Workflow
股东大会召集
icon
Search documents
仁智股份: 北京大成(深圳)律师事务所关于浙江仁智股份有限公司2025年第一次临时股东大会之法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-06-04 11:30
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter from Beijing Dacheng (Shenzhen) Law Firm confirms the legality and validity of the procedures, qualifications, and voting results of the 2025 first extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Zhejiang Renzhi Co., Ltd [1][5][9] Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The notice for the 2025 first extraordinary general meeting was announced, specifying the time, location, convenor, attendees, and agenda, in compliance with relevant laws and regulations [4] - The meeting was conducted using a combination of on-site voting and online voting, with the on-site meeting held on June 4, 2025, at 15:00 in Shenzhen [4][6] - The convenor of the meeting was the board of directors, which is in accordance with the legal requirements [5] Group 2: Attendee Qualifications - A total of 177 shareholders and their authorized representatives attended the meeting, representing 99,118,286 shares, which is a significant portion of the company's total shares [5][6] - The qualifications of all attendees, including directors, supervisors, and senior management, were verified and deemed valid [6] Group 3: Voting Procedures and Results - The voting process was conducted in accordance with the agenda outlined in the meeting notice, with no additional matters voted on [7] - The voting results showed that 98,036,286 shares were in favor of the proposals, accounting for 98.9084% of the valid votes cast [8][9] - The results also indicated strong support from minority investors, with 89.5652% voting in favor [8]
苏豪弘业: 国浩律师(南京)事务所关于苏豪弘业股份有限公司2024年年度股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-28 11:21
www.grandall.com.cn 中国江苏省南京市汉中门大街 309 号 B 座 5 层、7-8 层(210036) Tel: 86-25-89660900 Fax: 86-25-89660966 国浩律师(南京)事务所 关于 苏豪弘业股份有限公司 致:苏豪弘业股份有限公司 根据《中华人民共和国公司法》(下称"《公司法》")、《中华人民共和国 证券法》(下称"《证券法》")、《上市公司股东会规则》(下称"《股东会规 则》")、《上海证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第1号——规范运作》(下称 "《监管指引第1号》")及《苏豪弘业股份有限公司章程》(下称"《公司章程》") 的规定,国浩律师(南京)事务所(下称"本所")接受苏豪弘业股份有限公司 (下称"公司")的委托,指派本所律师出席公司2024年年度股东大会(下称"本 次股东大会"或"本次会议"),对本次股东大会的召集和召开程序、出席会议 人员的资格、召集人资格以及会议表决程序和表决结果予以见证并出具法律意见 书。 在本法律意见书中,本所律师仅对本次股东大会的召集和召开程序、出席会 议人员的资格、召集人资格、会议表决程序和表决结果是否符合《公司法》《证 券法 ...
泰达股份: 上海市锦天城律师事务所关于天津泰达股份有限公司2025年第二次临时股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-23 12:24
上海市锦天城律师事务所 关于天津泰达股份有限公司 法律意见书 上海市锦天城律师事务所 地址:上海市浦东新区银城中路 501 号上海中心大厦 9、11、12 层 电话:021-20511000 传真:021-20511999 邮编:200120 上海市锦天城律师事务所 法律意见书 上海市锦天城律师事务所 关于天津泰达股份有限公司 致:天津泰达股份有限公司 上海市锦天城律师事务所(以下简称"本所")接受天津泰达股份有限公司(以 下简称"贵司")委托,就贵司召开 2025 年第二次临时股东大会的有关事宜,根 据《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简称《公司法》)、《中华人民共和国证券 法》(以下简称《证券法》)、《深圳证券交易所上市公司股东会网络投票实施 细则(2025 修订)》(以下简称《网络投票实施细则》)等有关法律、行政法规、 规范性文件以及《天津泰达股份有限公司公司章程》(以下简称《公司章程》)、 《天津泰达股份有限公司股东大会议事规则》(以下简称《股东大会规则》)的 有关规定,就贵司 2025 年第二次临时股东大会(以下简称"本次股东大会")的 会议召集人资格、召集、召开程序合法性、出席会议人员资格以及会议表决 ...
