The market expects Williams Companies, Inc. (The) (WMB) to deliver a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when it reports results for the quarter ended June 2025. This widely-known consensus outlook is important in assessing the company's earnings picture, but a powerful factor that might influence its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates. The stock might move higher if these key numbers top expectations in the upcoming earnings report, which is expect ...

Core Insights - Investors are focusing on dividend stocks for regular income amid market volatility [1][2] Group 1: EOG Resources - EOG Resources announced the acquisition of Encino Acquisition Partners for $5.6 billion, leading to a 5% increase in its quarterly dividend to $1.02 per share, with an annualized dividend of $4.08, resulting in a dividend yield of 3.4% [3][4] - Analyst Gabriele Sorbara maintains a buy rating on EOG with a price target of $155, expecting strong quarterly results and significant expansion in the Utica shale due to the acquisition [4][5] - EOG is projected to return at least 70% of its free cash flow to shareholders annually, with an estimated $976.6 million in capital returns, representing 107.7% of free cash flow and a 6.0% capital returns yield [6] Group 2: Williams Companies - Williams Companies offers a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share, with an annualized dividend of $2.00, reflecting a yield of 3.5% [8] - Analyst Elvira Scotto reaffirmed a buy rating on WMB with a price target of $63, while adjusting Q2 projections due to seasonal factors and commodity price changes [9][11] - Scotto is optimistic about WMB's long-term growth potential, supported by a robust backlog of projects and expected benefits from additional projects and pipeline revivals [12][13] Group 3: Verizon Communications - Verizon Communications reported solid Q2 results, raising its annual profit guidance and announcing a quarterly dividend of $0.6775 per share, with an annualized dividend of $2.71, resulting in a dividend yield of 6.3% [14][15] - Analyst Michael Rollins reiterated a buy rating on Verizon with a price target of $48, noting the company's strong performance and upgraded full-year guidance [15][16] - Despite mixed key performance indicators and increased promotional costs, Rollins believes Verizon is well-positioned to meet its full-year guidance and sustain financial growth [16][17]

Investment Returns - The total return on the Fund's net asset value for the first half of 2025 was 2.3%, with dividends and capital gains reinvested [1] - The S&P Energy Sector and the S&P 500 Materials Sector had returns of 0.8% and 6.0%, respectively, while the benchmark (S&P 500 Energy Sector 80% and S&P 500 Materials Sector 20%) returned 1.8% [1] - The total return on the Fund's market price for the same period was 3.1% [1] Annualized Comparative Returns - For the 1-year period, the Fund's net asset value (NAV) decreased by 2.2%, while the market price increased by 1.7% [4] - Over 3 years, the NAV returned 10.7% and the market price returned 12.3% [4] - The 5-year returns were 21.2% for NAV and 22.1% for market price, while the 10-year returns were 6.1% for NAV and 6.8% for market price [4] Net Asset Value - As of June 30, 2025, the Fund's net assets were $634.74 million, down from $689.99 million a year earlier [6] - The number of shares outstanding increased to 26,888,697 from 25,453,641 [6] - The net asset value per share decreased to $23.61 from $27.11 [6] Largest Equity Portfolio Holdings - The top ten equity holdings accounted for 62.9% of net assets, with Exxon Mobil Corporation at 22.7% and Chevron Corporation at 11.5% [7] - Other significant holdings included ConocoPhilips (5.3%), Linde plc (4.7%), and EOG Resources, Inc. (3.8%) [7] Industry Weightings - The Fund's net assets were allocated primarily to the energy sector, with Integrated Oil & Gas at 35.1% and Exploration & Production at 19.8% [9] - Other allocations included Storage & Transportation (11.6%), Chemicals (13.6%), and Metals & Mining (3.6%) [10]

Another Oils-Energy stock, which has outperformed the sector so far this year, is Williams Companies, Inc. (The) (WMB) . The stock has returned 7.6% year-to-date. For Williams Companies, Inc. (The), the consensus EPS estimate for the current year has increased 1.1% over the past three months. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). Breaking things down more, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. is a member of the Coal industry, which includes 8 individual companies and currently sits at #232 in the Zacks ...

