Core Viewpoint - The ALPS (OUSA) ETF offers broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $804.12 million since its launch in July 2015 [1] Group 1: Large Cap Value Characteristics - Large cap companies typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion, characterized by stability and predictable cash flows, resulting in lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - Value stocks generally have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates, but have historically outperformed growth stocks in long-term performance [3] Group 2: Costs and Performance - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.48% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.33%, aligning with peer products [4] - OUSA aims to match the performance of the FTSE US Qual / Vol / Yield Factor 5% Capped Index, having gained approximately 2.46% year-to-date and 12.04% over the past year as of August 6, 2025 [7] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF's largest allocation is to the Financials sector at about 26.6%, followed by Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary [5] - Microsoft Corp. constitutes approximately 5.74% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 43.56% of total assets under management [6] Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - OUSA has a beta of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 13.53% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile with effective diversification across 101 holdings [8] - Alternatives include Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have significantly larger asset bases and lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10] Group 5: Bottom Line - Passively managed ETFs like OUSA are favored by both institutional and retail investors for their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Viewpoint - The SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) is a large-cap value ETF that aims to provide broad exposure to the US equity market, with significant assets under management and a focus on dividend-paying stocks [1][11]. Group 1: ETF Overview - Launched on November 8, 2005, SDY has over $20.17 billion in assets, making it one of the largest ETFs in its category [1]. - The ETF is passively managed and sponsored by State Street Investment Management [1]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Large-cap companies typically have market capitalizations above $10 billion, offering more stability and reliable cash flows compared to mid and small-cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, which SDY focuses on, generally have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, but they also exhibit lower sales and earnings growth rates [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - SDY has an expense ratio of 0.35% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.58% [4]. - The ETF has gained approximately 5.64% year-to-date and 5.23% over the past year, with a trading range between $121.58 and $144.00 in the last 52 weeks [8]. Group 4: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF's largest sector allocation is to Industrials at about 21%, followed by Consumer Staples and Utilities [5]. - Microchip Technology Inc accounts for approximately 2.49% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 17.82% of total assets under management [6]. Group 5: Risk and Alternatives - SDY seeks to match the performance of the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, which includes companies that have consistently increased dividends for at least 20 years [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 0.78 and a standard deviation of 14.28% over the trailing three years, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. - Alternatives to SDY include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article compares Global Industrial (GIC) and W.W. Grainger (GWW) to determine which stock represents a better undervalued investment opportunity for investors in the Industrial Services sector [1]. Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Outlook - GIC currently holds a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while GWW has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - The Zacks Rank system emphasizes companies with positive earnings estimate revisions, suggesting that GIC is likely experiencing a more favorable earnings outlook compared to GWW [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - GIC has a forward P/E ratio of 16.94, significantly lower than GWW's forward P/E of 23.04, indicating that GIC may be undervalued relative to GWW [5]. - The PEG ratio for GIC is 1.06, while GWW's PEG ratio is 2.44, further suggesting that GIC is a more attractive value option when considering expected earnings growth [5]. - GIC's P/B ratio stands at 4.18, compared to GWW's P/B of 10.97, reinforcing the notion that GIC is undervalued based on its market value relative to book value [6]. - These valuation metrics contribute to GIC's Value grade of B, while GWW has a Value grade of C, indicating a stronger value proposition for GIC [6]. Group 3: Conclusion on Investment Opportunity - Given the improving earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics, GIC is positioned as the superior value option in the current market [7].

