经济的角度说，在同一竞争性的领域中，执行两种不平等的规则，在规则上有了等差，经济奥林匹克赛场上出现了两种裁判规则，就从根本上失去了奥林匹 克精神，弱势的一方不具有长期性，不可能成为耐心资本，生产力将受到压制，引起效率递减。 在在全球化的背景，经济等差也是一个异类，无法融入国 际秩序，最终将步履沉重。 刘世锦提出：在同一个竞争性领域中，国企民企一视同仁。政策也已经有类似的语言，并写入了《民营经济促进法》，但体制机制的特征，决定了一视同仁 是选择性命题，正如我们现在谈"让市场主导资源配置"，确定地说，是宏观文件主导下的"市场主导"。 这种商业环境中的等差是有传统的，古代分为官商与民商，所不同的是，老百姓爱骂官商，"宫使驱将惜不得"；现在冠以"全民所有制"，国营就成了"人民 的企业"，而民营成了过街老鼠，国人的思维真的很分裂。 这种二元结构经济也被一些学者称之为中国模式。 比如，张维为认为中国经济的成功，就是成功于这种中国模式。 其实，中国经济的模式远没有定型，二元结构是不是能成为一种独特的模式，还有待于实 践的考验，是不是能一直走下去，是不是最终要做出向左，或向右的选择；都要打一个很大的问号，但最终一定会做出选择 ...

Group 1 - The consumer price index has not met expectations, currently at -0.1%, making it unlikely to achieve the 2% target set in the report, which is already lower than last year's 3% target [2] - Achieving the 2% target is crucial, especially in 2025, as it will be a significant year due to an unprecedented tariff war that will reshape the economy's reliance on external demand [3] - The macroeconomic strategy involves stimulating domestic consumption to counteract the effects of the tariff war, emphasizing the need for a strong internal market to avoid factory closures and unemployment [3] Group 2 - The challenge lies in boosting consumer spending, with strategies including lowering deposit rates and providing consumption subsidies, but market reactions have been tepid, leading to concerns among scholars [5] - Direct cash distribution to consumers is suggested as a more effective method to stimulate spending, allowing consumers to dictate market resource allocation rather than pushing them to buy surplus products [5][9] - The lack of positive expectations is a significant barrier to consumption and investment, with banks holding vast amounts of deposits due to a pessimistic outlook on the private economy and structural issues in income distribution [7] Group 3 - The most effective consumption stimulus policy is direct cash distribution combined with improving expectations, aiming to reduce household debt and promote consumption upgrades [9] - Addressing insufficient domestic demand is critical, especially in the context of the tariff war, as failure to do so could lead to ongoing economic risks [9]