Core Points - A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased V.F. Corporation ("VFC") securities between October 30, 2023, and May 20, 2025, inclusive [1] - VFC investors have until November 12, 2025, to file a lead plaintiff motion [1]

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The suit alleges defendants issued false statements concerning V.F. business and prospects, resulting in its stock trading at inflated prices. ...

NEW YORK , Sept. 22, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of V.F. ...

Group 1 - A shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired V.F. Corporation securities between October 30, 2023, and May 20, 2025 [1] - The complaint alleges that the defendants made misrepresentations regarding V.F. Corporation's business plans [2] - Investors interested in serving as lead plaintiff must file papers by November 12, 2025, and representation is on a contingency fee basis, meaning shareholders pay no fees or expenses [3] Group 2 - Bernstein Liebhard LLP has recovered over $3.5 billion for its clients since 1993 and has represented both individual investors and large public and private pension funds [4]

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the fireworks show organized by Arc'teryx and Cai Guoqiang in the Himalayas highlights the failure of decision-making processes within organizations, where individuals prioritize personal interests over environmental and social responsibilities [2][10][12]. Group 1: Decision-Making Failures - The ultimate decision-maker for the fireworks show failed to recognize potential issues due to being trapped in an "information cocoon" created by those involved in the project [2][4]. - Each participant in the project had a vested interest that led to selective blindness regarding the risks associated with the event [4][9]. - The local approval agencies, marketing teams, and artists all focused on their own objectives, neglecting the broader implications of the event [7][8][12]. Group 2: Organizational Dynamics - In large organizations, individuals often adopt a mindset of merely executing orders from above, leading to a lack of accountability [5][16]. - The pressure to please superiors and achieve personal career goals results in a collective avoidance of addressing potential risks [12][17]. - The environment fosters a paradox where individuals are reluctant to voice dissenting opinions, fearing repercussions for challenging popular ideas [15][16]. Group 3: Risk Awareness and Prevention - The best opportunity to prevent such incidents is during the initial idea phase, before significant resources are committed [13][14]. - Once a project gains momentum and involves multiple stakeholders, it becomes increasingly difficult to withdraw or address concerns [14]. - The reluctance to oppose a favored idea, especially when it is well-received by leadership, creates a culture where risks are ignored [15][16].

Core Viewpoint - The recent fireworks show by the outdoor brand Arc'teryx in the Himalayas has sparked controversy, highlighting the potential risks of marketing strategies that disregard ecological and ethical considerations [1][2] Group 1: Brand and Marketing Implications - The China Advertising Association criticized Arc'teryx for attempting to enhance brand visibility through creative marketing that could harm the fragile ecosystem at an altitude of over 5000 meters, leading to a loss of consumer trust [1] - The incident serves as a reminder that brand value is built over time but can be jeopardized by a single misstep that crosses ethical boundaries [1][2] - The association emphasized that marketing creativity must respect ecological, moral, and policy boundaries to avoid backlash and damage to brand reputation [2] Group 2: Industry Standards and Responsibilities - The China Advertising Association called for the advertising industry to adhere to ethical, ecological, and social value standards, reinforcing the need for self-regulation within the industry [2] - It was noted that marketing should not be an unbounded showcase but should be rooted in correct social guidance and positive values [2] - The association expressed hope that the advertising industry would learn from this incident, stressing the importance of respecting ecological protection and moral guidelines in marketing efforts [2]

Core Viewpoint - The event, part of a brand's initiative, aimed to explore local culture through art but faced widespread criticism regarding its environmental impact and cultural insensitivity [1][3][29] Group 1: Event Description - The performance took place at an altitude of approximately 4600 meters, with fireworks launched along a ridge extending to 5050 meters, creating a visual spectacle [1] - The event was broadcasted online and quickly became a trending topic on social media, raising concerns about its artistic value and environmental consequences [3] Group 2: Environmental Concerns - The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is recognized as a fragile ecological zone, with limited capacity to recover from disturbances, making it highly susceptible to environmental degradation [10][11] - The area where the event occurred features alpine meadows, which are critical for the local ecosystem and difficult to restore once damaged [13][15] - The claim that the event would not harm the environment was met with skepticism, as the ecological impact of fireworks and related activities could be severe [9][16] Group 3: Criticism of Mitigation Measures - The organizers suggested using salt bricks to lure small animals away from the fireworks area, a method deemed impractical and ineffective for the local wildlife [17][19] - The use of biodegradable materials in fireworks was questioned, as the degradation process in high-altitude environments may not be effective due to low temperatures and limited microbial activity [20][22] Group 4: Legal Implications - The recent enactment of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Ecological Protection Law emphasizes the need for strict protection of fragile ecosystems, which the event may have violated [25][26] - Potential legal repercussions for activities that could harm the environment in sensitive areas were highlighted, indicating that the event could face scrutiny under this new legislation [28] Group 5: Aftermath and Accountability - Following the backlash, both the brand and the artist issued apologies, but the long-term ecological damage remains a significant concern [29][30]

