当地时间3日，美国国会众议院议长、共和党人迈克·约翰逊将美国政府"停摆"原因甩锅给民主党，称共和党在负责地、真诚地行事，民主党却在"玩弄政 治"。国会参议院共和党领袖约翰·图恩也指责民主党挑动党争，连续多次否决临时拨款法案，"挟持联邦政府和美国人民"。 当地时间10月3日，美国国会参议院分别就民主党、共和党各自提出的政府拨款法案进行表决，两个法案均未获得通过，美国政府继续"停摆"。 美国两党当天互泼脏水，指责是对方让"停摆"危机持续。 随着两党的拨款法案在3日，也就是周五的表决中均未获得通过，美国国会将在周六和周日进入休息状态停止工作。舆论普遍认为，美国联邦政府"停摆"延 续至下周已成必然，其影响将进一步扩大。 同一天，众议院民主党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯则指责共和党的目标就是让政府继续关门。他批评共和党在预算谈判中的论点站不住脚，同时强调，任何旨在 结束停摆的预算协议必须包括加强医保相关福利。 （文章来源：央视新闻） ...

新华社华盛顿10月3日电 题：美国联邦政府再次"停摆"与以往有三个不同 新华社记者熊茂伶 在美国联邦政府时隔近七年再次"停摆"后，美国特朗普政府和民主党斗法进一步升级。特朗普政府 借"停摆"向民主党发起猛攻，削减民主党支持的项目、解散民主党主导的联邦机构。民主党则展现 出"罕见团结"，希望在斗争中挽回支持率。 美国舆论认为，两党围绕政府"停摆"的新一轮争斗与以往大不相同，以"更大的敌意和恶意"把"党争推 到了新高度"，这凸显美国愈演愈烈的政治极化，同时给美国民众带来了更大伤害。 不同之一：特朗普借"停摆"加大攻势 "'停摆'能带来很多好处。我们可以除掉很多我们不想要的东西——民主党的东西。"特朗普话音未落， 白宫便频下狠手。 美国能源部2日宣布终止涉及16个州的223个能源项目，相关资金总计约75.6亿美元。美联社报道，在去 年的总统选举中，这16个州都把票投给了民主党候选人，其参议员在几天前对共和党人临时拨款法案也 投了反对票。 特朗普政府还声称将借"停摆"推进联邦政府裁员计划，大规模解雇联邦雇员。"许多人会被解雇，他们 会是民主党的人。"特朗普说。 不同之二：民主党展现"罕见的团结" "特朗普在政府'停摆 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent unrest in Los Angeles is being interpreted by many as the beginning of a civil war in the United States, but key elements necessary for such a conflict are currently absent [1][3][5]. Group 1: Conditions for Civil War - A significant factor for the outbreak of war is the availability of weapons and ammunition, which is lacking as the current economic system remains stable and production continues [3][5]. - Financial support is crucial for warfare, yet the unrest in Los Angeles is not directly linked to financial capital, which remains unaffected and may even subtly support protestors for political gain [5][7]. - The scale of participation in the unrest is limited, with only a few thousand involved, primarily from marginalized immigrant communities, lacking the organization or resources to form a substantial resistance [5][7]. Group 2: Political Dynamics - The unrest has devolved into a spectacle of mutual accusations between the two major political parties, with Democratic governors criticizing Trump's deployment of the National Guard without consent [7]. - This political division is deepening, shifting from broader national strategies to localized confrontations, which may not escalate to a civil war unless there is a significant shift in control over production resources [7].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the escalating conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University, marked by the cancellation of Harvard's student and exchange scholar program and the halting of federal funding, which has intensified the ongoing legal battle [1][3]. - The conflict is seen as a continuation of Trump's established policy against elite institutions, particularly targeting Harvard, which is associated with the Democratic elite, including past presidents like Roosevelt and Obama [3][12]. - Harvard's historical role as a bastion of elite education has contributed to its current status, with its educational model historically focused on classical subjects and later evolving under leaders like Charles Eliot, who modernized its curriculum [5][7]. Group 2 - The financial model of Harvard, which relies on alumni donations and high tuition fees, has created a barrier for lower-income students, reinforcing social stratification and contributing to the formation of an elite class [9][10]. - The emergence of a "redneck" demographic, characterized by lower education levels and economic struggles, has become a significant political force, contrasting sharply with the elite educated class represented by institutions like Harvard [14][16]. - The political landscape has shifted dramatically since the 2008 financial crisis, with the Republican Party adapting its policies to appeal to this demographic, leading to Trump's rise and the subsequent polarization of American politics [17][19].