Workflow
司法拍卖
icon
Search documents
因无人出价,观致汽车资产再度流拍,姚振华曾质疑评估价过低
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-16 02:49
Core Insights - The core asset of Qoros Auto, including real estate and equipment, was auctioned for the second time on January 15, 2023, but failed to attract any bids, resulting in another unsuccessful auction [1] - The starting price for the second auction was approximately 860 million yuan, down from 1.0745 billion yuan in the first auction held on December 29, 2022, which also ended without any bids [1] - The chairman of Baoneng Group, Yao Zhenhua, stated that the third-party valuation of Qoros Auto's core assets is around 8 billion yuan, significantly higher than the court's assessed value of 1.5 billion yuan [1] - The auction is related to a 270 million yuan enforcement case stemming from a financial loan contract dispute involving Suzhou Asset Management Co., Qoros Auto, and Shenzhen Baoneng Investment Group [1] - On December 22, 2025, the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court officially accepted Qoros Auto's bankruptcy reorganization application [2]
南宁民族大道120套房产被两名买家拍下,成交总价4256万元,原东家是昔日广西首富
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2026-01-15 15:01
永凯春晖花园A区1号楼和2号楼。南国早报全媒体记者 蒋保平摄 两买家以4256万元拍下120套住宅 该拍卖标的位于南宁市青秀区民族大道137号永凯春晖花园A区1号楼、2号楼的120套住宅房产,于今年1月初在京东资产交易平台上架,被分成两个资产 包进行处置。历经3人报名、5轮出价后,这两宗住宅资产包已于1月12日上午成功拍出。 南国早报全媒体记者登录京东司法拍卖平台看到,其中66套房产(建筑面积4527.52平方米,其中位于1号楼的住宅有2套,位于2号楼的住宅有64套,位于 17~22层)被"中木至上木业有限公司"以约2413万元竞得;另外54套房产(建筑面积3428.68平方米,其中位于1号楼的住宅有8套,位于2号楼的住宅46 套,位于23~27层)则被自然人"毛斯民"以约1843万元收入囊中。 平台公开信息显示,两笔拍卖的起拍价均在评估价基础上打了约七折。其中,66套房产的计税估价约为3390万元,起拍价约2373万元,实际成交价约为 2413万元;而54套房产的计税估价约为2582万元,起拍价约1807万元,实际成交价约为1843万元。最终,拍卖成交价均相当于评估价的七成左右,折算单 价仅为5376元/平 ...
宝能姚振华实名举报,相关部门回应:举报不实,拍卖正常推进
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2026-01-15 03:11
1月14日,宝能集团董事长、观致汽车实控人姚振华通过"中国宝能"官方微信公众号发布实名举报视 频,向最高人民法院、江苏省高级人民法院举报常熟市相关部门在观致汽车2.7亿元执行案件中存在违 法操作,导致企业核心资产将被低价拍卖。 针对当日的二拍进程,该工作人员明确表示拍卖仍正常进行,相关情况可通过公开渠道查询。对于举报 内容本身,工作人员直言"显然是不实的",但具体哪些内容不实,需依据法律规定的正式口径对外通 报,目前暂无法提供更多细节。 此次事件的核心争议集中在资产估值差异。姚振华方面提供的第三方评估结果显示,观致汽车常熟生产 基地相关资产市场价值约为80亿元,但常熟市人民法院委托的评估报告中,该资产总估值仅为15亿元。 据京东司法拍卖平台公示,此次拍卖标的为"常熟市通达路1号不动产及厂区内设备设施、零配件等财 产",评估报告由苏州市天元土地房地产评估有限公司出具。 基于15亿元评估价,该资产包于2025年12月31日首次拍卖,起拍价10.5亿元,流拍后迅速定于2026年1 月15日进行二次拍卖,起拍价降至8.6亿元,保证金约1.7亿元。 评估报告给出了具体计价依据与背景说明。报告显示,拍卖标的中工厂土地厂房 ...
