Group 1 - The Chinese government firmly opposes Japan's challenge to the post-war international order and the revival of militarism, emphasizing that Japan's recent statements violate the principles of the UN Charter [2][3] - Japan's ambassador to the UN made unfounded claims regarding Taiwan, and the Chinese side demands clarity on Japan's "consistent position" on the Taiwan issue as outlined in four political documents [2][3] - The Chinese government reiterates its stance that Taiwan is an integral part of China and any external interference in Taiwan affairs will be met with strong resistance [4][5] Group 2 - The Chinese government has sent a letter to the UN Secretary-General reaffirming its position against Japan's actions, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and the global anti-fascist war [3] - There is a call for Japan to reflect on its past actions and fulfill its obligations as a defeated nation, urging Japan to stop undermining the feelings of the two nations' citizens [5][6] - The Chinese government expresses hope that relevant Japanese organizations will play a positive role domestically to mitigate the negative impacts of Japan's statements [5][6]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly opposes Japan's recent statements regarding Taiwan, asserting that they challenge the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, and emphasizes the necessity of addressing these issues through formal communication with the United Nations [1][4]. Group 1 - Japan's permanent representative to the UN made unfounded claims in a letter to the UN Secretary-General, which China refutes as filled with erroneous views and hypocrisy [3]. - The Chinese government questions Japan's ambiguous stance on Taiwan, demanding a clear and accurate explanation of its position as outlined in the four political documents between China and Japan [3]. - Japan's Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, linked Japan's defense policy to Taiwan, which China views as a direct threat to its sovereignty, contradicting Japan's stated defense principles [3]. Group 2 - The Chinese government reiterates its firm stance on Taiwan, emphasizing that the resolution of Taiwan issues is a matter for China alone, free from external interference [3]. - The letter from the Chinese permanent mission to the UN highlights Japan's military expansion and historical revisionism since its defeat in World War II, accusing Japan of undermining international commitments [3][4]. - China calls on Japan to reflect on its actions and fulfill its obligations as a defeated nation, urging it to adhere to international commitments and avoid further provocations [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's firm stance against Japan's recent statements regarding Taiwan, asserting that Taiwan is an integral part of China and criticizing Japan's actions as a challenge to post-war international order [2][3][6]. Group 1: Taiwan Issue - Taiwan is unequivocally stated as a part of China, and there is no recognition of a "foreign minister" from Taiwan [2]. - Japan's Prime Minister Kishi's remarks on Taiwan are deemed erroneous and a direct challenge to the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order [3][4]. - China demands Japan clarify its "consistent position" on Taiwan as outlined in four political documents, questioning Japan's commitment to its stated defense policies [4]. Group 2: Japan's Military Posture - Japan's defense strategy, described as "exclusive defense" and passive, is criticized for its implications of potential military action against China [4]. - The article highlights Japan's increasing military expenditures, which have risen for thirteen consecutive years, and its attempts to reinterpret its self-defense capabilities [5]. - Japan's actions are portrayed as a violation of its commitments under international law and its own constitution, with a call for Japan to reflect on its historical obligations as a defeated nation [6]. Group 3: International Relations - China has reiterated its position to the United Nations, emphasizing the need for Japan to adhere to its post-war commitments and to avoid actions that could destabilize the region [6]. - The article underscores the importance of respecting international law, particularly the principles outlined in the UN Charter, in the context of Japan's military rhetoric [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses strong opposition to Japan's recent military expansions and historical revisionism, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its past and adhere to international commitments [1]. Group 1: Japan's Military Developments - Japan has increased its defense budget for thirteen consecutive years, indicating a trend towards military expansion [1]. - The country has relaxed restrictions on arms exports and is developing capabilities for "counterattack against enemy bases," which raises concerns about regional security [1]. - Japan's actions are seen as a violation of the terms set forth in the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, which were established post-World War II [1]. Group 2: China's Position - China has reiterated its stance through a letter to the United Nations Secretary-General, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the post-war international order [1]. - The year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the global anti-fascist war, underscoring the historical significance of these events [1]. - China calls for Japan to reflect on its militaristic past and fulfill its obligations as a defeated nation, urging it to act in accordance with commitments made to China and the international community [1].

Core Points - The Chinese permanent representative to the UN, Fu Cong, has formally criticized Japan's representative, Yamazaki Kazunobu, for provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, which were made during a parliamentary session on November 7 [1][2] - Fu Cong emphasized that Japan's statements challenge the outcomes of World War II and violate the principles of the UN Charter, asserting China's sovereignty over Taiwan [2] - The letter from Fu Cong will be distributed as an official UN document to all member states, highlighting the seriousness of the diplomatic dispute between China and Japan [1] Summary by Sections - **China's Position**: Fu Cong reiterated that Taiwan is an integral part of China and criticized Japan for linking its national security to Taiwan, which he claims contradicts Japan's defense policy [2] - **Historical Context**: The letter references international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, which affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan and outline Japan's obligations post-World War II [2] - **Call for Action**: Fu Cong urged Japan to adhere to the One China principle and rectify its statements to foster stable Sino-Japanese relations, warning that Japan would bear the consequences of its actions if it fails to do so [2]

