Core Viewpoint - The construction of digital rural governance is accelerating, with various regions implementing "village service platforms" to enhance governance efficiency and encourage villager participation, although there are concerns about the effectiveness and practicality of these platforms in rural areas [1] Group 1: Activation of Internal Motivation - Digital platforms should not merely serve as online bulletin boards but should actively engage villagers through mechanisms like "points systems" and "checklists" to encourage participation in governance [2] - For instance, a village service platform in Sichuan incorporates gamification elements such as "enthusiasm points" and "experience points" to motivate villagers, while also allowing for online discussions and voting on significant issues [2] Group 2: Precision and Scientific Decision-Making - Digital platforms must leverage data to provide a "smart brain" for governance, moving beyond simple digitization of documents to address the complex and diverse needs of villagers [3] - In Ningxia, the use of smart sensors, IoT, and big data has led to significant upgrades in local industries, enabling more efficient governance and proactive disaster prevention through mobile applications [3] Group 3: Overcoming Resource Bottlenecks - The lack of resources such as funding, land, talent, and information has historically hindered rural industrial development, but digital platforms can help mobilize these resources effectively [4] - By integrating local resources like unique dining, cultural activities, and accommodations, digital platforms can facilitate the exchange of services that support industry growth, including product design and cultural tourism development [4] - The potential of digital platforms in modernizing rural governance is significant, but it is crucial to avoid superficial digitalization that does not address real needs, as this could lead to resource waste and increased burdens on local officials [4]

Core Insights - The article highlights the successful implementation of a governance model in a rural area of Inner Mongolia, which facilitated the resolution of land disputes and the smooth execution of a photovoltaic project [1][2] - The "Iron Triangle" governance model, which includes village leaders, grid workers, and party committees, transformed the challenges faced by an ecological immigrant village into governance advantages, promoting rural revitalization [2] Group 1: Project Implementation - The photovoltaic project in Xinjianzi Town involves the requisition of 2,477.05 acres of land across seven natural villages, with significant disputes arising over land ownership in the Sujiayao village [1] - A total of 615.51 acres of land ownership disputes were successfully resolved, allowing for the project's advancement and providing a replicable governance model [1] Group 2: Governance Model - The governance model was established by democratically electing seven village leaders to represent 57 households, addressing community needs and promoting policy awareness [2] - The model includes a four-level discussion mechanism that organized multiple coordination meetings to guide villagers in supporting the project [1][2] Group 3: Compensation and Efficiency - A compensation plan was drafted and approved unanimously by the villagers after eight rounds of modifications, ensuring that all 209 villagers received full compensation of 13,000 yuan by March 2025 [2] - The governance efficiency improved by 60% when the model was replicated in another village, with plans to extend it to five additional natural villages [2]