Meeting Details - The annual general meeting of Guangdong Provincial Highway Development Co., Ltd. is scheduled for May 21, 2025, at 3:00 PM [1] - The meeting will be held at the company's conference room located at 32 Zhujiang East Road, Guangzhou [3] - The meeting will combine on-site voting and online voting [4] Attendance - A total of 249 shareholders and their proxies attended the meeting, representing 1,286,824,551 shares, which is 61.5468% of the total voting shares [6] - Among them, 47 attended the on-site meeting, representing 1,068,226,276 shares (51.0916% of total voting shares), while 202 participated via online voting, representing 218,598,275 shares (10.4552% of total voting shares) [6] Proposal Voting Results - The proposal for the 2024 financial settlement report was approved with 1,286,643,751 votes in favor, accounting for 99.9860% of the votes cast [9] - The proposal for the 2024 profit distribution plan received 1,286,746,751 votes in favor, representing 99.9940% [12] - The proposal for the 2025 comprehensive budget was approved with 1,253,127,803 votes in favor, which is 97.3814% [16] - The proposal for the 2024 board of directors' work report was approved with 1,286,643,551 votes in favor, accounting for 99.9859% [19] - The proposal for the 2024 supervisory board work report received 1,286,643,051 votes in favor, representing 99.9859% [22] - The proposal for the 2024 annual report and its summary was approved with 1,286,644,151 votes in favor, accounting for 99.9860% [25] - The proposal for the 2025 investment plan received 1,250,074,212 votes in favor, which is 97.1441% [27] - The proposal for increasing investment in the Ji Guang Expressway project was approved with 253,740,860 votes in favor, representing 99.8679% [28] - The proposal for issuing medium-term notes received 1,286,675,251 votes in favor, accounting for 99.9884% [29] Legal Opinions - The legal opinions provided by Guangdong Lianyue Law Firm confirmed that the meeting's procedures and voting results comply with relevant laws and regulations [33] Future Meetings - The company will hold its first temporary shareholders' meeting on June 6, 2025, at 3:30 PM [74] - The meeting will also utilize a combination of on-site and online voting [76]

Core Viewpoint - ST Huaxi is facing significant challenges, including a continuous decline in stock price and legal issues involving its actual controller, which raises concerns about the company's future performance and governance [1][4][5]. Group 1: Company Governance and Management Changes - ST Huaxi's actual controller, Li Renchao, has been placed under detention and is under investigation, leading to a change in leadership with Huang Youquan being appointed as the new chairman and president [1][4]. - The company asserts that the board's operations remain normal and that there has been no change in control, emphasizing that production and operational activities are unaffected [4][5]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Stock Price Decline - The stock price of ST Huaxi has experienced a drastic decline, with a cumulative drop of over 43% from April 28 to May 20, falling from 4.02 yuan per share to 2.28 yuan per share [5][6]. - The company has reported continuous losses over the past five years, with total losses exceeding 2.4 billion yuan from 2020 to 2024, and a revenue decline of 15.15% year-on-year in Q1 2024 [7].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Qingdao Inpace Health Technology Co., Ltd., has announced the reappointment of Heshin Accounting Firm as its auditor for the year 2025, ensuring the continuity of its auditing services and compliance with regulatory requirements [9][10][19]. Financial Data - The first quarter report for the company has not been audited [8]. - The company has repurchased 1,256,700 shares, accounting for 0.85% of the total share capital as of the reporting period [5]. Shareholder Information - The company has confirmed that there are no changes in the major shareholders and their shareholding status compared to the previous period [6]. Audit Firm Information - Heshin Accounting Firm has been selected for reappointment, with an audit fee of 850,000 yuan and an internal control audit fee of 280,000 yuan, remaining the same as the previous year [10][17]. - The firm has a total of 45 partners and 254 registered accountants, with 139 of them having signed audit reports for securities services [11]. - The firm has not faced any criminal penalties or disciplinary actions in the last three years [13][15]. Audit Committee and Board Decisions - The audit committee has reviewed and approved the reappointment of Heshin Accounting Firm, emphasizing its qualifications and independence [18]. - The board of directors unanimously approved the proposal to reappoint the audit firm, which will be subject to shareholder approval [19].

