【#AI盗人脸视频仅删除远远不够#】#王劲松担心AI盗人脸沦为犯罪手段#近日，知名演员王劲松发文 控诉自己的形象被AI盗用生成视频，连其家人都难分真假，"太可怕了"。尽管通过投诉相关视频最终被 删除，但他仍担心，"谁能保证，这种钻法律空子的擦边球，最后不沦为犯罪手段？"王劲松的担心绝非 杞人忧天，诸多案例已摆在眼前。大量"数字人"在直播间滔滔不绝兜售假冒伪劣；已故名人莫名"被复 活"带货站台；甚至还有"李鬼拉黑李逵"的闹剧——某演员同时"现身"三个不同直播间，本人无意刷到 怒而对质，反被仿冒者一键拉黑。AI技术滥用，伤及的又何止名人？被伪造亲友声音、图像骗钱骗 物，照片被恶意嫁接、卷入无妄之灾，普通人同样饱受侵扰。面对AI滥用现象，相关治理工作一直在 进行，但现行法律法规针对深度伪造和生成式AI的细节条款仍不够精细。在规则相对滞后的背景下， AI发展却是一日千里。比如，呈现方式上，AI不再局限于传统静态影像，而是对微表情、行走步态、 声音韵律等方面的全面合成。与此同时，AI工具使用门槛持续降低，大多数人稍加熟悉都能在短时间 内生成视频，侵权变得极其便捷且成本低廉，迅速滋生出庞大的黑灰产业链条。打开各种平台，A ...

Group 1 - The central government has initiated a one-month campaign titled "Clear and Bright: Creating a Joyful and Harmonious Online Environment for the Spring Festival 2026" to promote a positive online atmosphere during the Spring Festival [1] - The campaign focuses on addressing four major issues: inciting negative emotions, generating and spreading low-quality content, fabricating false information, and directing traffic to illegal activities [1][2] Group 2 - The campaign aims to combat the promotion of negative values such as anti-marriage and anti-childbearing sentiments, as well as the incitement of gender conflict and social comparison during the festive season [1] - It seeks to eliminate the generation of low-quality content using AI technologies, which includes the distortion of classic literature and cultural references, as well as the creation of sensationalized narratives around family conflicts [1] - The initiative also targets the spread of false information related to public safety and social events during the Spring Festival, including fabricated announcements and misleading headlines [2] - Additionally, the campaign addresses the issue of illegal activities being promoted online, such as gambling and superstitious services disguised as festive offerings [2]

Group 1 - The rumor regarding the administrative division adjustment in Shandong, specifically that Rizhao would be merged into Linyi, has been confirmed as false by the Rizhao Civil Affairs Department, which has not received any notification regarding such changes [5] - The WeChat security center has refuted claims about new regulations that would lead to account suspensions for having too many friends or for maintaining a constant location, stating these are baseless rumors created by malicious groups to cover illegal activities [5] Group 2 - A common misconception exists regarding the radiation from subway security checks, particularly concerning pregnant women and fetal development; the radiation from metal detectors is classified as non-ionizing and is considered safe [6] - The X-ray scanners used for luggage are tightly shielded and emit minimal radiation, ensuring safety for all passengers, including pregnant women, as long as proper protocols are followed [6] Group 3 - Shenzhen's internet authorities are actively conducting the "Qinglang" campaign to combat the misuse of AI technology, targeting applications that disseminate low-quality AI-generated content and enforcing compliance among platforms [8] - Multiple accounts have been penalized for spreading false information and engaging in malicious marketing practices, including those impersonating authoritative sources or promoting pseudoscientific content [8][9] Group 4 - The campaign also focuses on protecting minors from exposure to inappropriate content and scams, with several accounts being shut down for exploiting minors or disseminating harmful information [9] - Actions have been taken against accounts that spread negative sentiments or engage in malicious behavior, including those that provoke social discord or misrepresent criminal activities [10]

Group 1 - Shenzhen's internet information office is conducting a series of "Clear" special actions in 2025 to combat malicious marketing in the short video sector, misinformation from self-media, abuse of AI technology, and infringement related to enterprises [2][3] - The actions include supervising local websites and platforms to fulfill their responsibilities, cleaning up harmful information, and dealing with non-compliant accounts to maintain a healthy online ecosystem [2] - Specific applications and accounts, such as "Tianyan" and "Tuqu AI," have been identified for spreading low-quality AI-generated content and failing to meet labeling requirements [2] Group 2 - Multiple accounts have been penalized for malicious marketing, including Tencent's "Qingfeng Kanggao" for posting fake staged content and WeChat's "Guoneng Goudong Yike" for impersonating authoritative institutions [3] - The initiative also targets accounts that exploit minors, including those posting vulgar content or using minors' images for profit, with several accounts being shut down or restricted [3] - Efforts to purify the online environment for minors have led to the identification of accounts involved in spreading false information related to school violence and other inappropriate content [3] Group 3 - In addressing misinformation from self-media, several accounts have been suspended for spreading subjective and inflammatory statements, distorting historical facts, and promoting negative values [4] - The campaign against malicious provocation of negative emotions has led to the restriction of accounts that spread divisive rhetoric or exploit social issues for views [5] - The initiative also includes measures against low-quality live streaming and accounts that engage in vulgar inducement for tips, resulting in restrictions or permanent bans on several accounts [5] Group 4 - The Shenzhen internet information department plans to continue strengthening governance over various online ecological issues, enforcing laws against non-compliant websites and accounts, and publicly sharing typical case resolutions [6]

