特朗普：向伊朗提供300亿美元造非军事核设施的报道是假新闻。 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article revolves around President Trump's threat to sue The New York Times and CNN for publishing a report that contradicts the official narrative regarding the effectiveness of U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities [1][3] - Trump's private lawyer claimed that the report harmed the president's reputation and demanded a retraction and apology, labeling the report as "false" and "defamatory" [1] - The New York Times and CNN both confirmed the validity of the intelligence assessment from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, which stated that the strikes only delayed Iran's nuclear program by a few months and did not destroy key components [3][4] Group 2 - Iranian officials, including the head of the Atomic Energy Organization, stated that measures have been taken to ensure the continuity of Iran's nuclear program despite military strikes [4] - The Iranian government is assessing the damage caused by the attacks and has prepared a plan to restart operations without interruption [4] - The International Atomic Energy Agency's director general acknowledged that while the Iranian facilities suffered significant damage, claims that the strikes set back Iran's nuclear program "decades" are seen as political assessments rather than factual [5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights that the Democratic leadership did not receive briefings prior to President Trump's military strike against Iran [1] - The White House Press Secretary, Levitt, requested CNN to retract its report, labeling it as "fake news" [1]

Core Viewpoint - U.S. Treasury Secretary Becerra referred to media reports claiming that Musk committed fraud as "fake news" [1] Group 1 - The statement from the U.S. Treasury Secretary indicates a defense of Musk against allegations of fraud [1]

韩国《朝鲜日报》 4 月 23 日文章，原题：成为利用假新闻牟利和政治两极化温床的网络视频平台 距离美 国网络视频平台YouTube上传第一条视频已经过去了20年，其危害和副作用日益暴露。这里充斥着假新 闻和有害信息，成为了助长政治两极化与社会矛盾和分裂的温床。问卷调查显示，62%的人认为其 是"假新闻的生成主体"，压倒性地排在榜首。在假新闻传播渠道的选项里，该平台占66%。不少主播通 过这种方式赚钱，政治人物从中获得政治利益，却并不承担责任。 订阅者为100万人左右的政治Youtube主播通过超级聊天赞助和点击量，每月能收益几千万韩元（1000万 韩元约合5万元人民币）。报道清潭洞酒宴的主播每天赚取了2000万韩元以上。即使被起诉，收入也多 于赔偿金，所以他们并不畏惧。一旦发生与名人相关的性骚扰、外遇、离婚、暴力、死亡事件，这些主 播就会出现，用未经验证的质疑和虚假信息制作并上传视频，通过恐吓、威胁勒索巨额钱财。该平台算 法只筛选符合用户喜好的刺激性内容——不是均衡推荐视频，而是不断引导人观看极端偏向的视频。借 助仇恨、暴力、煽动性的视频助长严重的确证偏见。 想阻止这种情况的发生，首先需要Youtube母公 ...