中国证监会向泰禾集团开出巨额罚单。 8月22日晚间，泰禾集团公告称，董事会于近日获悉，公司董事长兼总经理黄其森因涉嫌违法被辽宁省新民市监察委员会实施留置措施。 图片来源：泰禾集团公告 关于公司及相关当事人收到中| 行政处罚决定书| 同时，据中国证监会福建监管局（以下简称"福建证监局"）公告，因泰禾集团未按规定披露重大诉讼，2020年至2022年年度报告存在重大遗漏，该局对泰禾 集团股份有限公司给予警告，并处以600万元罚款。对时任董事长、总经理并代行董事会秘书职责的黄其森给予警告，并处以300万元罚款。处罚对象还包括 时任职工监事、监事长李卫东，时任财务总监刘向民，时任监事阮仕江，时任副总经理邵志荣，时任董事、副总经理葛勇，时任副总经理黄耀文，时任副总 经理王景岗，处罚金额在80万元～120万元不等。此次罚单总计金额达1740万元。 22起重大诉讼迟披露，违法事实"足以认定" 公告称，应当事人的要求于6月30日举行了听证会，听取了当事人及其代理人的陈述和申辩。现已调查、办理终结。 泰禾集团存在未按规定披露重大诉讼和年度报告存在重大遗漏违法事实。 2020年7月6日至2022年12月13日，泰禾集团系深圳证券交 ...

8月22日晚，证监会及其下属地方证券监管局集中发布多项行政处罚决定，对一批涉及财务造假、信息 披露违规的上市公司及其责任人开出重磅罚单。 罚单涉及*ST紫天、*ST汇科、华扬联众、泰禾集团等多家公司。《中国经营报》记者注意到，这批罚 单金额大，相关责任人被实施终身市场禁入，甚至有公司因重大违法而触发强制退市，这无疑彰显了监 管层对资本市场违法违规行为"零容忍"的强监管态势。 记者梳理罚单发现，本次系列处罚一方面体现监管加大全方位立体化追责力度，另一方面"追首恶"，重 点严惩实控人、董事长、财务总监等关键责任人，持续净化资本市场生态。 系统性财务造假遭严惩：*ST紫天领千万罚单并面临退市 福建证监局对*ST紫天的信息披露违法违规行为作出严厉处罚。 福建证监局作出的行政处罚中载明，经查，*ST紫天连续两年通过虚构业务、提前确认收入等手段，累 计虚增收入高达24.99亿元，三份财务报告存在造假行为。其中，2023年年报虚增营收占比竟达 78.63%。 比如，2022年年度报告中，*ST紫天虚构互联网广告费代充值业务、短信发送服务业务等行为，导致 2022年年度报告虚增收入7.79亿元、虚增营业成本4.65亿元、虚增 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 除上述情况外，最近五年内公司不存在其他被证券监管部门和证券交易所采取监管措施或处罚的情况。 点击查看公告原文>> 声明：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。 本文为AI大模型基于第三方数据库自动发布，任何在本文出现的信 息（包括但不限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成 个人投资建议。受限于第三方数据库质量等问题，我们无法对数据的真实性及完整性进行分辨或核验， 因此本文内容可能出现不准确、不完整、误导性的内容或信息，具体以公司公告为准。如有疑问，请联 系biz@staff.sina.com.cn。 责任编辑：小浪快报 江化微于2025年8月22日召开第五届董事会第十八次会议，审议通过多项议案。根据相关要求，公司披 露了最近五年被证券监管部门和交易所采取处罚或监管措施的情况。 公告显示，截至公告日，江化微最近五年不存在被证券监管部门和交易所行政处罚的情况。不过，在 2024年4月，公司曾被上海证券交易所口头警示。 2022年10月28日，公司原副总经理、董事会秘书汪洋离职后，于11月7日担任江苏澄星磷化工股份有限 公司副总裁、董事会秘 ...

Core Viewpoint - Taihe Group's chairman and general manager, Huang Qisen, is under investigation for suspected illegal activities, leading to significant penalties from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for failing to disclose major lawsuits and omissions in annual reports [1][3][10]. Summary by Sections Company Investigation and Penalties - The CSRC's Fujian Regulatory Bureau issued a warning and imposed a fine of 6 million yuan on Taihe Group for failing to disclose major lawsuits from 2020 to 2022, with total penalties amounting to 17.4 million yuan for various executives [3][5][10]. - Huang Qisen received a personal fine of 3 million yuan for his role in the company's failure to disclose significant lawsuits and for not ensuring the accuracy of annual reports [3][10]. Legal and Financial Issues - From July 6, 2020, to December 13, 2022, Taihe Group faced 23 major lawsuits, with a total claim amount of approximately 1.59 billion yuan, representing 48.21% of the company's audited net assets in 2020 [4][5]. - The company failed to disclose these lawsuits in a timely manner, with only one lawsuit reported by May 26, 2023, and the remaining lawsuits expected to be disclosed by February 6, 2025 [4][5]. Financial Condition - As of the first quarter of this year, Taihe Group reported total assets of 164.739 billion yuan and total liabilities of 188.191 billion yuan, indicating a significant debt burden [12]. - The company has been accelerating asset disposals, including the sale of properties such as the Shanghai Taihe Building for approximately 660 million yuan [12]. Operational Impact - Despite the legal challenges and penalties, the company claims that its operations continue normally, although there are concerns about the impact of asset freezes and the penalties on its financial stability [10][11].

