WEEKLY WRAP with James Turk – Available Now FOR DIRECTIONS ON HOW TO PLAY OR DOWNLOAD AUDIOS: CLICK HEREDUE TO POPULAR DEMAND AND ACCELERATED INVESTOR INTEREST, WE BRING YOU THE WEEKLY WRAP!This is going to be a very interesting and exciting year. KWN will shed light on what is happening in the major markets – featuring James TurkJames Turk: Founder & Lead Director of Goldmoney, Inc (Toronto Exchange XAU) – In his latest book, MONEY AND LIBERTY, James Turk explains the inextricable link between liberty and ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding former stockholders of Smartsheet Inc. about a class action lawsuit related to the company's sale to a consortium including Blackstone, Vista Equity Partners, and Platinum Falcon, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for February 24, 2026 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Former Smartsheet stockholders may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6]. - The complaint alleges that Smartsheet's solicitation of stockholder approval for the buyout involved a misleading Proxy statement that misrepresented the company's financial performance [5]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may not have the necessary experience [4]. - Rosen Law Firm has a history of successful settlements in securities class actions, including significant recoveries for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Smartsheet Inc. class action lawsuit alleges that shareholders were misled during the acquisition process by Blackstone Inc., Vista Equity Partners Management, LLC, and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, resulting in an unfair price for their shares [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Shareholders who held Smartsheet securities as of October 25, 2024, can seek appointment as lead plaintiff until February 24, 2026 [1]. - The lawsuit is titled Kara Eftimoglu v. Mader, No. 25-cv-02530 (W.D. Wash.) [1]. - The lawsuit claims that a misleading Schedule 14A Proxy statement was issued, leading to the approval of the merger at an unfair price of $56.50 per share [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Smartsheet - The lawsuit alleges that Smartsheet's management promoted its Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) metric as a key indicator of future performance, but this was not disclosed in the Proxy [4]. - The Proxy also failed to include January 2024 forecasts, preventing shareholders from fully assessing Smartsheet's financial prospects [4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who held Smartsheet securities to seek lead plaintiff status, with the lead plaintiff representing the interests of the class [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Smartsheet Inc. class action lawsuit has been initiated due to alleged violations related to the acquisition by Blackstone Inc., Vista Equity Partners Management, LLC, and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, with shareholders having until February 24, 2026, to seek lead plaintiff status [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Shareholders who held Smartsheet securities as of October 25, 2024, are eligible to participate in the class action lawsuit [1][2]. - The lawsuit alleges that a misleading Schedule 14A Proxy statement was issued, which led to shareholders approving the merger at an unfair price of $56.50 per share [3][4]. - The complaint claims that the Proxy failed to disclose important financial metrics, such as the Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR), which was touted in press releases and earnings calls as a key indicator of Smartsheet's financial performance [4]. Group 2: Legal Process and Representation - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who held Smartsheet securities as of the record date to seek lead plaintiff status, representing the interests of the class [5]. - The lead plaintiff can choose a law firm to litigate the case, and participation as a lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any potential recovery [5]. Group 3: Company Background - Smartsheet is an enterprise software company that provides software-as-a-service (SaaS) work management solutions, tracking its Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) as a key performance metric [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Smartsheet class action lawsuit alleges that shareholders were misled during the acquisition process by Blackstone Inc., Vista Equity Partners Management, LLC, and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, resulting in an unfair cash price of $56.50 per share for Smartsheet common stock [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Shareholders who held Smartsheet securities as of October 25, 2024, can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit by February 24, 2026 [1]. - The lawsuit is titled Kara Eftimoglu v. Mader, No. 25-cv-02530 (W.D. Wash.) [1]. - The lawsuit claims that a misleading Schedule 14A Proxy statement was issued, which led to the approval of the Merger by Smartsheet's former shareholders [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Smartsheet - The complaint alleges that Smartsheet's management promoted its Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) metric as a key indicator of future financial performance, yet this information was not disclosed in the Proxy [4]. - The Proxy also failed to include January 2024 forecasts prepared in the ordinary course of business, which would have allowed shareholders to better assess Smartsheet's financial prospects [4]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who held Smartsheet securities as of the record date to seek lead plaintiff status [5]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6].

Core Insights - The year 2025 marked a significant turning point for Indian private banks, attracting over $6 billion in foreign investment, with expectations for continued deals in 2026 [3][4] - A favorable regulatory environment, improved bank balance sheets, and strong growth potential in India have driven this influx of capital [4][6] Investment Trends - Major investments include Blackstone's proposal of ₹6,196.51 crore (approximately $0.7 billion) for a 9.99% stake in Federal Bank [5] - Japanese financial groups have made substantial investments, such as SMBC acquiring over 24% in Yes Bank for over $1.6 billion and MUFG Bank investing ₹39,618 crore (about $4.4 billion) for a 20% stake in Shriram Finance [7][8] - Emirates NBD's commitment of $3 billion for a 60% stake in RBL Bank represents one of the largest foreign investments in India's private banking sector [9] Regulatory Environment - The regulatory stance has become more accommodating, allowing foreign banks to acquire significant stakes in Indian banks, which has facilitated investment inflows [6] - The Reserve Bank of India is favoring larger, stronger institutions, which may lead to consolidation among small finance banks [15] Market Dynamics - Indian banks' balance sheets have largely been cleaned up, restoring investor confidence and enabling private-sector capital expenditure to gradually increase [14][16] - Mid-tier banks are attracting a broader base of foreign institutional investors, reflecting a structural recovery and increasing confidence in their long-term growth potential [15][16] Future Outlook - Experts predict that more mid-tier banks could attract significant foreign capital, and the trend of foreign investment is expected to continue as these banks seek to scale up and strengthen their balance sheets [4][15]

