据智通财经：成都哈拜网络科技有限公司平台注册的一辆顺风车此前在广州市增城区的花莞高速上追尾 因事故横跨多个车道的重型厢式货车，造成小车上3人死亡2人受伤。广州市应急管理局2026年1月8日公 布该事故的防范和整改措施落实情况评估报告。 报告内容显示，涉事的广州三群汽车租赁有限公司被处以110万元罚款、成都哈拜网络科技有限公司被 处以105万元罚款，两家公司的负责人也被处以相应的罚款。 广州市黄埔区应急管理局依据《中华人民共和国安全生产法》第一百一十四条第（二）项的规定，于 2025年8月5日作出对广州三群汽车租赁有限公司处以罚款人民币壹佰壹拾万元整（110万元）的行政处 罚。目前行政处罚案件处于行政诉讼诉前调解阶段。 依据《中华人民共和国安全生产法》第一百一十四条第一款第（二）项以及《生产安全事故罚款处罚规 定》第十五条第一款第（一）项的规定，2025年4月8日，广州市应急管理局给予成都哈拜网络科技有限 公司罚款人民币壹佰零伍万元（105万元）的行政处罚。该公司已按期缴纳罚款。 广州三群汽车租赁有限公司安全生产第一责任人、总经理被处以罚款人民币壹拾万伍仟肆佰零捌元整 （105,408元）的行政处罚。目前行政处 ...

"廉洁四川"微信公号 调查查明，事故直接原因是塔机安拆作业人员顶升拆卸标准节时，仅将顶升横梁右侧销轴少部分放置在 标准节踏步中孔内，该销轴与相应的踏步孔处于非正常受力状态，继续实施标准节拆卸作业，踏步孔内 侧位置受挤压变形，造成右侧异常承重的销轴发生轴向位移、脱出，左侧销轴无法承担顶升套架、回转 总成及以上部分的全部荷载，塔机上部结构向下蹾坐，产生的冲击致使平衡臂主肢发生折弯下摆，平衡 臂主肢、平衡重撞击顶升套架，导致塔机上部翻转坍塌。 "四川应急"微信公号 2025年9月1日10时左右，成都市成华区万年场街道槐树店路16号臻礼著项目发生一起较大起重伤害事 故，造成5人死亡，直接经济损失1363.16万元。事故发生后，四川省委、省政府高度重视，派出工作组 现场指导事故救援工作，并由省政府牵头成立事故调查组，对事故实行提级调查。有关纪检监察机关按 照干部管理权限，依规依纪依法对12名公职人员进行了严肃追责问责，公安机关对涉嫌违法犯罪的4名 涉案人员进行立案侦查。 中铁二十二局三公司臻礼著项目部副经理兼安全负责人蒲亮，精正公司臻礼著项目安全专业监理工程师 先科，塔机拆卸作业单位鑫鸿达公司法定代表人、总经理何彦，塔 ...

1月5日金融一线消息，新疆金融监管局今日发布公告称，持续强化保险效能，履行安全生产社会责任。 新疆金融监管局压实辖区保险机构安全生产责任，督促建立健全重大自然灾害应对预案，主动参与防灾 减灾救灾和应急管理体系。指导辖区保险机构加大安责险宣传力度，积极与应急管理局等部门联动，主 动对接企业安全生产需求；建立重大自然灾害理赔响应机制，统筹调配查勘资源，开辟绿色服务通道， 对责任明确、损失清晰的案件快处快赔、应赔尽赔。 责任编辑：曹睿潼 1月5日金融一线消息，新疆金融监管局今日发布公告称，持续强化保险效能，履行安全生产社会责任。 新疆金融监管局压实辖区保险机构安全生产责任，督促建立健全重大自然灾害应对预案，主动参与防灾 减灾救灾和应急管理体系。指导辖区保险机构加大安责险宣传力度，积极与应急管理局等部门联动，主 动对接企业安全生产需求；建立重大自然灾害理赔响应机制，统筹调配查勘资源，开辟绿色服务通道， 对责任明确、损失清晰的案件快处快赔、应赔尽赔。 责任编辑：曹睿潼 ...