Group 1 - The rising electricity consumption in the US is increasing the importance of natural gas as an energy source [1] - States like New York are committed to their stringent climate policies, posing challenges for companies in the natural gas sector [1] - The Williams Companies, Inc. faces significant challenges due to the conflicting dynamics of rising natural gas demand and strict climate regulations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The pipeline sector is positioned to offer high yields, predictable cash flows, and solid growth, particularly due to increasing natural gas demand from LNG exports and AI data centers. Company Summaries 1. Energy Transfer - Operates one of the largest midstream networks in the U.S. and is entering a growth phase with a capital expenditure budget increase from $3 billion to $5 billion focused on natural gas infrastructure in the Permian Basin [3][4] - Approximately 90% of EBITDA is tied to fee-based contracts, supporting a distribution yield of 7.2% with a target of 3% to 5% annual growth [5] 2. Enterprise Products Partners - Known for reliability, having raised distributions for 26 consecutive years, with 85% of revenue being fee-based and many contracts having take-or-pay terms [6][7] - Currently has $7.6 billion in projects under construction, with $6 billion expected to come online this year, focusing on high-return expansions in the NGL value chain [7] 3. Western Midstream - Offers a high yield of 9.5% with strong revenue visibility due to cost-of-service protections and minimum volume commitments in contracts [9][10] - Maintains conservative financial management with leverage below 3x and is investing in solid return projects like the $450 million Pathfinder produced-water pipeline [10][11] 4. Williams Companies - Yield is around 3.2%, but it has significant growth potential, particularly through its Transco pipeline system, which connects natural gas fields to growing markets [12][13] - Engaged in multiple expansion projects and a $1.6 billion investment in the Socrates project to serve data center demand [14] 5. Genesis Energy - Represents a turnaround story, having sold its soda ash business for $1.4 billion to reduce debt and improve cash flow [15][17] - Focused on growing its offshore pipeline system, with significant growth expected from upcoming deepwater projects and a marine segment on track for record earnings [18][19]

Core Insights - Williams Companies (WMB) has outperformed Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) in the past year, with a stock increase of 45.5% compared to EPD's 14.3% and the industry's 33.4% growth [1][3]. Company Performance - WMB is expanding its midstream operations through well-planned infrastructure projects like the Southeast Energy Connector and the Power Express Pipeline, which are either operational or in advanced stages [4]. - The Socrates project is a key initiative for WMB, designed to supply natural gas power to data centers, with a secured 10-year contract ensuring predictable income [5]. - WMB's projects are fully contracted before completion, reducing financial risk and ensuring stable cash flows [5]. Financial Strength - WMB has received credit upgrades, with S&P raising its rating to BBB+ and Moody's providing a positive outlook, reflecting strong profit margins and a solid business outlook [9][10]. - In contrast, EPD has not received recent upgrades or improved outlooks from credit agencies, indicating that WMB is currently viewed as financially stronger [10]. Valuation Metrics - WMB is trading at a trailing 12-month EV/EBITDA of 17.59x, which is a premium compared to the industry average of 13.95x and EPD's 10.03x [11]. - Despite WMB's positive long-term outlook, uncertainties in the energy business environment may affect investment decisions [12]. Earnings Estimates - EPD's outlook is less favorable, with its projects focused on gathering and processing fuel, which will take longer to generate profits compared to WMB [13]. - EPD has experienced downward revisions in earnings estimates for 2025 and 2026, indicating potential challenges ahead [13].