河南华英农业发展股份有限公司 证券代码：002321 证券简称：华英农业 公告编号：2025-029 根据《上市公司信息披露管理办法》（证监会令第 182 号）第五 十二条规定，我局决定对公司实施责令改正的行政监管措施，对曹家 富、许水均、汪开江、何志峰实施出具警示函的行政监管措施，并记 入证券期货市场诚信档案。你们应充分吸取教训，加强证券法律法规 学习，切实提高公司规范运作水平和信息披露质量，并于收到本决定 书之日起 30 日内向我局报送书面整改报告。 关于公司及相关人员收到行政监管措施决 定书的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整， 没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 河南华英农业发展股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"华英农 业"）于近日收到中国证券监督管理委员会河南监管局（以下简称"河 南证监局"）下发的行政监管措施决定书《关于对河南华英农业发展 股份有限公司实施责令改正措施并对有关责任人员实施出具警示函 措施的决定》（[2025]32 号）（以下简称"《决定书》"），现将 相关情况公告如下： 一、行政监管措施决定书的具体内容 "河南华英农业发展股份有限公司，曹家富、许水均、 ...

8月22日晚，泰禾3（即"泰禾集团"）接连发布公告。一方面，公司及时任董事长黄其森等高管收到中国证监会福建监管局出具的《行政 处罚决定书》，因信息披露违法违规，公司被处以600万元罚款，一众高管合计被罚1140万元，总处罚金额达1740万元。 另一方面，泰禾集团董事长兼总经理黄其森因涉嫌违法，已被辽宁省新民市监察委员会实施留置措施。 2023年8月，泰禾集团（又称"ST泰禾"）因触发"1元退市"，从A股市场摘牌。 而上述一系列事件使得本就深陷困境的泰禾集团雪上加霜，其未来走向充满不确定性。 违规细节曝光：一批重大诉讼逾期披露 三年年报重大遗漏 根据福建证监局查明的事实，泰禾集团的信披违法违规主要集中于两大领域，且涉及金额重大、时间跨度长。 其一，未按规定披露重大诉讼。 2020年7月6日至2022年12月13日期间，泰禾集团作为原上市公司及"16泰禾02""16泰禾03"等6只债券的发行人，累计发生23起重大诉 讼。 其中，2020年7月6日至2021年5月8日的13起诉讼标的额合计96.74亿元，占公司2020年经审计净资产的48.21%，且12起诉讼标的额超 5000万元；2021年12月14日至2022 ...

8月21日，上海证券交易所披露的纪律处分决定书显示，南京新百三任董事长因未及时披露担保、关联交易等问题集体被罚。而这 距离公司实际控制人袁亚非因另一起违规案被罚十年市场禁入仅一年有余。 接连的监管处罚，不仅暴露出企业在合规管理上的漏洞，也不断考验着这家老牌企业的治理与持续经营能力。 有着73年历史的 "中华老字号" 南京新街口百货商店股份有限公司(下称"南京新百")，近期因一场横跨数年的信息披露违规风波再 度站上风口。 三任董事长同被罚，实控人再添污点 针对上述违规行为，上交所作出处罚：对南京新百、控股股东三胞集团以及实际控制人暨时任董事长袁亚非、时任董事长翟凌 云、时任财务总监潘利建、唐志清、时任副总裁钱静予以公开谴责;对时任董事长杨怀珍予以通报批评。 隐瞒对外担保、资金占用、关联交易等事项 经查，南京新百两家核心子公司存在未及时审议及披露对外担保事项的问题。其中，原子公司南京新百房地产开发有限公司在 2018 年至 2021 年间，每年对外担保金额均超 10 亿元，四年累计达 69.57 亿元;子公司泰州丹瑞生物科技有限公司也在 2019年、 2020 年分别发生 5.31 亿元和5.47 亿元的对外担保 ...