（原标题：烟花秀引争议，蔡国强、始祖鸟道歉） "云端珠峰"微信公众号9月21日凌晨发布情况通报：9月20日，《蔡国强：升龙》烟花秀视频在网络发布 后，引发网民关注。日喀则市委、市政府高度重视，已成立调查组第一时间赶赴现场核查，后续将根据 核查结果依法依规处理。 0:00 根据品牌此前发出的相关宣传物料显示，"本次艺术创作所有活动均在科学评估和严格指导下进行，秉 持对自然最大的敬畏。创作使用的是环保材料，所选用的彩色粉为生物可降解材料"，会最大化减少烟 花爆破对区域环境造成的负面影响。 近日，户外品牌始祖鸟联手艺术家蔡国强在喜马拉雅山放烟火，引发争议。 9月21日早间，@ARCTERYX始祖鸟 发布致歉信称，感谢大家对青藏高原生态环境的关切与监督，并 诚恳接受所有的批评和建议。向各位表达最诚挚的歉意。始祖鸟承诺将依据评估结果和社会各界反馈， 展开及时有效的补救行动。 同日，蔡国强在短视频平台发布关于《升龙》艺术项目的说明："虚心接受大家对于在雪域高原实施艺 术创作的所有批评，并诚挚地感谢大家对我们的关心和提醒。我们确实存在很多考虑不周之处，我深表 歉意。" 说明中称，将主动配合第三方机构及相关部门，就此事对自然 ...

智通财经记者 | 翟瑞民 日前，户外品牌始祖鸟联手艺术家蔡国强在喜马拉雅山脉燃放了一场烟花，引发巨大争议。此举是否产 生环境污染？是否破坏当地生态环境？目前，品牌方、艺术家工作室和当地政府已经对此有所回应。 但是，上述相关说法并未能打消公众的疑虑。什么环保材料能使得烟花排放达到环保标准？燃放过程与 选址曾评估了哪些环境因素？燃放结束后当地政府是否对现场进行了足够的跟进监测？哪些被迫离开燃 放区的鼠兔等当地"居民"是否已经安全返回"家园"？这些问题都有待相关方面后续作出更详细的说明。 在人们常识理解中，烟花燃放不止造成空气污染，还会带来声光污染和灰尘污染。对于这种人迹罕至的 高原地带，各类动植物和空气、土壤才是生态环境的"主角"。一场场面壮观的烟花秀突如其来，可能导 致一整片生态系统在微观运行层面发生改变。涉事操作方不能只顾追求眼前漫天绚烂的行为艺术，在遭 受质疑时反而语焉不详，漠视事件可能带来的生态危险系数。政府监管也不能仅仅停留在审批合规就万 事大吉的层面，对于此类可能影响高原山脉生态系统的做法，应实施更严格的审批制度和执法监督程 序。 喜马拉雅山脉位于青藏高原的南缘。青藏高原是我国重要的生态安全屏障，是亚 ...

Group 1 - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of V.F. Corporation securities between October 30, 2023, and May 20, 2025 [1] - Investors who purchased V.F. Corporation securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A lead plaintiff must move the Court by November 12, 2025, to represent other class members in the litigation [3] Group 2 - The lawsuit alleges that V.F. Corporation's defendants disseminated materially false and misleading statements regarding the company's turnaround plans, particularly concerning the Vans brand [5] - The lawsuit claims that defendants concealed the need for additional significant reset actions to return the Vans brand to growth, which would negatively impact revenue growth [5]