我们要再次强调，世界上只有一个中国，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分，中华人民共和国政府是代 表全中国的唯一合法政府。这是国际社会普遍共识和国际关系基本准则。一个中国原则是中国与所有国 家建立和发展外交关系的前提和基础。个别西方政客出于一己私利，执意与台进行官方交往，势必影响 双边互信和互利合作。我们敦促有关国家遵守对华政治承诺，切实将坚持一个中国原则落到实处，约束 有关政客与"台独"分裂分子划清界限，不要执意站在14亿多中国人民的对立面。 中国人民实现国家统一的正义事业不可阻挡，国际社会坚持一个中国的格局不可撼动。任何妄图挑战一 个中国原则、挑战国际法治和国际秩序的行径，必将遭到全体中国人民和所有热爱和平、支持正义的各 国人民的共同反对。(完） 中新网北京9月29日电 (记者 曾玥 郭超凯)外交部发言人郭嘉昆29日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：近期，台湾当局派员以不同名义和身份窜访有关国家。发言人对此有何评论？ 郭嘉昆：我们注意到有关情况。赖清德当局打着经贸、科技、文化等幌子，或以所谓私人身份、非官方 身份窜访有关国家，大肆散播"台独"分裂谎言谬论，极力诱拉外部势力为其谋"独"恶行壮胆，妄图通过 自吹自擂掩盖 ...

华尔街日报引述知情者消息称，在特朗普渴望与中国达成经贸协议之际，习近平寻求特朗普在台湾问题上让步，正式表明美国反对台独。美国政府在拜登时期采取“不支持台独”的立场，而在特朗普任内，官方则表明“反对任何一方单方面改变现状”。知情者称，北京方面已不再满足于“不支持台独“的表述。知情者透露，在北京看来，若美国能明确反对台独，将意味着美国从中立转向与北京立场一致；而如今特朗普渴望与中国达成经贸协议，习近平认为能说服特朗普在台湾问题上改变立场。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and its leader Lai Ching-te for their pro-Japan stance and historical revisionism, particularly regarding the narrative of Taiwan's history during the Japanese occupation and the Second Sino-Japanese War [1][2][3]. Group 1: Political Stance and Historical Interpretation - Lai Ching-te's use of the term "end of war" instead of "victory in the war of resistance" is seen as aligning with Japanese militarism and betraying historical truth [1][2]. - The DPP's leadership is accused of promoting a post-colonial mindset that seeks to legitimize Japan's colonial rule over Taiwan [1][2]. - Public sentiment in Taiwan is increasingly against the DPP's handling of cross-strait relations, with a reported 63% dissatisfaction rate, a significant increase of 20 percentage points from the previous year [3]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Criticism - Taiwanese commentators express that Lai Ching-te's statements distort Taiwan's political situation and history, leading to ridicule on the international stage [2]. - A poll conducted by a Taiwanese news outlet showed over 95% of respondents disapproved of the DPP's recent comments regarding historical events [2]. - The DPP's approach to governance, particularly in disaster response, is criticized as being more focused on anti-China rhetoric rather than effective disaster management [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government asserts that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and emphasizes that any attempts at "Taiwan independence" will not be tolerated, framing such actions as threats to peace in the Taiwan Strait [1] Group 1: Government Stance - The Chinese government, represented by the Taiwan Affairs Office, reiterates that there is only one China and that Taiwan's status as part of China is a historical and legal fact [1] - The spokesperson criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for its "Taiwan independence" stance, claiming it undermines peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [1] Group 2: Regional Stability - The Chinese government calls for unity among Taiwanese compatriots to oppose "Taiwan independence" provocations and external interference, framing this as essential for maintaining peace in the region [1] - The statement highlights the belief that the DPP's actions, under the guise of maintaining peace, are actually efforts to pursue independence through external support [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Taiwanese authorities are reportedly enhancing their coast guard capabilities by acquiring six new patrol vessels, which has raised concerns about the potential militarization of the coast guard and the blurring of lines between law enforcement and military operations [1] Group 1 - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for its persistent stance on "Taiwan independence," claiming it poses the greatest threat to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [1] - The DPP is accused of colluding with external forces to provoke tensions and is attempting to use military means to pursue independence, which is seen as detrimental to the welfare of the Taiwanese people [1] - The spokesperson warned that the DPP's militaristic approach would ultimately lead to greater harm for Taiwan, emphasizing that their efforts to achieve independence through military means are futile and self-destructive [1]

