Core Points - The United Nations Secretary-General's spokesperson confirmed the reactivation of six sanctions resolutions against Iran as of September 27, 2023, based on Security Council Resolution 2231 [1][2] - The reactivated sanctions include Resolution 1737, which lists 43 individuals and 78 entities involved in Iran's nuclear program, military, and financial sectors [1] Group 1 - The six sanctions resolutions reactivated include Resolutions 1696, 1737, 1747, 1803, 1835, and 1929 [1] - The "snapback" mechanism was initiated by the UK, France, and Germany on August 28, citing Iran's violations of the nuclear agreement [2] - The Security Council's draft resolution aimed at extending the 2015 Iran nuclear deal was not passed, leading to the restoration of sanctions [2]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Ministry issued a statement rejecting the claims made by the UK, Germany, France, and the US regarding the restoration of previously terminated UN sanctions against Iran, labeling these actions as illegal and baseless [1] Group 1: Iran's Position on Nuclear Agreement - The statement emphasizes that the restrictions on Iran's peaceful nuclear program outlined in UN Security Council Resolution 2231 should end as scheduled on October 18, 2025 [1] - Iran accuses the UK, France, and Germany of initiating a so-called "snapback" mechanism under US pressure, while failing to fulfill their commitments under the nuclear agreement [1] - The statement asserts that these countries have supported or tolerated attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, which are under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency, constituting a serious violation of international law and the essence of the nuclear agreement [1] Group 2: Allegations Against Western Countries - Iran's Foreign Ministry accuses the European countries and the US of malicious intent, claiming they have continuously violated the terms and spirit of the nuclear agreement [1] - The statement highlights that Iran has strictly adhered to its obligations under the nuclear agreement and has proposed multiple initiatives to encourage all parties to return to compliance or reach a new negotiated understanding to resolve nuclear issues [1] - However, these initiatives have failed due to the lack of sincerity and goodwill from the US and European countries [1]

由于联合国安理会未能通过关于延长伊朗制裁豁免的决议草案，美东时间27日，根据"快速恢复制裁"机制，针对伊朗的多项制裁将正式恢复生效。伊朗 方面谴责此举为"政治打压"，并称已作出必要应对措施。 那么，什么是"快速恢复制裁"机制？对伊朗的制裁具体包含哪些内容？此次制裁恢复又将对地区局势产生怎样的影响？一文了解↓ 安理会两次决议草案未通过 联合国对伊制裁自动恢复 为施压伊朗与美国恢复核谈判，英国、法国和德国8月28日以伊朗未能履行伊核协议为由，通知安理会，依据第2231号决议启动"快速恢复制裁"机制。如果 安理会未能在30天内就延长对伊制裁豁免期限通过决议，相关制裁将恢复。 伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐指出，美欧动用所谓"快速恢复机制"毫无法律效力，是政治上鲁莽、程序上有缺陷的行为。他重申，所有基于安理会第2231号决议的 涉核限制措施将于今年10月18日永久终止，伊朗不会承认任何延长或恢复这些措施的企图。 据伊通社27日报道，鉴于英法德三国在滥用伊核协议争端解决机制、企图恢复已被联合国安理会撤销的决议方面的不负责任行为，伊朗驻德国、法国和英国 的大使已被召回德黑兰进行磋商。 9月19日，因美、英、法等9国投反对票，安理会 ...

伊朗外长阿拉格齐当日在参加安理会会议时就未通过决议草案批评美国、英国、法国、德国。他表示， 第2231号决议规定的所有与核相关的限制必须按照商定的2025年10月18日永久到期，伊朗不会承认任何 在此日期之后更新、恢复或实施这些限制条款的企图。 伊核协议参与方英国、法国、德国8月28日通知联合国安理会，以伊朗违反核协议为由，启动"快速恢复 制裁"机制。根据该机制，除非安理会就继续解除对伊朗制裁通过决议，否则联合国2015年以前对伊朗 的制裁将在30天内恢复。 （文章来源：新华社） 伊朗外交部27日发表声明说，由于英、法、德三国在利用伊核协议争端解决机制、推动恢复联合国安理 会已终止的对伊制裁决议方面采取了"不负责任的做法"，伊朗驻上述三国大使已被召回伊朗进行磋商。 安理会26日就一份旨在延长2015年伊朗核问题全面协议与核可该协议的安理会第2231号决议的决议草案 进行表决，但未获通过。该决议草案由中国和俄罗斯提出，如获通过，伊核协议和安理会第2231号决议 将延期6个月，各方可在此期间通过外交谈判达成妥协。 伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬27日说，伊朗已拒绝美国提出的用全部浓缩铀换取对伊三个月"制裁暂缓期"的要 求。 ...

