《联合国宪章》
Search documents
法国、德国、西班牙、意大利、葡萄牙等国,集体表态
Xin Jing Bao· 2026-01-03 22:41
另据新华社消息,欧盟和德国、西班牙、意大利、葡萄牙等多个欧洲国家当天也表示将密切关注委内瑞 拉局势,呼吁遵守《联合国宪章》。欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡娅·卡拉斯在社交媒体上说,欧盟 正密切关注委内瑞拉局势,呼吁各方保持克制。她已与美国国务卿鲁比奥以及欧盟驻委内瑞拉大使通 话。她还强调,确保在委内瑞拉境内欧盟公民安全是欧盟的首要任务。 央视新闻消息,当地时间3日,法国外交部长巴罗在社交媒体发文表示,抓走委内瑞拉总统马杜罗的军 事行动违背了国际法赖以建立的不使用武力原则。 巴罗强调,任何持久的政治解决方案都不能由外部强加,只有主权人民有权决定他们的未来。法国重申 遵循《联合国宪章》,该宪章应继续指导各国在任何时刻、任何地方的国际行动。 欧洲理事会主席科斯塔在社交媒体上表示,欧盟呼吁各方推动局势降温,并在充分尊重国际法和《联合 国宪章》原则基础上寻求解决方案。 ...
联合国秘书长就委内瑞拉局势升级表示严重关切,法国、英国、巴西表态
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-03 22:19
(来源:上观新闻) 当地时间1月3日,联合国秘书长古特雷斯通过发言人发表声明,对近期委内瑞拉局势持续升级表示深切 关切,尤其对当天美国在委内瑞拉采取的军事行动可能对地区安全稳定带来的影响表示担忧。 声明称,秘书长对近期委内瑞拉局势的升级深感震惊,尤其是今日美国在该国采取的军事行动,此举可 能对地区局势产生令人担忧的影响。 不论委内瑞拉国内局势如何,这些事态发展都构成了一个危险的先例。秘书长持续强调,各方都必须充 分尊重国际法,包括《联合国宪章》。秘书长对国际法规则未得到遵守深表关切。 秘书长呼吁委内瑞拉境内所有相关方在充分尊重人权和法治的前提下,开展包容性对话。 法国外长:美国对委内瑞拉的军事行动违背国际法原则 据新华社援引英国媒体3日报道,英国首相斯塔默表示,英国"未以任何方式参与"美国对委内瑞拉采取 的行动。 斯塔默在为英国媒体录制的视频表态中说,他尚未就美国方面抓捕委内瑞拉总统马杜罗一事与美国总统 特朗普进行沟通。"这显然是一个局势快速演变的情况,我们需要先查清所有事实。"他说。 斯塔默说:"我可以非常明确地表示,英国没有以任何方式参与这次行动。" 当被问及是否会对该行动予以谴责时,斯塔默表示,目前首要 ...
联合国安理会就委内瑞拉局势举行紧急会议
Xin Hua She· 2025-12-24 08:01
新华社联合国12月23日电(记者尚绪谦)联合国安理会23日就委内瑞拉局势举行紧急会议。俄罗斯和中 国代表抨击美国针对委内瑞拉的行动,绝大多数安理会成员强调应遵守《联合国宪章》,以和平方式解 决争端。 ...
日方信函充斥错误观点和虚伪谎言
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-12-02 22:33
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly criticizes Japan's recent letter to the UN Secretary-General, labeling it as filled with erroneous views and hypocritical lies, and urges Japan to reflect on its actions as a defeated nation and fulfill its commitments to China and the international community [1] Group 1: Japan's Position on Taiwan - Japan's Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, has made statements regarding Taiwan that challenge the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, which China views as a serious violation of the UN Charter [1] - The Chinese government questions Japan's vague stance on Taiwan, demanding a clear and accurate response regarding Japan's "consistent position" as outlined in the four political documents between China and Japan [1] Group 2: Military and Defense Issues - Japan's claims of adhering to a "defensive posture" are contradicted by its Prime Minister's comments linking Japan's survival crisis to Taiwan, implying a potential military threat against China [1] - The Chinese government highlights Japan's increasing military expenditures and its moves to reinterpret its self-defense policies, which it sees as a violation of its post-war commitments and a challenge to the international order established after World War II [1] Group 3: China's Response - In light of Japan's actions, China has reiterated its position through its permanent mission to the UN, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its past and adhere to its obligations as a defeated nation [1] - The year marks the 80th anniversary of China's victory in the War of Resistance against Japan, reinforcing China's stance against Japan's attempts to challenge the post-war international order and revive militarism [1]
外交部:任何外部势力胆敢介入台海事务,我们必将迎头痛击!