Core Viewpoint - The "Beijing Sharp" articles have significantly increased in frequency since mid-September, aiming to clarify the central government's policies towards Taiwan and the international situation [1][2][3] Group 1: Article Frequency and Style - "Beijing Sharp" began publishing almost daily articles on Taiwan-related issues since mid-September, emphasizing the urgency of conveying the central government's stance [1][2] - The articles are characterized by their concise yet profound style, often delivering significant insights in a brief format [2][3] Group 2: Public and Media Reaction - The articles have garnered considerable attention from both domestic and international media, indicating their impact on public discourse [3] - A specific article titled "The Unstoppable Trend of National Reunification" received over 100,000 views within an hour of publication, showcasing its popularity [8] Group 3: Data-Driven Arguments - An article published on September 22 utilized data to argue against the current Taiwanese leadership, highlighting a significant increase in dissatisfaction with Lai Ching-te's handling of cross-strait relations, from 43% to 63% [13][14] - The article also noted a drop of 8% in the belief that the U.S. would intervene militarily in a cross-strait conflict, reflecting a shift in public sentiment [13][14] Group 4: Consensus Building - Some articles aim to foster consensus and empathy, using recent significant events in mainland China to illustrate a narrative of national pride and unity among Chinese people, including Taiwanese compatriots [20][21] - The articles blend assertive rhetoric with a more compassionate tone, indicating a strategic approach to engage with the audience emotionally [20][21]

Core Points - The article discusses the statements made by Lai Ching-te regarding Taiwan's defense and economic strategies, which are criticized by the Chinese government as promoting "Taiwan independence" and escalating tensions across the Taiwan Strait [1][2][3][4] - The Chinese government emphasizes that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and rejects any claims of Taiwan's independence or separate existence [2][3][4] Group 1 - Lai Ching-te's three missions include enhancing defense budgets, protecting Taiwanese citizens, and shifting investments from mainland China to global markets [1] - The Chinese government accuses Lai of exacerbating cross-strait tensions and undermining the interests of Taiwanese businesses and citizens [1][3] - The Chinese government asserts that the historical and legal status of Taiwan as part of China is indisputable, referencing international agreements from World War II [2][3] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns that any attempts at "Taiwan independence" will ultimately fail and emphasizes the importance of the "1992 Consensus" as a basis for dialogue [4] - The article highlights the contradiction in the Taiwanese government's stance of seeking dialogue while simultaneously promoting independence narratives [4] - The Chinese government calls for unity among Taiwanese citizens against external interference and "Taiwan independence" movements [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson Chen Binhua criticized Lai Ching-te's recent claims regarding "three major missions," labeling him as a "Taiwan independence" proponent who exacerbates cross-strait tensions and undermines cooperation [1] Group 1: Political Stance - Lai Ching-te has consistently adhered to a "Taiwan independence" stance since taking office, disregarding the interests and welfare of the Taiwanese people and businesses [1] - The spokesperson accused Lai of obstructing and limiting cross-strait exchanges and cooperation, pushing for economic decoupling between Taiwan and the mainland [1] Group 2: External Influence - Lai is criticized for selling out Taiwan and catering to external forces, allowing them to manipulate Taiwan's situation [1] - The spokesperson highlighted that Lai's actions could lead Taiwan into a dangerous military conflict, jeopardizing the safety of the island [1] Group 3: Impact on Taiwan - Lai's rhetoric and actions have severely harmed the interests of local businesses and the general public in Taiwan [1] - The spokesperson warned that if Lai does not change his approach, the situation will worsen for Taiwan [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, and the notion of "Taiwan independence" is fundamentally flawed and counterproductive [1][2] - The spokesperson criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for its contradictory stance of claiming willingness for dialogue while promoting "Taiwan independence," indicating a lack of genuine intent for cross-strait communication [1] - The "1992 Consensus," which reflects the one-China principle, is highlighted as the political foundation for dialogue and negotiation between the two sides [1] Group 2 - The DPP's attempts to seek independence through external support and military means are described as a betrayal of the mainstream public opinion in Taiwan and detrimental to national interests [2] - The spokesperson asserts that the DPP's strategies are bound to fail and will not succeed in achieving their goals [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes the one-China principle, asserting that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, which is the political foundation for diplomatic relations between China and Austria [1]. Group 1 - The Chinese government firmly opposes any official exchanges between countries that have diplomatic relations with China and Taiwan [1]. - The Chinese government urges relevant countries to adhere to the one-China principle and stop providing platforms for "Taiwan independence" activities [1]. - The Chinese government warns that attempts to promote "Taiwan independence" are futile and will not succeed [1]. Group 2 - The Chinese government criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party's attempts to create a narrative of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan," stating that these efforts are destined to fail [1].