受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 2025年12月20日，贵州百灵（维权）（002424）公告收到证监会下发的《行政处罚事先告知书》，上海 久诚律师事务所股票索赔律师许峰提示，贵州百灵涉嫌的虚假陈述违法事实已基本清楚，如果投资者因 此受损，目前还可发起索赔，部分时段投资者已有胜诉先例。（许峰律师专栏） 许峰律师代理的贵州百灵投资者索赔案已向法院提交立案，目前正在等待法院的下一步安排，律师团队 还在继续推进后续案件的立案工作，还在继续接受后续投资者的索赔委托。 上述《行政处罚事先告知书》公告信息显示，经查，贵州百灵涉嫌违法的事实如下： 贵州百灵在财务核算时未执行《企业会计准则—基本准则》第九 条的规定，未以权责发生制为核算基 础，按收入成本费用配比原则计 提销售费用。贵州百灵 2019 年少计销售费用 35，012.49 万元，多计 利润 35，012.49 万元，占当期报告记载利润总额（绝对值）的 95.73%；2020 年少计销 ...

受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 一、两类投资者可索赔 贵州证监局在12月19日发布了对贵州百灵（维权）的行政处罚事先告知书，公司多年财务造假行为被曝 光。公司在2019年至2021年期间累计虚增利润达6.55亿元，2023年又虚减利润4.59亿元。 根据《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》，上市公司因财务指标虚假记载将被实施其他风险警示。贵州百 灵集团总部的企业标识旁，再次贴上了"ST"的警示标签，距离它上次摘掉这个标签仅过去不到半年。 上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师团队已收到数百位投资者的索赔报名，此次预处罚的送达也为后续诉讼提 供了有力的征集支持。（刘鹏律师专栏） 现针对其索赔条件进行了改动，目前符合以下任意区间的即可登记索赔：（ST百灵维权入口） （本文由上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师供稿，不代表新浪财经的观点。刘鹏律师，专注证券维权19年， 自2006年执业以来，成功为中青宝、国华网安、劲嘉股份（维权）等 300 余家上市公司的中小投 ...

贵州百灵财务造假案处罚方案出炉 公司领千万罚单、董事长被禁十年、股票将"ST" 作者 胡群 贵州百灵(002424.SZ)12月19日晚间连续发布两则公告，公布了这家上市药企长达数年的财务造假案调 查结果及处理方案。一则为贵州百灵企业集团制药股份有限公司关于公司及相关当事人收到《行政处罚 事先告知书》的公告。经查，贵州百灵在2019年至2021年及2023年，通过不当核算销售费用，在2019— 2021年虚增利润，在2023年虚减利润，导致四年年报存在虚假记载。监管拟对公司处以1000万元罚款； 对时任董事长姜伟处以500万元罚款，并采取10年证券市场禁入措施；另有多名高管及独立董事被处以 50万至350万元不等的罚款。 另一则公告显示，因触及财务报告虚假记载的相关规定，贵州百灵股票自2025年12月23日起被实施其他 风险警示，股票简称将由"贵州百灵"变更为"ST百灵"。这意味着公司即将面临行政处罚、人员追责与资 本市场警示的三重后果。 根据贵州证监局下发的《行政处罚事先告知书》，贵州百灵涉嫌违法的核心事实在于财务核算未执行企 业会计准则，未以权责发生制为基础计提销售费用，导致利润数据严重失真。 2019年 ...

Group 1 - The company Guizhou Bailing (002424.SZ) and 10 related individuals received an administrative penalty notice from the Guizhou Securities Regulatory Bureau for financial misconduct, including failing to adhere to the accrual basis of accounting [1][3] - From 2019 to 2021, the company understated sales expenses by 350 million, 241 million, and 64 million yuan respectively, leading to an overstatement of profits by up to 115.35% of the total reported profit for those periods; in 2023, sales expenses were overstated by 459 million yuan, with a profit understatement of 93.17% [1][3] - The company will be fined 10 million yuan and ordered to correct its financial statements; the former chairman Jiang Wei will face a 5 million yuan fine and a 10-year ban from the securities market [1][3] Group 2 - The company's stock will be suspended for one day on December 22, 2025, and will resume trading on December 23, 2025, with additional risk warnings; the stock name will change from "Guizhou Bailing" to "ST Bailing," while the stock code remains 002424, and the daily price fluctuation limit will be adjusted to 5% [2][3]

