Core Viewpoint - President Trump announced a 10% tariff on goods exported from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland to the US starting February 1, which will increase to 25% on June 1 until an agreement on the "complete and total purchase of Greenland" is reached [1] Group 1: Reactions from Sweden and Denmark - Sweden's Prime Minister Kristersson stated that Sweden will not be blackmailed and emphasized that only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning them [3] - Denmark's Foreign Minister Rasmussen expressed that the tariff policy was unexpected and highlighted ongoing discussions with the EU regarding the situation [4] - Denmark's Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister stated that Trump's threats are completely unacceptable and stressed the importance of international law and territorial sovereignty [4] Group 2: Reactions from Norway and France - Norway's Prime Minister Støre asserted that there should be no threats among allies and reaffirmed Norway's support for Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland [5] - French President Macron labeled the tariff threats as unacceptable and indicated that European nations would respond in a united and coordinated manner if the threats were confirmed [8] Group 3: Responses from Germany, the UK, and the Netherlands - Germany's government spokesperson noted that they are closely consulting with European partners to decide on appropriate responses [9] - UK Prime Minister Starmer described the tariff threats as completely wrong and emphasized that the future of Greenland should be determined by its people and Denmark [12] - The Netherlands is also in close contact with EU partners to discuss response measures to the tariff announcement [13] Group 4: Finland and EU's Position - Finland's President Stubb stated that issues among allies should be resolved through dialogue rather than pressure, warning that tariffs could harm transatlantic relations [14] - EU Commission President von der Leyen and European Council President Costa warned that tariffs would damage transatlantic relations and emphasized the importance of territorial integrity and sovereignty [18] Group 5: Greenland's Autonomy - Greenland's Prime Minister stated that their future should be determined by themselves, reflecting a strong sentiment of autonomy among Greenlandic leaders [20]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the announcement by U.S. President Trump regarding the imposition of tariffs on goods exported from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland to the U.S., starting from February 1, with an increase to 25% by June 1, contingent upon the purchase of Greenland [3]. Group 1: Responses from Various Countries - Sweden's Prime Minister Kristersson stated that Sweden will not be blackmailed and emphasized that only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning them [7]. - Denmark's Foreign Minister Rasmussen expressed that the U.S. tariff policy was unexpected and highlighted ongoing discussions with the EU [8]. - Norway's Prime Minister Støre affirmed that threats should not exist among allies and reiterated Norway's support for Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland [9]. - French President Macron labeled the tariff threats as unacceptable and indicated that European nations would respond in a united manner [11]. - Germany's government spokesperson noted that they are in close consultation with European partners to determine appropriate responses [12]. - The UK Prime Minister Starmer criticized the tariff plans as completely wrong and emphasized that the future of Greenland should be decided by its people and Denmark [15]. - The Netherlands is also in discussions with EU partners regarding the U.S. tariff announcement [16]. - Finland's President Stubb suggested that issues among allies should be resolved through dialogue rather than pressure [17]. Group 2: EU's Position - The EU Commission President von der Leyen and the European Council President Costa stated that the tariffs would damage transatlantic relations and could lead to a dangerous cycle [20]. - They reaffirmed solidarity with Denmark and Greenland and emphasized the importance of territorial integrity and sovereignty as fundamental principles of international law [20].

