Core Viewpoint - The Venezuelan representative to the UN, Samuel Moncada, condemned the illegal armed actions by the United States against Venezuela, asserting that such actions violate the UN Charter and fundamental principles of international law [1] Group 1: Legal and International Relations - Moncada emphasized that the actions of the US fit the legal definition of "occupation" under international law, stating that acquiring territory or resources through force is unacceptable [1] - He pointed out that the US actions are driven by resource and geopolitical motives, warning that allowing such behavior would replace law with power and undermine the foundations of international order [1] Group 2: Call to Action - Moncada urged the UN Security Council to fulfill its responsibilities by clearly condemning the use of force against Venezuela and reaffirming principles of international law while taking measures to de-escalate the situation [1] - He highlighted that Venezuela's national institutions are functioning normally, constitutional order is maintained, and the government has effective control over the entire territory, committing to defend national sovereignty through diplomatic and legal means [1]

孙磊指出，历史教训殷鉴不远，军事手段不是解决问题的出路，滥用武力只会导致更大的危机。美国曾绕过安理会对伊拉克发动军事行动，悍然袭击伊朗核 设施，对拉美和加勒比地区多国实施经济制裁、军事打击甚至武装占领，造成持续冲突动荡和巨大民生苦难。 当地时间1月5日，中国常驻联合国代表团临时代办孙磊在安理会委内瑞拉局势紧急公开会上发言时表示，中方对美方的单边、非法、霸凌行径深表震惊，予 以强烈谴责。 孙磊表示，一段时间以来，国际社会多次对美方针对委内瑞拉的制裁封锁和武力威胁表示强烈担忧。安理会召开两次紧急会议，联合国秘书长古特雷斯、广 大安理会成员、地区国家和域外国家一致呼吁遵守联合国宪章和国际法，保持冷静克制，和平解决争端，推动局势降级，维护地区稳定。然而，美国作为安 理会常任理事国，无视国际社会严重关切，肆意践踏委内瑞拉主权安全和合法权益，严重违反主权平等原则，严重违反不干涉内政原则，严重违反和平解决 国际争端原则，严重违反在国际关系中不得使用武力原则。美方将自身强权凌驾于多边主义之上，将军事行动凌驾于外交努力之上，严重威胁拉美和加勒比 地区乃至国际和平与安全。中方对此坚决反对，国际社会也普遍表示严重关切，予以强烈谴责 ...

据新华社，美国东部时间5日上午，遭美国强行控制的委内瑞拉总统马杜罗及其夫人被全副武装的警卫从纽约布鲁克林一处拘留中心带出，随后经直升机 等转运，抵达纽约南区联邦地区法院。 据该法院网站此前发布的通知，北京时间1月6日凌晨1时，也就是美国东部时间5日中午12时，马杜罗将出现在美国的法庭上，接受所谓"审判"。 据央视新闻，抗议者当地时间1月5日在美国纽约南区联邦法院外聚集。他们高呼口号，举着"释放马杜罗""不要向委内瑞拉开战"等标语横幅。 马杜罗为什么会被美国指控？其实，美国早有谋划。早在2020年，美国司法部就曾起诉马杜罗及其夫人，指控他们领导一个名为"太阳集团"的贩毒组织。 2025年，美国特朗普政府更进一步，将该集团乃至马杜罗政府整体列为"外国恐怖组织"。 然而，美国专家及媒体指出，至今没有公开证据能直接证明马杜罗本人指挥或参与了具体的毒品走私活动。更矛盾的是，根据美国缉毒署近年来的报告， 委内瑞拉甚至并非美国境内毒品的主要来源地。 据央视新闻，中国现代国际关系研究院拉美研究所所长孙岩峰表示，把委内瑞拉与美国面临的毒品问题相连，尤其是把一个国家的元首与美国的毒品问题 相连接，非常荒唐。 1月3日，委内瑞拉遭 ...

