据央视财经报道，去年年初，美国加州法院批准了苹果就Siri"非法且有意录制对话"集体诉讼达成的和 解协议，相关赔偿款项正于近期陆续发放。用户须在2014年9月17日至2024年12月31日期间，购买过支 持Siri的苹果设备，并且曾经历过"非预期激活Siri"才能申请赔付。 最终苹果选择通过和解方式推进案件处理，于2024年12月31日向加利福尼亚州奥克兰联邦法院提交了一 项拟议和解方案，金额高达9500万美元（约合人民币6.95亿元），但并未承认原告提出的"Siri收集个人 信息"等指控。 从去年年中开始，受影响的用户可以提交索赔申请，每名用户最多可申报5台设备。目前部分用户已陆 续开始收到赔付款项。最初每台设备预计可以赔付20美元、单人最多赔付100美元，但最终用户拿到手 的赔付金额大约是每台设备8.02美元、最多赔40.1美元。 案件起因是苹果被起诉iPhone等设备搭载的语音助手Siri涉嫌侵犯个人信息，原告方声称，即使用户未 通过语音唤醒Siri，它也会偷偷被激活，窃听用户对话，其中部分对话内容还被共享给企业，用于广告 目的。苹果否认了指控，此后加强了 Siri 的隐私保护。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The emergence of electronic wedding invitation platforms raises concerns about user privacy, particularly regarding the tracking of who views invitations and their interactions with them, which may infringe on visitors' rights [1] Group 1: Privacy Concerns - Some electronic wedding invitation platforms allow users to see who has viewed their invitations, how many times, and when, raising privacy issues [1] - Users may not receive proper authorization prompts when accessing invitations, leading to potential violations of privacy rights [1] - The platform's claim that "once authorized, always valid" contradicts principles of informed consent and minimal necessity in personal information handling [1] Group 2: User Experience and Social Implications - Electronic invitations save time and align with environmental considerations compared to traditional paper invitations [1] - The ability to track visitors may create social discomfort, awkwardness, and suspicion among users, as some may wish to remain anonymous when viewing invitations [1] - The development of convenient features must prioritize human dignity, emotions, and rights over mere technological advancement [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights that conventional methods like "deleting files" and "factory resetting" do not effectively erase personal information from old electronic devices, posing a risk of privacy breaches for consumers [1] Group 1: Industry Concerns - The rapid expansion of "trade-in" and second-hand markets for electronic products has led to a significant influx of old phones and computers into recycling channels [1] - There is a growing concern regarding the potential leakage of personal information, such as photos and contacts, stored on these devices if not properly cleared [1] Group 2: Technical Insights - Technical experts indicate that standard procedures often fail to completely eliminate user data, as advanced techniques can recover deleted information [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing concern over data privacy in the context of electronic product recycling, emphasizing that conventional deletion methods do not effectively erase personal information, leading to potential privacy breaches. Group 1: Data Recovery and Deletion Methods - Traditional deletion methods, such as using built-in system functions, are shown to be ineffective as data can still be recovered using specialized software [3][5] - A demonstration revealed that even after using a phone's deletion program, deleted images could still be retrieved, indicating that standard deletion practices do not guarantee data security [5] Group 2: Consumer Concerns and Market Impact - During the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, it is estimated that 6 billion idle mobile phones exist in China, with only 10% entering the second-hand market due to consumer fears of incomplete data deletion and privacy risks [7] - The new national standard aims to address these consumer concerns by mandating that manufacturers provide effective data deletion features [9] Group 3: New National Standards - The recently published national standard, effective from January 1, 2027, requires uniform data deletion processes for devices like phones, computers, and hard drives to prevent unauthorized data recovery [7][9] - The standard specifies that all user data, including texts, images, videos, and sensitive information, must be thoroughly erased before resale [9] Group 4: Responsibilities of Manufacturers and Recyclers - Manufacturers are required to implement built-in data deletion tools and provide free services or third-party options for consumers [9] - Recyclers must ensure that all second-hand electronic products undergo proper data deletion, with detailed records of the deletion process maintained for at least three years [11]