Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the Supreme Court's interpretation on prepaid consumption disputes has led to improved consumer rights and experiences, particularly in the fitness industry, where consumers are now more empowered to seek refunds and transfer memberships [1][3][8]. Group 1: Consumer Experiences - A consumer named Wang faced difficulties in obtaining a refund after experiencing injuries from a fitness program, but successfully sued for a full refund after the new interpretation was enacted [2][5]. - Another consumer, Teng, resolved a two-year dispute regarding unused training sessions after the interpretation clarified her rights, leading to a court ruling in her favor [6][7]. Group 2: Business Adjustments - Many businesses, including gyms and beauty salons, have adjusted their policies to allow easier refunds and membership transfers in response to the new interpretation [4][10]. - Individual businesses tend to have fewer restrictions on refunds and transfers compared to chain stores, which often provide clearer contracts and service optimizations [4]. Group 3: Legal Clarifications - The interpretation outlines specific consumer rights, including a seven-day no-reason refund policy, which addresses the information asymmetry between consumers and businesses [3][11]. - It identifies seven types of unfair contract terms related to prepaid services, empowering consumers to challenge unreasonable clauses [8][9]. Group 4: Recommendations for Consumers - Consumers are advised to strengthen their evidence collection practices, such as retaining contracts, payment records, and communication with businesses to support their claims [12][13]. - The interpretation emphasizes the importance of clear contractual agreements and the need for consumers to understand their rights regarding refunds and service quality [14][15].