Core Points - The IRS announced new regulations affecting 401(k) catch-up contributions starting in 2026, particularly for high-income earners [1][4] - An income test will be implemented, where individuals earning over $145,000 will only be able to make catch-up contributions to a Roth 401(k) [4][5] - This change introduces an upfront tax burden for high-income earners, as contributions to a Roth 401(k) are made with after-tax income [5] Summary by Sections Contribution Limits - For 2025, all workers can contribute up to $23,500 into 401(k) plans, with those over 50 allowed to make additional catch-up contributions [3] Income Test Implementation - Starting in 2026, workers earning over $145,000 will face restrictions on their catch-up contributions, limiting them to Roth 401(k) plans [4] Tax Treatment Differences - Standard 401(k) contributions are made pre-tax, allowing for tax deductions, while Roth 401(k) contributions are made after-tax, resulting in no immediate tax benefits [5] Impact on Workers - Approximately 20% of individuals aged 45 to 54 earn over $100,000, indicating that millions could be affected by the new regulations [6] - Employers are encouraged to confirm if they offer a Roth 401(k) plan, as nearly 93% do [6]

Skip to Main Content Skip to Search This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. Moody's Puts France on Watch for a Credit Downgrade. Why It's Become a 'Hot Mess.' By Ben Levisohn and Joe Light Updated Oct 25, 2025, 10:55 am EDT / Original Oct 24, 2025, 6:27 pm EDT Sh ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Quanex Building Products Corporation for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and prospects during the specified class period [3][7]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that Quanex failed to disclose significant underinvestment in tooling and equipment maintenance at its Tyman Mexico facility, leading to degraded conditions [3]. - It is alleged that the company was likely to incur substantial costs due to these issues, which would delay the expected benefits from the Tyman integration [3]. - The complaint asserts that Quanex had previously identified these problems but did not disclose them, rendering its positive statements about the company's operations misleading [3]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased Quanex shares between December 12, 2024, and September 5, 2025, and suffered losses are encouraged to contact the law firm for more information and to discuss their rights [4][7]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is November 18, 2025 [7]. About the Law Firm - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individual and institutional investors in complex litigation across the United States [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Cytokinetics, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding the New Drug Application (NDA) submission and approval process for aficamten, leading to investor losses during the class period from December 27, 2023, to May 6, 2025 [7]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that Cytokinetics misrepresented the expected timeline for FDA approval of aficamten, stating it would occur in the second half of 2025, while failing to disclose risks related to the omission of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) [7]. - On May 6, 2025, it was revealed that the company had discussions with the FDA regarding safety monitoring but chose to submit the NDA without a REMS, which misled investors about the regulatory timeline [7]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased Cytokinetics shares during the class period and suffered losses are encouraged to contact the law firm Bragar Eagel & Squire for more information and to discuss their legal rights [4][8].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial prospects during the specified class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [3][7]. Allegation Details - The complaint claims that Fluor's management failed to disclose significant cost increases related to major projects, including the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, were likely to have a substantial negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results [3]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is described as unreliable and unrealistic, with an overstated effectiveness of the company's risk mitigation strategies [3]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased Fluor shares and experienced losses are encouraged to contact the law firm Bragar Eagel & Squire for more information regarding their rights and potential claims [4][7]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is November 14, 2025 [7]. About the Law Firm - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individual and institutional investors in complex litigation across various courts in the United States [5].

