编制单位：扬州海昌新材股份有限公 司 单位：万元 占用方与上 上市公司核 2025 年期 2025 年度占用 2025 年度占 2025 年度 2025 年 6 月 资金占用 占用形 非经营性资金占用 市公司的关 算的会计科 初占用资 累计发生金额 用资金的利 偿还累计 30 日占用资 占用性质 方名称 成原因 联关系 目 金余额 （不含利息） 息（如有） 发生金额 金余 额 控股股东、实际控制 非 经营性占 人及其附属企业 用 小计 - - - - 前控股股东、实际控 非 经营性占 制人及其附属企业 用 小计 - - - - 其他关联方及其附 非经 营性占 属企业 用 小计 - - - - 总计 - - - - 往来性质 往来方与上 上市公司核 2025 年期 2025 年度往来 2025 年度往 2025 年度 2025 年 6 月 资金往来 往来形 （经营 性往 其他关联资金往来 市公司的关 算的会计科 初往来资 累计发生金额 来资金的利 偿还累计 30 日往来资 方名称 成原因 来、非经 营性 联关系 目 金余额 （不含利息） 息（如有） 发生金额 金余 额 往来） 控股股东、实际控制 人及其附属企业 ...

编制单位：美瑞新材料股份有限公司 单位：万元 上市公司核 2025 年期 2025 年半年度占 2025 年半年度 2025 年半 年 2025 年半年度 非经营性资金 占用方与上市公 司 占用形成 资金占用方名称 算的会计科 初占用资 用累计发生金额 占用资金的利 度偿还累计 期末占用资金 占用性质 占用 的关联关 系 原因 目 金余额 （不含利息） 息(如有) 发生金 额 余额 控股股东、实 际控制人及其 附属企业 小 计 前控股股东、 实际控制人及 其附属企业 小 计 其他关联方及 其附属企业 小计 总 计 上市公司核 2025 年期 2025 年半年度往 2025 年半年度 2025 年半 年 2025 年半年度 其他关联资金 往来方与上市公 司 往来形成 资金往来方名称 算的会计科 初往来资 来累计发生金额 往来资金的利 度偿还累计 期末往来资金 往来性质 往来 的关联关 系 原因 目 金余额 （不含利息） 息(如有) 发生金 额 余额 控股股东、实 本公司实际控制人 山东志瑞生物科技有限公司 其他应付款 2.00 19.65 19.65 2.00 业务往来 经营性往来 际控制人及其 控制的公司 附 ...

Core Viewpoint - The largest shareholder of *ST Jintai, Hainan Dahe, is seeking support from all shareholders to remove three directors and elect a new one, citing high delisting risks and alleged misappropriation of company funds by the current management [1][3]. Group 1: Shareholder Actions and Company Governance - Hainan Dahe is publicly soliciting votes to dismiss directors Luo Dian, Yu Xugang, and Tang Guangze, and to elect Liu Xiaolong as a new director at the upcoming extraordinary general meeting [1]. - The company is described as being on the brink of delisting, with claims of the current board's involvement in significant financial misconduct [1][3]. Group 2: Financial Disputes and Internal Conflicts - There are ongoing disputes within the company regarding financial transactions and the identification of the actual controller, with a mysterious figure named Pei Jian being pointed out as a potential actual controller [3][9]. - The company has faced scrutiny from regulatory bodies due to allegations of non-operational fund occupation and questionable financial practices, including a lack of clarity on the flow and purpose of funds [4][5][6]. Group 3: Strategic Inventory and Financial Management - The company has been criticized for its "strategic inventory" practices, which have been deemed inconsistent with normal procurement operations, raising concerns about potential non-operational fund occupation [4][5]. - An audit report indicated that the company's strategic inventory actions may not align with legitimate business practices, leading to significant risks regarding fund misappropriation [4][10]. Group 4: Transactions and Allegations of Misconduct - Two significant transactions involving the repayment of funds and subsequent transfers to trading partners have raised red flags, with allegations of these being disguised as normal business operations [7][8]. - The audit committee has expressed concerns that the repayment from Shihezi Yike may be a "false repayment," suggesting that the funds may have returned to the original source after a series of transactions [8][10]. Group 5: Control and Influence - There are allegations that Pei Jian, despite not being officially recognized as the actual controller, has significant influence over the company's operations, with reports of him having preferential treatment within the company [12][13]. - The board has faced internal dissent regarding the management's handling of financial disclosures and the identification of related parties, with some directors questioning the legitimacy of the company's claims about its trading partners [9][10].