Core Viewpoint - A new trend of fraudulent refund claims using AI-generated images is emerging in the e-commerce sector, exploiting the "refund only" policy, which poses challenges for merchants in identifying and managing these claims [1][2][4]. Group 1: AI-Generated Image Fraud - Merchants report that some buyers are using AI tools to create fake images to support refund requests, making it difficult for sellers to verify the authenticity of claims [1][2]. - The identification of AI-generated images relies heavily on manual inspection, and even when anomalies are detected, proving the buyer's dishonesty is challenging [1][4]. - The frequency of such fraudulent claims is not high, but they still occur regularly, leading to increased operational difficulties for merchants [2][4]. Group 2: Challenges in Refund Processing - Merchants often resort to negotiating with customers rather than outright rejecting refund requests, as the cost of returning items can be prohibitive [4][5]. - The "refund only" policy has led to a rise in contentious refund requests, prompting platforms to allow merchants to negotiate directly with customers [5][6]. - Merchants have developed verification rules to combat fraudulent claims, such as requiring buyers to provide specific evidence when claiming refunds [4][6]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Implications - The use of AI-generated images to falsely claim product defects may violate legal principles of honesty and could be classified as civil fraud [8][9]. - Legal experts suggest that sellers have the right to challenge fraudulent refund claims in court, especially if the fraudulent behavior is significant [8][9]. - E-commerce platforms are encouraged to enhance their rules and verification processes to better protect sellers from fraudulent claims [9][10]. Group 4: Industry Response and Future Directions - E-commerce platforms have begun implementing measures to combat AI-generated image fraud, including real-time detection of altered images [9][10]. - The introduction of regulations requiring AI-generated content to include watermarks is expected to help in identifying fraudulent images [12][13]. - Collaboration among e-commerce platforms, AI technology companies, and legal entities is essential to create a healthier ecosystem and mitigate the risks associated with AI misuse [10][18].

Core Viewpoint - The recent joint action by the National Internet Information Office and the China Securities Regulatory Commission aims to address the rampant issue of rumors and illegal stock recommendations in the capital market, which has been a long-standing problem affecting market stability and investor trust [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The regulatory bodies have effectively targeted five types of typical market misconduct, including fabricating false IPO policies and maliciously undermining listed companies, demonstrating a commitment to dismantling the entire chain of rumor production, dissemination, and profit-making [2]. - The measures include closing or silencing accounts that spread false information, which serves as a deterrent against those engaging in malicious activities [2]. - A multi-departmental approach to combating market rumors is becoming a regular practice, with the CSRC enhancing monitoring, identification, and response to false information [2]. Group 2: Market Impact - The spread of rumors has distorted market pricing mechanisms and eroded the foundation of trust, ultimately affecting the stable operation of the market [1]. - The misuse of AI technology has escalated the scale and low-cost nature of rumor dissemination, complicating the regulatory landscape [1]. Group 3: Recommendations for Stakeholders - Online platforms are urged to establish comprehensive processes for monitoring and addressing rumors to avoid amplifying false information [3]. - Listed companies and financial institutions should improve the timeliness of their information disclosures to reduce the space for rumors stemming from information asymmetry [3]. - Investors are encouraged to adopt a rational investment mindset, avoiding the allure of guaranteed profits and refraining from spreading or believing in rumors [3].

Core Viewpoint - The recent joint action by the National Cyberspace Administration and the China Securities Regulatory Commission aims to combat rumors and illegal stock recommendations in the capital market, addressing long-standing issues of misinformation that disrupt market stability [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The regulatory bodies have effectively targeted five types of typical market misconduct, including fabricating false IPO policies and maliciously undermining listed companies [2]. - A comprehensive approach has been adopted to dismantle the entire chain of rumor production, dissemination, and profit-making, with measures including shutting down or silencing violating accounts [2]. - The collaboration among multiple departments to combat market rumors is becoming a regular practice, enhancing monitoring, identification, and response to false information [2]. Group 2: Market Impact - The spread of rumors has historically distorted market pricing mechanisms and eroded trust, often harming retail investors who lack access to accurate information [1]. - The misuse of AI technology has escalated the scale and low cost of rumor propagation, complicating the regulatory landscape [1]. Group 3: Recommendations for Stakeholders - Online platforms are urged to establish comprehensive processes for monitoring and addressing rumors, avoiding their role as amplifiers of misinformation [3]. - Listed companies and financial institutions should improve the timeliness of information disclosure to reduce the space for rumors stemming from information asymmetry [3]. - Investors are encouraged to adopt rational investment philosophies and avoid engaging in or spreading rumors [3].

