【文/观察者网 潘昱辰 编辑/高莘】2025年4月12日，昆明市呈贡区乌龙街道海湖路1156号B-01商铺（呈贡吉祥摩托车配件经营部）发生较大火灾事故，造成 8人死亡，火灾直接经济损失53.04万元。日前，云南省人民政府"4·12"较大火灾事故调查组公布《昆明市呈贡区乌龙街道海湖路1156号B-01商铺"4·12"较大火 灾事故调查报告》。 | © 云南消防政务网 | | | 为完起或 纪律产品 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | YN.119.GOV.CN | | | 而因為國家屬於上 | | | | | 首页 机构 | 办事服务 | 消防资讯 | 信息公开 | 互动交流 | 消防科普 | Q | 《报告》内容显示，涉事电动自行车所装的蓄电池"国轩高科JTM黄金锂电"的同品牌、同型号、同批次被测产品判定为不合格；作为生产单位的青岛国轩电 池有限公司未履行产品质量安全主体责任，不遵守国家法律法规和强制性标准，对质量控制和生产管理把关不严，已涉嫌违反《中华人民共和国产品质量 法》《中华人民共和国标准化法》《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》。 ...

12月19日，2025年度"质量之光"论坛在北京举办。论坛以"质量强国建设'十四五'成效与'十五五'展 望"为主题，总结交流"十四五"时期质量强国建设成效，谋划展望"十五五"时期质量强国建设工作。会 议指出，"十四五"时期，全国市场监管系统坚持讲政治、强监管、促发展、保安全，推动我国宏观质量 政策体系更加健全、质量水平不断提升，质量强国建设取得积极成效。 产品质量安全水平稳步提升 据市场监管总局质量监督司副司长苗雨晨介绍，"十四五"期间，全国市场监管部门累计监督抽查产品超 300万批次；将质量安全风险较高的瓶装液化石油气调压器、安全帽等6种产品纳入生产许可管理，实施 工业产品生产许可证管理的产品达14类27种；国产棉花质量达到近年来最好水平。 据悉，为有效化解产品质量安全风险，"十四五"期间，市场监管总局每年制定重点工业产品质量安全监 管目录，年均覆盖产品达250种；开展质量安全隐患排查治理行动，累计检查生产销售单位超200万家 次，督促近10万家问题企业完成整改；对充电宝、婴儿牙胶等42类产品开展质量安全风险监测；聚焦燃 气具、电动自行车、羽绒制品、充电宝等重点民生产品开展专项整治，切实维护市场秩序和社会稳 ...

长江商报消息●长江商报记者 沈右荣 "老字号"同仁堂（600085.SH）被卷入磷虾油造假风波。 近日，上海市消保委发布了15款热销南极磷虾油产品的检测结果。其中，一款标称"北京同仁堂99%高 纯南极磷虾油"的产品引发关注。该产品磷脂标识值为43%，但检测结果显示磷脂含量为0，涉嫌造假行 为。 12月15日，同仁堂回应称，立即责令涉事企业停止经销该产品。公司还声明，这款产品未经授权擅自突 出使用"北京同仁堂"字样，涉嫌违法，将起诉涉事企业。 近年来，同仁堂多次因为产品问题惹出风波。2018年，公司卷入"蜂蜜门"，2024年，公司被曝仁丹汞超 标，2025年，又出现足浴包事件。 风波频频与贴牌模式直接相关。同仁堂及其旗下子分公司委托第三方生产，然后以"同仁堂"品牌进行销 售。 百年老字号招牌，在一次次的风波中逐渐失色。如今的同仁堂经营业绩增长承压。2025年前三季度，公 司营业收入及归母净利润双降。 同仁堂的市值也不如同行。截至2025年12月16日，公司市值约450亿元，不及云南白药、片仔癀的一 半。 风波不断陷入信任危机 老字号同仁堂又惹出风波。 12月11日，上海市消保委发布了15款不同品牌的南极磷虾油产 ...