Core Viewpoint - The Williams Companies, Inc. has seen a 4.1% increase in shares over the past month, but this performance is below that of the S&P 500, raising questions about future trends leading up to the next earnings release [1]. Group 1: Earnings Report and Stock Performance - A month has passed since the last earnings report, during which the stock has underperformed compared to the S&P 500 [1]. - Recent estimates for the company have trended downward over the past month [2]. Group 2: VGM Scores and Investment Strategy - The Williams Companies has an average Growth Score of C and a Momentum Score of B, but a low Value Score of D, placing it in the bottom 40% for this investment strategy [3]. - The overall aggregate VGM Score for the stock is D, indicating a lack of focus on a single investment strategy [3]. Group 3: Outlook and Future Expectations - Estimates for the stock have been broadly trending downward, with the magnitude of revisions being net zero [4]. - The Williams Companies holds a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting an expectation of in-line returns in the coming months [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) is actively working to revive two previously canceled natural gas pipeline projects, the Northeast Supply Enhancement (NESE) and the Constitution Pipeline, due to changing regulatory support and environmental discussions [1][4]. Regulatory Landscape - WMB is collaborating with federal and state regulatory agencies to reinstate the NESE and Constitution Pipeline projects, which were canceled after prolonged permit battles [2][4]. - The company has reached out to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to reinstate the necessary certificate for the NESE project, which is essential for interstate pipeline construction and operation [3]. Environmental Considerations - WMB is in discussions with environmental regulators in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York to secure the necessary permits for the pipeline projects, emphasizing that these projects are crucial for addressing natural gas supply issues in the Northeast [4]. - The company argues that the supply constraints lead to higher energy costs for consumers and increased demand for higher-emission fuels [4]. Political Context - The decision to revive these projects aligns with the Trump administration's recent support for natural gas initiatives, including the withdrawal of a stop-work order on Equinor's Empire Wind project [5]. - New York Governor Kathy Hochul has indicated a willingness to cooperate on new energy projects that comply with state laws, although she has not explicitly endorsed new pipelines [5]. Company Rankings and Comparisons - WMB currently holds a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), while other energy sector stocks like Flotek Industries (Rank 1), Energy Transfer (Rank 2), and RPC, Inc. (Rank 2) are noted for their stronger performance [6].

Industry Overview - The Zacks Oil & Gas – Production & Pipelines industry is crucial for the U.S. energy security and economic stability, relying on an extensive pipeline network to transport hydrocarbons from major production regions to consumers [1] - The long-term investment outlook for the industry is positive due to steady domestic energy consumption, growth in liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports, and a shift from coal to natural gas by utilities [1] Regulatory and Market Position - The pipeline industry is well-positioned to benefit from regulatory support, modernization efforts, and innovations that enhance efficiency and reduce emissions [2] - U.S. pipeline infrastructure has gained strategic importance amid global energy uncertainty, particularly for supporting allies abroad [2] Company Profiles - **Energy Transfer (ET)**: A diversified midstream company with operations in crude oil, NGLs, refined products, and natural gas pipelines, along with storage and processing facilities. It has a strong presence in the Permian Basin and operates the Dakota Access Pipeline [3] - **The Williams Companies (WMB)**: A leading natural gas infrastructure provider in North America, known for its strategic assets and stable fee-based revenues, connecting major production basins to growing domestic and export markets [4] Earnings Growth Projections - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for WMB's 2025 earnings has remained unchanged, while 2026 earnings have declined by 2.03% over the past 60 days [6] - For Energy Transfer, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2025 and 2026 earnings has increased by 2.86% and 4.26%, respectively, in the same timeframe [10] Financial Metrics - WMB's current Return on Equity (ROE) is 15.95%, outperforming ET's ROE of 11.47% and the sector's average of 14.67% [13] - ET's debt to capital ratio is 56.43%, while WMB's is higher at 64.84%, indicating WMB has a greater debt burden [14] Capital Expenditure Plans - Energy Transfer expects growth capital expenditures of nearly $5 billion and maintenance capital expenditures of approximately $1.1 billion for 2025 [15] - WMB's maintenance capital expenditure for 2025 is estimated to be between $800 million and $900 million [16] Valuation and Price Performance - Energy Transfer is trading at a Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of 12.2X, compared to WMB's 26.88X, indicating ET is currently undervalued [17] - In the last month, Energy Transfer's units gained 6.9%, while WMB's units increased by 2.5% [18] Conclusion - Energy Transfer has a more diversified midstream portfolio and is expected to benefit from higher fee-based earnings and systematic investments [19] - The Williams Companies is positioned to benefit from rising natural gas demand driven by AI and data centers [19]