中源家居: 关于中源家居股份有限公司2024年年度股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-23 10:31
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter from Zhejiang Tiance Law Firm confirms the legality and validity of the procedures, qualifications of attendees, and voting results for Zhongyuan Home Co., Ltd.'s 2024 annual shareholders' meeting [1][14]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The shareholders' meeting was proposed and convened by the board of directors, with the notice published on April 29, 2025 [2][3]. - The meeting utilized a combination of on-site and online voting methods, with the on-site meeting held at the designated location [2][5]. - The specific times for online voting through the Shanghai Stock Exchange platform were set for May 23, 2025, from 9:15 to 15:00 [3]. Group 2: Attendee Qualifications - Attendees included all shareholders registered with the company's Shanghai branch, with the option to appoint proxies who do not need to be shareholders [7]. - A total of 9 attendees were present at the on-site meeting, holding 89,241,360 shares, approximately 70.88% of the total share capital [7]. - Additionally, 54 shareholders participated in online voting, representing 194,258 shares, about 0.15% of the total share capital [7]. Group 3: Voting Procedures and Results - The voting process adhered to legal and regulatory requirements, combining on-site and online voting, with results announced immediately [8][9]. - The voting results showed overwhelming support for the proposed resolutions, with approval rates exceeding 99.95% for several motions [9][10][12]. - The meeting did not address any matters not listed in the notice, ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations [13][14].
深圳燃气: 深圳燃气2024年年度股东大会法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-23 10:14
上海市锦天城(深圳)律师事务所 关于深圳市燃气集团股份有限公司 法律意见书 上海市锦天城(深圳)律师事务所 地址:深圳市福田区福华三路卓越世纪中心 1 号楼 21、22、23 层 电话:86 755-82816698 传真:86 755-82816898 邮编:518048 上海市锦天城(深圳)律师事务所 法律意见书 《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简称"《公司法》")以及《上市公司股东会 规则》(中国证券监督管理委员会公告〔2025〕7 号)(以下简称"《股东会规 则》")、《上海证券交易所股票上市规则》(上证发〔2025〕59 号)(以下 简称"《上交所股票上市规则》")等我国现行法律、法规、规范性文件及《深 圳市燃气集团股份有限公司章程》(以下简称"《公司章程》")的规定,就本 次股东大会的相关事宜,按照律师行业公认的业务标准、道德规范和勤勉尽责精 神,出具本法律意见书。 为出具本法律意见书,本所及本所律师依据《律师事务所从事证券法律业务 管理办法》和《律师事务所证券法律业务执业规则(试行)》等规定,严格履行 了法定职责,遵循了勤勉尽责和诚实信用原则,对本次股东大会所涉及的相关事 项进行了必要的核查和验证 ...
南极电商: 北京市金杜律师事务所上海分所关于南极电商股份有限公司2024年年度股东大会之法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-21 12:13
有限公司关于召开 2024 年年度股东大会通知的公告》(以下简称"《股 东大会通知》"); 北京市金杜律师事务所上海分所 关于南极电商股份有限公司 2024 年年度股东大会之 法律意见书 致:南极电商股份有限公司 北京市金杜律师事务所上海分所(以下简称"本所")接受南极电商股份有 限公司(以下简称"公司")委托,根据《中华人民共和国证券法》 (以下简称"《证 券法》")、《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简称"《公司法》")、中国证券监督管 理委员会《上市公司股东会规则》 (以下简称"《股东会规则》")等中华人民共和 国境内(以下简称"中国境内",为本法律意见书之目的,不包括中国香港特别 行政区、中国澳门特别行政区和中国台湾地区)现行有效的法律、行政法规、规 章和规范性文件和现行有效的《南极电商股份有限公司章程》 (以下简称"《公司 章程》")的相关规定,指派律师出席了公司于 2025 年 5 月 21 日召开的 2024 年 年度股东大会(以下简称"本次股东大会"),并就本次股东大会相关事项出具本 法律意见书。 为出具本法律意见书,本所律师审查了公司提供的以下文件,包括但不限于: 有限公司第八届董事会第四次会议 ...
