Workflow
伊朗核问题
icon
Search documents
市场消息:德国外长抵达瑞士,将与欧盟官员一起就伊朗核问题进行会谈。
news flash· 2025-06-20 10:51
市场消息:德国外长抵达瑞士,将与欧盟官员一起就伊朗核问题进行会谈。 ...
美国巨型钻地弹能摧毁伊朗地下核设施吗?
Xin Hua She· 2025-06-20 08:16
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential military action by the U.S. against Iran, particularly focusing on the capabilities and effectiveness of the GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) against Iran's Fordow nuclear facility [1][4]. Group 1: U.S. Military Considerations - President Trump is expected to decide within two weeks whether to order military strikes against Iran, specifically targeting the Fordow underground uranium enrichment facility [1][12]. - The GBU-57A/B is a 30,000-pound (approximately 14 tons) bomb designed to penetrate deep underground targets, equipped with 6,000 pounds (approximately 3 tons) of high explosives [1][4]. - The bomb has not been used in combat since its first test in 2004, and the B-2 stealth bomber is currently the only aircraft capable of deploying it in real operations [4]. Group 2: Effectiveness Against Fordow Facility - The Fordow facility is located 80 to 90 meters underground, and experts suggest that a single GBU-57A/B may be at the edge of its capability to effectively strike this target [5]. - Multiple strikes on the same point may be necessary to have a significant chance of penetrating the Fordow facility, according to a report from the UK’s Royal United Services Institute [5]. - The estimated inventory of GBU-57A/B bombs in the U.S. military is around 30 units [5]. Group 3: Israel's Position - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu claims that Israel has the capability to destroy all of Iran's nuclear facilities, including the Fordow site, regardless of U.S. actions [6]. - Israel has reportedly already destroyed more than half of Iran's missile launchers, indicating a proactive military stance [6]. Group 4: Potential Consequences of Military Action - U.S. intelligence officials believe that if the U.S. attacks the Fordow facility or if Israel assassinates Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei, Iran may decide to pursue nuclear weapons [8][10]. - The U.S. maintains that Iran must not possess nuclear weapons and must reach an agreement that includes halting uranium enrichment activities [12].
以伊对攻升级,战争会走向何方?
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-06-20 00:05
6月18日晚,以色列与伊朗又展开新一轮互袭,以色列连续出动数十架战机,打击德黑兰多处目标。伊朗则首次向以色列发射"泥石"弹道导弹。以 色列和伊朗,到底谁的持久力更大?中东局势紧张之际,美国派大批战机增兵中东,此举将产生什么影响?本期《新华网国际看点》连线,宁夏 大学中国阿拉伯国家研究院院长李绍先,听听他的解读与分析。 伊朗和以色列,谁的持久力更大? 6月13日,在伊朗首都德黑兰,工程车辆清理在以军袭击中受损的建筑。新华社发 宁夏大学中国阿拉伯国家研究院院长李绍先:其实我们看到,现在伊朗和以色列之间已经形成了互攻。但是大家要知道,以色列和伊朗想达到的 目的是不同的。 以色列是这次互攻的先发起者,可以说它进行先发制人的这样一个军事行动去打击伊朗。而伊朗是被动应战,可以说以色列对伊朗这样一种突如 其来的攻击,极具侮辱性的攻击把伊朗逼到了墙角,伊朗实际上无处可退。 6月17日,在以色列中部城市海尔兹利亚,一栋建筑遭导弹袭击后升起浓烟。新华社发(吉德翁·马科维奇摄/基尼图片社) 长期以来以色列一直孜孜以求,要摧毁伊朗的核设施,也就是彻底终止伊朗的核能力建设。以色列这种追求不是一天两天了,至少十多年,二十 年,可以这样讲 ...
