Core Viewpoint - Kuaishou streamer Xinba announced his permanent withdrawal from the live streaming industry due to serious health issues, specifically a lung disease, and will hand over company operations to Chushi Xue [1][3] Group 1: Xinba's Withdrawal - This marks Xinba's fifth announcement of quitting the internet, raising skepticism among fans about the permanence of this decision [3] - Previous withdrawals have often coincided with controversies, leading to doubts about the authenticity of his claims [3][4] Group 2: Controversy Surrounding "Mian Mima" Brand - Xinba's brand "Mian Mima" sanitary napkins has been accused of containing carcinogenic substances, specifically high levels of thiourea, with concentrations reaching 16653.4679 μg/g [4] - The brand's claims of being a "conscientious sanitary napkin" have been called into question, as it was marketed with health benefits that now seem misleading [4][5] - The situation has led to over 112 cancer reports from consumers, raising serious concerns about product safety and regulatory compliance [4][5] Group 3: Industry Implications - The incident highlights deeper issues within the sanitary napkin industry regarding the presence of harmful chemicals and the adequacy of regulatory standards [5][6] - There is a pressing need for regulatory bodies to provide clear answers and for companies to take responsibility for consumer safety [6] - The ongoing controversy reflects a broader crisis of trust in the industry, necessitating a reevaluation of marketing practices and product safety standards [6]

Core Viewpoint - The sanitary napkin brand "Mian Mima" created by influencer Xinba is facing quality issues, with reports indicating high levels of thiourea in multiple batches of products, raising health concerns for consumers [1]. Group 1: Product Quality Issues - Multiple batches of "Mian Mima" sanitary napkins, including various types, were found to contain high concentrations of thiourea, with one product showing a thiourea content of 16653.4679 μg/g [1]. - Thiourea is classified as a Group 3 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and is associated with potential health risks such as thyroid dysfunction and reproductive system damage [1]. Group 2: Company Response and Compliance - In response to the allegations, Xinba's company stated that they requested inspections from local authorities, and the results indicated that the tested products met national standards, with no thiourea detected [4]. - The brand "Mian Mima" was established in 2017 under Xinba's group, focusing on women's hygiene products, and has sold over 549,000 units with sales exceeding 100 million yuan as of last August [4].

Core Viewpoint - The brand "Mian Mima" is facing health concerns due to high levels of thiourea detected in its sanitary products, raising questions about consumer safety and product integrity [1][4][8]. Group 1: Brand Background - "Mian Mima" was founded by popular streamer Xin Ba in 2017 and is marketed as a product he personally developed, claiming to have one million users [3]. - The brand has become a star product on live-streaming platforms, achieving over 1 billion yuan in single-session sales and accumulating total sales of 3.33 billion yuan over eight years [4]. Group 2: Product Concerns - Multiple batches of "Mian Mima" sanitary napkins, including the "Tea Oxygen" series, have been found to contain excessive levels of thiourea, with one product showing a concentration as high as 16,653.4679 μg/g [1][5]. - Thiourea, a compound used in various industries, is classified as a potential carcinogen and poses health risks with long-term exposure [1][8]. Group 3: Testing and Findings - A consumer-led initiative resulted in testing where 7 out of 10 samples of "Mian Mima" products were found to contain thiourea, with specific products showing levels of 3,732.2022 μg/g and 3,201.9902 μg/g [4][5]. - An official report indicated that only one batch of "Mian Mima" did not contain thiourea, while others, including a medical-grade product, had significant levels [5][7]. Group 4: Industry Implications - Experts suggest that the presence of thiourea may be due to its low cost and potential use as a substitute for more expensive antioxidants like tea polyphenols, indicating possible industry-wide practices [4][8].