Core Viewpoint - The long-established brand Tong Ren Tang (600085.SH) is embroiled in a scandal regarding the authenticity of its Antarctic krill oil product, which has been found to contain no phospholipids despite claims of a 43% content [1][2]. Group 1: Product Scandal - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission released test results showing that a product labeled "Beijing Tong Ren Tang 99% High Purity Antarctic Krill Oil" had a phospholipid content of 0, raising suspicions of fraud [1][2]. - The product was sold at prices ranging from 35 to 100 yuan on various e-commerce platforms, with misleading claims about its quality and content [2]. - Tong Ren Tang has ordered the involved company, Anhui Habao Pharmaceutical Co., to cease distribution of the product and has initiated legal action against them for unauthorized use of its brand [3]. Group 2: Historical Issues - Tong Ren Tang has faced multiple product quality issues over the years, including incidents involving excessive nitrite levels, illegal additives, and contamination [5][6]. - The company has been involved in various scandals, such as the "honey incident" in 2018 and the mercury contamination in its Ren Dan product in 2024 [4][5]. Group 3: Financial Performance - The company's revenue and net profit have been declining, with a reported revenue of 133.08 billion yuan and a net profit of 11.78 billion yuan in the first three quarters of 2025, representing year-on-year declines of 3.70% and 12.78%, respectively [8]. - In 2024, the company experienced a slowdown in growth, with revenue of 185.97 billion yuan, a mere 4.12% increase, and a net profit decline of 8.54% [7][8]. - The market performance has also been poor, with the stock price dropping from 64.28 yuan per share in May 2023 to around 33 yuan by December 2025, resulting in a market capitalization of approximately 450 billion yuan, significantly lower than competitors like Yunnan Baiyao and Pian Zai Huang [8].

央视网消息：据"市说新语"微信公众号消息，电动自行车质量安全直接关乎人民群众生命财产安全，生 产、销售不符合强制性国家标准要求的电动自行车，存在严重安全隐患。市场监管总局坚决贯彻落实党 中央、国务院决策部署，高度重视电动自行车安全隐患全链条专项整治工作，持续重拳出击、源头治 理，组织全系统查办电动自行车产品质量不合格、非法改装等违法违规行为，守牢产品质量安全底线。 现公布7起电动自行车产品质量执法典型案例。 案例一：陕西省西安市市场监管局查处龙域电动车销售店非法改装、销售不符合强制性国家标准的电动 自行车案 2025年11月11日，陕西省西安市市场监管局将龙域电动车销售店非法改装、销售不符合强制性国家标准 的电动自行车案移送公安机关追究刑事责任。 2025年10月14日，陕西省市场监管局以"联合指导、协同办案"模式，联合省公安厅指导西安市市场监管 局、公安局对龙域电动车销售店开展现场执法检查。经立案调查，当事人涉嫌非法改装并销售哈牛等品 牌不符合强制性国家标准电动自行车886台，销售金额168.22万元；对在售176台电动自行车进行抽样送 检，被判定为不合格，货值金额35.74万元。涉案车辆共计1062台，涉 ...

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation emphasizes the importance of children's toy product quality and safety, launching a three-year action plan to safeguard the safety of children's and students' products, and has announced five typical enforcement cases related to children's toy quality [1] Group 1: Enforcement Cases - Case 1: Shandong Province's Linyi City investigated Shandong Zhihuihang Educational Toy Co., Ltd. for producing and selling children's toys with forged factory names and addresses, and without mandatory product certification, resulting in the confiscation of 1,651 boxes and a fine of 67,200 yuan [2] - Case 2: Shaanxi Province's Weinan City penalized the Chengcheng Maidou Bear Children's Paradise store for selling children's toys without mandatory product certification, leading to the confiscation of illegal gains of 8,400 yuan and a fine of 11,600 yuan [3] - Case 3: Guangdong Province's Shantou City penalized Shantou Chenghai District Hongle Toy Factory for producing and selling children's toys using forged factory names and certification marks, resulting in the confiscation of 7,620 3D drawing pens and a fine of 46,000 yuan [4] - Case 4: Guangdong Province's Meizhou City penalized the Rui'an Toy Trading Store for selling toys with forged mandatory product certification marks and non-compliance with national standards, leading to the confiscation of illegal gains of 2,800 yuan and a fine of 20,000 yuan [6] - Case 5: Hebei Province's Xingtai City penalized Guangzong County Wanrun Children's Toy Factory for producing and selling children's scooters that do not meet mandatory national standards, resulting in the confiscation of 1,000 scooters and a fine of 50,600 yuan [7]

