Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the necessity of a comprehensive approach to the anti-corruption struggle, highlighting the need for a decisive, enduring, and systematic battle against corruption to ensure the integrity and purity of the Party [1][2][3]. Group 1: Anti-Corruption Strategy - The anti-corruption struggle must be characterized by a decisive offensive, a long-term commitment, and a systematic approach, reflecting the complex and persistent nature of corruption [2][4][6]. - The current anti-corruption landscape is marked by severe, stubborn, and recurring issues, necessitating a robust and multifaceted response [3][5][6]. Group 2: Challenges in Anti-Corruption - Corruption remains a significant threat, particularly in sectors with concentrated power and resources, such as finance, state-owned enterprises, and public health [3][4]. - The struggle against corruption is complicated by the intertwining of various interests and the evolving nature of corrupt practices, requiring a comprehensive and systemic response [6][7]. Group 3: Advantages in the Anti-Corruption Fight - The Party's foundational mission and strong leadership provide a solid foundation for the anti-corruption campaign, ensuring a unified direction and commitment [8][9]. - The Party's scientific theoretical guidance enhances its ability to navigate the complexities of governance and corruption, offering a clear framework for action [10][11]. Group 4: Institutional Mechanisms - A robust institutional framework is essential for effective anti-corruption efforts, including comprehensive regulations and a strong supervisory system [12][13]. - The integration of various supervisory mechanisms, including internal Party oversight and public accountability, is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures [13][14]. Group 5: Community Engagement - The support and involvement of the public are vital for the success of anti-corruption initiatives, as a strong connection with the masses reinforces the Party's legitimacy and effectiveness [11][12]. - Promoting a culture of integrity and accountability within society is essential for sustaining anti-corruption efforts and preventing the resurgence of corrupt practices [19].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of advancing the anti-corruption struggle as a significant political battle that cannot afford to lose, highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach to prevent corruption at all levels of the party [1][3]. Group 1: Achievements and Strategies in Anti-Corruption - Since the 18th National Congress, significant achievements have been made in the anti-corruption struggle, including the establishment of a comprehensive leadership structure for anti-corruption work [2]. - The approach combines immediate measures with long-term solutions, ensuring that party members are deterred from corruption through fear, institutional constraints, and ideological education [2]. - A zero-tolerance policy is maintained towards corruption, with a focus on both preventing new cases and addressing existing ones, particularly in key areas [2][4]. Group 2: Institutional and Ideological Framework - A robust regulatory framework has been developed, enhancing the rigidity of the system to prevent corruption and ensuring that regulations are effectively implemented [2][5]. - The ideological foundation against corruption is strengthened through education on party values and traditions, aiming to instill a strong moral compass among party members [2][5]. - The integration of various supervisory mechanisms is emphasized to ensure comprehensive oversight of power and to prevent abuse [5][6]. Group 3: Leadership and Accountability - The article stresses the need for leaders, especially those in high positions, to maintain a high standard of self-discipline and to manage their surroundings effectively [6]. - The role of disciplinary inspection agencies is highlighted, with a call for them to adapt to new challenges in the anti-corruption landscape and to enhance their operational capabilities [6]. - There is a focus on the importance of public support and involvement in the anti-corruption efforts, reinforcing the idea that the struggle against corruption is a collective responsibility [5][6].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to combat grassroots corruption, advocating for a comprehensive strategy that includes deterrence, prevention, and motivation against corruption [1] Group 2 - Establishing a grassroots supervision network is crucial, focusing on scientific power distribution, standardized exercise of power, and effective supervision to address corruption in key areas such as rural revitalization, education, healthcare, and social security [2] - The responsibility of grassroots party organizations and functional departments must be clarified to create a collaborative work pattern involving various stakeholders in combating corruption [2] - A mechanism for regular collaboration should be established to enhance the effectiveness of grassroots supervision, utilizing big data and innovative public participation methods [2] Group 3 - Maintaining a high-pressure stance on corruption is essential, with a focus on case handling to demonstrate commitment and effectiveness in combating corruption [3] - Expanding sources of information for investigations by integrating data from various departments and utilizing big data techniques to improve the precision of problem detection [3] - Strengthening the coordination among different supervisory organizations to enhance the quality and efficiency of case handling [3] Group 4 - Emphasizing source governance is vital, with a focus on preventing corruption by addressing root causes and enhancing the awareness of integrity among grassroots officials [4] - Implementing strict execution of regulations and transparency in power operations to minimize discretionary power and improve governance effectiveness [4]

Core Points - The emphasis on the integration of anti-corruption and integrity efforts is crucial for addressing the intertwined issues of misconduct and corruption [1][2][3] - The approach of "same investigation" and "same governance" aims to tackle the root causes of corruption and misconduct through systematic measures [1][3][4] - The need for a comprehensive strategy that includes education, supervision, and strict enforcement of discipline is highlighted to prevent the resurgence of corruption [3][5] Group 1 - The concept of "same investigation" maintains a high-pressure stance against misconduct and corruption, recognizing their interrelated nature [2] - The strategy involves deep investigations into specific areas and behaviors that contribute to corruption, such as improper gifts and bureaucratic formalism [2] - The use of new technologies, such as big data, is encouraged to enhance the detection and analysis of corruption-related issues [2] Group 2 - The "same governance" approach focuses on systemic treatment of corruption and misconduct, emphasizing the need for a holistic view and integrated efforts [3][4] - Continuous education on party discipline and the implementation of strict corrective measures are essential to address systemic issues revealed during investigations [3][5] - Strengthening the cultural foundation of integrity and promoting family values related to discipline are seen as vital components in building a robust anti-corruption framework [5]