Core Points - The Russian government continues to maintain contact with the U.S. government through working channels, but the U.S. has not yet responded to Russia's proposals regarding the New START treaty [1] - President Putin indicated that the New START treaty will expire on February 5, 2026, marking the end of the last agreement that directly limits nuclear missile capabilities [1] - Russia is prepared to adhere to the strategic weapon limits set by the treaty for one year after its expiration, provided that the U.S. takes similar actions and does not undermine the existing nuclear deterrence balance [1] - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov stated that Russia is awaiting a response from U.S. leaders regarding the proposals [1] - A third round of talks aimed at eliminating "stimulants" in the bilateral relationship is scheduled to take place before the end of this autumn [1]

Group 1 - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov stated that threats of military action against Russia are increasing, and Russia will respond decisively to any acts of aggression [1] - Lavrov emphasized that Russia has no intention of attacking NATO or EU countries, countering accusations from some nations [1] - Regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Lavrov expressed Russia's openness to negotiations aimed at eliminating the roots of the conflict, provided that Russia's security interests are guaranteed [1] Group 2 - Lavrov expressed a degree of hope for continued dialogue between Russia and the United States, particularly following a meeting between the leaders in Alaska [1] - He noted that the current actions of the U.S. government indicate a willingness to seek solutions to the Ukraine crisis and to develop pragmatic cooperation with Russia [1] - Lavrov reiterated President Putin's proposal to continue adhering to the core limitations of the New START treaty for one year after its expiration, provided the U.S. does not undermine the existing balance [1][2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that China appreciates Russia's willingness to continue adhering to the New START treaty's restrictions for one year after its expiration, emphasizing the importance of nuclear disarmament responsibilities for both the US and Russia [1] - China maintains a consistent stance on the New START treaty, advocating for both the US and Russia to fulfill their special and priority responsibilities in nuclear disarmament [1] - The New START treaty, signed in 2010, aims to limit the number of nuclear warheads and delivery systems deployed by the US and Russia, originally set to last for 10 years but extended to February 5, 2026 [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that China supports Russia's commitment to adhere to the core limitations of the New START treaty after its expiration and emphasizes the importance of nuclear disarmament by the US and Russia [2][3] - China calls for the US and Russia, as the two countries with the largest nuclear arsenals, to fulfill their special and priority responsibilities in nuclear disarmament and to restore the execution of the New START treaty [2] - There is a call for further substantial and legally binding reductions in nuclear arsenals in a verifiable and irreversible manner, which aligns with the expectations of the international community [2]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. White House has expressed a positive stance on Russia's proposal to continue adhering to the New START treaty regulations for one year after its expiration, indicating potential diplomatic engagement between the two nations [1] Group 1: U.S. Position - White House Press Secretary Levitt stated that President Trump is aware of Russia's proposal and intends to make a public comment on it [1] - Trump has expressed his willingness to personally handle the proposal, suggesting a proactive approach from the U.S. side [1] Group 2: Russia's Position - President Putin, during a meeting of the Russian Security Council, expressed confidence in the reliability of Russia's deterrent forces but stated there is no intention to engage in an arms race [1] - Putin proposed that the U.S. should maintain the status quo established by the New START treaty and indicated Russia's willingness to adhere to the treaty's weapon quantity limits for one year after its expiration on February 5, 2026, if agreed upon by President Trump [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent proposal from Russia regarding the continuation of compliance with the New START treaty after its expiration, which has garnered a positive response from the U.S. White House, indicating potential diplomatic engagement between the two nations [1]. Group 1 - The U.S. White House expressed that Russia's proposal to continue adhering to the New START treaty regulations for one year after its expiration sounds promising [1]. - White House Press Secretary Levitt stated that President Trump is aware of the proposal and intends to make a public comment on it [1]. - President Putin of Russia emphasized confidence in the reliability of Russia's deterrent forces and expressed no intention to engage in an arms race, suggesting the U.S. maintain the status quo established by the New START treaty [1]. Group 2 - Putin indicated that if President Trump agrees, Russia is willing to continue adhering to the treaty's weapon quantity limits for one year after the treaty's expiration date on February 5, 2026 [1].

