Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of a non-existent short drama titled "Trump Falls in Love with the White House Cleaner," which allegedly generated $150 million in revenue, highlighting the absurdity of media reporting on fabricated stories without verification [5][25][70]. Group 1: The Non-Existent Drama - The short drama claimed to have made $150 million in the U.S., which translates to over 1 billion RMB, a figure that is unrealistic for any single production [5][27]. - The supposed drama is based on a satirical premise involving a fictional relationship between Trump and a cleaner, which resonated with audiences despite its absurdity [8][14]. - The media frenzy surrounding the drama was fueled by a combination of a fictional web novel and misleading social media posts, leading to widespread misinformation [37][46]. Group 2: Media Dynamics - The article critiques the media's failure to fact-check and verify the existence of the drama, suggesting that the rapid production of news content has led to a lack of accountability [50][56]. - It highlights a shift in news production where quantity is prioritized over quality, resulting in the dissemination of sensationalized and often false information [51][52]. - The phenomenon reflects a broader trend where audiences are entertained by absurd news stories, leading to a cycle of misinformation that is accepted without scrutiny [57][73].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the criticism of Philippine President Marcos for his recent trade agreement with the U.S., which is perceived as unfavorable to the Philippines [1][4][5] - The agreement allows U.S. goods to enter the Philippines duty-free while imposing a 19% tariff on many Philippine exports to the U.S., which is seen as a significant disadvantage for Filipino exporters [2][4][5] - Critics argue that the agreement reflects a colonial mentality, as it resembles the historical context of the Philippines being a U.S. colony, where local industries were stifled by American imports [2][5][6] Group 2 - Former officials and political analysts express disappointment over the lack of negotiation strength displayed by President Marcos, especially when compared to Japan's more favorable trade terms [4][5] - The article mentions that the Philippine government is perceived as lacking assertiveness in its dealings with the U.S., leading to a situation where Filipino interests are compromised [5][6] - The disparity in trade terms between the Philippines and China is noted, with 98% of Philippine exports entering China duty-free, while many face high tariffs in the U.S. [5][6]

【环球时报驻美国特约记者 戴润芝 环球时报特约记者 于文】美国总统特朗普18日起诉《华尔街日报》，索赔至少100亿美元。在一份长达18页的诉状中， 这位美国总统指责《华尔街日报》及其记者"通过编造故事，诽谤特朗普总统的正直品格"，给其造成"巨大的经济和声誉损失"。此前一天，《华尔街日报》 发表独家报道称，特朗普2003年曾致信美国金融家杰弗里·爱泼斯坦祝贺其50岁生日，信中包含性暗示的不雅插画，并提及两人之间共享"秘密"。特朗普坚 称该信件"是伪造的"。这一事件再次将两人的关系置于媒体聚光灯下。19日，《纽约时报》、美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）、美国广播公司（ABC）等多 家媒体跟进，剖析特朗普和爱泼斯坦的关系史及该事件对特朗普的影响。 《华尔街日报》：坚决应诉 特朗普去年竞选总统时曾承诺公布爱泼斯坦"客户名单"，揭露爱泼斯坦罪行及其死亡背后的真相。但现在，特朗普本人却成了爱泼斯坦案的焦点。压力之 下，特朗普17日要求司法部寻求公布此案的陪审团记录。不过ABC称，与案卷本身或审判中提交的证据相比，陪审团的证词通常不会提供太多信息。特朗 普19日批评说，那些希望公开爱泼斯坦档案的人是"麻烦制造者和激进的左翼疯子 ...