宝能姚振华实名举报 相关部门回应:举报不实 拍卖正常推进
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2026-01-15 03:06
1月14日,宝能集团董事长、观致汽车实控人姚振华通过"中国宝能"官方微信公众号发布实名举报视频,向最高人民法院、江苏省高级人民法院举报常熟市 相关部门在观致汽车2.7亿元执行案件中存在违法操作,导致企业核心资产将被低价拍卖。 南都·湾财社记者注意到,举报发布时距观致汽车相关资产二次司法拍卖启动不足24小时。截至1月15日10时,京东司法拍卖平台显示,该拍卖标的已吸引超 两万人围观、796人关注,并有1人完成报名,法拍正在进行。 评估报告给出了具体计价依据与背景说明。报告显示,拍卖标的中工厂土地厂房估值约11.59亿元,设备设施及零配件估值约3.76亿元,合计15.35亿元。其 中设备设施评估净值约3.61亿元,较原值14.74亿元缩水超11亿元。 1月15日,观致汽车核心资产司法二拍当日,南都·湾财社记者就宝能集团董事长姚振华实名举报一事,致电常熟市人民法院咨询相关情况。工作人员表示, 针对姚振华举报法院的相关问题,需统一通过常熟市委宣传部对外回应。随后,常熟市委宣传部相关工作人员在电话中向记者透露,此事已进入司法程序, 宣传部的对外回应需以法院口径为准,目前暂无法提供权威答复。 针对当日的二拍进程,该工作人 ...
宝能集团姚振华举报观致汽车被贱卖
Xin Jing Bao· 2026-01-14 09:48
| | 201741817 | 一、有让建筑价值 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 障号 | 估价对象 | 建筑面积 | 评估单价 | 评估总价 | | | | (平方米) | (元/m2) | (元) | | 1 幢 | 焊装车间 | 33438.7 | 3285 | 109846130 | | 2 幢 | 车身分配中心 | 6005. 5 | 3107 | 680658881 | | 3 幢 | 涂装车间 | 50198 | 2954 | 148284892 | | 4幢 | 总装车间 | 53528. 74 | 3141 | 168133772 | | 5 幢 | 加油站 | 167. 63 | 8254 | 1383618 | | 6 幢 | 几配中心 | 1923. 55 | 1815 | 3491243 | | 7 幢 | 物流配送中心 | 15474. 05 | 3082 | 47691022 | | # 0 | 食堂 | 5360 74 | 2344 | 5552327 | | | 一政权 | 11 307 | 2189 | 23220693 | ...
亚星化学:持股5%以上股东1319.28万股被司法拍卖完成过户
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-12 09:49
亚星化学公告称,公司近日获悉,持股5%以上股东亚星集团持有的1319.28万股无限售流通股,占总股 本3.40%,被司法拍卖并已完成过户至魏巍名下。此次权益变动后,潍坊市城投集团通过直接持股和表 决权委托关系,合计控制公司表决权的股份总数占比从35.06%降至31.66%。本次变动属被动减持,未 触及要约收购,未导致控股股东、实控人变化,也不会对公司经营管理产生重大不利影响。 ...
锦龙股份逾90%股份流拍,什么情况?已有“法拍牛散”浮亏
券商中国· 2026-01-11 14:55
法拍折价"安全垫"或难抵股价下行风险。 近日京东司法拍卖网站显示,锦龙股份6900万股司法拍卖结束,仅有2名自然人以底价拍下合计600万股。 具体来看,上述股份共被拆分为20个标的,其中19个标的各为350万股,起拍价均为3883.95万元;另一标的为250万股,起拍价2774.25万元。所有标的起拍价合计 为7.66亿元。 上述股份均由锦龙股份实际控制人杨志茂的配偶朱凤廉持有,此次拍卖数量在朱凤廉所持股份中的占比高达52.23%,在公司总股本比例中为7.70%。 不过上述拍卖进展并不顺利,在为期一天的拍卖里,20个标的仅迎来2名自然人报名。最终曹贤斌、王梓旭双双以底价分别拍下250万股、350万股。其余18个标的 无人报名,全部流拍。 谈及此次流拍原因,有市场人士分析认为,挂牌价吸引力不高,且本次流拍后的二次拍卖会进一步折价。根据券商中国记者计算2025年至今锦龙股份历次司法拍卖 起拍价对应的股价情况,本次起拍价对应的股份单价约为11.10元/股,为历史第二高位。2025年锦龙股份有多次拍卖价格低于10元/股。 这主要因为锦龙股份历次司法拍卖起拍价的定价方式,大多时候按照股票竞拍日前二十个交易日的7折或8折 ...