2025年9月1日10时01分许，成都市成华区槐树店路16号新建商品住宅及附属设施项目（又称臻礼著项 目）发生一起塔式起重机（以下简称塔机）伤害事故，造成5人死亡，直接经济损失约为1363.16万元。 日前，四川省人民政府批复同意了《成都成华臻礼著项目"9·1"较大起重伤害事故调查报告》。经调查 认定，这是一起因相关企业安全生产主体责任落实不到位，专项施工方案存在缺陷，违规组织拆卸作 业，安全技术交底和安全教育培训流于形式，作业人员违章作业，属地有关部门和地方党委、政府安全 监管不到位，导致的较大生产安全责任事故。 事故发生后，四川省委、省政府高度重视，有关省领导作出指示批示，提出明确工作要求。应急管理部 派出工作组、住房城乡建设部派出专家赶赴现场指导事故应急处置工作。住房城乡建设厅、应急管理 厅、省市场监管局派出工作组，现场指导事故救援工作。依据《中华人民共和国安全生产法》等有关法 律法规，9月2日，省政府成立了由应急管理厅、住房城乡建设厅、公安厅、省市场监管局、省总工会和 成都市政府有关负责同志参加的成都成华臻礼著项目"9·1"较大起重伤害事故调查组（以下简称事故调 查组），对事故实行提级调查。同时，邀请 ...

北京商报讯(记者胡永新)1月5日，新疆金融监管局发布信息显示，新疆金融监管局持续强化保险效能，履行安全生产社会责任。新疆金融监管局压实辖区保 险机构安全生产责任，督促建立健全重大自然灾害应对预案，主动参与防灾减灾救灾和应急管理体系。指导辖区保险机构加大安责险宣传力度，积极与应急 管理局等部门联动，主动对接企业安全生产需求；建立重大自然灾害理赔响应机制，统筹调配查勘资源，开辟绿色服务通道，对责任明确、损失清晰的案件 快处快赔、应赔尽赔。 ...

调查报告显示，火灾的直接原因系饭店顾客王某丢弃的未熄灭烟蒂，在风势作用下通过紧贴外墙设置的 铝塑板排风道下方缝隙滚入检修口，引燃内部堆放的包装纸箱等垃圾，导致饭店外立面装饰装修使用的 铝塑板和建筑外墙聚苯乙烯保温板快速燃烧蔓延成灾。 针对事故中暴露的问题，事故调查组总结了多方面教训：属地党委政府和有关部门吸取事故教训不深 刻，防范化解重大安全风险的意识能力不足；生产经营单位安全生产主体责任不落实，只顾发展、不管 安全，最终隐患演变成事故；住建、自然资源、商务、消防等部门不同程度存在监管范围"自我设 限""只管合法、不管非法"等问题。 此外，调查报告建议对三里厨娘饭店经营者等8人移送司法机关。辽宁省纪委监委也同步成立火灾事故 追责问责审查调查组，依规依纪依法对重大火灾事故中负有责任的40名公职人员进行严肃追责问责。 来源 | 新华社 辽宁辽阳白塔区三里厨娘饭店重大火灾事故调查报告发布 40名公职人员被问责 辽宁省应急管理厅网站于12月28日向社会公布了辽阳白塔区三里厨娘饭店重大火灾事故调查报告。调查 认定，这是一起因饭店主体责任不落实，违法改造扩建外立面且大量使用以普通塑料为芯材的铝塑板， 违规在门外排风道下方 ...

Core Viewpoint - The investigation report on the major fire incident at the Jiuding Building in Zigong, Sichuan, reveals that the fire was caused by improper cutting operations involving unqualified workers, leading to significant casualties and property damage [6][34][47]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - The fire occurred on July 17, 2024, at approximately 6:00 PM, resulting in 16 fatalities and 39 injuries, with a burned area of 5,929 square meters [3][56]. - Firefighters arrived promptly and managed to rescue 91 trapped individuals [3]. Cause of the Fire - The direct cause was identified as a waste recycling worker using liquefied gas to cut an escalator, causing molten slag to ignite flammable materials in an unauthorized storage area [6][32]. - The investigation ruled out other potential causes such as arson, electrical faults, and spontaneous combustion [22]. Fire Spread Dynamics - The fire spread rapidly due to the building's design, which allowed smoke to travel through the atrium effect, reaching the fifth floor within just over two minutes [12][41]. - The building's fire safety systems, including smoke extraction and fire alarms, failed to operate effectively during the incident [58][45]. Building Safety Violations - The building's construction involved numerous safety violations, including the use of flammable materials for interior finishes and the absence of proper fire safety measures [39][47]. - The investigation highlighted that the building's fire safety standards were compromised during renovations, leading to increased fire risks [47]. Emergency Response - Initial emergency responses were inadequate, with only one security personnel present to manage the situation, and no immediate firefighting efforts were made [37][35]. - Many occupants failed to evacuate promptly due to a lack of awareness and ineffective alarm systems, which contributed to the high casualty rate [60][62]. Lessons Learned - The incident underscores the critical need for strict adherence to safety protocols and the establishment of comprehensive fire safety management systems in public buildings [62]. - It emphasizes the importance of training and certifying personnel involved in hazardous operations to prevent similar tragedies in the future [28][47].

