基层治理
Search documents
尼泊尔共产党(毛主义中心)地方党政干部考察团访渝
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-04-14 06:18
中新社重庆4月13日电 (梁钦卿)4月9日至13日,应中共中央对外联络部邀请,尼泊尔共产党(毛主义中 心)地方党政干部考察团一行25人来渝访问。 今年恰逢中国和尼泊尔建交70周年,考察团来渝访问是深化中尼两国地方合作、促进重庆对外开放的具 体举措。 在重庆市农业科学院,考察团成员深入了解水稻、蔬菜等农作物的种植和销售模式,对重庆现代农业高 科技园区表现出极大兴趣。尼共(毛中心)中央委员勒克纳特·纽帕内表示,在重庆的行程中,他们非常期 待亲眼看看中国农业发展的真实情况,更好地将中国经验带回尼泊尔。 尼共(毛中心)中央委员拉姆·迪普·阿查亚说,尼泊尔有70%的人从事农业,但仍旧不能实现粮食自给自 足,希望加强与中方的交流合作,通过"鱼菜共生"等智慧农业种植技术和现代化农业发展模式,解决尼 泊尔面临的肥料不足、产出效益较低等问题。 4月10日,尼泊尔共产党(毛主义中心)地方党政干部考察团走进重庆市九龙坡区民主村社区。梁钦卿 摄 在九龙坡区民主村社区,考察团成员走进民主村综合市场、社区食堂,与当地民众零距离互动交流。尼 共(毛中心)甘达基省省委委员乌玛坎塔·博特尔表示,民主村在城市更新中,合理布局便利店、菜市场、 早 ...
沈阳市大东区推行“导师帮带”创新基层治理模式
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-04-14 01:52
在沈阳市大东区万泉街道魁星社区旧改现场,导师魁星社区党委书记付卓带领学员开展"沉浸式教学",要求学员72小时内完成老旧车棚改造 方案设计。学员分组走访居民、测算尺寸、筹措资源,最终将多元方案提交居民议事会。"在实践中学习比听十场讲座更管用。"学员小林感慨 道。 新华网沈阳4月11日电(记者姜兆臣)近日,一场以"凝心聚力攻坚、共建幸福家园"为主题的社区书记沙龙活动在沈阳市大东区津桥街道河畔 社区党群服务中心举行。活动上,参与第二期"导师帮带"行动的60名导师与学员齐聚一堂,分享基层治理的实践与思考。 沈阳市大东区第二期"导师帮带"行动于3月27日正式启动,行动采用"1+4+8+N"立体化培养体系,即12名金牌导师每人带教4名学员,通过书 记沙龙、书记大讲堂、现场教学等在内的"八个一"规定动作,依托"导师工作室"创新推出的跟岗实践、案例工坊等N个自选动作强化实战能力。 沈阳市大东区津桥街道河畔社区党委书记王丽娟的"课程表"颇具特色:每周三上午学员参与社区晨会,每月第二个周六开展案例沙盘推演, 每月还需全程跟随导师工作一周。"社区工作没有惊天动地的大事,每一件小事对居民来说都是大事",王丽娟以组建"阳光护送队"服务 ...
群众工作札记丨打通农贸市场用水堵点
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-04-01 00:28
日前,随着供水管网改造工程完工,灌云县东王集镇怡景花城农贸市场的商户们终于告别了水费核算难 题。看着汩汩清水注满鱼虾盆,水产摊主刘大姐说:"现在生意总算能正常做了,用多少水交多少钱, 大伙儿再也不用为分摊水费扯皮了。" 经调查了解,原来,这个拥有32家商户的农贸市场竟只有一块总水表,每月水费由物业代收代缴。因部 分商户质疑分摊不公,累计拖欠水费3.8万元,最终被自来水公司停水。 一位商户坦言:"我们干货店每月用水不到2吨,但隔壁包子铺每月要用20吨左右,凭什么水费交一样 多?"随后,我们向物业公司了解情况查找问题症结。物业经理老张表示,农贸市场建成的时候用水就 是总表设计,后续收水费无法每一家分别统计,只能分摊。如果水表分户改造至少需要20万元,资金筹 措困难。 为快速回应群众关切,我们协调县自来水公司先行通水,并针对停水问题协调商户代表、物业公司、自 来水公司、住建局、东王集镇召开联席会议。经协商,镇政府决定启动"分户计量"工程,将农贸市场改 造纳入民生实事项目,协调自来水公司加快分户水表安装,联合物业公司同步做好商户思想工作。最 终,经多方努力,拖欠水费被缴清,摊位都安上了独立水表,实现分户收费,相关人员 ...
县级综治中心实现全覆盖
Liao Ning Ri Bao· 2025-03-31 01:11
Core Viewpoint - The establishment and operation of comprehensive governance centers are crucial for enhancing grassroots governance capabilities and resolving conflicts effectively [1][2][3] Group 1: Governance Centers - All 100 counties in the province have established comprehensive governance centers to facilitate conflict resolution at the grassroots level [1] - The centers are designed to provide a "one-stop" service for conflict resolution, minimizing the need for citizens to visit multiple departments [1][3] Group 2: Service Enhancements - The province has introduced a multi-dimensional model for department presence, with high-frequency matters having permanent staff and low-frequency matters rotating [2] - Various specialized rooms, such as mediation rooms and legal consultation rooms, have been added to enhance service offerings [2] Group 3: Information Technology Integration - A unified platform for conflict prevention and resolution has been established, integrating data across various departments and ensuring information sharing [3] - The platform aims to streamline the process of conflict resolution, making it more efficient and effective for citizens [3]
“三治融合”基层治理体系的演变、内涵与实践
Zhong Guo Jing Ji Wang· 2025-03-13 05:55
Core Viewpoint - The "Three Governance Integration" system under the leadership of the Party is essential for grassroots governance, combining self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance to address the evolving social contradictions and modernize the national governance system [1][6][7]. Historical Context of "Three Governance Integration" - The concepts of self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance have historically played significant roles in Chinese social governance, with their integration facing challenges due to the tension between official and unofficial governance [2][3]. - The historical roots of these governance ideas can be traced back to ancient Chinese philosophies, which emphasized the importance of self-governance, legal governance, and moral governance [2][3]. Development of the "Three Governance Integration" System - Since the establishment of the People's Republic of China, self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance have continued to play crucial roles in grassroots governance, with significant legal frameworks established to support these systems [3][4]. - The integration of these governance methods is seen as a response to the changing social landscape and the need for a more effective governance model that addresses the complexities of modern society [6][7]. Theoretical Implications of "Three Governance Integration" - The integration emphasizes the complementary strengths of self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance, aiming to create a more effective grassroots governance framework [7][8]. - The Party's leadership is crucial in guiding this integration, ensuring that governance is responsive to community needs while maintaining order and promoting moral values [8][12]. Practical Innovations in "Three Governance Integration" - Various local practices have emerged, such as the "One Agreement, Two Meetings, Three Groups" model and the village contract management model, showcasing the adaptability and effectiveness of the "Three Governance Integration" approach [15][16]. - The establishment of community discussion halls has also been a significant innovation, enhancing residents' participation in governance and decision-making processes [16]. Challenges and Conditions for Implementation - Despite the progress, challenges remain, including limited depth and breadth of self-governance, insufficient legal governance capabilities, and declining moral constraints within communities [18][19]. - The successful implementation of the "Three Governance Integration" system requires a robust framework that encourages public participation, strengthens legal governance, and revitalizes moral education [20][21].