Core Points - The article discusses the U.S. military action against Venezuela, which involved the forceful capture of President Maduro and his wife, leading to widespread international condemnation [1][2] - It highlights the violation of international law and the principles of the United Nations Charter, emphasizing that the U.S. acted without any international authorization [1][2] - The underlying motive of the U.S. action is suggested to be the control of Venezuela's oil resources, framed as a guise of "justice" and "rule of law" [1] Group 1 - The U.S. military strike against Venezuela is characterized as a serious violation of international law and the sovereignty of nations [1][2] - The unilateral use of force by the U.S. without UN Security Council authorization is seen as a systemic destruction of international law [2] - The potential consequences of such actions could lead to a degradation of international order, where might makes right, as warned by various international leaders [2] Group 2 - The article calls for a respect for the UN Charter and emphasizes the need for dialogue and multilateral mechanisms to resolve conflicts [2] - It argues that any attempt to reshape the world order through force will ultimately lead to increased regional tensions and instability [2] - The necessity of maintaining a common bottom line to ensure world peace and stability is underscored as a fundamental premise for the international community [2]

法院外，抗议者聚集，要求释放马杜罗，抗议美国军事干涉委内瑞拉。 当天，联合国安理会也就委内瑞拉局势召开紧急会议，多国代表对美方行径表示强烈谴责。 马杜罗拒绝美方所有指控 3月17日将再次出庭 美东时间5日8时许，马杜罗及其夫人被全副武装的警卫从纽约布鲁克林一处拘留中心带出，随后经直升机等转运，抵达纽约南区联邦地区法院。 美东时间当天12时许（北京时间6日凌晨1时），马杜罗在纽约南区联邦地区法院首次出庭接受庭审。法院公告显示，庭审由法官阿尔文·赫勒斯坦主持。 △美国纽约南区联邦地区法院 马杜罗被美方指控犯有"毒品恐怖主义阴谋罪、可卡因走私阴谋罪、持有机枪及破坏性装置罪，以及针对美国的持有机枪及破坏性装置阴谋罪"。 马杜罗在法庭上表示，自己是"被绑架的""我无罪"，拒绝美方对其一切指控。马杜罗强调，他仍然是委内瑞拉总统。 当地时间1月5日，遭美国强行控制的委内瑞拉总统马杜罗及其妻子，在纽约南区联邦地区法院首次出庭接受庭审。庭审过程中，马杜罗拒绝了美方所有指 控，并表示"我无罪"。 马杜罗的代理律师"对马杜罗被强行控制的合法性存在疑问"，并表示将提交大量文件来应对法律挑战。 马杜罗的妻子西利娅·弗洛雷斯对美方指控同 ...

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, where multiple countries condemned the military actions taken by the United States against Venezuela [1] Group 1: Brazil's Position - Brazil's representative emphasized the negative consequences of external military interventions, which often lead to authoritarian regimes and human rights violations [2] - Brazil reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining peace in the region and opposed the establishment of a "trust territory" in Venezuela, advocating for solutions that respect the self-determination of the Venezuelan people [2][3] - Brazil called for a strong condemnation of armed interventions against a nation's sovereignty and urged the Security Council to respond in accordance with international law [3] Group 2: Mexico's Position - Mexico's representative condemned the military aggression against Venezuela, stating it violates the United Nations Charter and undermines multilateralism [4] - Mexico emphasized the importance of territorial integrity and political independence, advocating for peaceful and democratic resolutions to political differences [4] - Mexico called for the international community to respect international law and support dialogue to resolve disputes, reinforcing the region's tradition as a "zone of peace" [4] Group 3: Nicaragua's Position - Nicaragua's representative highlighted the region's status as a "zone of peace," urging international respect for this principle [5] - Nicaragua supported Venezuela's constitutional order and the right of its people to defend their sovereignty against external interference [5][6] - Nicaragua called for collective efforts to prevent further deterioration of international peace and security [6] Group 4: South Africa's Position - South Africa's representative stated that the U.S. military actions against Venezuela severely violate its sovereignty and independence, contravening international law [7] - South Africa emphasized that internal governance issues should be resolved through multilateral mechanisms rather than military force [7] - The statement from South Africa highlighted the need for respect for international law to maintain global stability and order [7]

