他指出，赖清德在今天的讲话中，顽固坚持"台独"立场，渲染"大陆威胁"，鼓噪"民主对抗威权"，歪曲 二战历史和联大第2758号决议，妄图"以武谋独"、"倚外谋独"、扩军备战。其所言所行只会破坏台海和 平稳定，加剧台海紧张局势，加重台湾民众负担，葬送台湾经济命脉和发展前景，给台湾社会带来灾 难。 陈斌华强调，台湾属于中国事实清晰、地位明确，祖国统一大势滚滚向前、不可阻挡。不管赖清德说什 么、做什么，都改变不了台湾是中国一部分的历史和法理事实，改变不了台湾属于中国的国际社会共 识，阻挡不了中国终将统一、也必将统一的历史大势。让两岸同胞都能过上更好的日子，是我们发展两 岸关系的出发点和落脚点。只有坚持一个中国原则，反对"台独"，共同推动两岸关系和平发展，携手推 进国家完全统一，才是维护台海和平稳定、增进同胞利益福祉的康庄大道，才是促进台湾社会和谐安 宁、台湾同胞安居乐业的正确选择。我们将团结广大台湾同胞，坚决反对"台独"分裂和外来干涉，坚定 守护中华民族共同家园，同心共创国家统一、民族复兴的美好未来。 新华社北京10月10日电 针对赖清德10日在台北发表所谓"双十"讲话中有关两岸关系内容，国务院台办 发言人陈斌华答问 ...

今天，国务院台办发言人陈斌华答记者问。 问：赖清德今天在台北发表所谓"双十"讲话，请问发言人对讲话有关两岸关系内容有何评论？ 答：世界上只有一个中国，台湾是中国一部分，这是真正的台海现状。只有坚持一个中国原则和"九二 共识"，台海和平稳定才有切实保障，台湾同胞才能有好生活，台湾经济才能借由两岸经济合作、融合 发展获得更大空间和确定性。反之，背离一个中国原则，否认"九二共识"，推进"台独"分裂，台海形势 就会紧张动荡，台湾经济和民众切身利益就会严重受损。 赖清德在今天的讲话中，顽固坚持"台独"立场，渲染"大陆威胁"，鼓噪"民主对抗威权"，歪曲二战历史 和联大第2758号决议，妄图"以武谋独"、"倚外谋独"、扩军备战。其所言所行只会破坏台海和平稳定， 加剧台海紧张局势，加重台湾民众负担，葬送台湾经济命脉和发展前景，给台湾社会带来灾难。 台湾属于中国事实清晰、地位明确，祖国统一大势滚滚向前、不可阻挡。不管赖清德说什么、做什么， 都改变不了台湾是中国一部分的历史和法理事实，改变不了台湾属于中国的国际社会共识，阻挡不了中 国终将统一、也必将统一的历史大势。让两岸同胞都能过上更好的日子，是我们发展两岸关系的出发点 和落脚 ...

张亚中有一个判断，留给台湾的时间已经不多了，甚至都等不 到2028年大选。所以，他希望国民党在两岸关系的论述上能 向前一步，在答卷上写下"九二共识"的标准答案：认同一个中 国，追求两岸统一。这样就能与大陆的对台政策实现无缝连 接，从而避免台湾遭遇灭顶之灾。 这个其他因素，就是现任台中市长卢秀燕（燕子）。 作者： 王义伟 封图：本报资料室 在9月27日台湾中天电视台举办的国民党主席选举第二场辩论会上，参选人张亚中问其他参选人两个问题：第一，"九二共识"的真正内容是什么？第 二，你们是否主张两岸统一？ 不出意料，罗志强、郝龙斌、郑丽文、蔡志弘四人均拒绝回答是否主张统一的问题。 关于"九二共识"，罗志强说，"九二共识"就是一个有创意的模糊，既未谈统，也未谈"独"，形成了主权互不承认、治权互不否认的两岸默契。有了这个 默契，才有了国民党执政时期两岸签署的23项协议。两岸之间未来的政治安排、走向统一是一个漫长的过程，这个过程中和平是前提，两岸人民彼此 友善是前提。这一点，国民党做得到。 郝龙斌说，"九二共识""一中各表"是过去两岸之间对话的基础，也就是所谓的通关密语。"九二共识"很重要的一点是模糊。我始终主张我们要用对 ...