索引 页码 XYZH/2025BJAB2B0054 中国石油集团资本股份有限公司 中国石油集团资本股份有限公司全体股东： 按照《企业内部控制审计指引》及中国注册会计师执业准则的相关要求，我们审计 了中国石油集团资本股份有限公司（以下简称中油资本）2024 年 12 月 31 日财务报告内 部控制的有效性。 一、 企业对内部控制的责任 按照《企业内部控制基本规范》 、 《企业内部控制应用指引》 、 中国石油集团资本股份有限公司 《企业内部控制评 价指引》的规定，建立健全和有效实施内部控制，并评价其有效性是中油资本董事会的 责任。 二、 注册会计师的责任 我们的责任是在实施审计工作的基础上，对财务报告内部控制的有效性发表审计意 见，并对注意到的非财务报告内部控制的重大缺陷进行披露。 三、 内部控制的固有局限性 内部控制具有固有局限性，存在不能防止和发现错报的可能性。此外，由于情况的 变化可能导致内部控制变得不恰当，或对控制政策和程序遵循的程度降低，根据内部控 制审计结果推测未来内部控制的有效性具有一定风险。 四、 财务报告内部控制审计意见 我们认为，中油资本于 2024 年 12 月 31 日按照《企业内部控制基 ...

日照港股份有限公司 二〇二四年度 内部控制审计报告 致同会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙） 致同会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙） 中国北京 朝阳区建国门外大街 22 号 赛特广场 5 层 邮编 100004 电话 +86 10 8566 5588 传真 +86 10 8566 5120 www.grantthornton.cn 按照《企业内部控制审计指引》及中国注册会计师执业准则的相关要求， 我们审计了日照港股份有限公司（以下简称日照港公司）2024 年 12 月 31 日 的财务报告内部控制的有效性。 一、企业对内部控制的责任 按照《企业内部控制基本规范》、《企业内部控制应用指引》、《企业 内部控制评价指引》的规定，建立健全和有效实施内部控制，并评价其有效 性是日照港公司董事会的责任。 二、注册会计师的责任 我们的责任是在实施审计工作的基础上，对财务报告内部控制的有效性 发表审计意见，并对注意到的非财务报告内部控制的重大缺陷进行披露。 三、内部控制的固有局限性 内部控制具有固有局限性，存在不能防止和发现错报的可能性。此外， 由于情况的变化可能导致内部控制变得不恰当，或对控制政策和程序遵循的 程度降低，根据内部控制审计 ...

新天绿能: 新天绿能2024年度内部控制审计报告 一、企业对内部控制的责任 按照《企业内部控制基本规范》、《企业内部控制应用指引》、《企业内部控制评价指引》 的 规定，建立健全和有效实施内部控制，并评价其有效性是企业董事会的责任。 新天绿色能源股份有限公司 内部控制审计报告 二零二四年十二月三十一日 内部控制审计报告 安永华明（2025）专字第70015920_A04 号 新天绿色能源股份有限公司全体股东： 按照《企业内部控制审计指引》及中国注册会计师执业准则的相关要求，我们审计了新天 绿色能源股份有限公司 2024 年 12 月 31 日的财务报告内部控制的有效性。 二、注册会计师的责任 我们的责任是在实施审计工作的基础上，对财务报告内部控制的有效性发表审计意见，并 对注意到的非财务报告内部控制的重大缺陷进行披露。 三、内部控制的固有局限性 内部控制具有固有局限性，存在不能防止和发现错报的可能性。此外，由于情况的变化可 能导致内部控制变得不恰当，或对控制政策和程序遵循的程度降低，根据内部控制审计结果推 测未来内部控制的有效性具有一定风险。 安永华明（2025）专字第 70015920_A04号 四、财务报告 ...