赛分科技: 北京海润天睿律师事务所关于苏州赛分科技股份有限公司2024年年度股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-20 13:13
北京海润天睿律师事务所(以下简称"本所")接受苏州赛分科技股份有 限公司(以下简称"公司")的委托,指派本所律师出席公司 2024 年年度股东 大会,并依据《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简称"《公司法》")、《中华 人民共和国证券法》(以下简称"《证券法》")、《上市公司股东会规则》(以 下简称"《股东会规则》")、《公司章程》及其他相关法律、法规的规定,就 公司本次股东大会的召集、召开程序、出席会议人员的资格、召集人资格、表决 程序及表决结果等有关事宜出具本法律意见书。 关于本法律意见书,本所及本所律师谨作如下声明: 北京海润天睿律师事务所 关于苏州赛分科技股份有限公司 致:苏州赛分科技股份有限公司 会有关的文件、资料、说明和其他信息(以下合称"文件")均真实、准确、完整, 法律意见书 相关副本或复印件与原件一致,所发布或提供的文件不存在虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏。 予以公告,未经本所及本所律师事先书面同意,任何人不得将其用作其他任何目 的。 序、出席会议人员及召集人的资格、表决程序及表决结果进行核查和见证并发表 法律意见,不对本次股东大会的议案内容及其所涉及的事实和数据的完整性、真 实性和准确性发 ...
泰鸿万立: 国浩律师(杭州)事务所关于浙江泰鸿万立科技股份有限公司2025年第一次临时股东大会法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-20 10:13
Group 1 - The legal opinion letter is issued by Grandall Law Firm regarding the 2025 first extraordinary general meeting of Zhejiang Taihong Wanli Technology Co., Ltd [2][3] - The meeting was convened in accordance with the Company Law, the rules of the shareholders' meeting, and the company's articles of association [5][6] - The legal opinion confirms that the procedures for convening and holding the meeting, the qualifications of attendees, and the voting procedures are all compliant with relevant regulations [8] Group 2 - A total of 503 shareholders participated in the voting, representing the shares with voting rights registered as of the close of the registration date [5][6] - The meeting was presided over by the chairman of the board, and the actual time and location matched the notice provided [5] - The voting results indicated that the proposal to change the registered capital, company type, and amend the articles of association was approved with 101,551,146 shares in favor, representing a significant majority [7][8]
博众精工: 上海澄明则正律师事务所关于博众精工2024年年度股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-16 11:42
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter confirms that the 2024 annual general meeting of shareholders for Bozhong Precision Technology Co., Ltd. is scheduled for May 16, 2025, and that the meeting's procedures comply with relevant laws and regulations [1][5]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The meeting was approved by the company's third board of directors on April 25, 2025, and was announced to shareholders on April 26, 2025, via the Shanghai Stock Exchange website [2][3]. - The notice included details about the meeting time, location, and the rights of shareholders to attend and vote, including provisions for proxy voting [2][3]. Group 2: Attendance and Qualifications - A total of 64 shareholders (or their proxies) attended the meeting, representing 295,868,227 shares, which is 66.24% of the total voting shares [3][4]. - The qualifications of all attendees, including directors, supervisors, and legal witnesses, were verified to be in compliance with Chinese laws and the company's articles of association [4]. Group 3: Agenda and Voting Results - No new proposals were introduced by shareholders during the meeting, and all agenda items listed in the notice were discussed and voted on [4][5]. - The voting process was conducted through both on-site and online methods, and the results were in accordance with the company's articles of association, confirming the legality and validity of the voting outcomes [5].
天士力: 内蒙古建中律师事务所关于天士力医药集团股份有限公司2025年第三次临时股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-14 10:19
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion confirms that the procedures for convening and holding the third extraordinary general meeting of Tianjin Tianshili Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. are in compliance with relevant laws and regulations, and the voting results are valid [1][2][4]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The notice for the meeting was issued on April 29, 2025, detailing the time, location, and agenda [2]. - The meeting was held on May 14, 2025, using a combination of on-site and online voting methods [2][3]. - The voting period for online participation was specified, and the procedures followed were in accordance with legal and regulatory requirements [2][3]. Group 2: Attendance and Qualifications - The meeting was attended by shareholders and their proxies, with verification of their identities conducted by the Shanghai Stock Exchange [3]. - The board of directors served as the convener of the meeting, and the qualifications of attendees were deemed valid [3]. Group 3: Voting Procedures and Results - Voting was conducted through both on-site and online methods, with results compiled after the voting concluded [4]. - The first resolution, requiring a two-thirds majority, was passed, while the second resolution, needing a simple majority, was also approved [4]. - The voting process and results were confirmed to be in compliance with legal and regulatory standards [4].