Core Insights - The Indian financial sector has experienced significant mergers and acquisitions in 2025, with a total value of $8 billion, representing a 127% increase compared to the same period in the previous year according to Grant Thornton Group 1: Major Deals - MUFG will acquire a 20% stake in Shriram Finance for $4.4 billion, marking the largest cross-border investment in India's financial sector [1] - Emirates NBD plans to buy a 60% stake in RBL Bank for $3 billion, providing access to a wide branch network [2] - SMBC agreed to acquire a 20% stake in Yes Bank for $1.6 billion, with an additional 4.99% stake purchased in September [3] - Blackstone will invest ₹6,197 crore ($705.05 million) in Federal Bank for a 9.9% stake, allowing it to nominate a non-executive director to the board [4] - IHC will invest close to $1 billion for a 43.5% stake in Sammaan Capital, with plans for an open offer to acquire an additional 26% stake [5] - Warburg Pincus and ADIA will invest $877 million in IDFC FIRST Bank through convertible preference shares, resulting in a combined ownership of 15% upon conversion [6] - Bain Capital will acquire an 18% stake in Manappuram Finance for $508 million, with plans to increase its stake to over 40% through an open offer [8] - Bajaj Group repurchased a 26% stake in Bajaj Allianz General Insurance and Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance for $2.8 billion, ending a decade-long partnership with Allianz [9]

Core Insights - L'Oréal has acquired an additional 10 percent stake in Galderma Group AG, increasing its total ownership to 20 percent, emphasizing its commitment to the aesthetics sector [1][2] - The acquisition was made from a consortium led by EQT and is expected to close by the first quarter of 2026 [3] - L'Oréal plans to support Galderma's strategy and independence while exploring synergies between injectable and topical dermatological treatments [4][5] Transaction Details - The transaction will be executed through an off-market block trade, dissolving the previous shareholder agreement with Sunshine SwissCo GmbH [3] - Funding for the acquisition will come from L'Oréal's available cash and credit lines [3] Strategic Intent - L'Oréal views aesthetics as a key area adjacent to its core beauty business and aims to solidify its partnership with Galderma, which has been successful since the initial investment in 2024 [2][4] - The partnership will leverage Galderma's expertise in dermatological solutions and L'Oréal's knowledge in skin biology and diagnostic tools [5] Governance Changes - Following the increased stake, Galderma's board will consider appointing two non-independent board candidates from L'Oréal, replacing the EQT-led consortium starting from the 2026 annual general meeting [6]

Core Viewpoint - Asurion LLC is acquiring Domestic & General Group Ltd. to expand its business and geographic reach, with the deal expected to close in mid-2024 [1][2]. Group 1: Acquisition Details - The acquisition is valued at £2.1 billion ($2.8 billion) [2]. - Domestic & General provides warranties and repairs for various appliances across Europe, the US, and Australia, protecting over 22 million appliances in 12 markets [2]. - The transaction involves the sale from CVC Capital Partners Plc and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority [1][3]. Group 2: Company Background - Asurion, based in Nashville, Tennessee, specializes in insurance for mobile phones and electronic devices, partnering with major carriers and companies like Verizon, AT&T, Amazon, and Samsung [3]. - Domestic & General was founded in 1912 and listed in London in 1991, originally insuring cattle transport [2]. - CVC Capital Partners first invested in Domestic & General in 2013, and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority acquired a 30% stake in 2019 [3]. Group 3: Leadership and Support - Guru Gowrappan was appointed as CEO of Asurion in October [4]. - Asurion's backers include Madison Dearborn Partners and Providence Equity Partners [4].

Core Insights - Meesho Ltd. faced a setback in its anchor book as several major investors withdrew due to the allocation of shares favoring SBI Funds Management, India's largest asset manager [1][2][3] - Despite the withdrawals, Meesho's anchor lineup still includes significant global investors such as GIC Pte, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, Fidelity International, and BlackRock Inc. [4] - The situation highlights the strong demand for Indian tech startups as they approach public listings, with recent IPOs from digital platforms experiencing heavy demand [5] Company Overview - Meesho, based in Bengaluru, connects small manufacturers with price-sensitive consumers in smaller Indian cities and aims to raise up to 54.2 billion rupees (approximately $603 million) through its IPO [6] - The share price for the IPO is set between 105 rupees and 111 rupees per share, with existing shareholders, including Elevation Capital V Ltd. and Peak XV Partners Investments V, participating in the offering [6] Investor Dynamics - Major investors that withdrew include Capital Group, Aberdeen Group Plc, Norges Bank Investment Management, ICICI Prudential Asset Management Co., Nippon India Life Asset Management Ltd., and Nomura Asset Management, indicating a protest against the allocation process [3] - The final investor lineup for Meesho's anchor book is still subject to change as the allotment process is ongoing [4]