证券时报· 2025-12-02 09:45
Group 1 - The Chinese government firmly opposes Japan's challenge to the post-war international order and the revival of militarism, emphasizing that Japan's recent statements violate the principles of the UN Charter [2][3] - Japan's ambassador to the UN made unfounded claims regarding Taiwan, and the Chinese side demands clarity on Japan's "consistent position" on the Taiwan issue as outlined in four political documents [2][3] - The Chinese government reiterates its stance that Taiwan is an integral part of China and any external interference in Taiwan affairs will be met with strong resistance [4][5] Group 2 - The Chinese government has sent a letter to the UN Secretary-General reaffirming its position against Japan's actions, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and the global anti-fascist war [3] - There is a call for Japan to reflect on its past actions and fulfill its obligations as a defeated nation, urging Japan to stop undermining the feelings of the two nations' citizens [5][6] - The Chinese government expresses hope that relevant Japanese organizations will play a positive role domestically to mitigate the negative impacts of Japan's statements [5][6]
中方再次致函联合国
中国能源报· 2025-12-02 02:13
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's strong opposition to Japan's provocative statements regarding Taiwan, asserting that such remarks challenge international order and violate the principles of the UN Charter [1][3]. Group 1: China's Position - China firmly criticizes Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's remarks suggesting that Taiwan's situation could pose an existential threat to Japan, viewing this as a direct challenge to the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order [1][2]. - The letter from China's UN representative highlights that Japan's claims of a consistent stance on Taiwan are vague and unsubstantiated, questioning Japan's commitment to its historical agreements regarding Taiwan [2][3]. Group 2: Japan's Defense Strategy - Japan's assertion of a passive defense strategy is contradicted by its linkage of Taiwan's situation to Japan's national security, which implies a potential military response against China, thus exceeding the bounds of its stated defense policy [2][4]. - The article points out that Japan has significantly increased its defense budget for thirteen consecutive years and is modifying its post-war policies to allow for arms exports and potential nuclear capabilities, indicating a shift away from its historical defense posture [4]. Group 3: International Relations and Trust - The article argues that the provocative statements from Japan have severely damaged mutual trust and the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations, urging Japan to adhere to the One China principle and rectify its statements to foster stable relations [5]. - It warns that Japan's militarization and historical revisionism pose a threat to regional peace, calling for vigilance from the international community regarding Japan's military ambitions [4][5].
哥伦比亚向美洲国家组织投诉美国在加勒比海域行动
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-11-21 04:36
当地时间20日,哥伦比亚常驻美洲国家组织代表巴尔加斯向该组织投诉美国在加勒比海和东太平洋对疑似"贩 毒船只"的袭击的是"违规行为"。这些行为不符合国际人权法、《联合国宪章》和《公民权利与政治权利国际 公约》。 巴尔加斯表示,哥伦比亚再次反对和谴责这种单方面攻击,不能以打击"毒品贩运"之名在国际法之外采取行 动。他说,有组织犯罪必须在"执法"下进行打击,"它们不是战争情景"。 今年9月初以来,美军已在加勒比海和东太平洋击沉超过20艘美方所称的"贩毒船",造成数十人死亡。哥伦比 亚总统佩特罗确认死者中有该国公民。这些行动在美国国内外引发争议和批评,一些联合国人权专家认为美方 涉嫌"非法杀戮",哥政府多次谴责美国在加勒比和太平洋地区打击贩毒行动是"法外处决"。(总台记者 邓雪 梅) △哥伦比亚常驻美洲国家组织代表巴尔加斯发言现场 ...
联合国驻华协调员:中国领导力至关重要 中国贡献都不可或缺
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-10-25 07:10
Core Insights - The United Nations Coordinator in China,常启德, praised China's role in the UN and its leadership in reshaping the multilateral system globally [3][4] - He emphasized China's significant contributions through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative and the Global Development Initiative, aligning with the spirit of the UN Charter [3][4] Group 1 - China is a crucial member of the UN Security Council and the largest developing country contributor, playing an essential role in the UN system [3] - The UN has achieved unprecedented development in its 80 years, but vulnerabilities in global development are increasingly exposed [4] - China has successfully lifted over 800 million people out of poverty and feeds about one-fifth of the world's population using only 9% of global arable land [4] Group 2 - The UN Coordinator highlighted the importance of China's leadership in the current process of reshaping the multilateral system [4] - China is seen as a bridge for cooperation and coordination, significantly supporting the UN system and strengthening multilateralism [4] - The Coordinator noted that China's contributions are vital across five core areas outlined in the "Future Covenant": global governance, peace and security, sustainable development goals, AI and technology development, and youth development [4]
联合国举行成立八十周年纪念活动
人民网-国际频道 原创稿· 2025-09-23 03:31
Group 1 - The core message of the event is to reignite the hope from 80 years ago and to unite in facing global challenges, as emphasized by UN Secretary-General António Guterres [1][3] - Guterres highlighted unprecedented challenges facing the UN, including attacks on civilians in Gaza, Ukraine, and Sudan, as well as the spread of poverty and hunger, and climate crises causing disasters [3] - The importance of strengthening the UN and reshaping international cooperation is underscored, with references to the "2030 Agenda," "Future Pact," and the UN's 80th anniversary initiative [3] Group 2 - UN General Assembly President Annalena Baerbock stressed that this moment is not for celebration but for remembering lessons and choosing hope, urging nations to opt for dialogue over division [3] - The theme of the current UN General Assembly is "Working Together," which conveys a timeless truth about the importance of collaboration for a better future [3]
古特雷斯:《联合国宪章》不是自助餐式菜单
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-06-27 22:54
Core Points - The United Nations General Assembly held a meeting to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the signing of the UN Charter, with calls to uphold its principles and purposes [1][3] - UN Secretary-General António Guterres criticized the selective adherence to the Charter by some nations, emphasizing its foundational role in international relations [3] Group 1 - Guterres highlighted that the UN Charter was born from the ruins of war, symbolizing hope after deep suffering, and serves as a tool for changing destinies and saving lives [3] - He warned that the principles of the Charter are facing unprecedented attacks, including violations of sovereignty and international humanitarian law, and the deliberate targeting of civilians and infrastructure [3] - Guterres urged member states to fulfill their commitments and responsibilities to build a more inclusive and interconnected multilateral system for the 21st century [3] Group 2 - UN General Assembly President Csaba Kőrösi noted that the UN is currently in an extremely difficult historical period, with ongoing conflicts in Gaza, Ukraine, and Sudan posing severe challenges to multilateralism [3] - Kőrösi emphasized the need for dialogue and diplomacy over destructive warfare, which contradicts the fundamental principles of the UN Charter [3]