美情报官员:若福尔多核设施遇袭或哈梅内伊遇刺,伊朗或转向核武研发
news flash· 2025-06-19 23:31
跟踪中东局势动态 +订阅 金十数据6月20日讯,据纽约时报报道,尽管伊朗已囤积大量可用于制造核弹的浓缩铀,但美国情报官 员表示,情报机构仍认为伊朗尚未就是否制造核武器作出最终决定。这一评估自今年3月情报机构上次 研判伊朗意图以来未有变化——即便以色列已对伊朗核设施发动袭击。美国高级情报官员称,若美军袭 击伊朗福尔多铀浓缩设施,或以色列杀害伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊,伊朗领导人可能会转向核武研发。然 而,在美国和以色列的许多伊朗问题鹰派人士看来,伊朗是否已决定造核弹并不重要,他们认为德黑兰 的核能力已足以对以色列构成生存威胁。这一问题长期以来是伊朗政策辩论的焦点,随着特朗普考虑是 否轰炸福尔多核设施,争论再度升温。 美情报官员:若福尔多核设施遇袭或哈梅内伊遇刺,伊朗或转向核武研发 ...
美国白宫:特朗普将在“两周内”决定是否对伊朗动武
Xin Hua She· 2025-06-19 22:45
莱维特当天在白宫记者会上宣读了特朗普的一份声明。特朗普在声明中说,美国"在不久的将来"与伊朗 谈判或取消谈判的可能性都很大,"我将在未来两周内决定是否对伊朗发动打击"。莱维特重申,特朗普 的立场是,伊朗不得拥有核武器,必须同美方达成协议,内容包括不进行铀浓缩活动。 莱维特还称,美国与伊朗的联络"仍在继续"。 新华财经纽约6月19日电(记者徐静)美国白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·莱维特19日说,美国总统特朗普将 在"接下来两周内"决定是否下令美军对伊朗发动打击。 据美国媒体报道,特朗普17日晚批准军方对伊朗的打击计划,但是推迟作出最终决定,以观察伊朗是否 会放弃核项目。自17日以来,特朗普每天都在白宫战情室与他的国家安全团队会面。 另外,埃及外长阿卜杜勒阿提19日与欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡娅·卡拉斯通电话时,再次呼吁以 色列和伊朗停止军事冲突,呼吁推动加沙地带停火,并强调谈判是就伊朗核项目达成可持续协议、避免 中东地区陷入全面冲突的唯一途径。 (文章来源:新华社) 路透社援引数名不愿公开姓名的中东国家外交官的话报道,自以色列13日对伊朗发动袭击以来,美国中 东问题特使史蒂文·威特科夫和伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐多次通电话, ...
英国首相斯塔默:最好通过外交途径解决伊朗核问题。
news flash· 2025-06-19 11:22
英国首相斯塔默:最好通过外交途径解决伊朗核问题。 ...
“我们的耐心已经耗尽”,特朗普态度大反转!美国会在以伊冲突中直接下场吗?
第一财经· 2025-06-19 09:20
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shifting stance of the U.S. under President Trump regarding military action against Iran, highlighting the complexities of U.S.-Iran relations and the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Position Changes - President Trump initially expressed a desire to avoid war but has since approved military strike plans against Iran, contingent on Iran's nuclear program decisions [1]. - The U.S. is under pressure from both its "Make America Great Again" supporters, who oppose intervention, and Israel, which demands U.S. support against Iran [3][5]. - The U.S. is increasing military presence in the Middle East to bolster its defensive posture amid the ongoing conflict [3]. Group 2: Israel and Iran Conflict - Israel has conducted multiple airstrikes against Iranian targets, while Iran has retaliated with missile attacks on Israel [3]. - Israeli officials assert that military actions will continue until Iran's nuclear facilities are destroyed, although they currently lack the capability to do so [3][4]. Group 3: Iran's Stance - Iran remains resolute against U.S. military intervention, with its leaders stating that any aggression will have severe consequences [6]. - Despite claims from Trump about Iran's willingness to negotiate, Iranian officials have denied any requests for talks, emphasizing their refusal to negotiate under pressure [6].
从撇清关系到准备打击,美国会在以伊冲突中直接“下场”吗?
