Despite threatening rhetoric from the Trump administration and the president himself, judges across the country are pushing back on the administration’s immigration policies. Trump and his allies claim these rulings are being handed down by “rogue judges.” This moment underscores the judiciary’s critical role in defending constitutional limits. MS NOW: My Source for News, Opinion, and the World. Same mission. New name. » Subscribe to MS NOW: https://www.youtube.com/@msnow MS NOW is the go-to destination for ...

WE HAVE, OF COURSE, I THINK IT'S A NEW ANALIS THAT'S YOU KNOW, A NEW ANALYSIS THAT'S ACTUALLY SHOWING WHY SO MANY AMERICANS HAVE TURNED AGAINST THE ICE I THINK IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF CHILDREN WHO HAVE BEEN DETAINED BY ICE. IT SPIKED DURING DONALD TRUMP'S SECOND TERM. KATIE BRITT, SENATOR AND WE'LL HAVE HER FROM ALABAMA IS PROFILED TODAY IN THE NEW YORK TIMES EXPRESSING HER DEEP CONCERN OVER THAT HAPPENING.AND WE'RE ALSO GOING TO WE'LL HAVE THE SAD SPECTACLE OF WHAT HAPPENED YESTERDAY AT THE NATIONAL PRAYER BR ...

Trump’s Approval Rating Falls In 2 Polls As More Americans Reject His Immigration Policies https://t.co/6BhwJA7nfd ...

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk criticizes immigration policies, alleging they are manipulated to undermine democracy and create a single-party state in the United States [1][4]. Group 1: Allegations of Manipulation - Musk claims that "fraudulent government programs" are used by the "radical left" to import and retain both legal and illegal immigrants for electoral advantage [1][3]. - He cites the election of Ilhan Omar in Minnesota as an example of this manipulation, attributing her success to a newly formed Somali voting bloc in a historically homogeneous state [2][3]. Group 2: Broader Implications - Musk warns that if these immigration policies are not reversed, the votes of American citizens will become meaningless, eroding the democratic process [2][4]. - He suggests that similar manipulations are occurring in other countries, including Europe, the UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, indicating a global trend [2][3]. Group 3: Public Discourse Impact - Musk's comments come at a time when immigration policies are a contentious topic, and his significant social media following means his views can influence public discourse [4].

Core Viewpoint - A union-aligned investment group, SOC Investment Group, is seeking disclosures from Amazon, Walmart, and Alphabet regarding the financial and supply chain impacts of U.S. President Trump's immigration policies, particularly concerning H-1B visa regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Investment Group's Actions - SOC Investment Group owns less than 1% of Amazon, Walmart, and Alphabet, and is particularly focused on how these companies will manage the new $100,000 fee structure for H-1B visa approvals [2]. - The group has previously succeeded in convincing companies to conduct racial-equity audits and increase transparency about their lobbying efforts [2]. Group 2: Labor Market Concerns - The Executive Director of SOC, Tejal Patel, emphasized that the availability of skilled labor is critical for long-term company performance, and failure to hire the right talent could threaten company value [3]. - SOC is also inquiring how Trump's immigration policies, including farm raids, are affecting the trucking and farming sectors essential for supermarket supply chains [3]. Group 3: Shareholder Engagement - SOC Investment Group holds approximately 17 million shares of Walmart, 31 million shares of Amazon, and 41 million shares of Alphabet [4]. - The letters sent by SOC come in the context of new regulations being considered for proxy advisors, which could allow companies to disregard shareholder proposals more easily [6]. Group 4: Potential Actions - SOC is aiming for a "productive engagement" with the companies for more disclosures but is also considering litigation if the companies do not include the resolution in their proxy statements [7].

Core Viewpoint - A union-aligned investment group is inquiring about the financial and supply chain impacts of U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration policies on major companies like Amazon, Walmart, and Alphabet [1] Group 1: Company Impact - The investment group sent letters to Amazon, Walmart, and Alphabet, seeking information on how immigration policies are affecting their operations [1] - The focus is on understanding the financial implications and supply chain disruptions caused by these policies [1] Group 2: Industry Context - The inquiry reflects broader concerns within the industry regarding the effects of government policies on business performance and operational efficiency [1] - Companies are being urged to disclose how external political factors influence their financial health and supply chain management [1]

A federal judge in Maryland has ordered the release of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant at the center of political and legal battles for months as a symbol of Trump’s hardline immigration policies https://t.co/oul4N8Yo2Z ...