央广网北京1月18日消息 据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻和报纸摘要》报道，美国总统特朗普 17日表示，宣布美国将从2月1日起对丹麦、挪威、瑞典、法国、德国、英国、荷兰和芬兰的输美商品加 征10%关税。 特朗普说，加征关税的税率将从6月1日起提高到25%，直到相关方就美国"全面、彻底购买格陵兰 岛"达成协议。他还表示，美国对即刻与上述欧洲8国进行谈判持开放态度。 欧洲理事会主席科斯塔和欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩17日发表联合声明，表示美国宣布的加征关税措 施将削弱跨大西洋关系，并可能导致"危险的恶性循环"。欧洲议会国际贸易委员会主席朗格17日敦促欧 盟委员会立即启动反胁迫工具相关程序，作出"明确回应"。 英国首相斯塔默发表声明说，美国总统特朗普对盟友加征关税的做法"完全错误"，英方将直接与美 国政府交涉。 数千名丹麦人17日在首都哥本哈根举行游行示威，抗议美国企图控制格陵兰岛的行径。记者在现场 了解到，示威者中有人来自丹麦本土，有人来自格陵兰岛。游行人群喊着"格陵兰岛不出售"等口号，表 达丹麦人团结一致反对美国夺岛企图的立场。 法国总统马克龙表示，关税威胁"不可接受"，欧洲将团结应对。 瑞典首相克里斯特松表示，正 ...

此前应丹麦邀请，挪威、瑞典、法国、德国、英国、荷兰、芬兰及比利时等国宣布向格陵兰岛派兵，参 加在岛上举行的联合军事演习。1月16日，丹麦军方对媒体表示，丹麦业已邀请美国参加演习，尚未收 到美方答复。(完) （文章来源：中国新闻网） 声明表示，此前丹麦协调盟国计划在格陵兰岛举行军事演习，旨在加强北极地区安全，不针对任何一 方。欧盟将全力支持丹麦和格陵兰岛人民。 声明称，美国加征关税将破坏跨大西洋关系，引发危险恶性循环，欧盟将团结一致捍卫主权。与此同 时，对话依然重要，欧盟将继续推动丹麦与美国已于本周启动的对话进程。 17日早些时候，美国总统特朗普在社交媒体发文，宣布美国将从2月1日起对丹麦、挪威、瑞典、法国、 德国、英国、荷兰和芬兰加征10%的关税，6月1日起将税率增至25%，直到这些国家与美国就"购买格 陵兰岛"达成协议。 中新社布鲁塞尔1月17日电 (记者德永健)在美国总统特朗普宣布将对向格陵兰岛派兵的欧洲多国加征关 税后，欧洲理事会主席科斯塔和欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩17日发表联合声明，表示美国此举将破坏跨大 西洋关系，引发恶性循环，欧盟将团结一致捍卫主权。 声明称，领土完整和主权是国际法基本原则，对欧洲乃 ...

斯图布表示，对芬兰而言，与盟友一道努力加强北极地区安全至关重要，其中包括近日在格陵兰岛开展 由丹麦领导、多国参与的军事行动。他说，欧洲各国"团结一致"，强调领土完整和主权独立，"我们支 持丹麦和格陵兰岛"。 美国总统特朗普17日在社交媒体上宣布，将从2月1日起对丹麦、挪威、瑞典、法国、德国、英国、荷兰 和芬兰的输美商品加征10%关税，加征关税的税率将从6月1日起提高至25%，直到相关方就美国"全 面、彻底购买格陵兰岛"达成协议。 芬兰总统斯图布17日表示，美国为得到格陵兰岛而向欧洲国家加征关税，将损害跨大西洋关系。他敦促 美国通过与欧洲对话、而非单方面施压来解决分歧。 近日，挪威、瑞典、法国、德国、英国、荷兰和芬兰等欧洲国家宣布向格陵兰岛派兵，参加由丹麦在该 岛发起的"北极耐力"军事演习。 斯图布在社交媒体平台上发文说，解决问题的最佳途径是对话，而非施压，关税将破坏跨大西洋关系， 并可能导致危险的恶性循环。 （文章来源：新华社） ...

欧洲理事会主席科斯塔和欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩17日经欧盟官网发表联合声明，表示美国宣布的加征 关税措施将削弱跨大西洋关系，并可能导致"危险的恶性循环"。联合声明指出，尊重主权和领土完整是 国际法的基本原则，对欧洲乃至整个国际社会至关重要。欧盟与丹麦及格陵兰岛人民团结一致。丹麦与 盟国协调开展的军事演习，旨在加强北极安全，不对任何国家构成威胁。联合声明强调对话的重要性， 并表示欧洲将保持团结与协调，坚定维护自身主权。（新华社） ...