Core Viewpoint - The recent joint action by the National Internet Information Office and the China Securities Regulatory Commission aims to combat rumors and illegal stock recommendations in the capital market, addressing long-standing issues of misinformation that disrupt market stability [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The regulatory bodies have targeted five types of typical market misconduct, including fabricating false IPO policies and maliciously undermining listed companies, effectively dismantling the rumor manufacturing, dissemination, and profit-making chains [2]. - The measures include closing or silencing accounts that spread false information, demonstrating the regulators' commitment to maintaining order in the online space and curbing the malicious spread of false information in the capital market [2]. Group 2: Collaborative Efforts - A multi-departmental approach to combating market rumors is becoming a norm, with the CSRC enhancing monitoring, identification, and response to false information, while the National Internet Information Office promptly addresses the dissemination of untrue information [2]. - Law enforcement agencies are taking action against individuals who maliciously fabricate and spread rumors that disrupt social order, while the Supreme Court supports investor claims for losses caused by false information [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Stakeholders - There is a pressing need for online platforms to establish comprehensive processes for monitoring and addressing rumors, avoiding becoming amplifiers of misinformation [3]. - Listed companies and financial institutions should improve the timeliness of their information disclosures to reduce the space for rumors stemming from information asymmetry [3]. - Investors are encouraged to adopt a rational investment mindset, steering clear of tempting "guaranteed profits," and to refrain from creating, spreading, or believing in rumors [3].

Core Viewpoint - The recent joint action by the National Cyberspace Administration and the China Securities Regulatory Commission aims to address the rampant issue of rumors and illegal stock recommendations in the capital market, which has been a long-standing problem affecting market stability and investor trust [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The regulatory bodies have targeted five types of typical market disruptions, including the fabrication of false IPO policies and maliciously undermining listed companies, effectively dismantling the rumor manufacturing, dissemination, and profit-making chains [2]. - Measures include closing or silencing accounts that spread false information, demonstrating a strong commitment to maintaining order in the online space and curbing the malicious spread of false information in the capital market [2]. Group 2: Collaborative Efforts - A multi-departmental approach to combating market rumors is becoming a regular practice, with the CSRC enhancing monitoring, identification, and response to false information, while the National Cyberspace Administration addresses illegal stock recommendation accounts [2]. - Law enforcement is also involved in addressing those who maliciously fabricate and spread rumors that disrupt social order, with the Supreme Court supporting investor claims for damages caused by false information [2]. Group 3: Industry Recommendations - There is a pressing need for online platforms to establish comprehensive processes for monitoring and addressing rumors, preventing them from amplifying misinformation [3]. - Listed companies and financial institutions are encouraged to improve the timeliness of their information disclosures to reduce the space for rumors stemming from information asymmetry [3]. - Investors are advised to adopt a rational investment mindset, avoiding the allure of guaranteed profits and refraining from creating, spreading, or believing in rumors [3].

Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI-generated fake images and videos has led to a new form of fraud in e-commerce, where sellers face challenges in proving the authenticity of their products and defending against refund claims [3][6][9]. Group 1: AI Fraud Cases - A recent case in Jiangsu involved a seller who was defrauded by a buyer using AI-generated videos to claim that purchased crabs were dead, resulting in a refund of 195 yuan [3]. - The technology to create realistic fake evidence has become widely accessible, leading to an increase in fraudulent refund claims across various product categories, particularly in perishable goods [6][7]. - The prevalence of refund disputes is highlighted by data showing that refund issues accounted for 16.16% of complaints during the "618" shopping festival, with "arbitrary refunds" following closely at 12.10% [7]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Challenges - Current legal frameworks are struggling to keep pace with the rapid development of AI technology, making it difficult to pursue criminal charges for small-scale fraud cases [9][12]. - Many sellers find it challenging to prove their case to e-commerce platforms, which often reject claims due to insufficient evidence, pushing sellers to negotiate directly with buyers [7][9]. - Legal experts suggest that while the behavior may meet the criteria for fraud under existing laws, the low monetary amounts involved often prevent criminal prosecution [9][12]. Group 3: Industry Response and Recommendations - E-commerce platforms are urged to enhance their verification systems and improve rules to combat the misuse of AI technology in refund claims [11][12]. - There is a call for collaborative efforts among various stakeholders, including regulatory bodies, to address the rise of AI-related fraud and establish clearer legal guidelines [11][12]. - Education for consumers on the legal and illegal uses of technology is deemed essential to prevent misuse while fostering innovation [12].