报道内容称，消费者集体送检的检测报告显示，从2019年9月到2025年1月，多个批次的棉密码茶氧夜用 卫生巾、茶氧日用卫生巾等品类均检出超高含量硫脲，其中一款棉密码樱花·舒缓型卫生巾的硫脲含量 甚至高达16653.4679μg/g。"棉密码"多个产品系列号称采用茶多酚卫生巾芯片，主打抗氧化的效果。然 而，调查发现，"棉密码"卫生巾芯片正是检出硫脲的重灾区。 棉密码方面表示，"经权威机构检测认证，棉密码所有产品均严格遵循国家相关法律法规及标准。对于 网友反映部分批次检出硫脲成分，我们高度重视，已在第一时间向第三方检测机构送检，安全评估结论 为：当卫生巾在正常、合理及可预见的使用条件下，硫脲残留不会对人体健康造成潜在的风险。" 棉密码方面还称，"秉承对用户高度负责的态度，我司还主动向棉密码工厂所在地的汕头市澄海区市场 监督管理局申请对产品进行了抽检，检测结论为：产品检测合格，消费者可以放心使用。" 新浪科技讯 7月24日下午消息，据媒体报道，辛选集团旗下的"棉密码"卫生巾被检出超高含量硫脲，多 人疑似出现甲状腺癌等关联病症。针对此事，棉密码官方发布声明以及多份检测报告和安全评估报告。 责任编辑：何俊熹 "棉密码" ...

Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the detection of high levels of thiourea in various sanitary napkin products from the brand "Cotton Code," raising health concerns due to thiourea being classified as a potential carcinogen [1][4]. Group 1: Product Testing and Results - Multiple batches of "Cotton Code" sanitary napkins, including the "Sakura Soothing" variant, were found to contain thiourea levels as high as 16653.4679 μg/g [1]. - A testing report from the Shantou Quality Measurement Supervision and Testing Institute confirmed that the "Cotton Code Tea Oxygen Daily Sanitary Napkin" met the national hygiene standards [3]. - Other products tested, such as "Cotton Code Tea Oxygen Night Sanitary Napkin" and "Cotton Code Mini Sanitary Napkin," also complied with relevant national standards [4]. Group 2: Company Response and Safety Assessments - In response to the thiourea detection, the company requested immediate testing from local authorities, asserting that their products are compliant and do not pose cancer risks [1]. - A safety assessment report from Zhejiang Huitong Testing Technology Group concluded that thiourea residue at 1.7% in the sanitary napkin's non-woven fabric does not pose a health risk under normal usage conditions [4]. - "Cotton Code" is a brand created by popular live-streaming host Xin Ba (Xin Youzhi) in 2017, and it is a self-operated brand under Xin Xuan Group [4].

Core Points - The Civil Aviation Administration of China has issued an emergency notice prohibiting passengers from carrying power banks without clear 3C certification, leading to significant recalls from brands like Romoss and Anker Innovation [1] - The recent surge in power bank recalls is linked to safety incidents, including a forced emergency landing of a Hong Kong Airlines flight due to a Romoss power bank fire [1][2] - The overall quality control in the power bank industry is concerning, with a significant increase in the non-compliance rate of online sold power banks from 19.8% in 2020 to 44.4% in 2023 [3] Company Summary - Romoss has recalled nearly 500,000 power banks, while Anker Innovation has recalled approximately 710,000 units, indicating a substantial impact on consumers [1][2] - Both companies are facing criticism for their handling of the recall process, with reports of consumers being unable to return products due to logistics issues and inadequate customer service responses [2] - The Shenzhen Market Supervision Bureau has intervened, urging companies to establish special logistics channels for recalls and take responsibility for the safety of their products [2] Industry Summary - The power bank industry is facing a broader safety crisis, with incidents of self-ignition and non-compliance affecting even leading brands [3] - The need for stricter regulations and improved quality control measures in the industry has been highlighted, as the current situation poses risks to consumer safety [3] - The introduction of new national standards is anticipated to address these issues and enhance the overall safety and reliability of power bank products [3]

除了罗马仕，绿联、倍思、小米等多个头部充电宝品牌也陆续 卷入其中，旗下相关产品3C认证被大面积暂停。这场充电宝 危机，其背后的根源究竟是什么呢？ 作者：郑晨烨 封图：图虫创意 当下的这场移动充电宝安全危机，其影响仍在以一种始料未及的速度扩大。 6月26日，中国民航局在官网发布了一则紧急通知，在全国范围内收紧了对充电宝的航空安全管 控： 自6月28日起，禁止旅客携带没有3C标识、3C标识不清晰、被召回型号或批次 的充电 宝乘 坐境内航班。 民航局的一纸禁令，成为这场危机从行业内部溢出至公共安全领域的标志性事件。事实上，这场危 机早有预兆——2025年5月，法国航空事故调查局在一份正式报告中，将3月份的一起国际航班的 行李舱火情的源头指向了一枚罗马仕品牌的20000 mAh充电宝；6月中旬，多所北京高校陆续发出 了对罗马仕20000 mAh充电宝的"禁用通知"，有校方在通知中称，涉事型号产品的自燃概率远超正 常水平。 6月16日，深圳罗马仕科技有限公司（下称"罗马仕公司"）宣布召回约49万台产品；同样，行业领 军企业安克创新科技股份有限公司（下称"安克创新"）近日也宣布在中美两大市场召回共计超过 180万台产品。 ...