Core Insights - Mark Zandi, Chief Economist at Moody's Analytics, warns that the U.S. economy is in a "serious affordability crisis" due to specific policy choices impacting inflation [1][5] - Consumer price inflation is currently around 3%, significantly above the Federal Reserve's 2% target, attributed to recent interventions rather than an economic cycle [2][4] - Zandi highlights that aggressive tariffs and restrictive immigration policies are contributing to persistent inflation, which was previously on a downward trajectory [3][4] Economic Impact - The current economic baseline shows inflation spiking in 2025 and remaining elevated, contrasting with a scenario without tariffs where inflation would dip toward the Fed's target by 2026 [4] - Zandi predicts "even higher inflation dead-ahead," indicating a grim outlook for American consumers, especially low- and middle-income households [4][5] - The burden of inflation and economic shifts disproportionately affects lower-income households facing high prices for necessities [5] Market Response - Despite the negative economic outlook, futures for the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, and Dow Jones indices were trading higher, reflecting a positive market sentiment [6] - The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) and Invesco QQQ Trust ETF (QQQ) both closed higher, with SPY up 1.00% and QQQ up 0.75% [7]

Economic Growth and Market Sentiment - The Trump administration is actively pursuing policies aimed at re-industrializing America and fostering economic growth, which has generated enthusiasm among American investors and corporate America [2][3][4] - Current fiscal and monetary stimulus measures are contributing to a sense of economic optimism, despite being in a period of near full employment [3][4] Inflation and Monetary Policy - There is a prevailing belief in the market that inflation issues, particularly high inflation related to tariffs, are being resolved, but this may be premature [5][6] - Inflation is currently above target levels, with a significant depreciation of the US dollar by approximately 10% in the first half of the year, marking the largest decline in 50 years [10] - The Federal Reserve's focus on the labor market over inflation management raises concerns about potential inflation re-acceleration in the future [9][53] Tariffs and Trade Policies - The market appears to have moved past tariff concerns, but the uneven impact of tariffs on small and medium-sized businesses, particularly those reliant on Asian goods, remains a significant issue [32][33] - The agricultural sector is also facing challenges due to changing trade dynamics, particularly with China seeking food products from other countries [33] Immigration Policies - The current immigration policies are seen as counterproductive, especially given the declining birthrate in the US, which necessitates a more open approach to immigration to sustain economic growth [34][35] - There is a call to attract skilled immigrants, particularly in STEM fields, to bolster the workforce and innovation in the US [36][39] Political Landscape and Fiscal Responsibility - The ongoing government shutdown reflects deeper dysfunction between political parties regarding budget resolutions, with both parties criticized for irresponsible spending [15][16][18] - The US is currently running a deficit of approximately 6-7%, which is deemed unsustainable given the economic growth phase [17][21] Future Economic Outlook - The need for fiscal reform is emphasized to ensure long-term sustainability and economic health, with concerns about potential future tax increases to address debt [27][28] - The current economic policies are viewed as pro-cyclical and may lead to adverse consequences in the long run if not managed properly [26][28]

Economic Impact of Tariffs - The implementation of tariffs is raising costs for U.S. businesses, which could lead to a reduction in GDP by approximately 0.5% in the long run [6][13] - The unpredictability of tariff rates creates chaos for businesses, making investments riskier and potentially leading to poor financial outcomes [7][8] - Tariffs are primarily affecting inputs into U.S. manufacturing, thereby increasing operational costs for companies [12][13] Labor Market and Immigration - The reduction of immigrant labor due to immigration policies is negatively impacting productivity and living standards for native-born workers [5][4] - The construction industry, heavily reliant on immigrant labor, is facing challenges that could further drive up housing costs [2][4] Auto Industry Dynamics - The North American auto industry is highly integrated, and tariffs on steel and aluminum are increasing production costs without effectively bringing manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. [15][16] - The pressure on manufacturers to automate due to rising costs may not translate into job creation for U.S. workers [16][17] Revenue Generation and Fiscal Policy - Tariffs function as a sales tax on imported goods, which could theoretically help reduce the deficit, but the actual revenue generated may not be substantial [19][20] - The potential increase in tariff rates could lead to higher revenue, but the effectiveness of this approach in addressing the deficit remains uncertain [21] Long-term Trade Relations - The current administration's approach to tariffs is likely to damage U.S. credibility in international trade agreements, making future negotiations more challenging [22][23] - The violation of established trade agreements could have lasting repercussions on the U.S.'s role in the global trading system [22][23]