Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of style construction as a fundamental guarantee for the development of the Party's cause, particularly in the context of the Hainan Free Trade Port entering a new phase of operation [1] - The leadership's role as a "key minority" is crucial for demonstrating and guiding the political ecology, requiring them to lead by example and address challenges in infrastructure and institutional innovation [2] - A three-tier governance mechanism is proposed, focusing on prevention, identification of "micro-corruption," and innovative education to strengthen discipline awareness among Party members [3] Group 2 - The principle of addressing both symptoms and root causes in style construction is highlighted, advocating for a combination of strategic and tactical approaches to maintain continuous pressure and accountability [4] - The need for a political ecology that integrates "dare not corrupt, cannot corrupt, and do not want to corrupt" is emphasized, with a focus on high-pressure tactics against corruption and the establishment of a culture of integrity [5] - A flexible strategy for confronting complex contradictions is discussed, advocating for targeted measures and support for innovative efforts while maintaining fairness and order in the construction of the Free Trade Port [6][7] Group 3 - The concept of "systematic governance" is introduced, which includes a collaborative institutional framework, integrated supervision mechanisms, and a multi-faceted approach to promote integrity and governance [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the necessity of a comprehensive approach to the anti-corruption struggle, highlighting the need for a decisive, enduring, and systematic battle against corruption to ensure the integrity and purity of the Party [1][2][3]. Group 1: Anti-Corruption Strategy - The anti-corruption struggle must be characterized by a decisive offensive, a long-term commitment, and a systematic approach, reflecting the complex and persistent nature of corruption [2][4][6]. - The current anti-corruption landscape is marked by severe, stubborn, and recurring issues, necessitating a robust and multifaceted response [3][5][6]. Group 2: Challenges in Anti-Corruption - Corruption remains a significant threat, particularly in sectors with concentrated power and resources, such as finance, state-owned enterprises, and public health [3][4]. - The struggle against corruption is complicated by the intertwining of various interests and the evolving nature of corrupt practices, requiring a comprehensive and systemic response [6][7]. Group 3: Advantages in the Anti-Corruption Fight - The Party's foundational mission and strong leadership provide a solid foundation for the anti-corruption campaign, ensuring a unified direction and commitment [8][9]. - The Party's scientific theoretical guidance enhances its ability to navigate the complexities of governance and corruption, offering a clear framework for action [10][11]. Group 4: Institutional Mechanisms - A robust institutional framework is essential for effective anti-corruption efforts, including comprehensive regulations and a strong supervisory system [12][13]. - The integration of various supervisory mechanisms, including internal Party oversight and public accountability, is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures [13][14]. Group 5: Community Engagement - The support and involvement of the public are vital for the success of anti-corruption initiatives, as a strong connection with the masses reinforces the Party's legitimacy and effectiveness [11][12]. - Promoting a culture of integrity and accountability within society is essential for sustaining anti-corruption efforts and preventing the resurgence of corrupt practices [19].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of advancing the anti-corruption struggle as a significant political battle that cannot afford to lose, highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach to prevent corruption at all levels of the party [1][3]. Group 1: Achievements and Strategies in Anti-Corruption - Since the 18th National Congress, significant achievements have been made in the anti-corruption struggle, including the establishment of a comprehensive leadership structure for anti-corruption work [2]. - The approach combines immediate measures with long-term solutions, ensuring that party members are deterred from corruption through fear, institutional constraints, and ideological education [2]. - A zero-tolerance policy is maintained towards corruption, with a focus on both preventing new cases and addressing existing ones, particularly in key areas [2][4]. Group 2: Institutional and Ideological Framework - A robust regulatory framework has been developed, enhancing the rigidity of the system to prevent corruption and ensuring that regulations are effectively implemented [2][5]. - The ideological foundation against corruption is strengthened through education on party values and traditions, aiming to instill a strong moral compass among party members [2][5]. - The integration of various supervisory mechanisms is emphasized to ensure comprehensive oversight of power and to prevent abuse [5][6]. Group 3: Leadership and Accountability - The article stresses the need for leaders, especially those in high positions, to maintain a high standard of self-discipline and to manage their surroundings effectively [6]. - The role of disciplinary inspection agencies is highlighted, with a call for them to adapt to new challenges in the anti-corruption landscape and to enhance their operational capabilities [6]. - There is a focus on the importance of public support and involvement in the anti-corruption efforts, reinforcing the idea that the struggle against corruption is a collective responsibility [5][6].

Core Points - The emphasis on the integration of anti-corruption and integrity efforts is crucial for addressing the intertwined issues of misconduct and corruption [1][2][3] - The approach of "same investigation" and "same governance" aims to tackle the root causes of corruption and misconduct through systematic measures [1][3][4] - The need for a comprehensive strategy that includes education, supervision, and strict enforcement of discipline is highlighted to prevent the resurgence of corruption [3][5] Group 1 - The concept of "same investigation" maintains a high-pressure stance against misconduct and corruption, recognizing their interrelated nature [2] - The strategy involves deep investigations into specific areas and behaviors that contribute to corruption, such as improper gifts and bureaucratic formalism [2] - The use of new technologies, such as big data, is encouraged to enhance the detection and analysis of corruption-related issues [2] Group 2 - The "same governance" approach focuses on systemic treatment of corruption and misconduct, emphasizing the need for a holistic view and integrated efforts [3][4] - Continuous education on party discipline and the implementation of strict corrective measures are essential to address systemic issues revealed during investigations [3][5] - Strengthening the cultural foundation of integrity and promoting family values related to discipline are seen as vital components in building a robust anti-corruption framework [5]