Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes any official exchanges between Taiwan and countries that have diplomatic relations with China, emphasizing that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and that any attempts to promote "Taiwan independence" will ultimately fail [1] Group 1 - The spokesperson, Lin Jian, highlighted that the individual in question is merely a local foreign affairs official from Taiwan [1] - The Chinese government has expressed strong dissatisfaction and has lodged formal representations with relevant countries regarding their interactions with Taiwan [1] - There is a call for European countries to adhere to the One China principle and take effective measures to prevent visits by "Taiwan independence" figures [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns the Taiwan authorities that the pursuit of "Taiwan independence" is a dead end [1] - Any attempts to create the notion of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" in the international community are destined to fail [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government reaffirms its stance that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and opposes any official exchanges between Taiwan and countries that have diplomatic relations with China [1] Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasizes that there is only one China and that Taiwan is a part of its territory [1] - The Ministry expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to any support for "Taiwan independence" activities and has lodged serious representations to relevant countries [1] - The Ministry urges European countries to adhere to the one-China principle and take effective measures to prevent visits by "Taiwan independence" figures [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns Taiwan authorities that "Taiwan independence" is a dead end and that any attempts to create the notion of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" will ultimately fail [1]

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) regarding historical claims about Taiwan and the Chinese Communist Party's role in World War II are characterized as a distortion of history and an attempt to mislead public opinion [1][2] Group 1: Historical Context - The Chinese people made significant sacrifices during the 14-year War of Resistance against Japan, with approximately 35 million casualties, contributing to the victory in the anti-fascist struggle [1] - International legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation confirmed China's sovereignty over Taiwan, which was returned to China after the war [1] Group 2: Political Implications - The DPP's narrative of a "mainland threat" and the promotion of a false dichotomy between democracy and authoritarianism are seen as manipulative tactics to mislead both domestic and international audiences [2] - Any attempts to distort the history of World War II or undermine the achievements of the war are deemed futile, and the historical and legal facts affirming Taiwan as part of China cannot be altered [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that cross-strait communication and negotiation must be based on the One China principle, and that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must acknowledge the "1992 Consensus" for dialogue to resume [1][2] - The DPP's refusal to recognize the "1992 Consensus" has led to a halt in cross-strait communication since 2016, and the current administration's insistence on "Taiwan independence" is seen as a barrier to peace [1][2] - The spokesperson criticized the DPP's claims of "equal dignity" in negotiations, arguing that it attempts to alter historical and legal facts regarding cross-strait relations, which will ultimately hinder dialogue [2] Group 2 - The DPP's recent statements about strengthening defense capabilities and increasing defense budgets are viewed as a misguided approach that could harm the welfare of Taiwanese citizens [2] - The spokesperson highlighted that the DPP's actions, including reliance on external forces and military posturing, are detrimental to Taiwan's social welfare and security [2] - Criticism was directed at the DPP for attempting to deflect responsibility for its governance failures by blaming external factors, which has led to widespread discontent among the Taiwanese populace [3] Group 3 - The DPP's policies are accused of creating instability for cross-strait families, particularly for spouses from the mainland, by imposing political pressures and undermining their rights [3][4] - The spokesperson pointed out that the DPP's actions against cross-strait marriages are aimed at fabricating issues related to nationality and manipulating the concept of "two countries" [3][4] - The DPP's governance is characterized as oppressive and detrimental to the well-being of individuals living in Taiwan, particularly those with ties to the mainland [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Taiwan authorities, under Lai Ching-te, are increasing defense spending, aiming for over 3% of GDP next year and over 5% by 2030, while maintaining a stance of "Taiwan independence" which is criticized as detrimental to Taiwan's future and welfare [1] Group 1 - Lai Ching-te's administration insists on strengthening defense capabilities, which is seen as a move towards "Taiwan independence" and reliance on external forces [1] - The Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson, Chen Binhua, argues that this approach leads to wasteful spending of public funds and does not guarantee safety or peace for Taiwan [1] - The spokesperson emphasizes that the future and security of Taiwan depend on peaceful development of cross-strait relations and reunification with the mainland [1] Group 2 - Lai Ching-te's notion of "equal dignity" is viewed as an attempt to engage in dialogue without recognizing the One China principle, which is seen as an obstacle to cross-strait negotiations [1] - The Taiwan authorities are accused of trying to alter historical and legal facts regarding cross-strait relations, which is deemed futile [1]