据伊朗媒体今天（9月27日）报道，伊朗已召回驻英国、法国和德国的大使，进行磋商。 8月28日，英法德三国以伊朗未履行协议为由，要求在30天内启动"快速恢复制裁"机制，如果安理会未 能就延长对伊制裁豁免期限通过决议，相关制裁将恢复。伊朗多次指责英法德三国滥用"快速恢复制 裁"机制。 央视网消息（新闻联播）：联合国安理会26日就旨在延长2015年伊朗核问题全面协议与核可该协议的安 理会第2231号决议的草案进行表决，由于美、英、法等国的反对，草案未获通过。伊朗外长阿拉格齐当 天表示，这一结果是美国压力所致，伊朗不会向压力屈服。他同时强调，伊朗坚持和平利用核能的合法 权利。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei refutes U.S. accusations of Iran supporting "terrorism," labeling U.S. claims of offering diplomatic solutions as "hypocritical and absurd" [1][2] Group 1: U.S. Accusations and Iran's Response - Baghaei criticizes the U.S. for its direct involvement in supporting Israel's actions against Palestinians, which he describes as genocide and systematic terrorism [1] - He argues that U.S. accusations against Iran do not absolve it from its own actions and hatred towards Iran [1] Group 2: Diplomatic Negotiations and Military Actions - Since April, the U.S. and Iran have engaged in five rounds of indirect negotiations mediated by Oman, with significant disagreements on key issues like uranium enrichment [2] - The sixth round of talks, scheduled for June 15, was canceled due to an Israeli attack on Iran, followed by U.S. bombings of Iranian nuclear facilities [2] - In response to the tensions, Iran retaliated by striking a U.S. military base in Qatar [2] - On August 28, the UK, France, and Germany notified the UN Security Council to initiate a "snapback" mechanism against Iran for violating the nuclear agreement [2] - The Security Council failed to pass a resolution aimed at continuing the lifting of sanctions against Iran on September 19 [2]

安如泰山 信守承诺 十一前后油市地缘风险升温,核心聚焦俄乌演绎 能源评论 本周地缘风险的升温再次引领原油系品种上行，从相对强弱来看，近两个交易日布伦特涨3.8%、WTI涨 4%，截至周四上午收盘内盘SC涨3.6%、FU涨4.6%、LU涨2.7%、BU涨1.9%，即对外部地缘犹动更为敏感的 原油、燃料油期货涨幅居前。 具体来看，本周油市的偏强表现受到俄乌局势、伊朗核谈、委内瑞拉出口限制多方因素的共振推动，那么 这些因素的利多影响是否可持续? 在8月15日美俄元首的阿拉斯加会谈未取得明确成果后，近期特朗普言论再次倒向支持乌克兰，不仅反复要 求欧盟国家停止购买俄罗斯所有能源产品，还称乌方可能"赢回全部乌克兰，恢复原状" Polvmarket对年内 小ツ 血档/水江 郑大邱 今 竹 吊 称 ￣q ， 梁 今 Ｊ 昭 厕 王 จ 为 一 ， 权 报 不 ， ヤ ym Kr 铁 中 中 中 中 中 中 中 中 中 中 中 中 中持续对俄罗斯施压，8月俄罗斯炼厂遇袭受影响的产能在120万桶/天左右，在俄罗斯占比17％，9月以来全国 炼厂加工量494万桶/天，较8月水平进一步下降15万桶/天，目最新周度数据显示开工率仍在环比 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian President emphasized that Iran will not pursue the development of nuclear weapons or any weapons of mass destruction, asserting that this stance is rooted in the beliefs and moral principles of the Iranian people [3]. Group 1 - The Iranian President, Pezeshkian, reiterated during the 80th United Nations General Assembly that Iran has never sought and will never seek to develop nuclear weapons [3]. - He called for the international community to ensure transparent and fair oversight of nuclear facilities, opposing the targeting of scientists and experts in conflicts [3]. - Pezeshkian criticized the misuse of multilateral mechanisms by certain members of the Security Council, highlighting the double standards that undermine the foundation of multilateralism and international law [3].

中新社北京9月24日电 综合消息：伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊当地时间23日晚发表电视讲话称，伊朗不会在 铀浓缩问题上屈服于压力，在当前形势下与美国谈判无益于伊朗国家利益。 哈梅内伊称与美国谈判无益于伊朗国家利益 据伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社消息，哈梅内伊说，美方已经从自己的角度预设了谈判结果，并自行宣布希 望谈判能够导致伊朗停止核活动和铀浓缩活动，"参加这样的谈判是接受对方命令、强加于人的要求和 欺凌的表现"。他表示，与美国谈判"反而可能造成重大、有时是不可挽回的损失"。 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 美国和伊朗自今年4月以来举行五轮由斡旋方阿曼居中传话的间接谈判，双方在铀浓缩等核心议题上分 歧巨大。因以色列突袭伊朗，原定于6月15日举行的第六轮间接谈判取消。为施压伊朗与美国恢复谈 判，英国、法国、德国8月28日通知联合国安理会，以伊朗违反伊核协议为由，启动"快速恢复制裁"机 制。9月19日，安理会未能通过旨在继续解除对伊朗制裁的决议草案。(完) 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：万可义 广告 ...

Core Points - The situation in Iran has escalated as the UK, France, and Germany have initiated a mechanism to restore UN sanctions against Iran due to its violations of the nuclear agreement [3][5] - Iran has condemned the actions of the three countries and announced a suspension of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [5][7] Group 1: UN Sanctions Mechanism - On August 28, the UK, France, and Germany notified the UN Security Council to activate the "snapback" sanctions mechanism, which could lead to the restoration of six previous resolutions against Iran if no consensus is reached within 30 days [3] - The UN Security Council held a vote on a resolution to continue lifting sanctions on Iran, but it was not passed due to opposition from nine countries, including the US, UK, and France [3] Group 2: Iran's Response - Iran's Foreign Ministry issued a statement condemning the actions of the UK, France, and Germany, asserting its commitment to continue its peaceful nuclear program while reserving the right to respond to any illegal actions [5] - The Iranian government emphasized that the actions of the three countries undermine the credibility of the UN Security Council and damage the non-proliferation regime [5] - Iran's President held a meeting to discuss the regional situation and confirmed that cooperation with the IAEA would effectively be suspended due to the actions of the UK, France, and Germany, although diplomatic negotiations would continue [7]