Core Viewpoint - V.F. Corporation (NYSE: VFC) is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of disseminating materially false and misleading statements regarding its turnaround plans for the Vans brand, which has resulted in significant revenue setbacks [1]. Summary by Sections Allegations - The complaint claims that VFC concealed material adverse facts about the necessity for additional significant reset actions to return the Vans brand to growth, leading to a decline in revenue growth trajectory [1]. - Following the release of VFC's fiscal 2025 results on May 21, 2025, it was revealed that Vans' growth had declined from an 8% loss in the previous quarter to a 20% loss in the fourth quarter, with expectations of continued decline [1]. Financial Impact - VFC attributed its disappointing results and below-expectation guidance to "deliberately reduced revenue to eliminate unprofitable or unproductive businesses" and other unannounced actions [1]. - The company indicated that even without these deliberate actions, Vans would have experienced a "high single digit" revenue decline, suggesting a slowdown in growth compared to previous years [1]. - Following the announcement, VFC's stock price dropped from $14.43 per share on May 20, 2025, to $12.15 per share on May 21, 2025, marking a decline of approximately 15.8% in one day [1]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased VFC shares during the class period (October 30, 2023, to May 20, 2025) are encouraged to register for the class action lawsuit, with a deadline for lead plaintiff appointment set for November 12, 2025 [2]. - Registered shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software throughout the lifecycle of the case [2]. Legal Representation - The Gross Law Firm, a nationally recognized class action law firm, is representing the shareholders and aims to protect the rights of investors who have suffered losses due to misleading statements or omissions by VFC [3].

Group 1 - A class action lawsuit has been filed against VF Corporation (VFC) concerning allegations of securities fraud and unlawful business practices by the company and its officers [2][4] - Investors who purchased VFC securities during the Class Period have until November 12, 2025, to request appointment as Lead Plaintiff [2] - VFC reported a significant decline in the growth of its Vans brand, with losses increasing from 8% in the previous quarter to 20% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 [4] Group 2 - Following the disappointing financial results and guidance, VFC's stock price dropped by $2.21, or 15.8%, closing at $12.15 per share on May 21, 2025 [4] - The decline in revenue was described by VFC as a deliberate strategy to eliminate unprofitable or unproductive businesses [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the upcoming deadline of November 12, 2025, for investors to file a lead plaintiff motion in a case concerning V.F. Corporation (VFC) securities purchased between October 30, 2023, and May 20, 2025, indicating potential legal actions for investors who suffered losses during this period [1]. Group 1 - The law offices of Howard G. Smith are reminding investors about the deadline to participate in the ongoing securities litigation related to V.F. Corporation [1]. - The class period for the securities involved spans from October 30, 2023, to May 20, 2025, which is crucial for determining eligibility for the lead plaintiff motion [1]. - Investors who experienced financial losses in V.F. Corporation are encouraged to contact the law offices for participation in the case [1].

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $50,000 In VFC To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you suffered losses exceeding $50,000 in VFC between October 30, 2023 and May 20, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 Â (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] NEW YORK , Sept. ...

Core Points - The V.F. Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with a class period from October 30, 2023, to May 20, 2025 [1][3] - The lawsuit claims that V.F. Corporation misrepresented its revenue outlook and growth potential, particularly regarding the Vans brand, while downplaying risks associated with seasonality and macroeconomic factors [3][4] - Following the release of disappointing fiscal results on May 21, 2025, which included a decline in Vans' growth from an 8% loss to a 20% loss, V.F. Corporation's stock price dropped nearly 16% [4] Company Overview - V.F. Corporation, along with its subsidiaries, offers a range of branded apparel, footwear, and accessories for various demographics [2] - The company has been undergoing a significant inventory reset as part of a turnaround strategy, but has struggled to establish a sustainable growth model for the Vans brand [3][4] Legal Process - Investors who purchased V.F. Corporation securities during the class period can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, which allows them to represent the interests of all class members [5] - The lead plaintiff has the authority to select a law firm to litigate the case and does not need to be the lead plaintiff to share in any potential recovery [5] Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a prominent law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6] - The firm has a strong track record in obtaining significant recoveries in securities class action cases, including the largest recovery in history of $7.2 billion in the Enron case [6]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around V.F. Corporation's significant decline in growth for its Vans brand, which reported a 20% loss in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, worsening from an 8% loss in the previous quarter [3] - The company attributed its disappointing results and below-expectation guidance to deliberate actions aimed at eliminating unprofitable businesses, indicating that even without these actions, Vans would have experienced a high single-digit revenue decline [3] - Following the announcement of these results, VFC's share price dropped by $2.28, approximately 15.8%, from $14.43 on May 20, 2025, to $12.15 on May 21, 2025 [3] Group 2 - A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased VFC securities between October 30, 2023, and May 20, 2025, alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its turnaround plans for the Vans brand [4] - The lawsuit claims that the company concealed the need for additional significant reset actions to return the Vans brand to growth, which would adversely affect its revenue growth trajectory [4]

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, a leading national shareholder rights law firm, announces that a securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired V.F. Corporation ("VFC†or the "Company†) (NYSE: VFC) securities between October 30, 2023 and May 20, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period†). VFC investors have until November 12, 2025 to file a lead plaintiff motion. IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR V.F. CORPORA. ...