美国总统特朗普17日再次否认他与爱泼斯坦案有关联，就美国《华尔街日报》"特朗普致爱泼斯坦信 件"报道表示，这是"假新闻"，信件系伪造，他将起诉这家"令人作呕的肮脏小报"。 爱泼斯坦与大量美国政商名流交往密切，因涉嫌性犯罪被捕后，于2019年8月死于狱中，被判定为"自 杀"。特朗普去年竞选总统时曾承诺公布爱泼斯坦"客户名单"，揭露爱泼斯坦罪行及其死亡背后的真 相。美国司法部和联邦调查局本月7日发布联合备忘录，认定不存在"客户名单"且不会发布更多爱泼斯 坦案相关文件。这一结论在特朗普阵营内部引发质疑和不满，特朗普近期已多次就此发声。 （文章来源：新华社） 特朗普还称，《华尔街日报》刊载此类"诽谤性谎言"，表明其已沦为"令人作呕的肮脏小报"。若爱泼斯 坦案与他有关联，民主党人早就会曝光相关证据，"这些信息肯定不会尘封在档案里"，"这是假新闻的 又一案例"。 《华尔街日报》报道称，2003年，爱泼斯坦50岁生日时，收到的贺信中有一封带有特朗普签名。 特朗普在社交媒体上发表长帖写道，他和白宫发言人曾直接告知《华尔街日报》主编埃玛·塔克，所 谓"特朗普致爱泼斯坦信件"纯属伪造，但塔克对此充耳不闻。"《华尔街日报》仍坚持发 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's denial of a claim that he intended to provide Iran with $30 billion to build non-military nuclear facilities, labeling it as "fake news" [1] Group 1 - President Trump expressed outrage over the allegation, stating he had never heard of such a proposal and deemed it absurd [1] - The claim is characterized as a tactic by the media to undermine Trump's credibility [1] - Trump emphasized that the narrative is a fabrication aimed at discrediting him, referring to the media as "sick" [1]

特朗普：向伊朗提供300亿美元造非军事核设施的报道是假新闻。 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article revolves around President Trump's threat to sue The New York Times and CNN for publishing a report that contradicts the official narrative regarding the effectiveness of U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities [1][3] - Trump's private lawyer claimed that the report harmed the president's reputation and demanded a retraction and apology, labeling the report as "false" and "defamatory" [1] - The New York Times and CNN both confirmed the validity of the intelligence assessment from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, which stated that the strikes only delayed Iran's nuclear program by a few months and did not destroy key components [3][4] Group 2 - Iranian officials, including the head of the Atomic Energy Organization, stated that measures have been taken to ensure the continuity of Iran's nuclear program despite military strikes [4] - The Iranian government is assessing the damage caused by the attacks and has prepared a plan to restart operations without interruption [4] - The International Atomic Energy Agency's director general acknowledged that while the Iranian facilities suffered significant damage, claims that the strikes set back Iran's nuclear program "decades" are seen as political assessments rather than factual [5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights that the Democratic leadership did not receive briefings prior to President Trump's military strike against Iran [1] - The White House Press Secretary, Levitt, requested CNN to retract its report, labeling it as "fake news" [1]

Core Viewpoint - U.S. Treasury Secretary Becerra referred to media reports claiming that Musk committed fraud as "fake news" [1] Group 1 - The statement from the U.S. Treasury Secretary indicates a defense of Musk against allegations of fraud [1]

韩国《朝鲜日报》 4 月 23 日文章，原题：成为利用假新闻牟利和政治两极化温床的网络视频平台 距离美 国网络视频平台YouTube上传第一条视频已经过去了20年，其危害和副作用日益暴露。这里充斥着假新 闻和有害信息，成为了助长政治两极化与社会矛盾和分裂的温床。问卷调查显示，62%的人认为其 是"假新闻的生成主体"，压倒性地排在榜首。在假新闻传播渠道的选项里，该平台占66%。不少主播通 过这种方式赚钱，政治人物从中获得政治利益，却并不承担责任。 订阅者为100万人左右的政治Youtube主播通过超级聊天赞助和点击量，每月能收益几千万韩元（1000万 韩元约合5万元人民币）。报道清潭洞酒宴的主播每天赚取了2000万韩元以上。即使被起诉，收入也多 于赔偿金，所以他们并不畏惧。一旦发生与名人相关的性骚扰、外遇、离婚、暴力、死亡事件，这些主 播就会出现，用未经验证的质疑和虚假信息制作并上传视频，通过恐吓、威胁勒索巨额钱财。该平台算 法只筛选符合用户喜好的刺激性内容——不是均衡推荐视频，而是不断引导人观看极端偏向的视频。借 助仇恨、暴力、煽动性的视频助长严重的确证偏见。 想阻止这种情况的发生，首先需要Youtube母公 ...