美国白宫当地时间22日表示，俄罗斯提议《新削减战略武器条约》到期后一年内继续遵守相关规定"听 起来很不错"。白宫新闻秘书莱维特表示，美国总统特朗普知道相关提议，并希望对此发表公开评论。 当天，俄罗斯总统普京主持召开俄罗斯联邦安全会议常务委员会议。普京表示，俄罗斯对其威慑力量的 可靠性充满信心，但无意进行军备竞赛。普京建议美国维持《新削减战略武器条约》确立的现状。他表 示，如果美国总统特朗普也同意，俄罗斯愿意在2026年2月5日，即《新削减战略武器条约》期满日，之 后的一年内继续遵守条约规定的武器数量限制。 （文章来源：央视新闻客户端） ...

Group 1 - The meeting between Russian President Putin and US President Trump is scheduled for August 15 in Anchorage, Alaska, focusing on key issues including the Ukraine crisis and bilateral relations [1][2] - The meeting will begin with a one-on-one discussion followed by a 5-on-5 delegation-level consultation, involving key officials from both sides [1][3] Group 2 - The first agenda item is the ceasefire in Ukraine, with Trump emphasizing the goal of achieving a ceasefire during discussions with European leaders [3][4] - The second agenda item involves a long-term solution to the Ukraine crisis, with discussions potentially touching on territorial exchanges, although both sides have shown resistance to concessions on territorial issues [4][5] - The third agenda item is the normalization of US-Russia relations, with discussions expected to cover economic cooperation and global security issues [5][6] - The fourth agenda item is Arctic development cooperation, where Putin may propose projects aimed at enhancing economic development in the Arctic and Far East regions [7]

Group 1: Meeting and Diplomatic Tensions - The meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin is scheduled for August 15 in Alaska to discuss the Ukraine crisis, marking their first face-to-face meeting since 2019 [1] - Trump has expressed disappointment in Putin and indicated that the deadline for a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine remains valid, with a potential shortening of the 50-day timeline [3][4] - The ongoing verbal exchanges between the US and Russia have escalated, with both sides making strong statements regarding nuclear capabilities and treaties [2][6] Group 2: Nuclear Threats and Military Posturing - The current tensions between the US and Russia are described as the most explicit nuclear threat since the Cuban Missile Crisis, with both nations engaging in military posturing [8][20] - Trump announced the deployment of two US nuclear submarines to "appropriate areas," likely near Russian waters, emphasizing the seriousness of nuclear threats [7][9] - The US Navy operates 71 nuclear submarines, including 14 Ohio-class submarines, which can carry up to 24 Trident II missiles, each with a yield of 475 kilotons [11] Group 3: Arms Control and Treaty Developments - Russia has announced it will no longer adhere to the self-imposed restrictions of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which previously limited the deployment of land-based missiles [14][15] - The last remaining nuclear arms treaty between the US and Russia, the New START treaty, is set to expire on February 5, 2024, raising concerns about a new arms race [22] - The US has been expanding its intermediate-range missile capabilities since its withdrawal from the INF Treaty in 2019, with deployments planned in various allied countries [16][17]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict continues to escalate with significant military actions reported from both sides, alongside diplomatic developments involving the U.S. and potential negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Group 1: Military Actions - Over the past week, Russian forces have conducted 10 joint strikes targeting Ukrainian military industrial enterprises, military airfields, and drone facilities [2][3] - Russian Black Sea Fleet has destroyed 4 Ukrainian unmanned boats, while Russian air defense systems intercepted and destroyed 27 aerial bombs, 7 rockets, 4 Neptune missiles, and 2049 drones [3] - Ukrainian Armed Forces reported 85 battles occurring on the front lines, with the Pokrovsk region experiencing the most intense fighting [4] Group 2: Attacks on Ukrainian Cities - On July 25, Russia launched ballistic missile attacks on Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk regions, causing significant damage [5][6] - Reports indicate that Kharkiv was targeted by multiple airstrikes, resulting in injuries and fatalities among civilians, including a child [7][9] - An explosion in a residential building in Saratov resulted in 3 deaths, including one child, attributed to a suspected gas explosion [10][12] Group 3: Diplomatic Developments - Former U.S. President Trump expressed a desire to maintain the limits set by the New START treaty on U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear weapons, marking his first statement on this since taking office [13][14] - Trump indicated that the treaty, which limits each country to 1550 deployed nuclear warheads, is crucial for international security and should not be allowed to expire [15][16] - Discussions are ongoing regarding a potential meeting between Russian President Putin and Ukrainian President Zelensky, with both sides showing interest in negotiations [20][23]