Core Points - The outdoor brand Arc'teryx collaborated with artist Cai Guoqiang to create an "art fireworks show" named "Ascension" in the Himalayas, which sparked controversy due to potential ecological damage [1][4] - Following public backlash, both the brand and the artist issued apologies and expressed willingness to remedy any environmental impact [1][3] - An investigation has been initiated by local authorities to assess the situation and determine appropriate actions based on findings [1][14] Group 1: Event Details - The fireworks show took place at an altitude of 5,500 meters, lasting 52 seconds and featuring 1,050 fireworks [9][11] - The event was located approximately 30 meters from the nearest water body and 6 kilometers from the nearest glacier [9][11] - Local villagers reported significant noise and vibrations during the event, with concerns about its impact on wildlife and agriculture [16][19] Group 2: Environmental Concerns - Environmental experts indicated that the fireworks could have adverse effects on the fragile ecosystem of the Tibetan Plateau, which is home to unique flora and fauna [19][21] - The use of biodegradable materials in the fireworks does not guarantee environmental safety, especially in high-altitude regions where decomposition rates are slow [21][23] - The destruction of the grass mat layer in alpine meadows could lead to soil erosion and long-term ecological damage, potentially taking decades to recover [23][25] Group 3: Legal and Ethical Implications - The event may have violated several environmental protection laws, including the Grassland Law of the People's Republic of China, which prohibits damaging activities in ecologically fragile areas [14][26] - Legal experts emphasized that the environmental impact of the fireworks show contradicts the principles of ecological conservation, regardless of the materials used [26]

2025.09. 23 本文字数：1050，阅读时长大约2分钟 近日，始祖鸟、蔡国强喜马拉雅烟花秀事件持续引发关注。蔡国强的现场感言视频也随之曝光。 他在发言中感谢了牧民配合、感谢聪明的动物们帮助、感谢始祖鸟，并称"支持我们在这里大闹天 宫"，相关表述再度引发热议。 另据央视新闻22日报道，记者在探访中发现，活动已过去3天，但在现场还能看到活动留下的痕迹。 "感谢牧民配合，也感谢聪明的动物们帮助，让我的点火线路畅通无阻。很感恩在场的大家和我一起 实现我年轻时的梦想，全力支持我们在这大闹天宫，或者我们一起大闹天宫。最后要感谢这片土地， 这里的人民和永恒的大自然，期待未来有机会和大家再次相聚世界屋脊。"蔡国强说。 对此，网友纷纷表示质疑："他也知道那里有动物啊！""就算是道歉还得问问人家小动物接不接受 呢！" 9月22日中午，"中国小动物保护协会"微信公众号发布文章"别让艺术惊扰生灵，这份'热闹'请适可 而止"，其中提到，中国小动物保护协会高度重视蔡国强与始祖鸟联合举办的烟花活动，协会对此次 事件可能给当地动物带来的影响深感忧虑。 9月22日，央视记者探访"升龙"艺术烟花活动举办地，在日喀则市江孜县热龙乡"查琼嘎 ...

据央视新闻9月22日消息，9月19日16时30分，户外品牌"始祖鸟"联手烟花设计师蔡国强，在日喀则市江 孜县热龙乡举办烟花活动，引发质疑。总台央视记者在活动举办地看到，活动已过去3天，但在现场还 能看到活动留下的痕迹。 据日喀则市生态环境局江孜县分局一位负责人告诉记者，此次活动在生态环境局已备案，由于烟花使用 的是环保材料，未进行环境评估，乡、村、县三级政府同意即可。政府此前开过多次会议，研究选址， 评估调查周围有哪些野生动物等，最终的选址不属于生态保护区，周围无人居住。 烟花秀现场工作人员讲述了当时烟火燃放的细节。据了解，艺术烟花活动燃放时间52秒，共燃放烟花 1050盆，采取钢筋扦插固定方式悬挂和烟花箱方式燃放。活动地点所在地的山体海拔4500米，植被以高 山草甸为主，虽然不涉及自然保护区、风景名胜区等自然保护地和生态保护红线，也不涉及林业，但距 离最近水体约30米，距离最近的冰川约6公里。 ...