王沪宁表示，新时代新征程上，我们将继续全面准确、坚定不移贯彻"一国两制"方针，全面落 实"爱国者治港"、"爱国者治澳"原则，支持港澳更好融入国家发展大局。我们将坚决贯彻新时代党解决 台湾问题的总体方略，坚持一个中国原则和"九二共识"，促进两岸各领域交流合作，坚决反对"台独"分 裂和外部干涉，坚定不移推进祖国统一大业。我们将全面贯彻落实党和国家侨务政策，加强和改进侨务 工作。 李干杰主持招待会。部分在京中共中央政治局委员、中央书记处书记，全国人大常委会、国务院、 全国政协领导同志，约760名港澳台侨各界代表出席。 央广网北京9月29日消息 据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻和报纸摘要》报道，全国政协办公 厅、中共中央统战部、国务院侨办、国务院港澳办、国务院台办、中国侨联28日在人民大会堂联合举行 国庆招待会，庆祝中华人民共和国成立76周年。中共中央政治局常委、全国政协主席王沪宁出席并致 辞。他表示，要坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，坚持大团结大联合，巩固和发展最 广泛的爱国统一战线，汇聚起以中国式现代化全面推进中华民族伟大复兴的磅礴力量。 王沪宁表示，76年来，中国共产党团结带领全国各族人民，创造了 ...

Core Viewpoint - The debate among candidates for the Kuomintang (KMT) chairmanship highlighted differing perspectives on the "1992 Consensus" and cross-strait relations, with Zhang Yazhong advocating for a clear stance on unification while others preferred a more ambiguous approach [2][4][10]. Group 1: Candidates' Positions - Zhang Yazhong questioned the candidates' avoidance of the unification stance and criticized their interpretations of the "1992 Consensus" as incorrect, suggesting that the KMT has been misleading the public for years [4][10]. - Luo Zhiyang emphasized the importance of dialogue over confrontation and the need for mutual respect, stating that maintaining the status quo is the most significant consensus among the Taiwanese public [2][3]. - Zheng Liwen argued that the inability to engage in dialogue with the mainland is due to the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) rejection of the "1992 Consensus," which she views as a creative ambiguity that facilitated past exchanges [3]. Group 2: Political Dynamics - The current political landscape within the KMT is influenced by the aspirations of Taichung Mayor Lu Xiuyan, who is seen as a potential candidate for the 2028 elections, leading other candidates to align their policies with her views [5][8]. - The candidates' consistent use of the term "ambiguity" in their responses suggests prior coordination and a unified stance on cross-strait policy, likely to support Lu Xiuyan's future candidacy [7][8]. - Zhang Yazhong's urgent call for the KMT to adopt a definitive stance on the "1992 Consensus" reflects his belief that time is running out for Taiwan, urging the party to connect seamlessly with mainland policies to avoid potential crises [10][11].

既然张亚中教授已经被主张"台独"的民进党和国民党内的"反 动派"打成积极推进统一"红统"分子，那就别装了，干脆把这 份备忘录修改一番吧。 作者： 王义伟 封图：本报资料室 正在进行的国民党主席选举，参选人之一张亚中教授的表现给人印象深刻，主要体现在三个方面。 方也认知到，本备忘录的签署有助于未来两岸官方正式结束敌对状态、签署和平协议。 第一，准确阐释了"九二共识"的内涵。 在电视辩论中，张亚中问另一位参选人罗智强什么是"九二共识"。罗说"九二共识"就是"一中各表"。张亚中说，罗错了，"九二共识"的真正内涵有两 个，一个是一个中国原则，一个是追求统一。 第二，张亚中炮轰朱立伦、赵少康、郝龙斌等人密谋党主席选举，为此和赵少康公开骂战。这是他再一次挑战国民党积弊已久的酱缸文化。 第三，关于两岸关系，张亚中表示如果自己当选国民党主席，将立即恢复"国统纲领"，并代表国民党和大陆谈判，力争任内签署《创造两岸和平备忘 录》。 张亚中准确阐释"九二共识" ，挞伐国民党密室政治，勇气可嘉！ 关于他的两岸和平备忘录，笔者的感觉是，不但大陆方面，就是在台湾岛内，不少人对这份文件也是只闻其名、未见真容。大家都知道他编撰了这份文 件， ...