Group 1 - The largest shareholder of Jinlitai, Hainan Dahe, is seeking support from all shareholders to remove three directors and elect a new one due to concerns over the company's management and potential delisting risks [1][2][3] - Hainan Dahe has publicly stated that Jinlitai is at high risk of delisting and accused the current board of misappropriating company funds [3][4] - There are ongoing disputes within the company regarding the management's responses to inquiries, with significant disagreements among board members [4][14] Group 2 - Jinlitai's 2024 annual report revealed an audit report with no opinion, indicating internal issues and prompting regulatory scrutiny over potential non-operational fund occupation [7][8] - The company has been accused of transferring funds under the guise of a "strategic reserve," which may involve significant risks of fund misappropriation [10][13] - The audit committee has expressed that the strategic reserve actions do not align with normal procurement practices and should be classified as non-operational fund occupation [15] Group 3 - There are allegations of "false repayments" related to transactions with two entities, raising questions about the legitimacy of the funds' flow [18][20] - The audit committee suspects that repayments from one entity may have returned to the original fund provider, indicating potential financial manipulation [22][24] - Jinlitai's management has denied any wrongdoing, asserting that the transactions were legitimate despite the concerns raised by board members [21][22] Group 4 - The actual control of Jinlitai is under scrutiny, with claims that a mysterious individual, Pei Jian, may be the real controller behind the scenes [25][30] - There are connections between Pei Jian and a trading company accused of fund misappropriation, suggesting a complex web of control and influence [32][41] - Internal sources indicate that Pei Jian has significant influence over the company's operations, despite the official stance that there is no actual controller [41][42]

| 资 | | | | | - 1 - | | | 往来 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 有限公司 | | | | | | | | | | | 山东金召 | | | | | | | | | | | 矿 | | 子公司 | 应收账款 | 3,497,206.00 | 2,373,695.44 | | | | 经营性 | | 5,870,901.44 | 购销 | | | | | | | | | | 业有限公 | | | | | | | | | | | 司 | | | | | | | | | 往来 | | 山东金召 | | | | | | | | | | | 矿 | | | | | | | | | 非经营 | | 18,055,387.32 | | 子公司 | 其他应收款 | 8,072,133.67 | 35,403,287.34 | | | 25,420,033.69 | | | 周转 | 业有限公 | | | | | | | | | | 司 | | | | | | | | | 性往来 | | 塔什库尔干 ...

| 单位：万元 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 其他关联资 | | | 往来方与上市公司 | | 上市公司核算 | 2025 年期初往 | | 月往来累计 | | | | | | 发 | | | | 2025 年 | 6 月末 | 往来形成 | | | | | | | | 资金往来方名称 | | | | | | | | 月往来资金的 | | 月偿还累计 | | | | 发 金往来 | | 的关联关系 | | 营性往来、非 的会计科目 | 来资金余额 | | 生金额(不含 | | | | | | | 利 | | | | 往来资金余额 | | 原因 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 利息(如有) | | 生金 | | | | | 额 | | | | 经营性往来） | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 息) | | | | | | | | | 中化集团财务有限 | | 受同一最终控股 ...