Core Viewpoint - Three companies, Guizhou Bailing, Funu Dongfang, and Bayi Steel, have received administrative penalty notices from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for various financial misconducts, leading to potential claims from affected investors [1][6]. Summary by Company Guizhou Bailing - Guizhou Bailing failed to comply with the accounting standards, resulting in significant misstatements in financial reports. The company underreported sales expenses and overstated profits for the years 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2023, with the following discrepancies: - 2019: Underreported sales expenses by 350.12 million, overstated profits by 350.12 million, representing 95.73% of reported profit [2][7] - 2020: Underreported sales expenses by 240.81 million, overstated profits by 240.81 million, representing 115.35% of reported profit [2][7] - 2021: Underreported sales expenses by 63.79 million, overstated profits by 63.79 million, representing 45.04% of reported profit [2][7] - 2023: Overreported sales expenses by 459.41 million, understated profits by 459.41 million, representing 93.17% of reported profit [2][7] Funu Dongfang - Funu Dongfang's subsidiary engaged in fraudulent transactions that inflated profits. The company reported: - 2020: Inflated profits by 35.80 million, which was 120.18% of the reported profit due to fictitious receivables [3][8] - 2021: Recognized a loss on inflated prepayments, reducing profits by 22.65 million, which was 6.64% of the reported profit [3][8] Bayi Steel - Bayi Steel was involved in non-operational fund transactions with its controlling shareholder, leading to undisclosed financial activities: - 2022: Received 3.68 billion and transferred 3.64 billion to the controlling shareholder [4][9] - 2023: Received 2.81 billion and transferred 2.77 billion [4][9] - 2024: Received 2.51 billion and transferred 2.53 billion [4][9] - The company failed to disclose these transactions in its annual reports for 2022, 2023, and 2024, resulting in significant omissions [4][9]. Investor Claims - Investors who suffered losses due to the misconduct of these companies may be eligible for compensation based on specific purchase and sale dates of their shares: - Guizhou Bailing: Purchases between April 30, 2020, and November 8, 2024 [5][10] - Funu Dongfang: Purchases between April 14, 2021, and December 6, 2024 [5][10] - Bayi Steel: Purchases between April 18, 2023, and November 7, 2025 [5][10]

一、《行政处罚事先告知书》主要内容 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：002424 证券简称：贵州百灵 公告编号：2025-053 贵州百灵企业集团制药股份有限公司 关于公司及相关当事人 收到《行政处罚事先告知书》的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 贵州百灵企业集团制药股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2024 年11月8日收到中国证券监督管理委员 会（以下简称"中国证监会"）下发的《立案告知书》（编号：证监立案字0312024002号），因公司涉嫌 信息披露违法违规，根据《中华人民共和国证券法》《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》等法律法规，中国 证监会决定对公司立案。具体内容详见公司于2024年11月9日在指定信息披露媒体《证券时报》《证券 日报》《中国证券报》《上海证券报》和巨潮资讯网（www.cninfo.com.cn）披露的《关于收到中国证 券监督管理委员会〈立案告知书〉的公告》（公告编号：2024-067）。 2025 年 12月19日，公司及相关当事人分别收到中国证券监督管理委员会贵州监管局（以下简称"贵州 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent announcements from Fuhua Dongfang and Guizhou Bailing regarding false financial reporting have triggered significant market reactions, leading to their stocks being marked as ST (Special Treatment) due to serious violations of disclosure regulations [1][2][35]. Group 1: Case Analysis - Fuhua Dongfang's financial misconduct involved false records in its annual reports, affecting key financial metrics such as revenue and net profit, but did not meet the criteria for mandatory delisting [3][4]. - Guizhou Bailing's case is characterized by a systematic manipulation of financial statements, with a total of 655 million yuan (approximately 6.55 billion) in inflated profits over four years, followed by a profit reduction of 459 million yuan (approximately 4.59 billion) in 2023 [5][7][8]. - The fraudulent activities of Guizhou Bailing reflect a clear violation of the accrual basis of accounting, distorting the true financial performance and constituting fundamental fraud against investors [12][40]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - Regulatory authorities have imposed significant penalties, including a maximum fine of 10 million yuan for both companies under the new Securities Law, which aims to increase the cost of violations [14][48]. - The actual controllers of Guizhou Bailing face severe personal penalties, including a proposed 10-year market ban, highlighting the stringent enforcement of accountability for corporate misconduct [16][49]. - The issuance of administrative penalty notices indicates that investigations are nearing completion, with substantial evidence gathered against the companies involved [17][50]. Group 3: Investor Impact - The total market capitalization of Fuhua Dongfang and Guizhou Bailing stands at approximately 3.975 billion yuan and 7.868 billion yuan, respectively, reflecting the financial stakes of numerous investors [18][51]. - Being marked as ST typically leads to a "Davis Double Kill," where stock prices plummet due to negative market sentiment and the revelation of lower-than-expected actual profitability [19][54]. - Investors have avenues for recourse, including collective lawsuits for false statements, which can significantly lower the barriers for legal action against the companies and their executives [21][55]. Group 4: Market Governance Evolution - The cases of Fuhua Dongfang and Guizhou Bailing illustrate a broader trend in the evolution of China's capital market governance, moving towards a zero-tolerance approach for financial misconduct [22][58]. - The new Securities Law has significantly raised the penalties for violations and established a collective litigation system to enhance investor protection [23][59]. - Future scrutiny of intermediary institutions, such as auditing firms and brokers, is expected to increase, ensuring they fulfill their responsibilities in maintaining market integrity [24][60].