Core Points - The article discusses the statements made by Lai Ching-te regarding Taiwan's defense and economic strategies, which are criticized by the Chinese government as promoting "Taiwan independence" and escalating tensions across the Taiwan Strait [1][2][3][4] - The Chinese government emphasizes that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and rejects any claims of Taiwan's independence or separate existence [2][3][4] Group 1 - Lai Ching-te's three missions include enhancing defense budgets, protecting Taiwanese citizens, and shifting investments from mainland China to global markets [1] - The Chinese government accuses Lai of exacerbating cross-strait tensions and undermining the interests of Taiwanese businesses and citizens [1][3] - The Chinese government asserts that the historical and legal status of Taiwan as part of China is indisputable, referencing international agreements from World War II [2][3] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns that any attempts at "Taiwan independence" will ultimately fail and emphasizes the importance of the "1992 Consensus" as a basis for dialogue [4] - The article highlights the contradiction in the Taiwanese government's stance of seeking dialogue while simultaneously promoting independence narratives [4] - The Chinese government calls for unity among Taiwanese citizens against external interference and "Taiwan independence" movements [3][4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, and the notion of "Taiwan independence" is fundamentally flawed and counterproductive [1][2] - The spokesperson criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for its contradictory stance of claiming willingness for dialogue while promoting "Taiwan independence," indicating a lack of genuine intent for cross-strait communication [1] - The "1992 Consensus," which reflects the one-China principle, is highlighted as the political foundation for dialogue and negotiation between the two sides [1] Group 2 - The DPP's attempts to seek independence through external support and military means are described as a betrayal of the mainstream public opinion in Taiwan and detrimental to national interests [2] - The spokesperson asserts that the DPP's strategies are bound to fail and will not succeed in achieving their goals [2]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing Kuomintang (KMT) chairperson election has highlighted the impressive performance of candidate Zhang Yazhong, particularly in his interpretation of the "1992 Consensus," his criticism of internal party politics, and his proposals for cross-strait relations [1][2]. Group 1: Interpretation of "1992 Consensus" - Zhang Yazhong accurately articulated the essence of the "1992 Consensus," emphasizing that it consists of two main components: the principle of one China and the pursuit of unification [2]. - In a debate, Zhang challenged another candidate's understanding of the "1992 Consensus," asserting that it is not merely "one China, each with its own interpretation" as claimed [2]. Group 2: Criticism of Internal Party Politics - Zhang publicly criticized prominent KMT figures, including Zhu Lilun and Zhao Shaokang, for allegedly conspiring in the chairperson election, marking a challenge to the long-standing "jar culture" within the party [2][3]. Group 3: Proposals for Cross-Strait Relations - Zhang expressed his intention to restore the "National Unification Guidelines" if elected as KMT chairperson and to negotiate with the mainland, aiming to sign a "Cross-Strait Peace Memorandum" during his term [2][3]. - The proposed "Cross-Strait Peace Memorandum" emphasizes peace as a fundamental value and aims to end the current hostile state between the two sides, promoting equality and cooperation [5][6]. Group 4: Content of the Proposed Memorandum - The memorandum outlines several key points, including mutual recognition of national identity, opposition to separatism, and the commitment to peaceful resolution of disputes without the use of force [7][9][12]. - It also suggests establishing permanent representative offices and acknowledges differing views on political arrangements post-unification [13][14]. Group 5: Reactions and Critiques - The memorandum has received limited attention in Taiwan, with both pro-independence and pro-unification factions expressing dissatisfaction with its content [15]. - Critics argue that the memorandum lacks references to "Republic of China" and "Three Principles of the People," suggesting it may be an attempt by the KMT to impose its agenda on the Taiwanese populace [15][16].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that cross-strait communication and negotiation must be based on the One China principle, and that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must acknowledge the "1992 Consensus" for dialogue to resume [1][2] - The DPP's refusal to recognize the "1992 Consensus" has led to a halt in cross-strait communication since 2016, and the current administration's insistence on "Taiwan independence" is seen as a barrier to peace [1][2] - The spokesperson criticized the DPP's claims of "equal dignity" in negotiations, arguing that it attempts to alter historical and legal facts regarding cross-strait relations, which will ultimately hinder dialogue [2] Group 2 - The DPP's recent statements about strengthening defense capabilities and increasing defense budgets are viewed as a misguided approach that could harm the welfare of Taiwanese citizens [2] - The spokesperson highlighted that the DPP's actions, including reliance on external forces and military posturing, are detrimental to Taiwan's social welfare and security [2] - Criticism was directed at the DPP for attempting to deflect responsibility for its governance failures by blaming external factors, which has led to widespread discontent among the Taiwanese populace [3] Group 3 - The DPP's policies are accused of creating instability for cross-strait families, particularly for spouses from the mainland, by imposing political pressures and undermining their rights [3][4] - The spokesperson pointed out that the DPP's actions against cross-strait marriages are aimed at fabricating issues related to nationality and manipulating the concept of "two countries" [3][4] - The DPP's governance is characterized as oppressive and detrimental to the well-being of individuals living in Taiwan, particularly those with ties to the mainland [4]