江西沐邦高科股份有限公司关于公司控股股东所持公司部分股份将被司法拍卖的提示性公告
Core Viewpoint - The announcement details a judicial auction of shares held by the controlling shareholder of Jiangxi Mubang High-Tech Co., Ltd. due to a debt dispute involving a subsidiary, which may impact the shareholder's equity stake but will not change the company's control [2][4][5]. Group 1: Auction Overview - The auction is a result of a financing lease contract dispute between Inner Mongolia Haohan Energy Technology Co., Ltd. and Chengtai Leasing (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. [2][5] - The shares to be auctioned include 2,363,264 unrestricted circulating shares, representing 3.39% of the controlling shareholder's total shares and 0.54% of the company's total equity [2][9]. - The auction is scheduled to take place from January 24, 2026, at 10:00 AM to January 25, 2026, at 10:00 AM [3][12]. Group 2: Shareholder and Legal Context - The controlling shareholder, Mubang New Energy Holdings, holds a total of 69,723,616 shares, which is 16.08% of the company's total equity, with 93.92% of these shares currently pledged [14]. - The shares being auctioned are part of a court-ordered execution due to the failure of the controlling shareholder to fulfill legal obligations as determined by the Shanghai Pudong New District People's Court [5][8]. - If the auction is successful, the controlling shareholder's stake will decrease to 67,360,352 shares, or 15.53%, but will not affect the control of the company [14].
华菱精工:持股9.5%股东500万股股份拟于2026年1月司法拍卖
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-30 10:26
Core Viewpoint - Hualing Precision Engineering announced that a 9.5% shareholder, Jiedeng Zero Carbon, will have 5 million shares publicly auctioned due to a contract dispute, which represents 39.47% of Jiedeng's holdings and 3.75% of the company's total share capital [1] Group 1 - The auction is scheduled to take place from January 20 to January 21, 2026, on the Taobao judicial auction platform [1] - Jiedeng Zero Carbon's shares are fully frozen by judicial measures, but the auction will not lead to a change in the company's controlling interest [1] - The company does not anticipate any significant adverse impact on its operations from this auction [1]
2亿降到6673万,深圳“中科创系”涉黑案件别墅八拍流拍
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-12-29 08:42
Core Viewpoint - A luxury villa in Shenzhen, valued over 200 million yuan, failed to sell at auction for the eighth time, with a starting price significantly discounted by over 66% to 66.73 million yuan, reflecting a loss of over 130 million yuan from its assessed value [1][2] Group 1: Property Details - The villa is located in the Guanlan area of Shenzhen and has a total area of approximately 3,935.02 square meters, including various luxury amenities such as a gym, massage room, wine cellar, cinema, and KTV room [2] - The assessed price per square meter is 128,000 yuan, while the starting auction price translates to only 17,000 yuan per square meter, indicating a low unit cost that should attract buyers [2] Group 2: Financial Liabilities - The property has outstanding management fees of 2.1586 million yuan and unpaid electricity bills of 103,300 yuan, which the buyer would need to cover [3] - There is a mortgage on the property with a principal and interest amounting to 37.3244 million yuan, which will continue to increase, adding to the buyer's total costs beyond the starting auction price [3] Group 3: Legal and Ownership Issues - The villa is part of assets linked to a criminal case involving Zhang Wei, the legal representative of Shenzhen Zhongke Chuang Asset Management Co., who was sentenced to life imprisonment for leading a criminal organization [4][5] - The property has uncertainties regarding compliance due to unverified construction permits for additional areas, which could lead to potential legal issues for the buyer [3] Group 4: Auction History - The villa was first auctioned in August 2023 with an initial price of over 200 million yuan, labeled as "Shenzhen's most expensive judicial auction property," but has seen significant price reductions in subsequent auctions, ultimately failing to attract bids [3][6] - In contrast, other assets from the same case, such as luxury watches and a private jet, have successfully sold at auction, indicating varying levels of market interest in different asset types [6]