近日，美国移民与海关执法局人员在明尼苏达州拘留一名5岁男孩利亚姆及其父亲。报道称，执法人员 为入室执法，利用利亚姆去敲门引诱其家人开门。利亚姆及其父亲目前被关押在得克萨斯州一处移民拘 留设施内。报道称，该事件加剧了美国民众对联邦政府移民政策的不满。 1月28日，美国得克萨斯州爆发游行，抗议当地移民拘留设施关押5岁男孩利亚姆。得州警方与抗议人群 发生冲突，警方使用辣椒喷雾等驱散抗议者，并逮捕数人。 ...

1月27日，美国总统特朗普在艾奥瓦州发表演讲时称，共和党必须赢得中期选举。特朗普还称，如果民 主党赢得中期选举，"他们就会试图弹劾我"。美国中期选举定于11月举行，届时将改选国会众议院所有 席位及参议院三分之一席位。近日，美国移民与海关执法局人员在明尼苏达州行动中先后开枪打死两名 美国公民。报道称，最新民调显示，美国民众对特朗普政府的移民政策支持度跌至新低。 ...

此前，联邦移民执法人员于本月7日抓捕非法移民时连开多枪打死美国公民蕾恩·妮科尔·古德，引发大规 模抗议，同时令联邦与地方政府冲突加剧。 如今，普雷蒂之死在全美引发更激烈的争议，民众指责执法人员暴力执法，民主党与共和党阵营互指对 方应对乱局承担责任。 继两名民主党籍前总统克林顿和奥巴马25日发声谴责后，拜登26日表示，当前情况"有违美国最基础的 价值观"。 美国国土安全部官员27日向国会提供的证词显示，24日向普雷蒂开枪的为分属美国边境巡逻队和美国海 关与边境保护局的两名执法人员。 经济观察网 据央视新闻客户端消息，美国联邦执法人员1月以来在明尼苏达州最大城市明尼阿波利斯市 打死两名美国公民，引发的风波持续发酵。美国总统特朗普27日谈及最近一名死者时说，对方不该随身 携带枪支。这一言论立即引发共和党的忠实支持者——美国拥枪团体的不满。 37岁的亚历克斯·普雷蒂是一名重症监护室护士，拥有合法的持枪许可。美国国土安全部称，24日上 午，普雷蒂持枪靠近执法人员并"暴力反抗"，且"企图屠杀执法人员"，后者"出于自卫"开枪。 但目击者拍摄的现场视频显示，普雷蒂从未碰触过他的枪。他的家人发表声明说，普雷蒂当时一手持手 机， ...

转自：成都日报锦观 移民政策支持率跌至新低 明尼苏达州"越闹越乱" 国会参议院共和党领袖约翰·图恩表示，派霍曼前往明尼苏达州是"积极动向"，希望此举有助缓和当地紧张局势。 美国移民与海关执法局人员本月在明尼阿波利斯的行动中先后开枪打死两名美国公民，引发大规模抗议和骚乱。 益普索集团和路透社一份最新联合民调显示，只有39%的受访者支持特朗普政府的移民政策，这是他重新入主白宫后的最低水平。约58%受访 者认为美国移民与海关执法局人员"做得太过头"；在受访的民主党人中，这一比例高达90%。 据新华社（王宏彬） 特朗普在社交媒体上证实，他与明尼苏达州州长沃尔兹和明尼阿波利斯市市长弗雷进行了"非常好的电话交谈"。按照特朗普说法，他与沃尔 兹"有相似看法"。特朗普此前曾指责沃尔兹与弗雷阻挠联邦机构在当地展开移民执法，责令司法部对他们启动刑事调查。 沃尔兹的办公室说，沃尔兹与特朗普的通话"富有成效"，特朗普表示考虑撤出部分联邦执法人员，同意明尼苏达州对联邦执法人员在该州开枪 打死美国公民事件进行调查。 弗雷在社交媒体上说，特朗普同意"眼下局势不能再继续下去"，一些联邦执法人员计划于27日撤出明尼阿波利斯市。 据美国媒体报道 ...

1月21日，美国明尼苏达州执法人员将一司机从车内拖出，遭两名旁观者质疑大喊的画面曝光。两名旁 观者对执法人员大喊："你们的良心在哪里？"随后，执法人员逮捕从车内拖出的人并将其押入执法车辆 中。近期，美国移民与海关执法局在多地开展移民执法行动。美国多地爆发大规模游行示威，抗议联邦 政府驱逐非法移民的政策。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant impact of immigration policies in the United States over the past year, highlighting the political, economic, and social ramifications of these policies, particularly under the Trump administration, which has led to a net outflow of immigrants for the first time in decades and sparked widespread protests against violent enforcement actions [1]. Historical Context - The history of immigration in the U.S. dates back to 1607 with the establishment of Jamestown, which became a permanent British colony, attracting many Europeans [2]. - By the time of the American Revolutionary War, the population was predominantly white, with the first naturalization law in 1790 allowing only "free white" individuals to become citizens, reflecting early racial biases in U.S. immigration policy [2][3]. Legislative Developments - The original Naturalization Act was replaced by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which incorporated similar racial and nationalistic principles, allowing the president to restrict immigration based on national interest [3]. - Significant immigration laws, such as the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924, were enacted to maintain the U.S. as a nation of Northern and Western European descent, reflecting economic pressures and racial biases [4]. Political Dynamics - Both Republican and Democratic administrations have utilized the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency for immigration enforcement, with funding exceeding $170 billion over four years, indicating a bipartisan approach to immigration issues [8]. - The political landscape surrounding immigration has become increasingly polarized, with recent events, such as the shooting of a U.S. citizen by ICE agents, igniting nationwide protests and calls for the abolition of ICE [7][8]. Current Challenges - The debate over birthright citizenship has resurfaced, with a significant portion of the population opposing changes to this policy, which is rooted in the post-Civil War amendments aimed at ensuring citizenship for former slaves and their descendants [9][10]. - The complexities of immigration issues are exacerbated by the intersection of economic, social, and racial factors, leading to heightened tensions and divisions within American society [11][13]. Future Implications - The ongoing immigration debate reflects deeper questions about national identity and citizenship in the U.S., with implications for future immigration policies and societal cohesion [10][12].