Core Viewpoint - The quality and safety of children's toys are critical for public welfare, and the government is taking strict measures to ensure compliance with safety standards and regulations [1] Regulatory Actions - The State Administration for Market Regulation is implementing a three-year action plan to safeguard the safety of children's and students' products, focusing on identifying and penalizing non-compliant toys [1] - Five typical cases of enforcement actions against toy manufacturers and retailers violating safety regulations have been published [1] Case Summaries - **Case 1**: Shandong Zhihuihang Intelligent Toy Company was penalized for producing and selling toys with forged factory names and addresses, and without mandatory product certification, resulting in a fine of 67,200 yuan and confiscation of 1,651 boxes of toys [2] - **Case 2**: A children's amusement store in Shaanxi was fined 11,600 yuan for selling toys that lacked mandatory product certification, with confiscation of illegal gains amounting to 8,400 yuan [3] - **Case 3**: Guangdong's Hongle Toy Factory faced penalties for using counterfeit factory names and certification marks, leading to a fine of 46,000 yuan and confiscation of 7,620 boxes of toys [4] - **Case 4**: A toy store in Guangdong was fined 20,000 yuan for selling toys with forged certification marks and non-compliance with national standards, along with confiscation of illegal gains of 2,800 yuan [6] - **Case 5**: Hebei's Wanrun Children's Toy Factory was penalized for producing and selling scooters that did not meet national safety standards, resulting in a fine of 50,600 yuan and confiscation of 1,000 scooters [7]

Core Points - The article discusses the implementation of a risk monitoring plan for industrial product quality safety in Guangyuan City, Sichuan Province, which includes sampling and testing various products [2] - A total of 30 batches of products were tested, with 29 batches sampled and one batch of paint failing to meet standards, leading to the termination of sampling for that batch [2] - The results indicate that 30 out of 31 batches passed inspection, with only one batch of plastic shopping bags deemed non-compliant, and the case has been referred to local market supervision authorities for further investigation [2] Group 1: Product Testing and Results - The testing covered 15 types of products, including automotive gasoline, automotive diesel, disposable paper food containers, sanitary napkins, and compound fertilizers [2] - On November 7, representatives from various sectors participated in an open day event for product quality inspection, where three batches of sanitary napkins were selected for sampling [2] - The inspection results showed that 30 batches were compliant, while one batch of plastic shopping bags was found to be non-compliant [2][3] Group 2: Consumer Participation and Reporting - Consumers are encouraged to actively participate in monitoring industrial product quality and report any counterfeit or substandard products [2] - A hotline is provided for consumers to report issues, specifically numbers 12345 and 12315 [2]

近期，省市场监管局组织开展了柔巾产品质量安全风险监测工作，本次风险监测共采集柔巾样品20 批次，对柔巾产品的残硫量、吸水性、干湿态断裂强力、微生物、荧光增白剂、纤维含量6个项目进行 了监测。监测结果表明，5批次产品的纤维含量项目不符合标准要求。 纤维含量项目主要考核产品实际纤维含量与标注信息是否相符。市场上大部分柔巾成分为棉或者粘 胶纤维，有部分商家使用植物纤维代替粘胶纤维的字眼，强调产品的天然属性而规避了粘胶生产过程中 的化学反应，属于误导消费者行为。 省市场监管局提醒消费者在选购和使用时，应优先通过正规渠道购买，日常洁面及母婴护理时优先 选择100%纯棉或再生纤维素纤维制品，部分柔巾厂商为了误导消费者，故意使用植物纤维等字样，实 际上产品主要成分是粘胶，因此消费者购买时应注意产品的成分含量标识内容。 ...

Core Points - Xiaomi has clarified rumors regarding a fire incident in its battery production line, stating that it was caused by an operational error during equipment debugging, not due to any design or manufacturing defects in the batteries [1][2] - The fire was minor and quickly extinguished without affecting other production areas or causing any injuries [1] - Xiaomi emphasizes that all its vehicle battery packs meet high development standards and comply with national battery regulations, assuring customers of product safety [1][2] Summary by Sections - **Incident Details** - The fire incident occurred during the debugging of production equipment, where an operational error led to a battery pack short-circuiting and causing a small fire [1] - The situation was promptly managed, and the fire did not spread to other areas of the factory [1] - **Clarification on Battery Quality** - Xiaomi reassures that the incident does not indicate any design flaws, material issues, or manufacturing defects in the batteries [1] - All battery packs for Xiaomi's vehicles, including the Xiaomi SU7 and Xiaomi YU7, adhere to stringent development standards and national battery safety requirements [1] - **Response to Misinformation** - The company urges the public not to believe or spread false information, promoting a responsible online discourse [2] - Xiaomi acknowledges the importance of rigorous management to ensure product safety and quality during the initial testing and debugging phases of new production lines [2]