Core Viewpoint - The First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is a passively managed ETF that aims to provide broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with significant assets under management and a focus on dividend-paying companies [1][7]. Group 1: ETF Overview - RDVY was launched on January 7, 2014, and has accumulated over $15.46 billion in assets, making it one of the larger ETFs in its category [1]. - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.48% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.44% [4]. - It seeks to match the performance of the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers Index, which includes companies with a history of paying dividends [7]. Group 2: Market Characteristics - Large cap companies, typically with market capitalizations above $10 billion, are considered more stable with predictable cash flows and lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, which RDVY focuses on, generally have lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, and while they have lower sales and earnings growth rates, they have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 36.5% of the portfolio, followed by Information Technology and Industrials [5]. - Meta Platforms Inc. (META) accounts for approximately 2.3% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 22.2% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - As of August 1, 2025, RDVY has gained approximately 7.84% year-to-date and 9.92% over the past year, with a trading range between $51.60 and $64.37 in the past 52 weeks [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 1.07 and a standard deviation of 18.88% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - RDVY carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a sufficient option for investors seeking exposure to the Large Cap Value area [9]. - Alternative ETFs in this space include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) with $69.21 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.06%, and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) with $139.05 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.04% [10]. Group 6: Investor Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like RDVY are increasingly favored by retail and institutional investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11].

Core Viewpoint - The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $256.19 million, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in this category [1]. Group 1: Mid Cap Value Characteristics - Mid cap companies, with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, are perceived to have higher growth prospects compared to large cap companies and are considered less risky than small cap companies, making them stable and growth-oriented investments [2]. - Value stocks typically exhibit lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates, but have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets, although they may underperform during strong bull markets [3]. Group 2: Costs and Performance - The annual operating expenses for RFV are 0.35%, which is competitive with most peer products, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.21% [4]. - RFV aims to match the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index, having gained approximately 1.81% year-to-date and 3.75% over the past year, with a trading range of $97.97 to $131.23 in the last 52 weeks [7]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Consumer Discretionary sector, comprising about 26% of the portfolio, followed by Industrials and Financials [5]. - Concentrix Corp (CNXC) represents about 4.55% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 30.93% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - RFV has a beta of 1.17 and a standard deviation of 22.3% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a higher risk profile, but it diversifies company-specific risk with around 84 holdings [8]. - Alternatives to RFV include the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE), which have significantly larger asset bases of $13.45 billion and $18.17 billion, respectively, with lower expense ratios of 0.23% and 0.07% [11]. Group 5: Investment Trends - There is a growing trend among retail and institutional investors towards passively managed ETFs due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12].