Core Viewpoint - The recent police shooting of a U.S. citizen in Minneapolis has reignited nationwide protests against immigration enforcement and police violence, highlighting deep political divisions and social unrest in the U.S. [1][3][11] Group 1: Incident Overview - The shooting of 37-year-old U.S. citizen, Reign Good, by ICE agents during an immigration enforcement operation has sparked significant public outrage and protests across major U.S. cities [1][3][9] - The incident occurred near the site of George Floyd's death, which had previously ignited nationwide protests against police brutality [1][3] - Following the shooting, over 1,500 arrests were made in Minnesota as part of a broader crackdown on illegal immigration, described as the largest operation of its kind in U.S. history [7][11] Group 2: Public Response and Protests - Protests erupted in Minneapolis and spread to cities like Washington, New York, and Seattle, with demonstrators calling for the abolition of ICE and demanding accountability for the shooting [3][11][13] - The protests saw participation from thousands, with slogans like "ICE: Cold-Blooded Killers" and "No ICE, Yes Peace" being prominently displayed [3][20] - The public response has been characterized by a mix of support for strong immigration enforcement and calls for civil rights protections, reflecting a polarized national sentiment [18][20] Group 3: Political Implications - The incident has become a focal point for political debate, with both Republican and Democratic parties using it to galvanize their bases ahead of the 2026 midterm elections [18][20] - The White House has framed the shooting as a case of self-defense by ICE agents, while local officials have criticized the federal government's handling of the situation [13][15] - The ongoing tensions between federal and state authorities are likely to exacerbate divisions within the U.S. political landscape, as both sides seek to leverage the incident for electoral gain [17][20]

Group 1 - President Trump will deliver a prime-time address to the nation, aiming to promote his agenda amid declining public support for his economic policies [1][2] - The speech will highlight Trump's historical achievements over the past year and preview upcoming policies for the new year [1][2] - The address comes at a critical time as Trump's approval ratings are softening, and economic indicators show warning signs, including slowing wage growth and rising living costs [2][3] Group 2 - Trump has been reshaping the federal government by reducing its size and cutting funding for long-criticized programs, while also focusing on immigration policies [2] - The upcoming midterm elections in November will serve as a test of Trump's power and legislative agenda, with the potential for the Republican Party to lose seats in Congress [2] - Political opponents are criticizing Trump's tariffs, linking them to rising consumer prices and inflation, which have become key concerns for voters [2]

Core Viewpoint - The "Trump Gold Card" program aims to attract wealthy individuals to the U.S. by offering permanent residency in exchange for significant fees, reflecting a shift in U.S. immigration policy towards favoring affluent applicants [1][3][6] Group 1: Program Details - The "Trump Gold Card" is priced at $1 million for individuals and $2 million for businesses, with an additional processing fee of $15,000, allowing for expedited permanent residency [3][4][13] - The program simplifies the application process for EB-1 and EB-2 visa categories, requiring only a background check and payment, contrasting with traditional requirements for extensive documentation [4][14] - A "Platinum Card" option is also proposed at $5 million, allowing holders to stay in the U.S. for up to 270 days annually without paying U.S. taxes on foreign income [15] Group 2: Financial Implications - The U.S. government openly acknowledges the financial motivations behind the program, with Trump suggesting it could raise substantial funds to address national debt [6][18] - The program's goal includes raising $1 trillion to help pay down the national debt, which currently exceeds $38 trillion, highlighting the ambitious nature of the initiative [7][18] - The program faces challenges regarding market demand, as the high entry cost may exclude many potential applicants, raising questions about its effectiveness [18][23] Group 3: Policy Controversies - The "Gold Card" initiative has sparked significant debate, with critics arguing it prioritizes the wealthy and effectively "sells" citizenship [8][19] - Legal experts question the legitimacy of the president's unilateral creation of this program, indicating potential legal challenges ahead [8][19] - The program's timing and design, featuring Trump's image, have raised concerns about the politicization of immigration policy [21][23]

Core Viewpoint - The report highlights a significant contradiction in the U.S. government's immigration enforcement narrative, revealing that over one-third of individuals arrested by ICE in the first nine months of the Trump administration had no criminal record, despite claims that operations target serious offenders [1] Group 1: Arrest Data - Approximately 220,000 individuals were arrested by ICE during the first nine months of the Trump administration, with more than 75,000 of these arrests involving individuals without any criminal record [1] - The data does not include arrests made by the Border Patrol, which has been actively conducting operations in various cities, including Chicago and Los Angeles [1] Group 2: Government Claims - U.S. government officials have stated that immigration actions are focused on apprehending "murderers, rapists, and gang members," which contradicts the arrest data showing a high number of non-criminal arrests [1] - Ariel Ruiz Soto, a senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, pointed out the inconsistency between the government's claims and the actual data regarding arrests [1]