以下文章来源于凤凰网科技 ，作者凤凰网科技 凤凰网科技 . 凤凰科技频道官方账号，带你直击真相。 作 者 | 周遐观 来源 | 凤凰网科技 导语 ： 此次召回，无论在国内还是国外，都将严重拖累其业绩；再加上为挽回声誉而投入的 营销费用，安克创新利润下滑，甚至出现季度或年度亏损，也未可知。 6月以来，一场由电芯供应商引发的行业危机，正让整个充电宝市场经历 了 "大地震"。罗马仕、安 克创新等头部品牌 ， 先后宣布召回总计超200万件充电宝，背后矛头直指核心供应商安普瑞斯—— 其 相关公司有 70余张3C认证及 I SO三体系认证被全面暂停 。 这一事件 暴露 的 不仅 是 单个企业的质量漏洞，更是整个行业长期在快充效率与体积内卷中对安全 底线的集体失守。当"高倍率充电""超薄机身"的卖点突然变成"易燃易爆"的隐患，这场席卷安克、 罗马仕、绿联等头部品牌的召回风暴，究竟如何演变成全行业的信任危机？ 最近几天，一场无声的"大清洗"运动，悄然席卷了整个充电宝行业。 起因是在6月13日，有北京高校学生发帖称，接到学校提醒，"罗马仕牌20000 毫安的充电宝在充电 时，相较其他品牌更容易发生爆炸现象，建议师生舍弃。" 紧 ...

Core Viewpoint - The charging power bank industry is undergoing a significant self-reflection and transformation due to a series of safety issues, particularly involving the ROMOSS brand, which has faced multiple recalls and safety concerns [1][3][5]. Group 1: Safety Issues and Recalls - Multiple universities in Beijing have advised students to stop using ROMOSS brand power banks due to a higher risk of self-ignition or explosion compared to other brands [1]. - ROMOSS has initiated a recall plan for certain models of power banks manufactured between June 5, 2023, and July 31, 2024, totaling 491,745 units [2]. - Anker Innovations has also recalled 712,964 units of its basic power bank products due to safety concerns related to unapproved material changes in battery cells [4]. Group 2: Industry Response and Supply Chain Issues - Following the safety incidents, various power bank brands and related battery suppliers are conducting internal checks and cooperating with regulatory bodies for rectification and recall efforts [5]. - A significant issue has been identified with a lithium battery supplier, which allegedly outsourced the production of battery separators to a factory that violated material standards, leading to potential safety risks [6]. - The separator is crucial for preventing short circuits in batteries, and over one-third of battery safety incidents are attributed to mechanical damage or thermal failure of these separators [6][7]. Group 3: Industry Transformation - The series of incidents has prompted the entire charging power bank industry to reassess its quality control and safety standards, indicating a broader industry transformation beyond individual brand issues [1][7].

Group 1 - Recently, Shenzhen-based company Romoss announced a recall of over 490,000 power banks due to safety concerns, particularly the risk of explosions during charging [1] - Following the recall announcement, public discourse around Romoss surged, with negative sentiment reaching 91.25% of discussions on social media platforms [1] - The recall incident has triggered a ripple effect in the industry, with Anker Innovations recalling 710,000 power banks and other brands like Baseus and Ugreen facing scrutiny over their products [1][2] Group 2 - Complaints regarding power banks from brands such as Romoss, Anker Innovations, Baseus, Ugreen, and Pisen have highlighted widespread quality control issues in product development and manufacturing [2] - The power bank industry has faced serious safety incidents, including a flight emergency landing due to a Romoss power bank catching fire, underscoring the potential dangers associated with these products [2] - The recalls point to deeper issues in supply chain management, particularly concerning the quality of upstream battery materials, with reports indicating that the supplier Amperex has had its certifications suspended [2] Group 3 - There is a pressing need for government oversight to ensure quality safety standards in the power bank industry, including stricter production regulations and enhanced product testing [3] - Increased market regulation and consumer safety education are essential to prevent the circulation of substandard products and to strengthen the overall safety framework [3]