Core Viewpoint - The investigation report reveals a fatal accident at Kanglong Chemical (300759), resulting in the death of two employees during an operation related to the innovative drug project DT-818, which is in the IND approval stage [1] Group 1: Accident Details - The accident occurred on June 3, leading to the death of two employees due to asphyxiation caused by nitrogen gas entering an isolation chamber, reducing oxygen levels below the suffocation threshold [1] - The investigation identified that the employees did not follow safety protocols while operating the flexible isolator, which contributed to the incident [1] Group 2: Company Leadership and Compensation - The main responsible person, Lou Xiaoqiang, holds dual roles as President and COO, with a pre-tax salary of 1.9133 million yuan in 2024 [2] - Other key executives include Boliang Lou, the Chairman and CEO, with a pre-tax compensation of 2.213 million yuan, and Zheng Bei, the Executive Vice President, earning 160,000 yuan [3] Group 3: Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, Kanglong Chemical reported a revenue of 6.44 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 14.9%, while the net profit attributable to shareholders decreased by 37% to 701 million yuan [4] - The decline in net profit is attributed to the impact of non-recurring gains from the previous year, which included a significant gain from the disposal of PROTEOLOGIX, INC. shares [4] Group 4: Share Pledge and Market Performance - On August 1, Zheng Bei pledged 7.35 million shares, representing 46.67% of his holdings, while also releasing 7.61 million shares from pledge [5] - As of September 19, Kanglong Chemical's stock price was 35.01 yuan per share, with a market capitalization of 62.255 billion yuan, reflecting a nearly 40% increase year-to-date [6]

Core Viewpoint - The investigation report on the high-altitude fall accident at the construction site in Bao'an District, Shenzhen, indicates that the incident was caused by workers' violation of safety regulations and inadequate safety management at the construction site, resulting in one fatality [1][4]. Incident Overview - The construction project received its construction permit on April 23, 2023, and was at the rough decoration stage when the accident occurred [2]. - The total contractor, China State Construction Engineering Corporation South China Group, signed a subcontract with Yuan Chuang Construction Co., Ltd. for rough decoration work in June 2024 [2]. - The accident occurred on April 21, 2025, when a worker fell approximately 26.2 meters from the elevator shaft due to the removal of safety barriers [3][4]. Responsibility Assignment - The investigation identified direct responsibility for the accident with the deceased worker, suggesting no further action due to his death [5]. - The project manager from Yuan Chuang Construction, who failed to enforce safety protocols, is recommended for administrative penalties [5][6]. - Both Yuan Chuang Construction and China State Construction Engineering Corporation South China Group are held accountable for inadequate safety management and oversight [6]. Administrative Penalties - On July 7, 2025, China State Construction Engineering Corporation South China Group was fined 30,000 RMB for poor safety management [7]. - Yuan Chuang Construction Co., Ltd. faced a fine of 550,000 RMB for failing to fulfill safety responsibilities and not enforcing safety measures [7]. Company Background - Yuan Chuang Construction Co., Ltd. was established in 2020 with a registered capital of 50 million RMB, primarily engaged in the construction industry [8]. - China State Construction Engineering Corporation South China Group, a member of China State Construction Group, was founded in 2019 with a registered capital of 100 million RMB [8].

Core Viewpoint - The fire incident at Yongju Coal Industry Co., Ltd. resulted in 26 fatalities and 38 injuries, with direct economic losses amounting to 49.9026 million yuan. The incident was classified as a production safety responsibility accident, leading to significant legal and financial repercussions for the company and its management [2][8]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The fire occurred on November 16, 2023, at approximately 6:30 AM, in the second-floor bathroom of the company's office building, affecting an area of about 900 square meters [2][8]. - The direct cause of the fire was identified as a short circuit in the main power supply line of an electric hoist, which ignited combustible materials in the vicinity [8][12]. Group 2: Financial and Legal Consequences - Yongju Coal Industry was fined 15 million yuan by the local emergency management bureau, with the penalty being enforced on October 8, 2024 [5]. - The actual responsible person, Han Wenming, was placed on a serious safety production dishonesty list as of November 12, 2024 [6]. - A total of 13 individuals, including key management personnel, were prosecuted for their roles in the incident, with charges related to major labor safety accidents [4][6]. Group 3: Remedial Actions and Safety Measures - Following the incident, the company invested 37.5 million yuan in fire safety reconstruction, established a fire safety organization, and enhanced safety education and emergency response training [2]. - The company has been mandated to rectify identified safety hazards and has developed a responsibility checklist for compliance [2][3]. Group 4: Investigation Findings - The investigation revealed multiple failures in safety management, including inadequate fire safety facilities, insufficient fire hydrants, and a lack of emergency response training for workers [11][13]. - During the initial 20 minutes of the fire, no workers called emergency services, which contributed to the rapid escalation of the fire [12][13].