Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit against the Journal and Rupert Murdoch is perceived as a threat to free speech, particularly for those publishing content that may be disfavored by the President [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit is described as "meritless," indicating a belief that it lacks substantial legal foundation [1] - Lawyers for the Journal argue that the lawsuit could deter individuals from expressing their views or publishing content critical of the President [1]

Core Points - Donald Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times has been dismissed by a judge, allowing him 28 days to amend his complaint [1][2] - The judge criticized Trump's complaint as a "decidedly improper" attempt to attack an adversary, emphasizing that a complaint should inform defendants clearly and not serve as a platform for vitriol [2] - Trump's legal team remains committed to holding the media accountable, while The New York Times welcomed the ruling, stating the complaint was more political than legal [3] Group 1 - The lawsuit was initiated after The New York Times published a report regarding alleged notes Trump sent to Jeffrey Epstein, which Trump claims are false [1][6] - The judge has mandated that Trump submit an amended complaint not exceeding 40 pages within the given timeframe [2] - Trump's social media post described The New York Times as "one of the worst and most degenerate newspapers," reflecting his ongoing conflict with the media [6] Group 2 - The controversy also involves a lewd birthday message Trump allegedly sent to Epstein, which was later published by Congress [7][8] - Trump's assertion that the notes were not written by him is based on claims that the handwriting and signature do not match his own [8] - The media landscape is further complicated by Trump's comments about revoking licenses from networks that provide negative coverage, indicating a broader tension between his administration and the media [11][14]

Core Points - President Donald Trump's $15 billion lawsuit against The New York Times was dismissed by a federal judge due to the complaint being excessively lengthy and not meeting the requirements of Rule 8 [1] - The judge noted that the lawsuit, spanning 85 pages, contained repetitive and superfluous allegations, including claims about Trump's reality TV show "The Apprentice" [1] - Trump has the option to re-file the lawsuit within 28 days, with a requirement to limit the complaint to under 40 pages [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit accused The New York Times of making defamatory statements aimed at damaging Trump's reputation and sabotaging his 2024 presidential candidacy [3] - Specific articles and a book titled "Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father's Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success" were highlighted in the lawsuit [3] Group 2 - The Trump administration has a history of targeting the media through various legal actions and funding cuts, including a recent $1.1 billion funding cut from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting [4] - A previous lawsuit against CBS News resulted in a $16 million settlement after Trump claimed deceptive editing of an interview [4]

Core Points - A federal judge dismissed President Trump's defamation lawsuit against The New York Times before the newspaper could respond, citing the lawsuit's excessive length as a primary reason [1] - The judge, Steven Merryday, criticized the lawsuit as being more of a political document than a serious legal filing, stating that it was "tedious and burdensome" with excessive detail [2][9] - Trump's legal team intends to continue pursuing the lawsuit, which seeks $15 billion in damages and also names Penguin Random House as a defendant [3][8] Summary by Sections - **Lawsuit Dismissal** - The lawsuit was dismissed due to its length, with the judge stating it exceeded the acceptable page limit [1][11] - The judge provided Trump's attorneys with 28 days to re-file the lawsuit, limiting the new filing to 40 pages [2] - **Judge's Critique** - Judge Merryday described the lawsuit as improper under federal court rules and noted that it contained repetitive and superfluous details [9][11] - The judge highlighted that the first count of defamation was not explained until page 80 of the 85-page complaint [10] - **Trump's Response** - A spokesperson for Trump's legal team confirmed that the president would continue with the lawsuit, emphasizing accountability for what he terms "Fake News" [3] - The lawsuit includes a long list of grievances against The New York Times and claims regarding Trump's political and business successes [9]

Core Points - A federal judge dismissed President Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, labeling it as "decidedly improper and impermissible" but allowed for a shorter amended complaint to be filed within a month [2][4] - The judge criticized the original lawsuit for being excessively lengthy and filled with irrelevant praise and allegations, consuming 85 pages with only a few pages dedicated to the actual claims [2][3] - The judge emphasized that a legal complaint should not serve as a platform for political rhetoric or personal grievances, likening it to a public relations tool rather than a serious legal document [3] Legal Proceedings - Trump and his legal team have 28 days to submit an amended lawsuit, which must not exceed 40 pages, excluding certain elements [4] - The original complaint included Penguin Random House as a defendant due to a book published by them that Trump’s lawyers claimed was defamatory [5] - Trump's legal team expressed intent to hold the media accountable through the lawsuit, while The New York Times welcomed the judge's ruling, indicating the complaint was more political than legal [6]

(Bloomberg) — A US judge in Florida for now tossed out President Donald Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times days after it was filed, finding the president’s lawyers failed to follow court rules requiring “short, plain, direct” claims. Most Read from Bloomberg US District Judge Steven Merryday issued an order on Friday concluding that Trump’s lawsuit “unmistakably and inexcusably” violated the court’s rules by featuring “repetitive,” “superfluous” and “florid” allegations and ...

A Florida judge on Friday temporarily dismissed U.S. President Donald Trump's $15B lawsuit against The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) for being too long and violating court rules. According to U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday, Trump's lawyers did not follow the court rules ...

央视记者获悉，当地时间19日，法庭文件显示，美国法官驳回了美国总统特朗普对《纽约时报》提起的 150亿美元诉讼，并允许其修改诉状。 （文章来源：央视新闻客户端） 法官裁定特朗普的起诉书违反联邦规则，需提供简明扼要的陈述以证明原告应获赔偿。法官表示，"起 诉书并非谩骂攻讦的公开论坛，亦非攻击对手的受保护平台。" 9月15日，美国总统特朗普在其社交媒体"真实社交"发文，称对《纽约时报》提起150亿美元诽谤诉讼。 《纽约时报》16日回应特朗普的表态称，其提起的150亿美元诽谤诉讼"毫无法律依据"，并称这是"试图 压制和阻挠独立报道"的行为。 ...

Core Points - A federal judge dismissed Donald Trump's $15 billion lawsuit against The New York Times, stating the complaint was "improper and impermissible" [1][2] - The judge allowed Trump's legal team to file a new complaint within 28 days, with a maximum length of 48 pages [1] - The lawsuit accused The New York Times of being a "mouthpiece of the Democrat party" and claimed it misrepresented Trump's rise to fame [3] Legal Proceedings - Judge Steven Merryday emphasized that the complaint did not adhere to the requirements of Rule 8, which governs the format and content of legal complaints [2][4] - The judge criticized the complaint for being more of a public relations statement rather than a formal legal document, stating it should inform defendants in a professional manner [4] Trump's Position - Trump's lawsuit included grievances against specific articles and authors, claiming they falsely portrayed his celebrity status as being created by the show "The Apprentice" [3] - A spokesperson for Trump's legal team indicated that the lawsuit aims to hold the media accountable and will continue despite the judge's ruling [4] The New York Times' Response - The New York Times responded to the lawsuit by asserting that it lacks merit and is an attempt to suppress independent journalism [4]

A federal judge on Friday struck Donald Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times over its content. ...