央视网消息：据公安部公众号消息，防汛抗灾抢险是争分夺秒的硬仗，广大群众团结一心、多部门 迅速响应，第一时间组织力量投入工作。然而，却有极个别网民为博流量，散布谣言，扰乱社会公共秩 序。公安机关持续开展打击整治涉灾情、险情等领域网络谣言，今日，公安部公布10起涉灾情、险情网 络谣言典型案例。 案例一：陆某兴编造传播"四川泸定桥发生塌方"网络谣言案 近日，四川公安网安部门查明，陆某兴(男，55岁)为吸粉引流、博取关注，通过"移花接木"的方式，拼 凑合成地质灾害、塌方等视频，并在某短视频平台发布，谣称"泸定桥发生塌方"，误导大量网民关注和 讨论，引发当地居民恐慌，扰乱社会公共秩序。 案例二：田某平编造传播"河南夏邑发生洪涝自然灾害"网络谣言案 近日，山东公安网安部门查明，樊某旺(男，35岁)为博取流量、吸粉引流，在多个短视频平台发布内容 为"2025年7月8日，牡丹区王浩屯镇出现龙卷风，多家企业和居民受到影响，240国道的交通一度中断， 另有官方消息，该灾难造成5人死亡，83人受伤"的谣言信息，误导大量网民关注和讨论，引发当地居民 恐慌，扰乱社会公共秩序。 案例七：吴某妹编造传播"景德镇地震"网络谣言案 近日，江西 ...

央视网消息：据新疆网络辟谣微信公众号消息，近日，有网民在网络平台发布信息称，"新疆乌鲁木 齐山区雪崩，10人被困生死成谜"，引发网友关注和担忧。 经乌鲁木齐市应急管理局核实，网传信息系谣言。 网信部门提醒：互联网不是法外之地，对于利用网络编造、制作、复制、发布和传播虚假有害信息的行 为，有关部门将依法依规予以处理。 ...

央视网消息：近日全国多地持续遭遇强降雨，防汛救灾工作紧张进行，公安部也发布提示，警惕四类谣 言。一，夸大灾情、散布水库溃坝等不实信息，制造恐慌；二，假冒政府或社区人员，以"转移安 置""发放补贴"为由索要个人信息；三，冒充公益组织发送"紧急募捐"短信或者链接，诱导转账至私人 账户；四，以"灾情实时地图""自救指南"等名义传播带病毒文件。防汛救灾关键时刻，网络谣言危害极 大，警方也提醒广大网民，筑牢网络安全防线，不造谣传谣。 ...

每经编辑｜程鹏 近日，台风"竹节草"扫过上海。网络上，有网民为了博眼球、拉流量，刻意篡改、编辑往年视频和文字造谣传谣，造成负面的社会影响，对抗台工作造成 干扰。 7月31日上午，上海市公安局发布通报称，经警方调查，马某、汪某为博取流量分别在网络平台用其它地区多年前的视频篡改、合成"奉贤地区严重内 涝"的视频；聂某发布外省市多辆汽车被洪水冲走的视频，并谎称此情况发生在上海；周某发布的三天前外滩观光平台上游客撑伞避雨的视频，造谣称30 日当天有大量游客因台风被困在外滩；徐某、张某在微信群、短视频平台发布"路易号"巨轮附近积水严重的虚假视频。目前，上述6人因虚构事实、散布 谣言扰乱公共秩序，均已被警方处以行政拘留。 警方提醒：当前全市人民正全力以赴抗台，编造传播涉台风的谣言，干扰抗台工作正常进行，公安机关将依法严厉打击此类违法犯罪行为，也请广大市民 群众提高辨别能力，不要随意转发未经证实的信息，共同维护健康清朗的网络舆论环境和良好社会秩序。 另据上海奉贤警方7月30日晚发布通报，2025年7月30日，马某（男，38岁）、汪某（男，64岁）为博取流量分别在网络平台用其它地区多年前的视频篡 改、合成"奉贤地区严重内涝" ...

