Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant shift in Canada's foreign policy and economic strategy in response to aggressive trade actions and rhetoric from the Trump administration, particularly focusing on the pivot towards China as a new strategic partner [1][3][5]. Group 1: Trade Relations and Economic Impact - In February 2025, the Trump administration imposed a 25% tariff on Canadian goods, which was later increased to 35% in August, severely impacting Canada's economy, particularly in sectors like lumber, automotive, and dairy [1][3]. - The tariffs led to factory shutdowns, rising unemployment, and a depreciating Canadian dollar, pushing the Canadian economy into recession [3]. - The Canadian government, under Prime Minister Carney, recognized the need to reduce reliance on the U.S. and began exploring new partnerships, particularly with China [5][18]. Group 2: Diplomatic Engagement with China - Following the change in leadership, Canada initiated diplomatic talks with China, with the Canadian Foreign Minister speaking to Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who expressed a willingness to enhance cooperation [9]. - A Canadian delegation led by the Minister of Agriculture visited China to discuss agricultural exports, particularly canola and other products, highlighting China's importance as a market for Canadian goods [7]. - The shift towards China is seen as a strategic move to mitigate the economic fallout from U.S. tariffs while signaling a desire to restore cooperative relations [7][9]. Group 3: Geopolitical Implications - The evolving relationship between Canada and China reflects a broader trend of Western allies reassessing their ties with the U.S., leading to fractures within alliances like the Five Eyes [11][13]. - Canada's pivot towards China is indicative of a global trend towards multipolarity, as countries seek to balance their foreign relations amid U.S. unilateralism [15][20]. - The Carney government's strategy aims to navigate between the U.S. and China, maximizing benefits from both while avoiding over-dependence on either [18].

英国《经济学人》 11 月 12 日文章，原题：为什么英国可能停止与美国分享某些情报？ 在过去两个月 中，美国一直在加勒比和太平洋地区炸毁船只，他们称这些船只被用于走私毒品，这一行动导致人员伤 亡。一些专家认为这些打击行动是非法的。英国对此已经忍无可忍。根据美国和英国的新闻报道，几周 前，英国暂停了与美国在该地区毒品走私方面的情报共享。这将标志着两国长达80多年的情报关系出现 裂痕。 美国在"全球反恐战争"中使用酷刑的行为令英国感到震惊，本可能引发类似的情报中断，但当这些暴行 曝光时，美国已基本上停止使用酷刑，因此英方情报人员最终仍然继续合作。当然，不是所有情报都会 被共享：一些情报会被标记为"UKEO（UK Eyes Only）"，即"仅限英国查看"。英美之间的协议明确允 许一方宣布不共享特定情报，但这在实际操作层面极为罕见。尤其是在信号情报领域，包括截获通信， 双方都默认会共享情报。前情报官员表示："通常总能找到解决办法，没必要选择极端的做法。" 在加勒比地区，英国的做法直到最近都与美国类似——一直是拦截并登船检查可疑船只。过去，英国皇 家海军的狙击手会通过射击舷外发动机来使船只失去行动能力。"我们从未考 ...