Group 1 - The EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Borrell, and Germany's Defense Minister, Pistorius, discussed security challenges in the Arctic and Greenland, emphasizing the need for NATO's collective interest in the region [1] - Pistorius affirmed support for Denmark's territorial integrity and sovereignty over Greenland, stating that the security of the Arctic must align with the interests of all NATO members, not just the U.S. [1] - Borrell acknowledged the transatlantic relationship with the U.S. but noted that it is not as strong as it once was [1] Group 2 - President Trump has made multiple strong statements regarding the acquisition of Greenland, emphasizing its necessity for the U.S. and expressing a desire for complete ownership [2][3] - Trump has suggested that the U.S. should purchase Greenland and has not ruled out military options to achieve this goal, despite potential impacts on NATO relationships [4][5] - Analysts have identified four potential methods for the U.S. to acquire Greenland: purchasing it, military takeover, inciting independence, or binding treaties [6][7] Group 3 - NATO European countries are actively seeking solutions to counter U.S. intentions regarding Greenland, which could create rifts within the alliance [9] - Proposals include establishing a NATO joint task force named "Arctic Sentinel" to enhance security in the Arctic region and counter U.S. claims [9] - There are discussions among NATO members about potentially expelling U.S. military forces from European bases, which could affect U.S. operations in other regions [9]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and German Defense Minister focused on security challenges in the Arctic and Greenland, emphasizing NATO's collective interest in the region [1] Group 1: Security Policy - The German Defense Minister stated that Greenland is within NATO's responsibility zone and must be protected, highlighting the importance of safeguarding the area [1] - The Minister affirmed strong support for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark [1] - The security of Greenland and the Arctic should align with the interests of NATO as a whole, not just the United States [1] Group 2: Transatlantic Relations - The EU representative acknowledged that while the U.S. remains an ally, the relationship is not as strong as it once was [1]

Group 1 - The Danish Prime Minister and the Greenlandic Prime Minister reaffirmed their commitment to not selling Greenland to the United States during a press conference in Copenhagen [1] - The EU's defense official stated that the EU could provide security support for Greenland if Denmark requests it, warning that a military takeover by the U.S. would lead to a "fatal blow" to NATO [1] - The strategic importance and resource richness of Greenland were highlighted, noting its historical context as a former Danish colony until 1953 and its current status of self-governance since 2009 [2] Group 2 - The U.S. President expressed a strong desire for the U.S. to "own" Greenland and did not rule out the use of force if a simple agreement could not be reached [2] - The recent military actions by the U.S. in Venezuela were mentioned, indicating a pattern of aggressive foreign policy that could extend to Greenland [2] - The U.S. President claimed that he does not need international law to justify actions globally, relying instead on his own moral standards [2]

Core Viewpoint - The EU is prepared to provide security support for Greenland if Denmark requests it, while warning that any military action by the US to seize Greenland would be a "fatal blow" to NATO and severely damage transatlantic relations [1] Group 1: EU and NATO Relations - EU defense official Kubilius stated that a US military takeover of Greenland would lead to a "very negative" reaction among European citizens [1] - Kubilius agrees with Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen's view that such an action would be detrimental to NATO [1] Group 2: Security Support for Greenland - The EU treaty stipulates that member states are obligated to assist if one is subjected to armed aggression [1] - If Denmark requests, the EU will enhance security support for Greenland, which may include deploying troops, naval vessels, and improving counter-drone capabilities [1] Group 3: US and Denmark Relations - Both Denmark and the US are NATO members, and discussions regarding Greenland are scheduled to take place between the two parties [1] - Greenland and Denmark have repeatedly emphasized that the island is "not for sale," countering US President Trump's previous claims about the necessity for the US to "own" Greenland [1]