipment relies on Chinese rare earth processing [3][5]. Group 2: U.S. Military Response - The U.S. Department of Defense has been urgently meeting to address the impact of China's rare earth controls on military production lines, with companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing expressing significant concerns [5][6]. - The NGAD sixth-generation aircraft project has been halted for review due to material supply issues, highlighting the dependency on rare earth elements for advanced military technology [5][11]. Group 3: Technological Disparity - The U.S. is approximately 20 years behind China in rare earth separation and purification technology, which poses a significant challenge for rebuilding its supply chain [8][13]. - China has established a complete rare earth industrial chain, from mining to refining, while the U.S. struggles to restart its own operations [8][9]. Group 4: Strategic Investment and Challenges - The Biden administration's $100 billion investment aims to rebuild the rare earth supply chain by 2027, but this timeline is seen as unrealistic compared to China's immediate control measures [13]. - The U.S. faces challenges in attracting private capital to the rare earth sector, which is heavily reliant on government subsidies [13]. Group 5: Historical Context and Future Outlook - The U.S. relinquished its rare earth industry in the 1990s due to environmental and cost concerns, leading to a significant technological and industrial gap with China [13]. - China's ongoing innovation in rare earth materials and applications continues to widen the gap, making it difficult for the U.S. to regain its former position [13].

Core Viewpoint - Robbins LLP has initiated a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who acquired Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) securities between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025, alleging that the company misled investors regarding its business prospects [1][2]. Allegations - The complaint states that Lockheed Martin failed to disclose several critical issues, including: - Lack of efficient internal controls related to risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rates [2] - Absence of effective procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [2] - Overstatement of the company's ability to meet contract commitments regarding cost, quality, and schedule [2] - Likelihood of reporting significant losses as a result of these issues [2] Financial Impact - On July 22, 2025, Lockheed Martin disclosed an additional $1.6 billion in pre-tax losses on classified programs, which included: - $950 million in losses from the Aeronautics Classified program - $570 million in losses from the Canadian Maritime Helicopter Program - $95 million charge related to the Turkish Utility Helicopter Program - Following this announcement, the company's share price dropped by $49.79, or over 10%, closing at $410.74 on the same day [3]. Class Action Participation - Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiffs must submit their papers by September 26, 2025. Participation in the case is not required to be eligible for recovery [4]. Company Background - Robbins LLP is recognized for its leadership in shareholder rights litigation, focusing on helping shareholders recover losses and improve corporate governance since 2002 [5].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government is interested in acquiring equity stakes in defense contractors, specifically targeting Lockheed Martin following a recent investment in Intel [1] Group 1: Government Interest in Defense Sector - The U.S. Commerce Secretary stated that the Trump administration is considering acquiring stakes in defense companies [1] - Lockheed Martin's annual report indicates that 73% of its net sales in 2024 will come from the U.S. government, with 65% of that from the Department of Defense [1] Group 2: Recent Investment in Intel - On February 22, Intel announced an agreement with the U.S. government for an investment of $8.9 billion, acquiring 9.9% of the company's common stock [1] - President Trump expressed a desire for more similar investment cases following the Intel deal [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government is considering acquiring equity stakes in defense contractors, particularly Lockheed Martin, following a similar investment in Intel, indicating a trend of government intervention in key industries [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Government's Investment in Defense - The U.S. Commerce Secretary revealed that the Trump administration is interested in acquiring shares of major defense contractors, specifically naming Lockheed Martin [3]. - Lockheed Martin derives 97% of its revenue from the U.S. government, with 73% of its net sales in 2024 expected to come from government contracts, primarily from the Department of Defense [3]. Group 2: Intel's Agreement with the U.S. Government - Intel announced an agreement with the U.S. government for an investment of $8.9 billion, acquiring 9.9% of the company's shares at $20.47 per share [5]. - The funding for this investment comes from previously allocated subsidies under the CHIPS and Science Act, aimed at revitalizing the struggling semiconductor industry [5]. Group 3: Implications of Government Ownership - Intel expressed concerns that the government's stake could pose commercial risks, particularly affecting its international sales, which account for nearly 80% of its revenue [7]. - The involvement of the U.S. government as a major shareholder may lead to stricter foreign subsidy reviews and impact Intel's operations in international markets [7].

Group 1 - The U.S. government is considering acquiring equity in defense contractor Lockheed Martin, following its recent investment in Intel [1][2] - U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo highlighted that 97% of Lockheed Martin's revenue comes from the U.S. government, indicating a close relationship between the company and the government [1] - In 2024, Lockheed Martin reported that 73% of its net sales would come from the U.S. government, with 65% specifically from the Department of Defense [1] Group 2 - Intel announced a deal with the U.S. government for an $8.9 billion investment, acquiring 9.9% of the company's common stock [2] - The funding for Intel's investment comes from previously allocated subsidies under the CHIPS and Science Act, totaling $5.7 billion, along with an additional $3.2 billion from government-funded projects [2] - Following the transaction, the U.S. government will become a major shareholder in Intel, with President Trump expressing interest in similar future investments [2]