Geopolitical Risk & Sino-Japanese Relations - China's Foreign Ministry sanctions Japanese Senator Ishii Taira (石平) for spreading misinformation on Taiwan, Diaoyu Islands, history, Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong issues [1] - The sanction is due to Ishii Taira's (石平) alleged violation of the spirit of the four Sino-Japanese political documents and the One China principle [1] - The sanction is also due to Ishii Taira's (石平) alleged interference in China's internal affairs and damage to China's sovereignty and territorial integrity [1] Sanctions & Restrictions - China will freeze Ishii Taira's (石平) assets (movable and immovable) and other types of property within China [1] - Chinese organizations and individuals are prohibited from engaging in transactions and cooperation with Ishii Taira (石平) [1] - Visa restrictions and entry bans (including Hong Kong and Macau) are imposed on Ishii Taira (石平) and his immediate family members [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the historical significance of the anti-fascist struggle shared by China and Kyrgyzstan, highlighting their joint efforts during World War II to defeat fascism and the deep friendship formed through this struggle [1][2]. - Both countries have maintained a commitment to uphold the results of World War II, supporting the international order based on the United Nations and international law, with a specific focus on the One China principle [2][3]. - The strategic partnership between China and Kyrgyzstan has been elevated to a new level, with China being the largest trade partner, import source, and investment source for Kyrgyzstan, indicating strong economic ties [3]. Group 2 - The construction of the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway project is highlighted as a significant development that will enhance connectivity and economic cooperation between the two nations [3]. - Both countries share similar positions on major international and regional issues, advocating for an open world economy and a multilateral trade system centered around the World Trade Organization [3]. - The partnership aims to continue the legacy of World War II victories, fostering a closer community of shared destiny between the two nations for a better future for their peoples [3].

Core Viewpoint - The academic seminar commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's liberation was held in Xiamen, emphasizing the importance of the one-China principle and the need for unification [1] Group 1: Event Overview - The seminar took place from August 30 to 31 in Xiamen, organized by the Taiwan History Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Xiamen University Taiwan Research Institute, and Fujian Normal University Min-Tai Regional Research Center [1] - Over 100 experts and scholars from both sides of the Taiwan Strait, as well as Japan and South Korea, attended the event [1] Group 2: Key Statements - Zhang Haipeng, Director of the Taiwan History Research Center, highlighted the significance of recognizing the one-China principle and the necessity for China to unify through its own strength [1] - Qi Jialin, President of Taiwan's "Motherland" magazine and Honorary Chairman of the United Alliance Party, emphasized the importance of objective historical research to commemorate the anniversaries and assert the historical origins of both sides belonging to one China [1] Group 3: Discussion Topics - Experts and scholars presented academic reports and engaged in discussions on topics such as Taiwan's anti-Japanese history, Taiwan's liberation history, and cross-strait relations [1]

Core Points - Taiwan's belonging to China is an undeniable historical and legal fact, emphasized by the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs [1][2] - The return of Taiwan to China is a significant outcome of World War II and an essential part of the post-war international order, supported by international legal documents like the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [1] - The One China principle is a widely accepted consensus in the international community, serving as the political foundation for China's diplomatic relations with 183 countries [1] - The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, passed in 1971, restored the legitimate rights of the People's Republic of China in the UN and expelled representatives of Taiwan, eliminating the possibility of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" [1] - The Taiwan issue is a core interest of China, with the resolution of this issue being a common aspiration of all Chinese people [2] - China's diplomatic mission is to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, with increasing international support against Taiwan independence movements [2] - The Taiwan issue is strictly an internal matter for China, and any foreign interference is deemed unacceptable [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that Taiwan's return to China is an important part of the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order [1][2] - The one-China principle is recognized as a fundamental norm in international relations, with 183 countries establishing diplomatic relations with China based on this principle [1] - The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, passed in 1971, resolved the representation issue of Taiwan in the UN, eliminating the possibility of "two Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" [1] Group 2 - The Taiwan issue is described as the core of China's core interests, with a collective desire among the Chinese people for complete national unification [2] - The current international consensus on the one-China principle is strengthening, with widespread understanding and support for China's opposition to "Taiwan independence" [2] - The statement asserts that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter for China, rejecting any foreign interference [2]