Core Insights - The commercial real estate industry is beginning to adopt blockchain technology, which could significantly change the processes of buying, selling, and financing properties [1][2] - Experts predict that the entire commercial real estate sector will operate on blockchain technology within the next decade [2] Group 1: Blockchain Applications - Blockchain serves as a secure platform for storing vast amounts of records, including titles, deeds, and mortgage bonds, without risk of loss or manipulation [3] - Beyond record-keeping, blockchain-based smart contracts are being integrated with public utility services, leading to automated billing and more efficient city management [4] Group 2: Cryptocurrency in Real Estate - Investors are increasingly using cryptocurrency as collateral for property loans, allowing them to maintain ownership of digital assets while acquiring real estate [5][6] - This approach resolves the dilemma of choosing between crypto holdings and real estate investments, enabling investors to benefit from both [6] Group 3: Tokenization - Tokenization is emerging as a transformative application of blockchain, allowing ownership rights in commercial properties to be converted into tradable digital tokens [7] - This process facilitates fractional ownership and simplifies the trading of shares in individual properties [7]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against V.F. Corporation (VFC) for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its turnaround plans and the Vans brand's revenue growth trajectory [3][7]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that VFC's management provided overly positive statements about the company's turnaround plans while failing to disclose significant adverse facts [3]. - It is alleged that additional reset actions were necessary for the Vans brand to return to growth, which were not communicated to investors [3]. - The setbacks in revenue growth for Vans were not mentioned in public commentary regarding the Reinvent initiative or the Vans turnaround progress [3]. - As a result, the statements made by VFC about its business and prospects were misleading, leading shareholders to purchase securities at inflated prices [3]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased VFC shares between October 30, 2023, and May 20, 2025, and suffered losses are encouraged to contact the law firm for more information and to discuss their rights [4][7]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is November 11, 2025 [7].

Market Overview - Current market sentiment is overly bullish despite potential risks, with major indices at all-time highs [2][3] - Historical context provided by the 1987 market crash, where a similar drop today would equate to an 11,000-point decline in the Dow Jones [1] Economic Conditions - Consumers and businesses are in relatively good financial shape, with significant increases in stock portfolios and home prices over recent years [3][5] - The economic system is not as precarious as it was during the 2008 financial crisis, indicating a more stable environment currently [3][5] Investment Strategies - Building a cash position is advised in anticipation of a market correction, similar to strategies employed by Warren Buffett [5] - Closing out margin positions is recommended to mitigate risks associated with high-volatility investments, especially in a declining market [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Lantheus Holdings, Inc. for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its product Pylarify and its competitive position during the specified class period [3][7]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that Lantheus provided overly positive statements while concealing adverse facts about Pylarify's competitive position [3]. - It is alleged that Lantheus was not adequately equipped to assess pricing and competitive dynamics for Pylarify [3]. - The company reportedly failed to disclose that a price increase in early 2025, despite previous price erosion, created opportunities for competitive pricing, jeopardizing Pylarify's price point and growth potential [3]. - As a result, the statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were materially false and misleading [3]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased Lantheus shares and suffered losses are encouraged to contact the law firm for more information and to discuss their rights [4][7]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is November 10, 2025 [7].

Core Insights - AutoZone reported an $80 million non-cash LIFO charge due to tariffs in the previous quarter, expecting it to rise to $120 million in the current quarter, with ongoing charges projected between $80 million and $85 million for the rest of the fiscal year [1] - Despite rising prices from tariffs, AutoZone's CEO indicated that consumer inelasticity positions the company well, as customers will ultimately need to address maintenance issues [2][3] - O'Reilly Automotive's recent update presents a contrasting view, indicating a pullback in DIY auto repair due to price increases, which has negatively impacted their stock [4][5] AutoZone Insights - AutoZone's pricing remains competitive compared to dealership costs, which may mitigate the impact of rising prices on consumer behavior [3] - The company is optimistic about its market position despite the tariff-related challenges [2] O'Reilly Automotive Insights - O'Reilly Automotive's stock fell nearly 7% following their third-quarter results, primarily due to exposure to a bankrupt supplier and a negative outlook on consumer behavior [4] - The company raised its full-year profit and revenue outlook but lowered projections for cash from operating activities, citing pressure on DIY customers [6] - O'Reilly described the DIY market as fluid, with deferrals in larger-ticket jobs affecting their business [7] - Despite challenges, O'Reilly plans to open between 225 and 235 new stores by 2026, including its first store in Canada [8]