Core Viewpoint - The Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF (PFM) offers broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $710.63 million, making it a competitive option in this space [1] Group 1: Large Cap Value Characteristics - Large cap companies generally have a market capitalization above $10 billion, characterized by stability and predictable cash flows, resulting in lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - Value stocks typically exhibit lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates, but have historically outperformed growth stocks in long-term performance [3] Group 2: Costs and Performance - The annual operating expenses for PFM are 0.52%, which is competitive within its peer group, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.48% [4] - PFM aims to match the performance of the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index, with a year-to-date return of approximately 7.25% and a one-year return of about 12.05% as of July 31, 2025 [7] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Information Technology sector, comprising about 24% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Healthcare [5] - Broadcom Inc (AVGO) represents approximately 4.33% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 31.14% of total assets under management [6] Group 4: Risk Assessment - PFM has a beta of 0.81 and a standard deviation of 13.62% over the trailing three-year period, categorizing it as a medium risk investment with effective diversification across 432 holdings [8] Group 5: Alternatives - The Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to the Large Cap Value area, alongside alternatives like Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) [9][10] Group 6: Market Trends - Passively managed ETFs are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low cost, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Insights - The SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) is designed to provide exposure to the Mid Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with assets over $2.37 billion, making it an average-sized ETF in this category [1] - Mid cap companies, with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, are noted for having higher growth prospects and lower volatility compared to large and small cap companies [2] - Growth stocks typically exhibit higher sales and earnings growth rates but come with higher valuations and volatility, performing better in strong bull markets [3] Costs - The annual operating expenses for MDYG are 0.15%, positioning it as one of the cheaper options in the ETF space, with a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.83% [4] Sector Exposure and Top Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Industrials sector, comprising about 28.7% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Consumer Discretionary [5] - Individual holdings include Interactive Brokers Group Cl A (IBKR) at approximately 1.67% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 12.48% of total assets under management [6] Performance and Risk - MDYG aims to match the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, having gained about 4.07% year-to-date and approximately 4.47% over the past year, with a trading range between $70.44 and $94.90 in the last 52 weeks [7] - The ETF has a beta of 1.06 and a standard deviation of 19.96% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile with effective diversification across 245 holdings [7] Alternatives - MDYG holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating it is a strong option for investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Growth segment [9] - Other comparable ETFs include the Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) with $17.67 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.07%, and the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) with $20.22 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.23% [10] Bottom-Line - Passively managed ETFs like MDYG are increasingly favored by retail and institutional investors for their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Viewpoint - The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is designed to provide exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with a focus on companies that typically have higher growth prospects than large cap companies and are considered less risky than small cap counterparts [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Overview - RWK is a passively managed ETF launched on February 22, 2008, and has accumulated assets over $854.70 million, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in its category [1]. - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.39%, which is competitive with most peer products, and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.21% [4]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Mid cap companies, with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, are seen as stable investments with growth potential [2]. - Value stocks, which RWK primarily invests in, have lower than average price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, and while they have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets, they may underperform during strong bull markets [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Industrials sector, comprising about 22.8% of the portfolio, followed by Consumer Discretionary and Financials [5]. - Albertsons Cos Inc (ACI) is the largest holding at approximately 3.05% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 18.77% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - RWK aims to match the performance of the OFI Revenue Weighted Mid Cap Index, which re-weights constituents based on revenue, with a maximum weighting of 5% per company [7]. - The ETF has gained approximately 5.75% year-to-date and 7.61% over the past year, with a trading range between $94.80 and $126.49 in the last 52 weeks [8]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - RWK carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment [10]. - Alternatives include the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) with $13.61 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.23%, and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) with $18.34 billion in assets and a lower expense ratio of 0.07% [11]. Group 6: Industry Trends - Passively managed ETFs are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low cost, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12].

Group 1 - Michael Wiggins De Oliveira is an inflection investor, focusing on buying undervalued companies at pivotal moments when their profitability is expected to improve significantly over the next year [1] - The investment strategy emphasizes technology and the Great Energy Transition, including uranium, with a concentrated portfolio of approximately 15 to 20 stocks and an average holding period of 18 months [1] - Michael has over 10 years of experience analyzing companies in tech and energy sectors, and has built a following of over 40,000 on Seeking Alpha [2] Group 2 - The Investing Group Deep Value Returns, led by Michael, offers insights through its concentrated portfolio of value stocks, timely updates on stock picks, and a weekly webinar for live advice [3] - The group provides "hand-holding" support for both new and experienced investors, fostering an active and kind community accessible via chat [3]

Core Insights - Investors in the Alternative Energy - Other sector may consider Cosan (CSAN) and Ormat Technologies (ORA) as potential stocks for investment [1] - A strong Zacks Rank combined with a high Value grade in the Style Scores system is identified as an effective strategy for finding value stocks [2] Group 1: Zacks Rank and Analyst Outlook - Cosan currently holds a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a more favorable earnings estimate revision compared to Ormat Technologies, which has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3] - The improving analyst outlook for CSAN suggests a more positive sentiment among analysts [3] Group 2: Valuation Metrics - CSAN has a forward P/E ratio of 4.01, significantly lower than ORA's forward P/E of 42.60, indicating that CSAN may be undervalued [5] - The PEG ratio for CSAN is 0.13, while ORA's PEG ratio is 4.26, further suggesting that CSAN is more attractive in terms of expected earnings growth relative to its price [5] - CSAN's P/B ratio is 0.33, compared to ORA's P/B of 2.07, highlighting CSAN's lower market value relative to its book value [6] - These metrics contribute to CSAN's Value grade of A and ORA's Value grade of C, positioning CSAN as the more favorable option for value investors [6]