中海油服: 中海油服：2024年度内部控制审计报告 中海油田服务股份有限公司 内部控制审计报告 内部控制审计报告 安永华明（2025）专字第70001873_A01号 中海油田服务股份有限公司 中海油田服务股份有限公司全体股东： 按照《企业内部控制审计指引》及中国注册会计师执业准则的相关要求，我们 审计了中海油田服务股份有限公司 2024 年 12 月 31 日的财务报告内部控制的有 效 性。 三、内部控制的固有局限性 内部控制具有固有局限性，存在不能防止和发现错报的可能性。此外，由于情 况的变化可能导致内部控制变得不恰当，或对控制政策和程序遵循的程度降低，根 据内部控制审计结果推测未来内部控制的有效性具有一定风险。 四、财务报告内部控制审计意见 我们认为，中海油田服务股份有限公司按照《企业内部控制基本规范》和相关 规定在所有重大方面保持了有效的财务报告内部控制。 A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited 内部控制审计报告（续） 安永华明（2025）专字第 一、企业对内部控制的责任 按照《企业内部控制基本规范》、《企业内部控制应用指引》、《企业内部控 制评价指 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the significant issue of internal control failures in listed companies, which serve as a breeding ground for financial fraud, and emphasizes the need for a thorough examination of the auditing mechanisms and corporate governance systems in place [2][5]. Summary by Sections Financial Fraud Cases - Dongfang Group was fined millions by the CSRC for significant financial fraud, having inflated business revenue by over 16 billion yuan through fictitious business operations over four years [3]. - A staggering 80% of companies penalized by the CSRC had received unqualified audit opinions regarding their internal controls in the five years leading up to their penalties [4][8]. Audit Mechanisms and Internal Controls - The audit process is likened to a health check for a company, focusing on the compliance of financial reporting and internal controls [7]. - The Ministry of Finance and the CSRC issued guidelines in 2010 stating that any significant internal control deficiencies should lead to a negative audit opinion [7]. - Despite clear evidence of financial misconduct, many companies received standard unqualified opinions on their internal controls during the years of their violations [10][12]. Statistics on Audit Opinions - From 2022 onwards, 257 companies were penalized for financial reporting violations, with many having never received non-standard audit opinions in the five years prior [12][13]. - Among the companies that faced penalties, 178 had internal control audits that were deemed effective, despite their violations [13]. Discrepancies in Audit Findings - The article discusses the disconnect between audit opinions and regulatory penalties, attributing it to differences in the focus and capabilities of auditors versus regulatory bodies [17][18]. - Auditors often prioritize financial reporting over internal controls, leading to a lack of attention to potential internal control failures [18]. Recommendations for Improvement - To restore the credibility of audits, experts suggest enhancing auditor independence, adopting modern auditing techniques, and addressing low-cost competition that undermines audit quality [23][25][26]. - A comprehensive digital system is recommended to improve internal governance and reduce violations of internal control procedures [30]. - Cultivating a compliance culture within companies is essential, with suggestions for regular risk training and establishing a whistleblower system to encourage reporting of misconduct [31]. Conclusion - The article concludes that the effectiveness of internal controls is crucial for corporate governance, and there is an urgent need for companies to address the systemic issues that lead to audit failures and financial misconduct [28][29].

新疆塔里木农业综合开发股份有限公司 审计委员会对会计师事务所履行 ( 监督职责情况的报告 (一) 会计师事务所基本情况 大信会计师事务所(特殊普通合伙)（以下简称"大信"）成立 于 1985年,2012年 3 月转制为特殊普通合伙制事务所,总部位于北 京,注册地址为北京市海淀区知春路 1 号 22 层 2206。大信在全国设 有 33 家分支机构,在香港设立了分所,并于 2017年发起设立了大信 国际会计网络,目前拥有美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、德国、法国、英 国、新加坡等 38 家网络成员所。大信是我国最早从事证券服务业务 的会计师事务所之一,首批获得H 股企业审计资格,拥有近 30年的 证券业务从业经验。 首席合伙人为谢泽敏先生。截至 2023年 12月 31日,大信从业 人员总数 4001人,其中合伙人 160人,注册会计师 971人。注册会 计师中，超过 500 人签署过证券服务业务审计报告。 (二)续聘会计师事务所履行的程序 根据《国有企业、上市公司选聘会计师事务所管理办法》《上海 证券交易所股票上市规则》《上海证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引 第 1 号一规范运作》等规定和要求,新疆塔里木农业综合开发股 ...