Core Viewpoint - The news highlights the spread of misinformation regarding tourists being trapped at the Bund due to Typhoon "Zhu Jie Cao," which has been debunked by local authorities [1][8]. Group 1: Misinformation and Response - Social media posts falsely claimed that many tourists were trapped at the Bund observation platform due to the typhoon [1]. - The Shanghai Meteorological Center updated the rain warning from yellow to orange on July 30, 2025, prompting local police to enhance patrols in the area to ensure public safety [1][3]. - The Huangpu District authorities confirmed that the observation platform was temporarily closed and had no tourists present at 1 PM on the same day [1]. Group 2: Clarification of Events - Investigations revealed that videos and photos circulating online showing large crowds at the Bund were actually taken days prior, during previous rain showers, not on July 30 [8]. - The misleading posts were created by individuals who misattributed these earlier scenes to the current weather situation, thus fabricating the "tourists trapped" narrative [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the rise of misinformation regarding giant pandas, driven by individuals posing as "fans" to exploit public sentiment for financial gain [1][2][3]. Group 1: Misinformation and Legal Actions - Recent legal actions in Sichuan have addressed multiple cases of rumors related to "abuse of giant pandas," revealing an underlying profit-driven motive [2][4]. - The court sentenced two individuals, Bai and Xu, for spreading false information about panda abuse, with their fabricated videos receiving over 545,000 views [4][6]. - Bai, known as "Daliao Huanghou," and her husband Xu, were found to have created a network of over ten groups on various platforms, misleadingly portraying themselves as panda advocates [5][6]. Group 2: Profit Mechanisms - Bai and Xu reportedly earned over 170,000 yuan through live streaming and fundraising, utilizing emotional manipulation to generate traffic and revenue [6][7]. - Their tactics included fabricating rumors about panda research facilities and experts, inciting public outrage and harassment against professionals in the field [7][8]. Group 3: Characteristics of Misinformation - The misinformation spread by these individuals often involved sensational claims, such as allegations of unethical practices in panda breeding centers [7][8]. - They also engaged in emotional manipulation by editing videos to create misleading narratives that attracted significant viewer engagement [8][9]. - The article notes that some "fans" are encouraged to participate in tasks that enhance the influence of these misinformation spreaders, further monetizing their activities [9]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The article discusses the increasing number of panda "fans" in China, with a wide age range, some of whom are susceptible to misinformation due to a lack of understanding of panda conservation [14]. - It emphasizes the need for fans to rely on authoritative sources for accurate information about giant pandas, as emotional responses can lead to harmful behaviors [15]. - The article also points out the inadequacies in content regulation on live streaming platforms, suggesting a need for updated legislation to address these issues [16].

Core Viewpoint - Huaxi Biological has officially responded to false information circulating on online platforms, claiming that the content is fabricated and maliciously distorts facts, which has severely damaged the company's reputation. The company has reported the matter to the public security authorities and will pursue legal action against the spreaders of rumors [1][2]. Summary by Sections - The company discovered serious false information about itself on online platforms, which was confirmed to be fabricated and published on an overseas website. The nature of the content includes political rumors, which the company deems extremely malicious [2]. - The individual responsible for the false information, identified as Li, previously served as the marketing director at Huaxi Xinyu Investment Co., Ltd. Li had a history of embezzlement, having fraudulently obtained 9 million yuan that was supposed to be paid to a brokerage firm. This incident was uncovered during an annual report review [2]. - Following the discovery of Li's actions, the company reported the case to the public security authorities, which led to a criminal prosecution based on the embezzlement charge. During the investigation, Li attempted to mitigate his punishment by writing an apology letter, but the company refused to entertain any additional compensation demands beyond the return of the embezzled funds [2]. - As of July 25, Huaxi Biological's stock closed at 53.83 yuan per share, with a market capitalization of 25.9 billion yuan [2].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving a BYD vehicle at Chengdu Tianfu Airport parking lot was misrepresented in social media, and the company has taken steps to address the misinformation and protect its reputation [1][6]. Summary by Sections Incident Details - On July 24, 2025, a report was made to the Sichuan Airport Police regarding a vehicle behaving erratically in a public parking lot. The police responded quickly and found that the driver, Mr. Jiang (40 years old), was agitated due to being unable to contact a guest, which led him to drive in circles. No injuries or property damage occurred, and tests confirmed he was not under the influence of alcohol or drugs [2][4]. Company Response - BYD's news verification office stated that the vehicle's braking system was functioning normally and that the incident was unrelated to the vehicle itself. The company is collecting evidence against those spreading false information and may pursue legal action against the media and individuals responsible for the rumors [1][6]. Ongoing Investigation - The situation is still under further investigation by the relevant authorities to ensure all facts are clarified [3][4].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving a BYD vehicle at Chengdu Tianfu International Airport has been clarified by the company, stating that the vehicle's braking system was functioning normally and the event was unrelated to the vehicle itself [2][4][6]. Group 1: Incident Details - A video circulated on social media showing a black BYD Han car driving erratically in the airport parking lot, leading to public concern about the vehicle being out of control [2]. - The vehicle reportedly made at least 30 circles in the parking lot, prompting police and fire department intervention, although no collisions occurred [2][6]. - The hashtag BYDOutOfControl trended on Weibo, reaching a peak position of 2 and accumulating 17.9 million views [2]. Group 2: Company Response - BYD's news verification office stated that they have gathered evidence against the online rumors and urged media and users to delete false information, indicating potential legal action against those spreading the rumors [4][6]. - The police report confirmed that the driver, identified as a 40-year-old male, was agitated due to being unable to contact a passenger, which led to the erratic driving behavior [6][7]. - The investigation ruled out alcohol or drug influence on the driver, and it was confirmed that no injuries or property damage occurred during the incident [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - BYD responded to the incident at Chengdu Tianfu International Airport, stating that the claims of a vehicle losing control are severely misleading and that the vehicle's braking system was functioning normally [2][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On July 24, a video circulated on social media showing a black BYD Han car driving in circles in the airport parking lot, leading to public speculation about the vehicle losing control [2]. - The hashtag BYDOutOfControl reached the second position on Weibo's trending list, with a reading volume of 17.9 million [2]. Group 2: Company Response - BYD's news verification office stated that they have collected evidence against the online rumors and urged media and users to delete false information, indicating potential legal action against those spreading the rumors [4]. - The Sichuan Provincial Public Security Bureau confirmed that the driver, identified as a 40-year-old male, was agitated due to being unable to contact a passenger, which led to the vehicle's erratic movement. No injuries or property damage occurred [4].