Group 1 - The Chinese government condemns the U.S. military actions against Venezuela, stating it violates international law and threatens regional peace and security [1] - China emphasizes the importance of respecting Venezuela's sovereignty and its right to choose its development path, calling for stability in the country [1] - China expresses serious concern over the forced control of President Maduro and his wife by the U.S., urging their immediate release and advocating for dialogue to resolve the situation [1] Group 2 - China reaffirms its commitment to continue normal oil imports from Venezuela, highlighting the cooperation between the two countries is protected by international law [2] - The Chinese government opposes any actions that violate the principles of the UN Charter and interfere in the internal affairs of Latin American countries [2] - China maintains a consistent and stable policy towards Latin America, emphasizing non-interference in internal matters and mutual respect [3]

当地时间1月5日，在联合国安理会当天举行的紧急会议上，委内瑞拉常驻联合国代表萨缪尔·蒙卡达强 烈谴责美国对委内瑞拉采取缺乏法律依据的非法武装行动，指出有关行为严重违反《联合国宪章》和国 际法基本原则。 萨缪尔·蒙卡达还表示，相关事件符合国际法中"占领"的法律定义，他强调通过武力获取领土或资源不 可接受。委方指出，美方行动背后存在资源和地缘政治动机，若此类行为被纵容，将以强权取代法律， 动摇国际秩序根基。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 蒙卡达敦促安理会履行职责，明确谴责对委内瑞拉使用武力的行为，重申国际法原则，并采取措施缓和 局势。他还强调，当前委内瑞拉国家机构运作正常，宪政秩序得以维护，国家对全境实施有效控制，政 府将继续通过外交和法律途径捍卫国家主权。 ...

委内瑞拉在总统马杜罗被美军强行带往美国后进入紧急状态，代理总统罗德里格斯领导的政府下令警方 在全国范围内搜捕所有参与或支持美国袭击的人员，同时联合国高级官员在安理会紧急会议上明确指 出，美方军事行动违反国际法。 据央视新闻，联合国副秘书长迪卡洛代表秘书长古特雷斯在1月5日周一举行的安理会会议上表示，美国 对委内瑞拉的军事行动使局势进入"十分严峻的时刻"。这位联合国高官称，美国的袭击严重违反《联合 国宪章》，对地区和国际和平与安全构成威胁。 据央视，美国总统特朗普在3日美军袭击当天称，美国将"管理"委内瑞拉直至实施"安全"过渡。特朗普 次日周日表示，若代理总统罗德里格斯不配合，她将付出"可能比马杜罗更大的代价"。 罗德里格斯周日晚间发表声明，邀请美国政府"在国际法框架内就合作议程共同努力"，态度较初期的强 硬谴责明显软化，但这一转变可能在委内瑞拉政府内部强硬派中引发不满。 委内瑞拉启动全国搜捕行动 据央视新闻，当地时间1月5日周一，根据委内瑞拉政府紧急状态法令，警方立即启动全国范围的搜捕行 动，抓捕所有参与策划或支持美国袭击的人员。 央视提到，周一当天，代理总统罗德里格斯与国防部长洛佩斯共同探访了在上周六美国军 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case against Venezuelan President Maduro, involving drug-related charges, has raised significant international concerns regarding U.S. sovereignty violations and the motivations behind the prosecution, particularly in relation to oil interests [1][6]. Group 1: Charges and Legal Proceedings - Maduro faces four charges: drug terrorism conspiracy, cocaine smuggling conspiracy, possession of machine guns and explosives, and conspiracy related to possession of machine guns and explosives [2][3]. - The supplementary indictment details Maduro's alleged collaboration with drug traffickers, including providing diplomatic cover for drug operations and involvement in violent acts against those who owed debts [2][3]. - The court proceedings were presided over by Judge Alvin Hellerstein, who emphasized the importance of a fair trial [3][4]. Group 2: Historical Context and U.S. Actions - The U.S. has been planning the prosecution of Maduro since at least 2020, with previous accusations linking him to a drug trafficking organization [5]. - The recent military actions by the U.S. against Venezuela, including the capture of Maduro and his wife, have been framed as part of a broader strategy to exert control over Venezuelan oil resources [5][6]. Group 3: International Reactions - The international community has expressed outrage over the U.S. actions, with various leaders condemning the violation of international law and the potential precedent it sets for global political stability [6][7]. - Maduro's son, Nicolás Maduro Guerra, warned that normalizing the kidnapping of a head of state poses a direct threat to global political stability [7].