Group 1 - The article discusses China's firm rebuttal to Japan's claims regarding Taiwan, emphasizing that Japan has not provided a clear stance on its position despite multiple inquiries from China [2][3] - It highlights that historical international legal documents, such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan and Japan's obligation to return territories taken during wartime [2] - The article criticizes Japan's defense strategy, stating that recent comments by Japanese officials contradict their claimed passive defense posture and suggest a potential military threat to China [3] Group 2 - It points out Japan's increasing military budget, which has seen thirteen consecutive years of growth, and the modification of its post-war defense policies, indicating a shift away from its historical stance on military engagement [3] - The article warns that Japan's actions, framed as self-defense, echo historical militaristic tendencies and could pose a threat to regional stability [3] - It calls for international vigilance regarding Japan's military ambitions and the implications of its recent rhetoric on global peace and security [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's strong opposition to Japan's provocative statements regarding Taiwan, asserting that such remarks challenge international order and violate the principles of the UN Charter [1][3]. Group 1: China's Position - China firmly criticizes Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's remarks suggesting that Taiwan's situation could pose an existential threat to Japan, viewing this as a direct challenge to the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order [1][2]. - The letter from China's UN representative highlights that Japan's claims of a consistent stance on Taiwan are vague and unsubstantiated, questioning Japan's commitment to its historical agreements regarding Taiwan [2][3]. Group 2: Japan's Defense Strategy - Japan's assertion of a passive defense strategy is contradicted by its linkage of Taiwan's situation to Japan's national security, which implies a potential military response against China, thus exceeding the bounds of its stated defense policy [2][4]. - The article points out that Japan has significantly increased its defense budget for thirteen consecutive years and is modifying its post-war policies to allow for arms exports and potential nuclear capabilities, indicating a shift away from its historical defense posture [4]. Group 3: International Relations and Trust - The article argues that the provocative statements from Japan have severely damaged mutual trust and the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations, urging Japan to adhere to the One China principle and rectify its statements to foster stable relations [5]. - It warns that Japan's militarization and historical revisionism pose a threat to regional peace, calling for vigilance from the international community regarding Japan's military ambitions [4][5].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly rebuts the recent statements made by Japan's permanent representative to the UN, emphasizing its stance on Taiwan and Japan's historical commitments regarding territorial integrity [1][4][6]. Group 1: China's Position on Taiwan - China questions Japan's so-called "consistent position" on Taiwan, demanding clarity and a direct response from Japan regarding its stance [4][5]. - Historical documents such as the Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Declaration, and Japan's surrender documents affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, which Japan is obligated to recognize and respect [5][6]. Group 2: Japan's Defense Strategy - Japan's representative claims adherence to a "passive defense strategy," yet recent statements by Japanese officials suggest a potential military response concerning Taiwan, contradicting their stated defense posture [5][7]. - Japan's defense budget has seen continuous increases, indicating a shift away from its post-war defense principles, raising concerns about a resurgence of militarism [7][8]. Group 3: Bilateral Relations and Trust - The remarks made by Japanese officials have severely damaged mutual trust and the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations, necessitating Japan to reaffirm its commitment to the One China principle [8]. - Japan is urged to retract its erroneous statements and align its actions with its commitments to China to avoid further consequences [8].

12月1日，中国常驻联合国代表傅聪再次致函联合国秘书长古特雷斯，针对日本常驻联合国代表山崎和 之11月24日给古特雷斯秘书长致函中有关无理狡辩言论予以严正批驳，并阐明中国政府立场。致函全文 如下： 阁下： 我日前向你致函表达中国政府对于日本首相高市早苗涉台挑衅性言论的严正关切。中方注意到，日本常 驻代表于11月24日给你写信进行无理狡辩，回避关键问题，对中方无端指责、倒打一耙，中方对此坚决 反对。我奉政府指示进一步阐明立场如下： 该函将作为联合国大会正式文件，向全体会员国散发。 《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》《日本投降书》等国际法文件早已确认中国对台湾的主权、日本应将窃取 的台湾等中国领土归还中国和战后对日处置原则，构成了战后国际秩序的重要组成部分。1972年《中日 联合声明》明确规定，"日本国政府承认中华人民共和国政府是中国的唯一合法政府"，"中华人民共和 国政府重申：台湾是中华人民共和国领土不可分割的一部分。日本国政府充分理解和尊重中国政府的这 一立场，并坚持遵循波茨坦公告第八条的立场"。此后日本政府在中日两国一系列条约和声明中都明确 承诺坚持上述立场。高市早苗的错误言论背弃日政府迄今承诺，如何取信于国际社会 ...

本文字数：247，阅读时长大约1分钟 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪12月1日再次致函联合国秘书长古特雷斯，针对日本常驻联合国代表山崎和 之11月24日给古特雷斯致函中有关无理狡辩言论予以严正批驳，并阐明中国政府立场。该函将作为 联合国大会正式文件，向全体会员国散发。致函全文如下： 明立场如下: 一、当前中日之间存在严重分歧的直接原因,是 日本首相高市早苗11月7日在国会答辩时发表挑衅 性言论,妄称"台湾有事可能对日本构成存亡危机 事态",暗示日本会武力介入台湾问题。相关错误 言论公然挑战二战胜利成果和战后国际秩序,严 重违反《联合国宪章》宗旨和原则。中方向你致 函阐明严正立场,完全正当必要。事实上,国际 社会和日本国内许多正义人士,包括日本的前首 相,也对高市的言论持明确批评态度。 二、包括日本代表致函在内,日方声称坚持"一贯 立场"。中方近期多次公开质问日方,所谓"一贯 立场"到底是什么?日方始终言辞闪躲,到现在仍 未给中方以正面答复。日方能否向国际社会完整 准确回答在台湾问题上的"一贯立场"是什么? 2025.12. 02 度言'勿。 四、日本代表在致函中还影射指责他国的国防力 量建设。我愿提请秘书长先生注意以 ...