"中华老字号"南京新街口百货商店股份有限公司（南京新百，600682）因存在未及时审议及披露对外担 保事项的问题，三任董事长齐遭上交所纪律处分。此前，南京新百实际控制人袁亚非因牵扯三胞集团关 于江苏宏图高科技股份有限公司（宏图高科，600122，已退市）信息披露违法违规案，已被证监会处以 200万元的罚款及采取10年市场禁入措施。 此外，南京新百控股股东三胞集团未按规定报送关联人名单事项。 2017年、2018年南京新百子公司与南京荥炜电子实业有限公司、南京方矩实业有限公司等公司发生交易 19335万元，与南京雷琥商业管理有限公司通过南京博融电子科技有限公司等公司发生交易分别9000万 元、10750万元。三胞集团作为南京新百控股股东未及时向上市公司董事会报送上市公司关联人名单及 关联关系的说明，导致南京新百未对上述关联交易及后续进展及时履行审议程序和披露义务，亦未在 2017年和2018年年报中披露，且在《关于上海证券交易所对公司2019年年度报告的信息披露监管工作函 回复公告》等回复公告中相关信息披露不准确。 为此，上交所开出的罚单为，对南京新百、控股股东三胞集团、南京新百实际控制人暨时任董事长袁亚 非、 ...

Core Viewpoint - Dalian Friendship's governance issues have resurfaced during a sensitive period of stock price volatility and anticipated half-year losses, following a warning letter from the Dalian Securities Regulatory Bureau regarding information disclosure violations by its controlling shareholder, Wuxin Investment Holding [1][2][3] Group 1: Information Disclosure Violation - Wuxin Investment Holding failed to timely inform Dalian Friendship about a significant strategic cooperation agreement signed on July 22, 2025, which was disclosed to the market only on August 15, 2025, resulting in a 24-day delay [2][3] - The strategic cooperation agreement involves Wuxin Investment, Wuhan Credit Investment Group, Wuhan Kaisheng Economic and Trade Development, and Dalian Friendship's former controlling shareholder, Dalian Friendship Group, aiming to enhance operational effectiveness and explore diversified cooperation [2][3] Group 2: Regulatory Response - The Dalian Securities Regulatory Bureau determined that Wuxin Investment's failure to disclose the agreement constituted a violation of the relevant regulations under the "Management Measures for Information Disclosure of Listed Companies," leading to the issuance of a warning letter [3] - The violation will be recorded in the capital market integrity database [3] Group 3: Company Impact and Financial Performance - Dalian Friendship stated that the regulatory measures against its controlling shareholder would not affect its normal business operations and emphasized the need for improved compliance awareness [4] - However, the company is facing operational pressures, with a projected net loss of between 30 million to 38 million yuan for the first half of 2025, a significant increase from a loss of 26.41 million yuan in the same period last year [5] - The losses are attributed to three main factors: land value-added tax penalties from its real estate subsidiary, declining sales revenue and gross margin due to regional competition in its retail stores, and increased financial expenses from rising external debt [5]

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Financial Court and the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau have released ten cases related to securities false statements, providing clear guidelines for market participants regarding responsibilities and behaviors that may violate information disclosure regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Securities False Statement Cases - The five typical cases of securities false statement responsibility disputes focus on issues such as "deceptive" share buybacks, the identification of predictive information, and the application of "safe harbor" rules [2][3]. - In the case of *ST Jintai, executives were found liable for failing to fulfill share buyback commitments, resulting in a compensation of approximately 780,000 yuan to investors [2]. - Shanghai Electric was held responsible for not timely disclosing performance losses, leading to false records in its 2020 annual report, and was denied the "safe harbor" rule exemption [2][3]. - In the financial fraud case of Zhong An Ke, three internal directors were held liable for relying excessively on intermediaries, while three independent directors were exempted from liability [2][3]. Group 2: Regulatory Enforcement Cases - The five regulatory enforcement cases focus on frequent violations such as "shell-preserving" financial fraud, performance-related financial manipulation, and abuse of control rights [3][4]. - Specific cases include *ST Jintai's executives violating buyback commitments, financial fraud in subsidiaries of Shanghai Shiji, and illegal share reductions by the controlling shareholder of Feikai Materials [4]. Group 3: Legal Responsibility Clarification - Recent judicial practices have introduced new types of disputes, including the legal applicability of different market segments and the identification of responsibilities for aiding fraudsters [5]. - The cases emphasize that information disclosure obligations cannot be evaded under the guise of predictive information and clarify the legal responsibilities of public commitments made by listed companies [5]. Group 4: Strict Enforcement and Accountability - The regulatory approach emphasizes strict enforcement and increased penalties for violations, particularly targeting key individuals responsible for financial fraud [6]. - For instance, the former chairman of Delisted Fuxin was found guilty of violating important information disclosure laws, while penalties were imposed on the controlling shareholder of Feikai Materials for illegal share reductions [6]. - The Shanghai Financial Court has received a total of 18,040 securities false statement responsibility disputes, with a total amount in dispute of 7.646 billion yuan, involving 26,956 investors [6][7].