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-06-19 08:46
Group 1 - The article discusses the fluctuating stance of the U.S. President Trump regarding military action against Iran, indicating a shift from a non-interventionist approach to a more aggressive posture [1][3] - Following an Israeli airstrike on Iran, Trump expressed a desire for Iran to "unconditionally surrender" and hinted at potential U.S. military involvement [1][3] - The U.S. is reportedly increasing its military presence in the Middle East to bolster its defensive posture amid ongoing conflicts between Israel and Iran [3] Group 2 - Iran's leadership, particularly Supreme Leader Khamenei, has firmly rejected any notion of surrender and warned of severe consequences for U.S. military intervention [5] - Despite Trump's claims of Iran's willingness to negotiate, Iranian officials have denied any requests for talks with the U.S., asserting that they will not negotiate under pressure [5] - The ongoing conflict has led to a series of indirect negotiations between the U.S. and Iran regarding nuclear issues, which have been complicated by military actions [5]
普京称:俄罗斯曾主动提出共同研制防空系统,但伊朗不感兴趣
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-06-19 08:00
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current geopolitical tensions between Iran, Israel, and the United States, highlighting Russian President Putin's comments on the situation and the implications for regional stability. Group 1: Russia's Position - Putin refused to discuss the potential assassination of Iranian leader Khamenei and stated that Iran has not made any formal requests for weapon supplies [1][2] - He emphasized that Russia's strategic partnership with Iran does not include military cooperation and that Iran showed little interest in joint defense projects [2][4] - Putin assured that Iran's nuclear interests can be safeguarded and that discussions have taken place with Israel and the U.S. regarding these issues [1][4] Group 2: Iran-Israel Conflict - The conflict between Israel and Iran has escalated, with significant casualties reported: over 450 Iranian deaths and 24 Israeli deaths due to ongoing hostilities [4] - Israel has targeted Iranian oil, gas, and nuclear facilities, while Iran has retaliated against Israeli infrastructure [4][5] - The situation is critical, with concerns about U.S. military involvement in the conflict, as President Trump has hinted at possible military action against Iran [4][7] Group 3: U.S. Military Strategy - Reports indicate that the U.S. may need to intervene militarily to target Iran's deep underground nuclear facilities, which are beyond the reach of Israeli conventional weapons [5][7] - Trump has been described as being on the edge of a significant gamble regarding military action in the Middle East, with potential implications for his political stance [7] - U.S. military assets are reportedly being deployed to Europe and the Middle East in response to the escalating situation [5][7] Group 4: Regional Stability Concerns - Russian officials have warned that U.S. attacks on Iran could severely destabilize the Middle East and potentially lead to a nuclear disaster [8] - The rhetoric surrounding the conflict suggests a precarious balance, with the potential for escalation into broader military engagement [8]
美官员透露美对伊袭击时间!伊朗逮捕18名以色列特工,以军发出最新撤离警告
21世纪经济报道· 2025-06-19 03:01
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating military conflict between Iran and Israel, highlighting recent attacks, military preparations, and international responses. Group 1: Military Actions and Developments - U.S. officials are preparing for potential military action against Iran, with reports suggesting an attack could occur soon [1][10] - Iran has arrested 18 alleged Israeli agents accused of involvement in drone operations [2] - The Israeli Air Force has launched new attacks on Tehran and other regions, warning residents to evacuate before strikes on military facilities [4] - Iran has utilized its advanced "Mudstone" ballistic missiles for the first time in the ongoing conflict, targeting Israeli intelligence and military bases [8] - Since the conflict began, Iran has reportedly fired over 400 ballistic missiles and 1,000 drones at Israel, resulting in significant casualties and damage [8] Group 2: Political Context and Responses - President Trump approved an attack plan against Iran but has not issued a final order, seeking to assess Iran's nuclear intentions [10][12] - Iran's UN representative denied any request for negotiations with the U.S., labeling Trump's statements as false [14] - Russian President Putin expressed willingness to ensure Iran's peaceful nuclear energy interests while addressing Israeli security concerns [18][19] - The UN Secretary-General called for an immediate ceasefire and diplomatic solutions to the conflict, emphasizing the need to avoid escalation [22]