公司因战略备库行为被质疑非经营性资金占用，且存在与贸易商之间的大额资金往来异常。同时，董事间对公司实际控制人及资金占用问题存在分歧，有 董事指控裴剑为实际控制人并涉嫌勾结管理层侵占公司资金。 裴剑与涉嫌占用资金的贸易商存在隐秘联系，但公司否认其实际控制人身份，未回应相关指控。 提名人选迟迟未能进入董事会，汽车涂料龙头*ST金泰（原证券简称金力泰，以下均称"金力泰"，300225.SZ，股价5.15元，市值24.48亿元）第一大股东海 南大禾企业管理有限公司（以下简称"海南大禾"）决定向上市公司全体股东公开"求援"。 近日，海南大禾公开征集表决权，针对金力泰即将在9月召开的临时股东大会，海南大禾希望全体股东能够帮助其罢免罗甸、于续刚、唐光泽三位董事， 并选举刘小龙为新董事。 在官方微信公众号内，海南大禾直言金力泰退市风险高悬，正站在生死存亡的悬崖边缘，并称现董事会管理层涉嫌挪用甚至侵占公司巨额资金。 金力泰第一大股东海南大禾公开征集表决权，欲罢免三位董事并选举新董事，称公司面临退市风险，董事会管理层涉嫌挪用资金。 当下，理清资金流、分辨实控人，成为各方面关注的焦点。 是"战略备库"还是"占用资金"？ 今年7月发 ...

湖南中先智能科技有限 实际控制人控制的 预付款项 1,267.65 272.90 1,540.55 采购商品 经营性往来 | 公司 | 企业 | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 湖南中伟新银材料科技 | 董事控制的企业 | | 其他应收款 | 30.13 | | 25.85 | 4.28 | 销售商品 | 经营性往来 | | | 有限公司 | 广西新铂材料科技有限 | | | | | | | | | | | | 董事控制的企业 | | 其他应收款 | 0.01 | | | 0.01 | 代垫费用 | 经营性往来 | | | 公司 | 湖南中伟新铂材料科技 | | | | | | | | | | | | 董事控制的企业 | | 其他应收款 | | 0.01 | | 0.01 | 销售商品 | 经营性往来 | | | 有限公司 | | | | | | | | | | | | 湖南雅空间物业管理有 | | | 实际控制人近亲属 其他应收款 | 24.05 | | 24.05 ...

| 位:万元 | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | 占用方与上市公 | | 上市公司核算 | 2025年期初占 | | | | | 2025年半年度期 | 占用形成 | | | | | | | | | 非经营性资金占用 | | 资金占用方名称 | | | | 用累计发生金额 | | 占用资金的利 | | 息 偿还累计发生 | | | | 占用性质 | | | | | | | | 司的关联关系 | | 的会计科目 | 用资金余额 | | | | | 末占用资金余额 | 原因 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (不含利息) | (如有) | 金额 | | | 控股股东、实际控 | | | | | | | | | | 制 | | | | | | | | 非经营 | | 性占用 | | | | | | | | | | 人及其附属企 | | | | | | | | | | 业 | | | | | | | | 非经 | | 营性占用 | | | | | | | | | | 小计 ...

| 上市公司名称：武汉凡谷电子技术股份有限公 | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 司 | | | | | | | | | 单位：万元 | | | | | | 上市公司核算的 | | 2025年期初占 | | | | | | | 非经营性资金占用 | | 资金占用方名称 | 占用方与上市公司的关联关系 | | | | | 累计发生金额（不 | 占用资金的利 | 偿还 | | 累计发生 期末占用资 | | | 占用形成原因 会计科目 用资金余额 | | 占用性质 | | | | | | | | | | 含利息） | | | 息（如有） | | 金额 | 余额 | | | 控股股东、实际控制 | | | | | | | | | | | | 人及其附属企业 | | | | | | | | | | | | 小 | | | | | | | | | | | | 计 - | | - | - - | | - | - | - | - | - | - | | 前控股股东、实际控制 | ...