贵州百灵（002424）(002424.SZ)12月19日晚间连续发布两则公告，公布了这家上市药企长达数年的财 务造假案调查结果及处理方案。一则为贵州百灵企业集团制药股份有限公司关于公司及相关当事人收到 《行政处罚事先告知书》的公告。经查，贵州百灵在2019年至2021年及2023年，通过不当核算销售费 用，在2019—2021年虚增利润，在2023年虚减利润，导致四年年报存在虚假记载。监管拟对公司处以 1000万元罚款；对时任董事长姜伟处以500万元罚款，并采取10年证券市场禁入措施；另有多名高管及 独立董事被处以50万至350万元不等的罚款。 另一则公告显示，因触及财务报告虚假记载的相关规定，贵州百灵股票自2025年12月23日起被实施其他 风险警示，股票简称将由"贵州百灵"变更为"ST百灵"。这意味着公司即将面临行政处罚、人员追责与资 本市场警示的三重后果。 根据贵州证监局下发的《行政处罚事先告知书》，贵州百灵涉嫌违法的核心事实在于财务核算未执行企 业会计准则，未以权责发生制为基础计提销售费用，导致利润数据严重失真。 2019年，贵州百灵少计销售费用35,012.49万元，多计利润35,012.49万元 ...

Core Viewpoint - The final ruling on a tax fraud case involving Jiangsu Wuzhong and its subsidiary, Wuzhong Import and Export Co., has been announced, confirming the company's ongoing financial and operational challenges, including an impending delisting from the stock market [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Fraud Case - Jiangsu Wuzhong's subsidiary, Wuzhong Import and Export, was found guilty of tax fraud, resulting in a fine of 8 million yuan and a prison sentence of 3 years and 6 months for the company's former chairman, Yang Feng [1]. - The fraudulent activities occurred from July 2011 to December 2018, during which the company illegally obtained approximately 242 million yuan in export tax rebates and profited over 16 million yuan through service fees [4]. - The case revealed that Wuzhong Import and Export disguised its operations to facilitate tax fraud, significantly impacting its financial performance, as evidenced by a drastic profit drop from 14.67 million yuan in 2018 to just 180,600 yuan in 2019 [5]. Group 2: Company Delisting - Jiangsu Wuzhong is facing delisting due to continuous financial fraud and misuse of funds, with the last trading day expected to be December 29, 2025 [2]. - The company has been under scrutiny for failing to disclose its actual controlling shareholders, which has compounded its legal and financial troubles [7]. - Despite the ongoing legal issues, Jiangsu Wuzhong claims that the court ruling will not affect its normal business operations [1].

Core Viewpoint - A tax fraud case involving Jiangsu Wuzhong and its subsidiary has reached a final verdict, with significant implications for the company's future and ongoing operations [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Verdict - Jiangsu Wuzhong's wholly-owned subsidiary, Wuzhong Import and Export Co., received a final ruling from the Hunan Province Hengyang Intermediate People's Court, upholding the original judgment [1]. - The first-instance judgment revealed that Wuzhong Import and Export was found guilty of tax fraud, resulting in a fine of 8 million yuan, and the former legal representative, Yang Feng, was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months in prison along with a fine of 123,000 yuan [1][4]. - The court also ordered the confiscation of illegal gains amounting to 16 million yuan, which had been seized by law enforcement [1]. Group 2: Financial Implications and Company Operations - Jiangsu Wuzhong announced that the verdict would not affect its normal business operations, stating that the company's current operational status remains stable [1]. - The tax fraud case spanned from July 2011 to December 2018, during which Wuzhong Import and Export fraudulently obtained approximately 242 million yuan in export tax rebates [4]. - The company had previously reported a significant drop in profits from Wuzhong Import and Export, with a 98.77% decrease in 2019 compared to 2018, which was later linked to the fraudulent activities [5]. Group 3: Company’s Listing Status and Investor Rights - Jiangsu Wuzhong is facing delisting, with only six trading days remaining before its stock enters a delisting period, expected to conclude on December 29, 2025 [2][7]. - Despite the impending delisting, investors who purchased shares between April 20, 2019, and February 26, 2025, retain the right to claim compensation for losses incurred [6][7]. - The company is under scrutiny for financial misconduct, including inflated revenues exceeding 1.7 billion yuan over four years, which has led to potential legal repercussions for its current management [6].